Core Viewpoint - The discussion on stablecoins reflects a complex interplay of interests among various stakeholders, highlighting the conflicts between state power, platform authority, and user trust in the context of global digital finance [1][3][7]. Group 1: Nature and Trends of Stablecoins - Stablecoins are a product of the platformization trend, representing a shift in power from traditional media to digital platforms [3]. - The emergence of stablecoins signifies the expansion of platforms into the economic and financial realms, leading to five core conflicts: between nations, between states and platforms, among platforms, between old and new capital, and between platforms and users [3][4]. Group 2: Stakeholder Dynamics - Regulatory bodies are caught in a dilemma, expressing concerns about risks while hesitating to impose strict regulations due to fears of losing global competitiveness [5]. - Issuers of stablecoins often engage in policy manipulation, presenting their interests as national benefits while promoting dollar hegemony [6]. - Traditional financial institutions criticize stablecoins as shadow banking while simultaneously developing their own digital currencies [6]. Group 3: Regulatory Approaches in Different Regions - The U.S. balances innovation and risk, aiming to leverage stablecoins for global dominance while fearing potential financial crises [7]. - China emphasizes the importance of sovereignty and control, focusing on strengthening the position of the renminbi and preventing financial disorder [8]. - The EU prioritizes regulation and stability, but faces internal conflicts among member states regarding digital sovereignty [8]. Group 4: Implications of the Stablecoin Debate - The discourse surrounding stablecoins is a microcosm of the broader power reshuffling in the digital age, where control over financial platforms equates to control over digital finance [8]. - The evolution of currency forms, from physical to digital, signifies profound societal changes, with technology serving the interests of power rather than being neutral [8].

Group 1 - The article discusses the calls from German and Italian politicians to repatriate their gold reserves stored in the United States, citing concerns over financial sovereignty and asset security amid geopolitical tensions and criticism of the Federal Reserve by President Trump [1][3]. - According to the World Gold Council, Germany and Italy hold the second and third largest gold reserves globally, with 3,352 tons and 2,452 tons respectively, and approximately one-third of their gold is stored in the U.S., valued at around $245 billion [3]. - German politicians express that the current geopolitical instability provides "sufficient reason" to bring more gold back to Europe, emphasizing the need for the German central bank to ensure the safety of national gold reserves [3]. Group 2 - The European Taxpayers Association has urged German and Italian authorities to reconsider their reliance on the Federal Reserve for gold storage, expressing concerns over Trump's interference with the Fed's independence and advocating for the European Central Bank to have absolute control over these reserves [3]. - Despite New York's status as a global gold trading hub, there are increasing signs of skepticism from Europe, with a survey indicating that more countries are considering domestic gold storage to ensure accessibility during crises [3]. - Germany's central bank initiated a "gold repatriation" plan in 2010, moving half of its reserves back domestically, and as of now, 37% of Germany's gold reserves remain stored in New York [3]. Group 3 - In Italy, the Brothers of Italy party, led by Meloni, previously advocated for repatriating gold reserves, but Meloni has not publicly addressed this since becoming Prime Minister in 2022, likely to maintain relations with Trump and avoid economic friction with the U.S. [4]. - Some Italian politicians express caution regarding the repatriation of gold, suggesting that having reserves managed by "historical allies" is of relative importance, while a senior German investment figure warns that a large-scale repatriation could signal deteriorating German-American relations [4].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority's (HKMA) liquidity injection measures reflects the ongoing challenges faced by the Hong Kong dollar's peg to the US dollar, highlighting the historical significance of the linked exchange rate system in maintaining financial stability amid global economic shifts [2][3][19]. Group 1: Liquidity Injection Measures - The HKMA injected a total of 1166.14 billion HKD over four days to stabilize the market, with significant injections occurring on May 2 (465.39 billion HKD), May 5 (95.32 billion HKD), and May 6 (605.43 billion HKD) [2][3]. - The liquidity measures were triggered when the Hong Kong dollar exchange rate hit the strong-side convertibility threshold of 7.75, necessitating intervention to prevent further appreciation [3][19]. Group 2: Historical Context and Comparison - The current situation draws parallels to the 1998 Asian financial crisis, where the linked exchange rate system was also under attack, emphasizing the resilience and importance of this mechanism in times of financial stress [5][18]. - The HKMA's actions in 2025 echo the strategies employed during the 1998 crisis, where significant financial resources were mobilized to defend the currency and maintain market confidence [19][20]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The recent capital inflows and the strengthening of the Hong Kong dollar against the US dollar indicate a shift in global economic dynamics, with investors increasingly favoring Asian currencies amid concerns over the US economy [4][18]. - The HKMA's robust foreign exchange reserves, which have grown from 92.8 billion USD in 1998 to 420 billion USD in 2024, enhance its capacity to manage financial crises effectively [19][20].

4月21日，上期所黄金期货主力合约突破800元/克关口，再创历史新高。据央视新闻4月19日报道，4月，美国政府挥舞"关税大棒"，国际 金价刷新历史新高。在这场全球贸易格局的震荡中，黄金作为终极避险资产的吸引力持续升温。 此时，全球黄金储备的存放与管理问题也成为焦点。 ▲图据图虫创意 黄金储备量是指一国货币当局持有的用以平衡国际收支、维持或影响汇率水平、作为金融资产持有的黄金。据央视新闻报道，世界黄金协会2024年第 四季度的数据显示，美国是迄今为止持有黄金最多的国家，其黄金储备为8133.46吨，是第二大黄金持有国德国的两倍多，其黄金储备占全球地上黄 金供应量的近4%。 据环球时报报道，从各国官方公布的数据来看，截至2024年年底，美国以8133.46吨位列全球黄金储备第一，几乎是排名其后的德国、意大利、法国 三国储备量之和。中国以2279.56吨位列第五，且今年以来持续增持。另据我国央行数据，截至今年3月末，央行已连续5个月增持黄金，我国黄金储 备目前占外汇储备的比例为6.5%，未来还有进一步提升空间。 各国对黄金储备的存放方式不同。美国、法国、俄罗斯等国选择将绝大部分黄金存放于本国金库。根据新加坡贵金属交 ...