吕大良表示，就船舶的港务费问题，此前有关部门已经多次作过回应，美方的措施是典型的单边主义、 保护主义行为，具有明显的歧视性色彩。中方的反制措施是必要的被动防御行为，既是维护中国产业和 企业正当权益不得不采取的措施，也是维护国际航运和造船市场公平竞争环境的必要措施。希望美方能 够正视自身的错误，与中方相向而行，回到对话协商的正确轨道上来。 新京报讯(记者姜慧梓)在10月13日举行的国新办新闻发布会上，海关总署新闻发言人、统计分析司司长 吕大良回应船舶港务费问题。 ...

Core Insights - China's trade with other APEC economies has shown a year-on-year growth of 2% in the first three quarters, reaching a total of 19.41 trillion yuan, which accounts for 57.8% of China's total trade volume [1] - High-tech product imports and exports to APEC economies exceeded 2 trillion yuan, with imports growing by 7.9% and exports by 12%, both representing over 60% of the total value of similar products [1] - Exports of daily chemical products to APEC economies increased by 5.7%, while imports of sports goods rose by 15.6% [1] Trade with South Korea - In the first three quarters, trade with South Korea amounted to 1.74 trillion yuan, marking a growth of 2% [1] - Exports to South Korea reached 771.28 billion yuan, growing by 0.6%, while imports from South Korea totaled 967.17 billion yuan, increasing by 3.1% [1] - Specific product categories such as electromechanical products and agricultural products saw import and export growth of 6% and 3.3%, respectively [1] Regional Cooperation - APEC serves as an important platform for regional economic cooperation, facing challenges such as geopolitical tensions, unilateralism, and protectionism [1] - Strengthening consensus and deepening cooperation across various fields is essential for addressing regional economic challenges and enhancing prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region [1] - China is South Korea's largest trading partner, while South Korea ranks as China's fifth-largest trading partner, indicating a deeply intertwined supply chain and industrial cooperation [1]

海关总署副署长王军在新闻发布会上表示，今年以来，世界经济面临的不稳定、不确定因素增多，单边 主义、保护主义盛行，这些都给我国外贸运行带来了压力。但是我国经济基础稳、优势多、韧性强、潜 能大，长期向好的支撑条件和基本趋势没有变，超大规模的市场和完整的产业体系的优势突出，进出口 保持韧性和活力，这些都将为下一阶段外贸稳定发展提供支撑。 央视网消息：国务院新闻办公室于10月13日上午10时举行新闻发布会，请海关总署副署长王军介绍 2025年前三季度进出口情况，并答记者问。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that China's response to the U.S. imposition of port fees on Chinese vessels is a necessary defensive action after prolonged patience and failed communications [1][3] - The term "passive defense" used by China indicates a clear stance: China does not seek confrontation, the U.S. is the initiator of conflicts, and China has no option but to retaliate [3][5] - The U.S. "301 investigation" is characterized as a unilateral tool that bypasses multilateral dispute resolution mechanisms, reflecting a continuation of U.S. trade policy towards China [5][8] Group 2 - The U.S. accuses China of employing non-market measures in maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries without providing solid evidence, while China attributes its industry growth to innovation and market rules [5][7] - China has made efforts to engage in dialogue since the London economic talks, but the U.S. has shown a negative attitude, closing off negotiation avenues [7][10] - China's countermeasures are precise, targeting only U.S. vessels to minimize collateral damage and are based on domestic law while adhering to WTO principles [7][8] Group 3 - The international reaction to the term "passive defense" highlights a shift in narrative, challenging the Western portrayal of China as aggressive [10][12] - If the U.S. continues to misuse the 301 clause, it may lead to a fragmented global trade system as other countries might adopt similar retaliatory measures [10][12] - The ongoing trade friction may enter a new phase, with the U.S. potentially combining various pressure tactics against China, necessitating a multi-faceted response from China [12][14]

Core Points - The USTR announced modifications based on public comments received regarding the 301 investigation into China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors, reflecting consultations with petitioners and advisory committees [1][2] - Key modifications include changes to service fee calculations for foreign-built vehicle transport vessels, the removal of a clause allowing LNG export license suspensions, and the imposition of 100% tariffs on certain shore cranes and cargo handling equipment [1] - Further proposed modifications include fee exemptions for certain long-term leased ethane and LPG transport vessels and additional tariffs of up to 150% on specific cargo handling equipment and parts [1] Group 1 - The USTR's modifications are a response to public input and consultations, indicating a structured approach to the 301 investigation [1] - The changes in service fees and tariffs are expected to impact various sectors, including cranes and chassis, with previous considerations for container tariffs being dropped [2] - The USTR's actions have faced significant opposition from various industry representatives and the Chinese government, highlighting tensions in trade relations [2][3] Group 2 - The Chinese government has expressed strong dissatisfaction with the USTR's measures, labeling them as unilateral and protectionist, which disrupts global supply chains and violates WTO rules [2][3] - China urges the U.S. to adhere to multilateral trade rules and correct its actions, indicating potential retaliatory measures to protect its interests [3]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced modifications to measures aimed at restoring the U.S. shipbuilding industry, reflecting public feedback and consultations with petitioners and advisory committees [3][4]. Group 1: Modifications to Measures - The USTR has changed the calculation basis for service fees of foreign-built vehicle transport vessels to $46 per net ton, effective from October 14, 2025 [3]. - A clause allowing the suspension of LNG export licenses without meeting certain restrictions on foreign-built vessels has been removed, retroactive to April 17, 2025 [3]. - A 100% tariff will be imposed on certain shore cranes and cargo handling equipment [3]. Group 2: Proposed Further Modifications - The USTR proposed additional modifications, including fee exemptions for certain long-term leased ethane and LPG transport vessels [4]. - Additional tariffs of up to 150% will be levied on certain cargo handling equipment, such as rubber-tired gantry cranes and their components [4]. - The deadline for submitting written comments on the proposed modifications is set for November 12, 2025 [5]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - A senior logistics industry professional indicated that the USTR's Section 301 investigation was initiated over a year ago by domestic companies and is now progressing through the necessary processes [5]. - The USTR's measures are expected to impact cranes and frames, although previous considerations for container tariffs have been abandoned [6]. - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce expressed strong dissatisfaction and opposition to the U.S. measures, labeling them as unilateral and protectionist, which disrupts global supply chains and violates WTO rules [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong opposition to the U.S. unilateral measures against its shipbuilding industry, emphasizing the need for equal negotiations and cooperation to resolve issues [1][6]. Group 1: Chinese Government's Response - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce states that the countermeasures against the U.S. restrictions are legitimate defensive actions aimed at maintaining fair competition in the international shipping and shipbuilding markets [1]. - The Ministry of Transport announces that starting from October 14, 2025, special port fees will be charged for U.S. vessels, which is seen as a direct response to the U.S. Section 301 investigation into China's maritime and shipbuilding industries [3][4]. - The Chinese government urges the U.S. to correct its erroneous practices and to stop the unreasonable suppression of China's shipping industry [4][6]. Group 2: Details of the Special Port Fees - The special port fees will be charged based on net tonnage, starting at 400 RMB per net ton from October 14, 2025, increasing to 1120 RMB per net ton by April 17, 2028 [4]. - The fees will only be collected at the first port of call in China for each voyage, with a maximum of five voyages per year for each vessel [4]. Group 3: Impact on U.S. Shipping Companies - A senior U.S. logistics expert notes that the direct impact of these measures will primarily affect U.S. shipping companies and vessels flying the U.S. flag, although the broader implications could affect any vessel with over 25% U.S. ownership [5]. - The expert highlights that companies like Seaspan, which are U.S.-controlled, will indirectly affect foreign shipping companies that lease their vessels [5]. Group 4: Context of U.S. Measures - The U.S. measures are characterized as unilateral and discriminatory, significantly harming Chinese enterprises, with the U.S. aiming to revitalize its shipbuilding industry, which has seen a drastic decline in output since the 1970s [6][7]. - The U.S. Trade Representative's office reported that China's share of global shipbuilding tonnage increased from 5% in 1999 to over 50% in 2023, while U.S. shipyards have drastically reduced their annual output [6].

专访中，萨克斯指出，美国政策的随意性与中国政策的系统规划，形成了鲜明对比。他表示，美国总统特朗普及其政府的 政策非常不稳定。而中国的行事方式则完全不同，中国有长期和非常系统的规划。他希望美国能够真正转向长远思维，与 中国开展外交互动和谈判，而不是奉行单边主义和随意行事的做法。 由于对美国霸权的批评以及对中国发展和治理模式的支持，萨克斯在西方陷入负面评价。对此，他表示，他的工作是清晰 阐释观点，而非迎合舆论。 今年3月，美国哥伦比亚大学经济学教授、可持续发展中心主任杰弗里·萨克斯在海南博鳌接受《高端访谈》专访。 ...

Core Points - The G20 Trade and Investment Ministers' Meeting took place in Gqeberha, South Africa, on October 10, focusing on trade, inclusive growth, and global challenges [1] - Key discussions included promoting green industrialization, sustainable trade investment frameworks, and WTO reforms [1] - The meeting resulted in the issuance of the G20 Trade and Investment Ministers' Declaration and the Chair's Summary, setting the stage for the upcoming G20 Leaders' Summit in November [1] Group 1 - China expressed strong support for multilateralism and announced it would not seek new special and differential treatment in current and future WTO negotiations, demonstrating its commitment as a responsible developing country [1] - The G20 is recognized for its significant contributions to global trade and investment development, emphasizing the need for better utilization of the G20 trade investment mechanism to address global challenges through open cooperation [1] - China aims to contribute to global economic growth while advancing its own development, advocating for support of the multilateral trading system and free trade to counter unilateralism and protectionism [1] Group 2 - During the meeting, China’s representative held discussions with several heads of delegations and leaders of international organizations, including the Director-General of the WTO [2]

Core Points - The G20 Trade and Investment Ministers' Meeting took place in Gqeberha, South Africa, focusing on trade, inclusive growth, and global challenges [1] - Key discussions included promoting green industrialization, sustainable trade investment frameworks, and WTO reforms [1] - The meeting resulted in the G20 Trade and Investment Ministers' Declaration and Chair's Summary, preparing for the upcoming G20 Leaders' Summit in November [1] Group 1 - China firmly supports multilateralism and announced it will not seek new special and differential treatment in current and future WTO negotiations, demonstrating its commitment as a responsible developing country [1] - The G20 is recognized for its significant contributions to global trade and investment development, emphasizing the need for better utilization of the G20 trade investment mechanism to address global challenges through open cooperation [1] - China aims to contribute to global economic growth while promoting its own development, urging support for the multilateral trading system and free trade to counter unilateralism and protectionism [1] Group 2 - During the meeting, discussions were held between Li Chenggang and various heads of delegations, including the Director-General of the WTO and leaders of international organizations [2]