Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has issued guidelines to strengthen credit regulation of MCN (Multi-Channel Network) institutions, which have emerged alongside the rise of live streaming, social media, and short videos, but have also led to issues such as false information and unethical marketing practices [1][8]. Group 1: Issues with MCN Institutions - MCN institutions are criticized for prioritizing short-term traffic over long-term benefits, leading to a proliferation of low-quality content and misinformation [3][4]. - A specific case highlighted the manipulation of content by MCN institutions, where multiple accounts operated by five MCNs spread sensationalized news, resulting in legal action against the responsible parties [3][4]. - The use of "data magic" to create false traffic is prevalent, with some MCNs offering services to artificially inflate view counts for a fee, raising concerns about the integrity of content [5][6]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions and Industry Response - The government has intensified efforts to regulate MCN institutions, including a special campaign to address illegal activities such as misleading advertising and exploitation of minors [8][9]. - Industry self-regulation is being promoted, with associations calling for MCNs to reject false content and prioritize quality [9][10]. - New regulations are being proposed that would hold MCN institutions accountable for the content they publish, requiring them to conduct compliance checks before releasing information [10][11]. Group 3: Future Directions for MCN Institutions - There is a call for MCN institutions to adopt a more ethical approach to content creation, focusing on quality and positive societal impact [11][12]. - Legislative measures are suggested to clarify the legal relationship between MCNs and content creators, aiming to protect creators from unfair contracts [12]. - Encouragement for innovative and high-quality MCN institutions is emphasized, with suggestions for resource support to help them thrive and set new standards in content creation [12].

Core Viewpoint - The public security authorities in Yinchuan, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, have successfully implemented a new grassroots social governance model called "Saishang Fengqiao," which integrates party leadership, community involvement, technological empowerment, and innovative mechanisms to enhance public safety and community service [1] Group 1: Party Leadership and Community Involvement - Yinchuan police have established a robust grassroots governance structure by integrating existing community defense organizations into the Security Committee, with community party secretaries serving as committee heads and police officers acting as political advisors [2] - All village and community committees have formed Security Committees, with 577 committees and 659 community defense teams extending their reach to the grassroots level [2] - The Security Committees have effectively resolved over 2,300 conflicts and assisted in solving more than 100 public security cases this year [2] Group 2: Technological Empowerment - The Yinchuan police have developed a comprehensive command system that connects various platforms, enhancing the efficiency and intelligence of grassroots governance [3] - A successful intervention occurred when police intercepted a man attempting to transfer 60,000 yuan in a suspected scam, showcasing the effectiveness of real-time coordination and technological integration [3] - The establishment of a command and dispatch function within an app allows for real-time monitoring of Security Committee members' patrol areas and risk management [3] Group 3: Multi-Party Cooperation - Yinchuan police have created a multi-party governance model that integrates police stations and community centers, enhancing community participation in public safety efforts [4] - The governance structure employs a "police + grid" model, allowing Security Committee members to actively engage in community policing and conflict resolution [4] - Innovative methods for conflict resolution include a tiered system for risk management and the introduction of incentive programs for Security Committee members, fostering a collaborative environment [4]