Group 1 - The National Market Supervision Administration has emphasized the importance of monitoring and assessing monopoly risks in key areas during the 14th Five-Year Plan period [1] - The administration is committed to strengthening regular supervision of the platform economy to prevent and curb disorderly competition in the online market [1] - A total of 3,400 cases related to operator concentration in natural monopoly areas have been concluded, with 145 cases of illegal operator concentration being addressed [1] Group 2 - The administration has launched special actions against monopolistic practices in the livelihood sector, including the pharmaceutical industry, to restore drug prices to reasonable levels [1] - Actions have also been taken against monopolistic cases in water supply, gas, building materials, and vehicle inspection sectors, effectively reducing public living costs and the production burden on businesses [1] - The efforts aim to maintain a fair competitive market order [1]

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration emphasizes the importance of monitoring and evaluating monopoly risks in key sectors during the 14th Five-Year Plan period, aiming to strengthen regular regulation of the platform economy and prevent disorderly competition in the online market [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Continuous enforcement of antitrust actions in the livelihood sector is being carried out, particularly targeting monopolistic practices in the pharmaceutical industry to restore drug prices to reasonable levels [1] - Investigations into monopolistic cases in water supply, gas, building materials, and vehicle inspection sectors have been conducted, effectively reducing public living costs and the production burden on businesses [1] Group 2: Market Oversight - Enhanced scrutiny of operator concentration in key areas of the platform economy has been implemented, with a total of 3,400 cases reviewed and 145 cases of illegal operator concentration addressed, significantly maintaining fair competition in the market [1]

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has drafted the "Antitrust Guidelines for the Public Utilities Sector (Draft for Comments)" and is seeking public feedback on it [1]. Group 1: Overview of Public Utilities - Public utilities encompass a range of industries that provide essential goods or services to the public, including water supply, electricity, gas, heating, sewage treatment, waste disposal, broadcasting, and public transportation, most of which have natural monopoly characteristics [3]. Group 2: Antitrust Guidelines Purpose - The guidelines aim to address the unique characteristics and market competition rules of the public utilities sector, enhancing the scientific, targeted, and effective nature of antitrust enforcement [4]. Group 3: Identification of Antitrust Behaviors - The draft provides detailed specifications on potential monopolistic agreements in the public utilities sector, helping operators accurately identify legal risks [6]. - Horizontal monopolistic agreements are prevalent in the public utilities sector, particularly in the bottled gas industry, where operators may fix prices or divide market shares through informal agreements [8]. Group 4: Abuse of Market Dominance - The draft addresses the frequent occurrence of market dominance abuse in sectors like water, gas, electricity, and heating, detailing factors related to unfair pricing, refusal to deal, and other unreasonable trading conditions [9]. - It specifies common scenarios that may not be considered legitimate justifications for market dominance abuse, emphasizing that actions without legal basis or those claiming safety without proof are generally not justified [10][14].

Group 1 - The company and its subsidiaries, Shandong Shengshida Chemical Co., Ltd. and Shandong Taishan Explosive Equipment Co., Ltd., were fined for engaging in a price-fixing monopoly agreement, violating the previous Anti-Monopoly Law [1][2] - The total fines imposed on the two companies amount to approximately 2.5023 million yuan, with Shandong Shengshida fined 1.8114 million yuan and Shandong Taishan fined 690,900 yuan [2] - The fines represent 0.15% of the company's audited revenue and 2.02% of the net profit attributable to shareholders for the most recent fiscal year [3] Group 2 - The companies cooperated with the investigation and ceased the monopolistic behavior, leading to a reduction in penalties [2] - The involved joint sales company, Shandong Longdao Explosive Equipment Co., Ltd., has ceased all operations since July 2021 and was officially deregistered in February 2023 [2] - The company plans to enhance compliance awareness and strengthen the understanding of anti-monopoly laws to prevent future legal risks [3]

【今日推荐】 俄外长：普京已向特朗普提议提高俄乌直接谈判代表团级别 俄罗斯外长拉夫罗夫当地时间20日表示，俄罗斯已准备好以各种形式就乌克兰问题进行谈判，但高层会晤需要 周密准备，以免会谈导致局势恶化。拉夫罗夫称，普京在与特朗普通话中提议提高俄乌直接谈判代表团的级 别。 美联储会议纪要：同意维持利率不变经济前景不确定性仍然较高 当地时间8月20日，美联储公布联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）7月29日至30日的会议纪要。会议纪要显示，美 联储同意将联邦基金利率目标区间维持在4.25%-4.5%之间。在本次会议的货币政策讨论中，委员们一致认为， 尽管净出口波动影响了数据，但近期指标表明，上半年经济活动增长有所放缓。通胀率仍然略高，经济前景的 不确定性仍然较高。 财政部：地方政府要根据经济社会发展需要、项目性质和财力状况，按照轻重缓急合理排序，优先实施具有一 定收益的项目 第一财经每日早间精选热点新闻，点击「听新闻」，一键收听。 国务院办公厅转发财政部《关于规范政府和社会资本合作存量项目建设和运营的指导意见》的通知。其中提 出，地方政府要根据经济社会发展需要、项目性质和财力状况，按照轻重缓急合理排序，优先实施具有一定收 ...

Group 1 - Israeli Defense Forces conducted airstrikes on Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon, including weapon depots and rocket launchers, claiming their presence violated agreements between Israel and Lebanon [3] Group 2 - NATO defense ministers from 32 member countries confirmed support for Ukraine during a video conference, emphasizing the priority of achieving a just and lasting peace [5] - The European Union is considering establishing a treaty equivalent to NATO's Article 5 for Ukraine, which would ensure collective defense in case of an attack on any member [5] Group 3 - The Federal Reserve decided to maintain the federal funds rate target range at 4.25% to 4.5%, citing economic uncertainty and a slight increase in inflation [7] - Some Federal Reserve officials expressed concerns about the labor market and advocated for a 25 basis point rate cut to prevent further weakening [7] Group 4 - The American Soybean Association urged the U.S. government to reach an agreement with China to alleviate financial pressures on soybean farmers, highlighting a significant drop in soybean prices and rising production costs [9] - Prior to 2018, 28% of U.S. soybeans were exported to China, which accounted for 60% of total soybean exports during that period [9] - For the 2023-2024 marketing year, U.S. soybean exports to China are projected to be nearly 25 million tons, significantly higher than the 4.9 million tons exported to the European Union [9] Group 5 - The State Administration for Market Regulation released a draft guideline for antitrust measures in the public utility sector, addressing issues of market dominance and unfair practices [11][12] - The guideline aims to clarify the principles of antitrust enforcement in public utilities, which include water, electricity, gas, and waste management, and to provide clearer compliance guidance for operators [13]

每经记者｜陈鹏丽 每经编辑｜陈俊杰 8月20日晚，凯龙股份（SZ002783，股价10.46元，市值52.23亿元）公告，下属公司山东天宝化工股份 有限公司（以下简称天宝化工）、山东凯乐化工有限公司（以下简称凯乐化工）同时收到山东省市场监 督管理局下发的《行政处罚决定书》。 记者注意到，除了凯龙股份，8月19日晚，保利联合公告，下属3家公司保利澳瑞凯 (山东) 矿业服务有 限公司（简称 山东矿业公司）、保利澳瑞凯 (威海) 爆破器材有限公司（简称威海爆破）、盘化 (济南) 化工有限公司（简称 盘化化工）分别收到山东省市场监督管理局下发的《行政处罚决定书》。在山东 省爆破器材行业协会组织下，2021年山东矿业公司、威海爆破、盘化化工与具有竞争关系的民爆生产企 业达成固定价格的垄断协议，涉嫌垄断。 山东省市场监督管理局依据相关法律规定，决定对上述3家公司合计罚款410万元。 凯龙股份两下属公司被罚176万元 据山东省市场监督管理局出具的《行政处罚决定书》，天宝化工、凯乐化工2020年与具有竞争关系的民 爆生产企业达成垄断协议的行为，破坏了山东省区域内民爆生产企业的公平竞争秩序，导致下游企业无 法享受市场竞争带来的 ...

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has released a draft guideline on antitrust practices in the public utility sector, aiming to clarify enforcement principles and provide guidance for compliance, thereby promoting healthy development in this sector [1][2]. Group 1: Antitrust Guidelines - The guideline specifies regulations against the abuse of market dominance in the public utility sector, which includes essential services like water, electricity, gas, heating, sewage treatment, waste disposal, broadcasting, and public transportation [2][3]. - It highlights the prevalence of monopolistic behaviors in the public utility sector, particularly in water, gas, electricity, and heating industries, where operators often extend their monopolistic advantages to competitive upstream and downstream markets [2][3]. Group 2: Market Dominance Assessment - The guideline details factors for determining market dominance, considering the natural monopoly characteristics, franchise models, and public, regional, and policy-related aspects of public utilities [3]. - Key considerations include market share, competition status, control over essential infrastructure, user dependency on services, and barriers to market entry [3]. Group 3: Abuse of Market Dominance - Specific abusive practices are outlined, such as unfair pricing, refusal to deal, tying arrangements, imposing unreasonable conditions, and differential treatment [3][4]. - The guideline provides examples of limiting trading behaviors, including requiring customers to procure services exclusively from the utility provider or its designated operators [3]. Group 4: Justifiable Reasons for Actions - The guideline lists common justifiable reasons for actions that may otherwise be deemed abusive, such as compliance with laws and regulations or adherence to industry norms [4]. - It also specifies situations that generally cannot be considered justifiable, particularly in cases of refusal to deal or differential treatment [4]. Group 5: Compliance and Fair Competition - Public utility operators and industry associations are encouraged to conduct business in accordance with the Antitrust Law, promoting fair competition and voluntary cooperation to enhance market competitiveness [5]. - The guideline emphasizes that even operators below the reporting threshold may need to declare their concentration if it could restrict competition [5]. Group 6: Administrative Power and Legal Responsibility - The guideline provides clear behavioral directives for administrative agencies regarding the prohibition of actions that restrict competition, including limiting market entry and hindering free trade [6]. - It outlines the legal responsibilities of public utility operators and associations in cases of antitrust law violations, including potential leniency if actions were taken under administrative coercion [6].

Core Viewpoint - The company Kaierong Co., Ltd. (002783) has been fined approximately 1.76 million yuan due to a price-fixing monopoly agreement with competing enterprises in the explosive materials industry, which violated antitrust laws [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Penalty - Kaierong's subsidiaries, Tianbao Chemical and Kaile Chemical, received fines of 881,800 yuan and 880,300 yuan respectively, totaling about 1.76 million yuan [1]. - The violations were identified as limiting competition among explosive production enterprises, harming downstream companies' interests [1]. Group 2: Financial Impact - The penalty is expected to reduce the company's net profit by approximately 1.3962 million yuan, subject to confirmation by annual audit [2]. - Despite the penalty, the company anticipates a significant recovery in net profit for the first half of 2025, projecting a profit of 100 million to 120 million yuan, representing a year-on-year growth of 53.64% to 84.37% [2][3]. Group 3: Performance Overview - The company reported a 15% decline in net profit last year but expects a substantial rebound in the first half of 2025 [2]. - The increase in net profit is attributed to growth in the explosive service business in Xinjiang and a decrease in service costs [3]. - The company’s basic earnings per share are projected to be between 0.20 yuan and 0.24 yuan, compared to 0.14 yuan in the same period last year [3]. Group 4: Market Performance - As of August 20, the company's stock price increased by 0.10% to 10.46 yuan per share, with a total market capitalization of 5.223 billion yuan, reflecting a nearly 30% increase in stock price year-to-date [3].

⑥Dayforce确认与Thoma Bravo就约$70/股的私有化深入洽谈。 ⑦富途控股盘前涨约3%，公司此前公布 Q2净利同比增长105%至约$3.39亿。 ⑧雅诗兰黛盘前跌超8%，公司此前公布Q4净亏损由上年同期2.84 亿美元扩大至5.46亿美元。 ⑨塔吉特盘前跌超10%，公司此前公布Q2销售额再度下滑，公司同时宣布 首席执行官布莱恩·康奈尔（Brian Cornell）将于2026年2月份离职。 来源：滚动播报 ①美股三大股指期货齐跌：道指期货跌0.01%，标普500期货跌0.09%，纳指期货跌0.20%。 ②欧洲股市 指数涨跌不一：德国DAX30跌0.32%，法国CAC40涨0.21%，欧洲斯托克50涨0.14%，英国富时100涨 0.62%。③美股科技巨头遭16年最大低配，大摩：资金回补将成上涨新推力。④美国反垄断来袭，政府 拟要求谷歌其出售Chrome并对竞争对手许可其搜索数据，若落地或成自1984年AT&T以来最大强制拆 分，OpenAI/Perplexity传有意竞购。⑤美国劳氏公司发布Q2财报，业绩优于预期，并上调全年营收指 引。同时公司宣布已达成协议，将以约88亿美元现金收购Found ...