股票估值

Search documents
估值周报(0721-0725):最新A股、港股、美股估值怎么看?-20250726
HUAXI Securities· 2025-07-26 11:18
A-share Market Valuation - The current PE (TTM) for the A-share market is 16.34, with a historical average of 23.49[7] - The Shanghai Composite Index has a PE (TTM) of 13.47, while the ChiNext Index stands at 49.19[10] - The A-share market's risk premium rate is currently at 0.76%[18] Hong Kong Market Valuation - The Hang Seng Index has a current PE (TTM) of 11.32, with a maximum of 22.67 and a minimum of 7.36 recorded historically[59] - The Hang Seng Technology Index shows a current PE (TTM) of 21.51, indicating a significant valuation compared to other indices[65] US Market Valuation - The S&P 500 Index has a current PE (TTM) of 28.63, with historical extremes ranging from 11.21 to 41.99[79] - The NASDAQ Index's current PE (TTM) is 42.96, reflecting a high valuation compared to historical data[87] Sector Valuation Insights - In the A-share market, the food and beverage sector has a low PE (TTM) of 18.51, while the technology sector has a high PE of 87.91[24][38] - The banking sector in the A-share market has a PB (LF) of 0.91, indicating a relatively low valuation compared to historical averages[27] Chinese Concept Stocks - Key Chinese concept stocks show a median PS of 7.38 for Alibaba and 2.92 for Baidu, with current values significantly lower than historical highs[96]
Buy Or Fear Century Aluminum Stock?
Forbes· 2025-07-25 14:10
Core Viewpoint - Century Aluminum (CENX) stock is considered hazardous and a poor investment choice at its current price of approximately $22 due to several identified issues despite its low valuation [2][3]. Valuation Comparison - CENX stock appears inexpensive when compared to the broader market based on price per dollar of sales or profit [4]. Revenue Growth - Century Aluminum's revenues have shown significant growth, with a 11.4% increase from $2.1 billion to $2.4 billion in the past 12 months, compared to a 5.5% growth for the S&P 500 [6]. - The company experienced an average annual decline of 1.4% in its top line over the last three years, while the S&P 500 saw a 5.5% increase [6]. - Quarterly revenues rose by 29.5% to $634 million in the most recent quarter from $490 million a year prior, outperforming the S&P 500's 4.8% improvement [6]. Profitability Metrics - Century Aluminum's operating income over the last four quarters was $166 million, reflecting a poor operating margin of 7.0% [7]. - The operating cash flow (OCF) during this timeframe was $63 million, indicating a very poor OCF margin of 2.6% compared to 14.9% for the S&P 500 [7]. - The price-to-sales (P/S) ratio for Century Aluminum is 0.9, while the S&P 500's is 3.1; the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is 17.3 versus the benchmark's 26.9 [7]. Financial Stability - Century Aluminum's debt stood at $483 million at the end of the most recent quarter, with a market capitalization of $2.1 billion, resulting in a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 23.3% compared to 19.4% for the S&P 500 [9]. - Cash (including cash equivalents) constitutes $45 million of the $2.0 billion in total assets, leading to a poor cash-to-assets ratio of 2.3% [9]. Downturn Resilience - CENX stock has historically performed worse than the S&P 500 during several downturns, including an 82.1% drop during the inflation shock of 2022 compared to a 25.4% decline for the S&P 500 [10]. - During the COVID pandemic in 2020, CENX stock fell 62.1%, while the S&P 500 experienced a peak-to-trough decline of 33.9% [10]. - In the global financial crisis of 2008, CENX stock dropped 98.7%, significantly worse than the S&P 500's 56.8% decline [11]. Overall Assessment - Century Aluminum's performance across key parameters is summarized as follows: Growth is very strong, profitability is very weak, financial stability is weak, and downturn resilience is very weak, leading to an overall weak assessment of the stock [13].
日股狂飙后,多个指标亮起红灯!
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-07-25 06:52
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the recent surge in Japanese stock markets driven by a trade agreement with the U.S., but it also raises concerns about potential market corrections due to overbought conditions and historical precedents of market crashes [1][2][5] - The Tokyo Stock Exchange Index and Nikkei 225 Index saw a cumulative increase of over 3% following the announcement of a 15% tariff by the U.S. on Japan, with the Tokyo Stock Exchange Index closing at 2977.55 points, surpassing its previous historical high set on July 11, 2024 [1] - Technical indicators, such as the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reaching approximately 79, suggest that the market is nearing overbought territory, similar to conditions observed before last year's market crash [1][2] Group 2 - Analysts express caution regarding the rapid market rise, referencing the market crash in August 2024 triggered by unexpected interest rate hikes and hawkish comments from the Bank of Japan, which could lead investors to reassess risks despite current macroeconomic drivers [2] - The forward price-to-earnings ratio of the Tokyo Stock Exchange Index stands at 15.7, close to the 15.87 level seen before last year's downturn, indicating that stock valuations need to be supported by corporate earnings as the earnings season approaches [5] - Foreign investors have been net buyers of Japanese stocks for 15 consecutive weeks, but underlying political and fiscal issues in Japan, including concerns over government bond yields, could complicate the market outlook [6]
Why RTX Stock Popped Today
The Motley Fool· 2025-07-23 21:36
RTX stock is expensive when valued on earnings. Valued on free cash flow... it's even more expensive. A funny thing happened to RTX Corporation (RTX 4.81%) yesterday -- meaning funny-strange. RTX reported 9% sales growth in its fiscal second-quarter earnings report, and beat analyst forecasts with $1.56 per share earned on revenue of $21.6 billion. Is RTX stock a buy? Call me a cynic, but I just don't see things that way. Beyond guidance, when I look at RTX stock, I see a defense company earning $6.1 billio ...
SCHV: A Quiet Contender In A Growth Dominated World
Seeking Alpha· 2025-07-23 11:57
Group 1 - The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHV) offers a dividend yield exceeding 2% and is positioned defensively against market drawdowns [1] - The ETF is capable of generating strong returns in the current market environment [1] Group 2 - The analyst has over 20 years of experience in quantitative research, financial modeling, and risk management, focusing on equity valuation and market trends [1] - The analyst's expertise includes model validation, stress testing, and regulatory finance, with a strong emphasis on both fundamental and technical analysis [1] - The research approach combines rigorous risk management with a long-term perspective on value creation, particularly interested in macroeconomic trends and corporate earnings [1]
估值周报(0714-0718):最新A股、港股、美股估值怎么看?-20250719
HUAXI Securities· 2025-07-19 09:35
证券研究报告 最新A股、港股、美股估值怎么看? ——估值周报(0714-0718) 李立峰 SAC NO:S1120520090003 冯逸华 SAC NO:S1120523070007 2025年7月19日 请仔细阅读在本报告尾部的重要法律声明 全球主要指数估值总览 图表1:全球主要指数PE(TTM) 注:自2010年1月起,截至2025年7月18日 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 上证指数 创业板指 恒生指数 恒生科技 标普500 纳斯达克指数 道琼斯工业指数 日经225 德国DAX 中位数 最大值 最小值 现值 A股 港股 美股 日股 德股 资料来源: wind ,华西证券研究所 2 目录 风险提示 3 一、A股市场估值水平 二、A股行业估值水平 三、部分机构集中持有个股估值水平 四、港股市场估值水平 五、港股行业估值水平 六、美股市场估值水平 七、中概股估值、中美银行股估值比较 1.1 A股绝对估值变化 4 图表2、3:A股整体PE(TTM)、A股剔除金融和石油石化PE(TTM,剔除负值) 资料来源: wind ,华西证券研究所 4 16.08 5 10 15 20 25 ...
Rethinking CONY As Coinbase Rallies - Tactical Use, Not Income Plan
Seeking Alpha· 2025-07-15 11:20
Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of quantitative research, financial modeling, and risk management in equity valuation and market trends [1] - It highlights the experience of the analyst in leading teams for model validation and stress testing, showcasing a strong background in both fundamental and technical analysis [1] - The collaboration between the analyst and their research partner aims to provide high-quality, data-driven insights for investors [1] Group 1 - The analyst has over 20 years of experience in the field, focusing on uncovering high-growth investment opportunities [1] - The approach combines rigorous risk management with a long-term perspective on value creation, particularly in macroeconomic trends and corporate earnings [1] - The goal is to deliver actionable ideas for investors seeking to outperform the market [1]
估值周报(0707-0711):最新A股、港股、美股估值怎么看?-20250712
HUAXI Securities· 2025-07-12 13:27
Group 1: A-share Market Valuation - The current PE (TTM) of the A-share market is 15.94, with a historical average of 22.57 when excluding financial and oil sectors[7] - The Shanghai Composite Index has a PE (TTM) of 13.25, while the ChiNext Index stands at 49.22, indicating significant valuation differences among indices[15] - The risk premium for the A-share market is currently at 0.79%, which is below the historical average[18] Group 2: Hong Kong Market Valuation - The Hang Seng Index has a current PE (TTM) of 10.75, with a historical maximum of 22.67 and a minimum of 7.36[58] - The Hang Seng Technology Index shows a current PE (TTM) of 19.81, reflecting a higher valuation compared to the broader market[63] - The Hang Seng Financial Index has a median PE of 7.45, indicating lower valuations in the financial sector[70] Group 3: U.S. Market Valuation - The S&P 500 Index has a current PE (TTM) of 28.02, with a historical maximum of 41.99 and a minimum of 11.21[80] - The NASDAQ Index shows a PE (TTM) of 42.43, indicating a high valuation relative to historical levels[88] - The Dow Jones Industrial Average has a current PE (TTM) of 31.24, reflecting strong market performance[92] Group 4: Sector Valuation Insights - In the A-share market, sectors like non-ferrous metals and food & beverage are currently at historically low PE levels, while sectors like computers and steel are at high PE levels[25] - The banking sector in A-shares has a PB (LF) of 0.64, indicating undervaluation compared to historical averages[28] - The consumer sector, particularly in white goods, has a PE (TTM) of 11.02, suggesting potential for growth[37]
Netflix Stock Stalled as Analyst Voices Valuation Concerns
Schaeffers Investment Research· 2025-07-07 13:34
Group 1 - Netflix Inc has been downgraded to "neutral" from "buy" by Seaport Research Partners due to concerns over its long-term valuation and limited growth potential, particularly regarding advertising and new project launches [1] - The stock has experienced significant growth since mid-2022, with a 45% increase in 2025 and reaching a record high of $1,341.15 on June 30 [2] - The 14-Day Relative Strength Index (RSI) for Netflix closed at 71, indicating it is nearing "overbought" territory, which could signal potential price declines [2] Group 2 - Options traders are increasingly buying puts, with a 50-day put/call volume ratio of 0.87, ranking higher than 98% of readings from the past year, suggesting a growing interest in protective positions [3]
估值周报(0630-0704):最新A股、港股、美股估值怎么看?-20250705
HUAXI Securities· 2025-07-05 07:08
A-share Market Valuation - The current PE (TTM) for the A-share market is 15.09, with a median of 13.40 and a maximum of 30.60[12] - The PE (TTM) excluding financial and oil sectors is 22.32, indicating a higher valuation in these sectors[6] - The Shanghai Composite Index has a PE (TTM) of 13.15, while the ChiNext Index stands at 49.24, reflecting significant sectoral differences[12] Hong Kong Market Valuation - The Hang Seng Index has a current PE (TTM) of 10.65, with a median of 10.25 and a maximum of 22.67[58] - The Hang Seng Technology Index shows a higher valuation with a current PE of 19.86, indicating investor interest in tech stocks[58] US Market Valuation - The S&P 500 Index has a current PE (TTM) of 28.12, with a median of 20.87 and a maximum of 41.99, suggesting a premium valuation compared to other markets[82] - The NASDAQ Index has a PE (TTM) of 42.45, reflecting its growth-oriented nature[88] Sector Valuation Insights - In the A-share market, sectors like non-ferrous metals and food & beverage have lower PE ratios, indicating potential undervaluation[22] - The financial sector, particularly banks and brokers, shows a PB (LF) of 0.91, suggesting a value opportunity compared to historical averages[25] Risk Factors - Potential risks include policy effectiveness falling short of expectations and unexpected corporate earnings results, which could impact market valuations negatively[102]