杨冬介绍，强制性产品认证是降低制度性交易成本、守护产品质量安全底线的重要手段。在"内卷式"竞 争压力下，企业降成本的冲动增加，产品质量潜在风险进一步加大。加强产品一致性管理成为发挥好强 制性产品认证制度作用的基础要素。 据介绍，市场监管总局将深入开展强制性产品认证制度"守底线"专项行动，加强强制性产品认证指定机 构日常监管，开展机构能力条件持续符合性核查，建立重点产品指定机构双月调度机制。紧密结合产品 特性、生产制造工艺、企业整体状况，修订认证实施规则，形成针对性强、科学性更高的规则体系。提 高精细化管理水平，要求认证机构加强风险识别，用好"成本核算"手段，对市场上明显低于成本价格产 品加强认证监管。制定产品认证机构设立认证质量总监和认证项目质量负责人的管理规定，强化责任落 实到人。加大工厂检查员的培训考核力度，提高法规意识和专业技术能力。此外，强化认证实施中对原 材料和重要零部件的检查力度，推动企业质量保证能力和产品一致性水平提升。 针对风险，市场监管总局提前研判，采取多项措施切实保障产品质量安全。包括加严过程管理。如型式 试验的样品要在生产企业现场随机抽取，并明确抽样人员、封样程序等具体要求。提高"不预先 ...

新京报讯（记者陈琳）1月21日，市场监管总局召开专题发布会，现场公布2025年综合整治"内卷式"竞 争十大典型案例，货拉拉低价竞争、外卖"补贴大战"、充电宝缺陷调查与召回等事件被列入其中。 市场监管总局竞争协调司副司长赵春雷介绍，总体来看，这些案例和做法集中体现了三方面突出特点。 首先，注重事前预防。在光伏行业开展"事前预警+合规辅导"，帮助企业在"内卷外化"风险形成前及时 纠偏；在新能源汽车领域首次实施整车质量抽查，防范可能出现的低价低质风险；通过强化认证一致性 检查，防止企业获证后降低质量，从生产源头杜绝"降价降质"竞争。 其次，注重刚柔并济。不断丰富监管手段，在货拉拉、外卖平台等案例中，运用约谈等柔性工具引导企 业自律；在广告合规领域加强指导，显著降低违法率；对私域直播虚假宣传、缺陷产品等问题，实施穿 透性打击和强制召回，筑牢安全与诚信底线。 9、牵头制定发布组织治理领域国际标准，推动一批新能源汽车标准"走出去"。牵头研制并发布《组织 利益冲突指南》等3项国际标准、新能源汽车领域10余项国际标准，推动14项新能源汽车标准被多个国 家采用，引导新能源汽车等行业企业由"内卷式"竞争转向质量竞争。 最后，注重 ...

王昌林表示，要坚持把宏观政策的发力点放在做强国内大循环上，全方位扩大国内需求。重点是要适应 需求升级的趋势，结合新一轮科技革命和产业变革的需要，将研究制定出台2026—2030年扩大内需战略 实施方案，为以新需求引领新供给、以新供给创造新需求提供强有力的创新举措和要素保障，努力实现 供需互促、循环升级。 本报讯 记者马玲报道 "当前，我国经济发展中需求不足的问题较为突出，同时也存在供给不充分的问 题。"1月20日，国家发展改革委副主任王昌林在国新办新闻发布会上表示，当前，供给到了从"有没 有"到"好不好"的阶段，有的需求很大，但供给不能满足。针对这些问题，必须坚决贯彻落实中央经济 工作会议精神，扩大内需、优化供给，推动供需在更高水平上实现动态平衡和良性循环，促进形成更多 由内需主导、消费拉动、内生增长的经济发展模式。 实体经济是我国经济发展的根基，王昌林表示，要发挥好国家创业投资基金行业标杆作用，研究设立国 家级并购基金，加强政府投资基金布局规划和投向指导，促进创新创业创造，加快培育和发展新质生产 力。 "坚持把市场运行的调控点放在纵深推进全国统一大市场建设上，充分激发市场活力。"王昌林表示，重 点是要综合整 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the successful completion of the main economic and social development goals for 2025, emphasizing proactive macro policies, technological self-reliance, and improved living standards [1] - The manufacturing sector has maintained its position as the world's largest for 16 consecutive years, with a focus on high-level technological independence and breakthroughs in new productivity [1] - The total import value for the year reached 18.48 trillion yuan, maintaining a global import share of around 10% [1] Group 2 - By 2026, significant development potential will be released across consumption, investment, technology, industry, urban-rural, and regional sectors, with a continuous shift towards higher quality economic structure [2] - New economic growth points in high-tech industries such as renewable energy, aerospace, and quantum technology are being planned, with the new energy storage capacity exceeding 100 million kilowatts, accounting for over 40% of the global total [2] Group 3 - A strategic plan for expanding domestic demand from 2026 to 2030 is being developed, focusing on adapting to demand upgrades and aligning with new technological revolutions [3] - The establishment of a national-level merger fund is being researched to enhance government investment and promote innovation and entrepreneurship [4] Group 4 - Measures to address "involution" competition are being implemented, aiming to shift from price competition to value competition, and to regulate market entry and exit mechanisms [5] - The "Two New" policies are expected to continue driving investment stability, consumption expansion, and transformation, with over 8,400 equipment renewal projects supported by long-term special government bonds [6][7] Group 5 - Policies to promote reasonable price recovery are being coordinated, with a focus on fiscal and monetary policy synergy to foster economic growth and price recovery [8][9] - Measures to enhance private investment and improve the participation of private enterprises in major projects are being implemented [10][11] Group 6 - A nationwide unified market construction regulation is being developed to strengthen legal protections and clarify the roles of local governments in economic development [12]

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated an investigation into Ctrip Group for suspected abuse of market dominance, particularly in its hotel business, following numerous complaints from merchants and prior local discussions [3][12]. Group 1: Investigation Background - The investigation is a response to previous local discussions and industry complaints, with Ctrip having been repeatedly interviewed by market regulators since the second half of 2025 [3][12]. - The investigation is based on the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China, focusing on Ctrip's alleged monopolistic practices in the online travel industry [3][12]. Group 2: Merchant Complaints - Numerous merchants have reported unreasonable terms imposed by Ctrip, claiming they have lost pricing power and are forced to comply with platform demands [4][14]. - Merchants have expressed frustration over the difficulty in disabling the "price adjustment assistant" feature, which they claim undermines their pricing strategies [4][13]. - Complaints have highlighted Ctrip's "choose one from two" policy, which may restrict merchants from listing on competing platforms while maintaining high commission rates [4][14]. Group 3: Market Share and Competition - Ctrip holds a significant market share in the hotel and travel sector, with a projected GMV market share of 56% in 2024, while its closest competitor, Tongcheng, holds 13% [6][14]. - The combined market share of Ctrip and Tongcheng accounts for nearly 70% of the domestic OTA market, indicating a lack of fair competition [6][14]. Group 4: Financial Performance - Despite the challenges faced by merchants, Ctrip's financial performance has been strong, with a net profit of 17.2 billion yuan in 2024, representing a 72% year-on-year increase [7][15]. - Approximately 40% of Ctrip's revenue is derived from hotel booking services, highlighting the importance of this segment to its overall business [7][15]. Group 5: Regulatory Context - The investigation aligns with the government's broader efforts to address "involutionary" competition, which is characterized by low-quality, low-price competition that disrupts the market [8][17]. - New regulations under the Anti-Unfair Competition Law aim to prevent platforms from forcing merchants to sell below cost and engaging in deceptive practices [9][18]. - If found guilty of abusing its market position, Ctrip could face administrative fines and the confiscation of illegal gains, as stipulated by the Anti-Monopoly Law [9][18].

Group 1: Economic Overview - In the past year, China's economy faced challenges, with retail sales exceeding 45.6 trillion yuan, growing by 4.0%, indicating consumer spending remains a stabilizing force [1] - By the end of December, the number of business entities reached 195 million, with over 100 million tax-related entities, reflecting robust market vitality [1] Group 2: Platform Economy Regulation - The competition among major platforms like JD, Taobao, and Meituan in the food delivery sector involved nearly 100 billion yuan in investments, leading to improved service quality and better treatment for delivery riders [2][3] - Regulatory bodies played a crucial role in maintaining fair competition, shifting the focus from subsidy wars to enhancing service quality and ensuring food safety [2][3] Group 3: Addressing Deep-rooted Issues - Regulatory efforts in 2025 targeted the "algorithmic hegemony" and unreasonable rules imposed by platforms, leading to the cancellation of controversial refund policies and promoting fairer trading practices [3] - Major platforms committed to creating a win-win ecosystem for consumers, merchants, and delivery riders, with initiatives like eliminating penalties for late deliveries and increasing social security coverage for riders [3][4] Group 4: Combating "Involution" Competition - "Involution" competition emerged as a significant challenge in 2025, characterized by price wars that compromised product quality and safety, as seen in the drastic decline of profit margins for brands like Laiyifen [6][7] - The government emphasized the need to shift competition from price-cutting to value creation, with regulatory measures aimed at addressing unfair practices and enhancing product quality [6][7][8] Group 5: Food Safety and Standards - The "pre-made dish" controversy highlighted public concerns over food safety, prompting regulatory bodies to accelerate the establishment of national standards for the industry [10][11] - Regulatory measures included comprehensive food safety oversight and the introduction of transparency in food production processes to restore consumer trust [11][12] Group 6: Market Dynamics and Innovation - The regulatory framework aims to create a balanced market environment where quality and innovation are prioritized over low prices, allowing businesses to thrive without compromising standards [9][12] - The response from the industry includes innovative dining experiences and significant investments in product development, indicating a shift towards higher quality offerings [9][12]

Economic Overview - In the past year, China's economy faced challenges, with total retail sales of consumer goods exceeding 45.6 trillion yuan, growing by 4.0%, indicating that consumption remains a stabilizing force for the economy [1] - By the end of December, the number of business entities in China reached 195 million, with over 100 million tax-related entities, reflecting sustained market vitality [1] Consumer Trends - Consumer activity is shifting from traditional shopping to experiential scenarios, such as enjoying hot pot while watching movies or visiting stores for service experiences, indicating a new market dynamic focused on quality and experience [1] - The pursuit of quality and experience has become a new driving force in the market, presenting challenges for regulators [1] Platform Economy Regulation - The competition among platforms like JD.com, Taobao, and Meituan in the food delivery sector has led to significant investments, with nearly 100 billion yuan spent in just six months, resulting in improved service quality and better treatment for delivery personnel [2][3] - Regulatory bodies have played a crucial role in maintaining fair competition, shifting the focus from subsidy wars to enhancing service quality and ensuring food safety [2][3] Addressing Deep-rooted Issues - Regulatory efforts in 2025 targeted the "algorithmic hegemony" and unreasonable rules imposed by platforms, leading to the cancellation of controversial refund policies and the establishment of fairer trading conditions [3] - Major platforms committed to creating a win-win ecosystem for consumers, merchants, and delivery personnel, with initiatives to eliminate penalties for late deliveries and improve social security coverage for riders [3][4] Market Corrections - In 2025, major food delivery platforms collectively reduced merchant commissions by 52 million yuan, addressing issues of excessive fees and fines, thereby sharing growth benefits more equitably among ecosystem participants [4] - Regulatory measures included the introduction of compliance management documents and guidelines to enhance the scientific and standardized operation of online markets [5] Combatting "Involution" Competition - "Involution" competition, characterized by price wars and product homogeneity, has been identified as a significant challenge, prompting regulatory focus on promoting high-value competition rather than low-level price cuts [6][7] - The government has initiated actions against substandard products and unfair practices, with a focus on maintaining market integrity and safety [6][7] Food Safety and Standards - The "pre-prepared food" controversy highlighted the need for unified national standards in the food industry, leading to accelerated efforts in standard formulation and enhanced food safety regulations [9][10] - Regulatory bodies are emphasizing comprehensive food safety oversight across the supply chain, addressing public concerns about food safety and ensuring transparency in food production [10][11] Conclusion - The collective efforts in 2025 aimed to create a fairer and more trustworthy market environment, allowing all value-creating entities and workers to thrive, ultimately leading to a balance between market vitality and order [12]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting held by three departments aims to regulate the competition order in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, emphasizing the need to resist chaotic "price wars" and promote a fair market environment focused on quality and value [1][2]. Group 1: Policy and Regulatory Actions - The three departments will enhance collaboration, strengthen cost investigations and price monitoring, and increase regulatory enforcement to maintain a fair market environment [2]. - A comprehensive regulatory system covering price, quality, and production will be established to deter violations and improve regulatory efficiency through data sharing and enforcement coordination [2]. Group 2: Industry Transformation and Impact - The core objective of addressing "involutionary" competition is to maintain long-term innovation momentum within the industry [2]. - Transitioning to orderly competition is expected to lead to four significant changes: 1. Shift from "price involution" to healthy competition based on technology, quality, and service, resulting in the exit of low-quality, low-price capacities and increased industry concentration [2]. 2. Recovery of profitability for car manufacturers, increased R&D investment, and breakthroughs in core technologies such as batteries and intelligent driving, enhancing product strength and brand value [2]. 3. Optimization of the industry chain ecosystem, with standardized supplier payment terms and stable operations for small and medium-sized enterprises, enhancing supply chain security and resilience [2]. 4. More rational consumer behavior focusing on product quality and cost-effectiveness, leading to a market shift from incremental expansion to stock upgrading, which will also promote the development of the automotive aftermarket and new energy services [2].

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated an antitrust investigation into Ctrip Group for suspected abuse of market dominance, particularly in its hotel business operations [1][6]. Group 1: Investigation Background - The investigation is based on prior checks and is in accordance with the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China [1]. - Ctrip holds a significant market share in the online travel industry, particularly in hotel bookings and flight ticketing [1]. - Complaints from numerous merchants indicate that Ctrip imposes unreasonable terms and conditions, leading to claims of market manipulation [2][3]. Group 2: Merchant Complaints - Merchants have reported difficulties in adjusting prices on Ctrip, with some stating that their pricing autonomy has been completely taken away [2]. - The "price adjustment assistant" feature has been a point of contention, with merchants struggling to disable it despite repeated attempts [2]. - Ctrip's "choose one from two" policy, which may force merchants into exclusive agreements, is also under scrutiny [2][3]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - Ctrip's market share in the hotel and travel market is projected to reach 56% by 2024, with its closest competitor holding only 13% [3]. - The company has expanded its operations to over 120,000 international hotels across more than 200 countries, as well as 750,000 hotels in over 600 cities in China [3]. - Merchants face high commission rates, with total commission costs potentially nearing 40% when including hidden fees [4]. Group 4: Financial Performance - Despite the challenges faced by merchants, Ctrip's financial performance has been strong, with a projected net profit of 17.2 billion yuan in 2024, a 72% increase year-on-year [4]. - Approximately 40% of Ctrip's revenue comes from hotel booking services [4]. Group 5: Regulatory Context - The investigation is part of a broader effort by the government to address "involutionary" competition, which is characterized by low-quality, low-price competition that undermines long-term business viability [6]. - The new Anti-Unfair Competition Law, effective from 2025, aims to regulate practices such as forced low-cost sales and manipulation of market rules [6]. Group 6: Potential Consequences - If found guilty of abusing its market position, Ctrip could face administrative fines and confiscation of illegal gains, with penalties ranging from 1% to 10% of the previous year's sales [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to address "involution" competition, which is characterized by low prices, low quality, and low standards, disrupting market signals and hindering long-term competitiveness and high-quality development [2] Group 1: Key Areas of Governance - "Involution" competition often arises from unclear competition rules in specific sectors and a lack of unified technical guidance for industry development [3] - The revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law, implemented in June last year, targets issues like fake reviews and forced lowest prices, establishing a solid legal foundation for comprehensive governance against "involution" competition [3] - The introduction of 167 national standard projects for emerging advantageous industries aims to set clear quality benchmarks and guide technological direction, compelling companies to upgrade their technology and improve product quality [3] Group 2: Market Exit Mechanism - A significant issue contributing to persistent "involution" competition is the lack of a smooth market exit mechanism, with many "zombie companies" distorting market signals and disrupting competition [4] - The implementation of the "Mandatory Company Deregistration System" since October last year has effectively streamlined the market exit process, with 294,900 companies undergoing forced deregistration by the end of December [5] - This system ensures that companies that have been deregistered do not escape their responsibilities, reinforcing the importance of legal compliance and integrity among businesses [6] Group 3: Collaborative Governance Approach - Addressing "involution" competition requires a comprehensive and long-term approach, with various regulations and guidelines being introduced to create a full-chain governance system [7] - The regulatory framework includes preventive measures, real-time supervision, and post-event cleanup, aiming to shift the market focus from quantity to quality [7] - Different sectors require tailored governance strategies, with strict regulations for safety-critical areas and compliance guidance for innovative sectors, promoting quality upgrades in competitive industries [8]