穆罕默德·萨利赫·塞德吉安是伊朗研究阿拉伯中心主任、伊朗知名政治分析家。近日，他在接受人民网记者专访 时表示，加入上海合作组织和金砖合作机制是伊朗的战略机遇，伊朗期待同中国进一步深化务实合作。 塞德吉安表示，伊朗同中国建立全面战略伙伴关系以来，特别是签署全面合作计划之后，双方关系得到进一步 发展。中国是伊朗最大贸易伙伴。伊中加强政治、经济等各领域合作符合双方利益和地区稳定发展需求。中方 提出共建"一带一路"倡议，加强亚非欧之间的互联互通和经贸往来。伊朗自古就是丝绸之路上的重要交通枢 纽，是共建"一带一路"重要国家，共建"一带一路"为伊朗发展提供机遇。 伊朗研究阿拉伯中心主任、伊朗知名政治分析家穆罕默德·萨利赫·塞德吉安。受访者供图 "伊中合作有助于共同应对单边主义和霸道霸凌，维护公平正义。"塞德吉安说，伊方赞赏中方主张通过政治外 交途径解决伊朗核问题的立场。在中国的支持下，伊朗2023年加入上合组织，2024年加入金砖合作机制。"加入 上合和金砖是伊朗的战略机遇，有助于伊朗增强其政治经济地位"。 他指出，据世界银行统计，上合组织的成员国总人口占全球人口的40%以上，其GDP总和约占全球25%。伊朗期 待上合组 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent U.S. entry restrictions on citizens from 12 countries under the guise of "national security" have sparked widespread criticism and are perceived as discriminatory policies that could damage the U.S.'s image and credibility [1][4]. Group 1: Impact on Individuals - Many individuals, particularly students, have expressed confusion, anxiety, and anger over the sudden entry restrictions, which have disrupted their plans to study or reunite with family in the U.S. [2][3]. - Specific cases highlight the emotional and financial toll on affected individuals, such as a Sudanese student whose plans to attend Stanford University were thwarted, resulting in wasted travel expenses and uncertainty about his future [2]. - Concerns have been raised about the long-term effects on students currently studying in the U.S. and the emotional impact on their families [2][3]. Group 2: International Reactions - The entry restrictions have intensified dissatisfaction towards the U.S. among the affected countries, with some analysts noting that the relationships between these nations and the U.S. were already strained [3][4]. - Observers from various countries have characterized the restrictions as blatant racism and unilateralism, further alienating the U.S. from these nations [3][4]. - The restrictions have been criticized for being discriminatory, particularly against Muslim-majority countries, with claims that "national security" is merely a pretext for racial and religious discrimination [4][5]. Group 3: Legal and Human Rights Concerns - The broad and comprehensive nature of the entry restrictions has raised concerns regarding international law, particularly the principle of non-discrimination, and the potential stigmatization of individuals from the affected countries [5].

Core Viewpoint - The increase of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports by the U.S. from 25% to 50% is seen as a unilateral and protectionist action that could disrupt global supply chains and trade, with potential indirect impacts on China's steel exports [2][5]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policy - The U.S. has raised tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, with the new rates effective from June 4, 2025, following a history of tariff increases initiated by former President Trump [3]. - The White House's executive order maintains a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports from the UK, with potential adjustments based on compliance with environmental policies [3]. Group 2: Impact on China - In 2024, China exported 110.716 million tons of steel, a 22.7% increase year-on-year, but only about 890,000 tons were exported to the U.S., representing 0.8% of China's total steel exports, indicating limited direct impact from the tariff increase [4][5]. - Concerns exist that the U.S. tariff policy may indirectly affect China's steel exports through its impact on downstream industries and the global trade system [5]. Group 3: International Reactions - The tariff increase has faced criticism from Canada, the EU, and Japan, with officials expressing concerns about its legality and potential negative effects on ongoing trade negotiations [5]. - Japan's exports of steel and aluminum to the U.S. are expected to decrease significantly, potentially impacting Japan's GDP growth [5]. Group 4: Domestic Concerns in the U.S. - There are worries among U.S. domestic stakeholders that rising costs of steel and aluminum imports will ultimately be passed on to American consumers [6]. - The OECD has revised down the U.S. economic growth forecast for 2025 and raised inflation expectations, indicating potential economic challenges ahead [6].

当特朗普政府突然宣布将钢铝关税从25%提升至50%时，这个看似提振美国制造业的决策，瞬间在北美 大陆投下震撼弹。加拿大和墨西哥作为美国钢铁进口的主要来源国，首当其冲成为这场贸易风暴的中 心。数据显示，加拿大90%的钢铁出口依赖美国市场，而墨西哥更是美国钢铁的净进口国，这种针对性 的关税政策暴露出特朗普贸易战的荒谬逻辑。 这场关税风暴的背后，隐藏着更残酷的经济现实。加拿大铝业协会的警告并非危言耸听，50%的关税壁 垒足以摧毁整个产业链的经济可行性。钢铁工人失业潮、工厂倒闭连锁反应、供应链断裂等灾难性场 景，正在从预测转变为迫在眉睫的威胁。更讽刺的是，美国本土制造业同样依赖加拿大优质钢材，这 种"杀敌一千自损八百"的做法，暴露出贸易保护主义的内在矛盾。 欧盟现有的210亿欧元反制清单只是前菜，950亿欧元的预备清单犹如悬在美国出口商头顶的达摩克利斯 之剑。从波本威士忌到佛罗里达橙汁，越来越多的美国特产可能成为贸易战的牺牲品。欧盟委员会发言 人强调的"创造谈判空间"颇具外交智慧，但特朗普政府反复无常的谈判风格，让任何理性对话都充满变 数。这种不确定性本身，就是全球贸易体系的最大毒药。 历史总是惊人地相似，2018年 ...

自从特朗普大搞关税政策以来，不少国家甚至连美国自身都受到了影响。 哪里有压迫，哪里就有反抗。 面对这种行为，中方坚决反制。 而不少国家对美国的加税政策也拒不接受，对美国强硬的国家越来越多。 当特朗普大刀阔斧地推出对中国和其他国家加征关税时，他无疑高估了自己的底气。 刚开始，似乎他真的做到了"以关税制胜"，尤其是在贸易战的初期； 美国的经济似乎并未受到太大冲击，反而不少国家都试图在这种高压政策下找到妥协的空间，可随之而来的是一场全球性的反击。 中国作为全球制造业中心，凭借着庞大的市场和无可替代的供应链优势，迅速做出了反制。 这一反制不仅仅是一个经济层面的回击，更在国际政治舞台上打响了声势，让其他国家纷纷警觉。 中美贸易谈判中的一系列变化，正是其他国家的转折点，许多国家开始放慢与美国的谈判进程，拒绝在美国的压力下匆忙做出妥协。 更令特朗普意外的是，越来越多的国家开始以中国的反制措施为蓝本，改变了自己对美国的态度。 中美之间的冲突，反而成了全球其他国家的"活教材"，教会了它们如何面对美国的关税压迫，如何在全球博弈中争取更多话语权。 | 北京时间 5月12日 | | | --- | --- | | 中美联合声明 | ...

Core Viewpoint - In the first four months of the year, China's total goods trade import and export value increased by 2.4% year-on-year, indicating sustained economic vitality and resilience in foreign trade despite external challenges [1] Group 1 - The growth rate of imports and exports in April accelerated by 4.3 percentage points compared to the first quarter, reflecting a positive trend in trade performance [1] - The statement emphasizes that "Chinese manufacturing" remains a global necessity, and the Chinese market continues to be a hotbed for investment [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that unilateralism and protectionism are unsustainable, and barriers cannot hinder China's commitment to open cooperation and shared development with countries around the world [1]

Group 1: U.S. Soft Power and Global Influence - The U.S. has built its soft power post-World War II through political values, technological innovation, cultural appeal, and legitimate foreign policy, gaining significant influence in creating a new international order [1] - In the last decade, U.S. soft power has been severely impacted by the rise of unilateralism, protectionism, and cultural conservatism, leading to a decline in its international image and trust in its values and policies, particularly during Trump's presidency [1][2] - Trump's "America First" policy has led to a rejection of multilateralism, with the U.S. ranking lowest in support for multilateralism among 193 UN member states, which has resulted in a breakdown of international trade systems and supply chains [3][4] Group 2: Economic and Trade Policies - Trump's administration has adopted a confrontational approach to economic relations, exemplified by increasing tariffs, which has disrupted the multilateral free trade system and caused significant supply chain issues globally [3][4] - A Pew Research Center survey indicated that in 21 relatively affluent countries, 10 experienced a decline in favorable views of the U.S. by 6 percentage points or more, with Australia, Israel, South Africa, and Germany seeing the largest drops [4] - Trump's trade policies, including high tariffs, threaten the global trade system, which could lead to a decrease in demand for the dollar and weaken its value and credit [8][9] Group 3: Financial Stability and Dollar Credit - The U.S. has maintained financial hegemony through the dollar, which has been supported by its historical ties to gold and later oil, but this trust is now at risk due to increasing national debt and fiscal deficits [7][8] - The U.S. national debt has exceeded $36 trillion, with rising interest costs impacting the country's creditworthiness, leading to higher yields on U.S. Treasury bonds [8][9] - Trump's policies have contributed to a weakening dollar, with long-term Treasury yields rising above 4%, indicating market uncertainty and increasing risks to dollar credit [9] Group 4: Impact on Scientific Research and Education - Trump's administration has significantly cut funding for scientific research, with the National Science Foundation's new project funding dropping nearly 50% compared to the previous year, and the NIH's indirect costs being reduced from 40% to 15% [11][12] - The administration's focus on "useful research" has led to a decline in support for basic research, which is crucial for long-term innovation and competitiveness [12][17] - The reduction in federal funding has resulted in layoffs and program cuts at major universities, with institutions like Johns Hopkins and Harvard facing significant financial constraints [16][17] Group 5: Broader Implications for U.S. Soft Power - The ongoing conflict between Trump's administration and academic institutions reflects a broader ideological battle between conservative and progressive values, impacting the U.S.'s ability to attract and retain top talent in science and technology [15][17] - The erosion of support for scientific research and education under Trump's policies threatens the U.S.'s historical leadership in global science and technology, potentially diminishing its soft power [18]

就接下来在扩大中国与南亚国家经贸合作方面有哪些考虑，商务部副部长鄢东在国新办新闻发布会上表 示，要发挥企业主体作用。在中国—南亚国家经贸合作蓬勃发展中，工商界是重要的参与者、推动者、 实践者。中方愿加强与南亚各国重要商协会、贸易投资促进机构的广泛联系，开展贸易投资促进活动， 不断扩大南亚国家朋友圈，为企业家朋友搭建交流信息、创新合作的平台，继续鼓励和支持中国企业赴 南亚国家考察对接，挖掘双方经贸合作潜力，共同将合作愿景转换为具体行动。要共同坚持多边主义。 要践行真正的多边主义，共同反对单边主义、保护主义，维护以世贸组织为核心的多边贸易体制。共同 倡导平等有序的世界多极化和普惠包容的经济全球化，为世界发展注入更多的稳定性和确定性。(人民 财讯) ...

Group 1 - California's Governor Newsom emphasizes the importance of listening to expert advice, criticizing Trump's tariff policies for potentially jeopardizing the U.S. economy's global standing [1] - The advertisement aired by Newsom highlights California's position as the fourth-largest economy globally, attributing its success to reduced trade barriers and efficient goods transportation [1][2] - The advertisement warns of significant declines in cargo ship arrivals at Los Angeles and Long Beach ports, indicating a potential supply chain crisis affecting essential goods for American families [1][5] Group 2 - California's GDP stands at $3.9 trillion, with 40% of its imports coming from China, Mexico, and Canada, facing a challenge of approximately $203 billion in annual imports due to tariff policies [2] - Historical context shows that the U.S. economic rise has been supported by open markets and immigration, contrasting with Trump's unilateral approach [2][4] - The trade war's impact is evident, with a 30% drop in container traffic between the U.S. and China, leading to significant supply chain disruptions [5][8] Group 3 - The U.S. heavily relies on Chinese manufacturing, with 90% of bicycles and 85% of toys imported from China, despite high tariffs failing to reduce dependency [8] - Recent communications between the U.S. and China indicate a recognition of the need for cooperation, with Trump considering tariff reductions to alleviate economic pressures [8][10] - The traditional U.S. strengths in technology and finance contrast with China's manufacturing capabilities, highlighting the necessity for a balanced approach to competition and cooperation [10]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Court ruled that Trump's tariff policies are unconstitutional, leading to a significant impact on global trade dynamics [1][2]. Group 1: Court Ruling and Legal Basis - The court's decision invalidated Trump's tariffs, stating that the president does not have unlimited authority to impose tariffs without congressional approval [2]. - The ruling emphasized that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act only allows the president to impose tariffs in cases of extraordinary threats to national security [1][4]. Group 2: Impact on Trade Policies - The ruling effectively halts three types of tariffs imposed by Trump, including those against China, Canada, and Mexico, as well as the so-called reciprocal tariffs against multiple countries [1][4]. - The decision is seen as a positive development for global trade, potentially easing tensions and promoting a more equitable trade environment [6]. Group 3: Political and Economic Implications - The lawsuit was initiated by five small U.S. businesses adversely affected by Trump's tariffs, highlighting the internal conflict and economic strain caused by these policies [6]. - The outcome of the ruling may influence the future of U.S. trade policy and the ongoing trade war, with global stakeholders closely monitoring the situation [6].