Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute between former Hubei billionaire Lan Shili and the grain and oil giant Jinlongyu, backed by Yihai Kerry, stems from allegations regarding the unsafe transportation of edible oil using uncleaned oil tankers, leading to significant reputational damage and financial implications for the companies involved [1][4][10]. Group 1: Incident Background - The controversy began with the "oil tanker mixed transport chaos" incident, where it was reported that an oil tanker transported coal-derived oil and then directly loaded edible oil without cleaning, raising public safety concerns [4][5]. - A specific tanker, identified as冀E5476W, was tracked to have loaded edible oil at a facility linked to Jinlongyu after transporting coal-derived oil [4][6]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Yihai Kerry filed a lawsuit against Lan Shili for defamation, claiming his statements about the company's products being "toxic" and the alleged stock price drop were baseless and damaging to their brand reputation [8][10]. - The Shanghai court ruled in favor of Yihai Kerry, ordering Lan Shili to apologize publicly and pay damages, which he contested in a subsequent appeal that was also rejected [10][15]. Group 3: Regulatory Implications - The incident prompted the State Council's Food Safety Office to take the matter seriously, leading to a joint investigation into the transportation of edible oil and subsequent regulatory reforms [5][11]. - Proposed amendments to the Food Safety Law include stricter licensing requirements for the transportation of liquid food products, with penalties for violations [11]. Group 4: Ongoing Disputes - Following the court's ruling, Lan Shili claimed that Yihai Kerry continued to pursue legal action despite the settlement, leading to the freezing of his bank accounts and further complicating the legal situation [14][15]. - Lan Shili has since sought a retrial and is pursuing additional claims against Yihai Kerry for alleged improper conduct during the enforcement of the court's decision [15].

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute between former Hubei billionaire Lan Shili and Yihai Kerry, the parent company of the grain and oil giant Jinlongyu, has escalated from a public controversy regarding food safety to a complex legal battle involving defamation and unjust enrichment claims [2][6][16]. Group 1: Incident Background - The controversy began in July 2024 when media reported on the "oil tanker mixed loading chaos," raising public concerns about the safety of edible oil transportation [7][8]. - Lan Shili released a video accusing Jinlongyu of using uncleaned oil tankers for transporting edible oil, claiming that the company's market value dropped by 650 billion [2][8]. - The video gained significant traction, amassing 46,000 likes and over 20,000 shares on Douyin by July 30, 2024 [8]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Yihai Kerry filed a lawsuit against Lan Shili for defamation, claiming his statements were false and damaging to their brand reputation [11][12]. - The Shanghai court ruled in favor of Yihai Kerry, ordering Lan Shili to apologize publicly and pay a total of 30,000 yuan in damages [13]. - Lan Shili appealed the decision, arguing that he was exercising his right to express concerns about a public issue, but the appeal was rejected [14]. Group 3: Escalation of Dispute - Following the court's decision, a new issue arose when Lan Shili mistakenly transferred 100,000 yuan instead of the ordered 10,000 yuan to Yihai Kerry [15]. - Lan Shili claimed that Yihai Kerry did not inform the court about receiving the payment and instead sought to freeze his bank account, leading to further legal action from his side [15][16]. - The dispute has now expanded to include claims of unjust enrichment, complicating the legal battle between the two parties [16].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal dispute between Lan Shili, a former billionaire from Hubei, and the grain and oil giant Jinlongyu has escalated, with Lan expressing his dissatisfaction with the court's decisions and seeking a retrial [1][9]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Lan Shili has filed for a retrial with the Shanghai High People's Court, contesting the first and second-instance rulings against him [1]. - The initial court ruling required Lan to apologize publicly and pay a total of 100,000 yuan (approximately 14,000 USD) in damages and legal fees to Yihai Kerry [7]. - After losing the appeal, Lan complied with the court's decision and paid the required amount, but he continues to assert that his actions were legitimate expressions of concern for public food safety [7][9]. Group 2: Public Statements and Reactions - Lan Shili accused Jinlongyu of exploiting legal loopholes and claimed that the company did not report the receipt of the execution payment to the court, leading to further legal actions against him [1][9]. - He criticized the company's actions as "bullying" and highlighted the significant discrepancy in the viewership of his apology video compared to his usual content, suggesting manipulation of public perception [9]. - Lan has announced intentions to file additional lawsuits against Jinlongyu, seeking the return of an alleged overpayment of 90,000 yuan (approximately 12,600 USD) and a public apology [10].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the food safety issue related to the transportation of edible oil has escalated into a legal battle involving former Hubei billionaire Lan Shili and the company behind Jinlongyu, Yihai Kerry. The situation has raised significant public concern and led to legal actions over defamation and claims of improper gains [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Background - The incident began in July 2024 when multiple media outlets reported on the "chaotic transportation of edible oil by tankers," which included allegations that tankers had previously transported non-food substances [6][7]. - On July 9, 2024, Lan Shili released a video claiming that a tanker transported edible oil to Jinlongyu's factory without proper cleaning, leading to a significant drop in the company's stock value [7][8]. - The video gained substantial traction on social media, amassing 46,000 likes and over 20,000 shares on Douyin by July 30, 2024 [8]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Yihai Kerry filed a lawsuit against Lan Shili for defamation on October 21, 2024, claiming that his statements were false and damaging to the company's reputation [11][12]. - The Shanghai court ruled in favor of Yihai Kerry, ordering Lan Shili to publicly apologize and pay a total of 30,000 yuan (approximately 4,600 USD) in damages [13]. - Lan Shili appealed the decision, arguing that he was exercising his right to express concerns about public safety [14]. Group 3: Escalation of Disputes - Following the court's decision, a new dispute arose when Lan Shili mistakenly transferred 100,000 yuan (approximately 15,400 USD) instead of the ordered 10,000 yuan to Yihai Kerry [17][18]. - Lan Shili claimed that Yihai Kerry did not inform the court about receiving the payment and instead sought to freeze his bank account, causing him significant distress [18]. - The legal conflict has now expanded to include claims of unjust enrichment, with Lan Shili seeking the return of the excess payment and additional damages [19].

千亿市值粮油巨头金龙鱼（300999）（300999.SZ）子公司涉诉案，一审判决结果出炉。 11 月 19 日晚间，金龙鱼公告，公司下属子公司益海（广州）粮油工业有限公司（以下简称"广州益海"）收到淮北市中级人民法 院作出的（2024）皖06刑初3号一审《刑事判决书》。 根据《刑事判决书》，广州益海构成合同诈骗罪，系从犯，判处罚金人民币100万元；被告人柳德刚（广州益海原总经理）构成 合同诈骗罪、非国家工作人员受贿罪，决定执行有期徒刑19年，并处罚金人民币280万元。 同时，法院责令被告单位广州益海对被害单位安徽华文国际经贸股份有限公司（以下简称"安徽华文"）的经济损失人民币18.81 亿元与云南惠嘉进出口有限公司（以下简称"云南惠嘉"）承担共同退赔责任。 值得一提的是，今年前三季度，金龙鱼净利润合计27.49 亿元，去年全年，公司净利润为25.02 亿元。此次《刑事判决书》涉及 的18.81亿元经济损失，约占金龙鱼去年全年净利润的近七成。 金龙鱼在公告中表示，广州益海当庭已提出上诉，广州益海与公司均不认可一审判决，公司亦会依法全力支持广州益海上诉。 合同诈骗"罗生门" 事情要从2024年1月12日金龙鱼发 ...

智通财经11月19日讯（记者 吴蔚玲）时隔近两年，金龙鱼下属子公司益海（广州）粮油工业有限 公司（下称"广州益海"）被刑事起诉迎来一审判决。法院裁定广州益海构成合同诈骗罪从犯，但广州益 海对此并不认可，并当庭提出上诉，金龙鱼则表示依法全力支持广州益海上诉。 今日晚间，金龙鱼发布公告，广州益海收到淮北市中级人民法院的《刑事判决书》。一审判决结果 显示，广州益海构成合同诈骗罪，系从犯，判处罚金100万元。对安徽华文国际经贸股份有限公司（下 称"安徽华文"）的经济损失18.81亿元，广州益海与云南惠嘉进出口有限公司（下称"云南惠嘉"）承担 共同退赔责任。 2024年1月12日，金龙鱼曾披露，广州益海被淮北市人民检察院提起公诉。《起诉书》认为，2008 年到2014年期间，广州益海作为中转仓储方，与安徽华文和云南惠嘉签订《中转协议书》，负责储存安 徽华文代理云南惠嘉进口的棕榈油。检查机关认为，广州益海在此期间配合云南惠嘉及其负责人张利华 等人实施合同诈骗犯罪，构成合同诈骗罪的帮助犯。 金龙鱼表示，根据本案开庭时查明的事实，在安徽华文与云南惠嘉违规从事融资性贸易过程中，云 南惠嘉通过长期行贿"被害人"安徽华文高管及员工 ...

穿梭于亚欧大陆的中欧班列，已累计开行近12万列。10多年间，这条"钢铁驼队"从最初单一的跨境物流 通道，到如今"班列+枢纽+产业+贸易"的多元融合生态，"中欧班列+"效应正持续放大，更以铁路大动 脉为纽带，将沿线分散的产业节点紧密串联、高效聚合，催生出一个个特色鲜明的产业集群，为亚欧大 陆架起了联通机遇、共促发展的产业协作新桥梁。 2011年3月19日，首列中欧班列"渝新欧"发出，开启亚欧铁路运输新纪元。"目前，中欧班列已累计开行 近12万列，形成了联通中国境内128个城市，通达欧洲26个国家232个城市以及亚洲11个国家100多个城 市的国际运输网络，为维护国际产业链、供应链稳定，促进全球经济发展发挥了重要作用。"国铁集团 董事长郭竹学说。 在网络延伸的同时，技术赋能让通道效率持续跃升，北斗定位、5G技术与电子施封锁的应用实现货物 全程可视化追踪。霍尔果斯口岸进口货物通行时间从2至3天压缩至16小时内，属地出口货物作业时间缩 短至1小时。高效稳定的物流通道，让内陆地区从开放末梢变为前沿阵地，为产业集群的形成提供了核 心支撑。 "班列+跨境电商""班列+订单农业""班列+绿色制造"等新模式蓬勃发展，不断拓展着 ...

Core Insights - The China-Europe Railway Express has operated nearly 120,000 trains, evolving from a single cross-border logistics channel to a multifaceted ecosystem integrating "trains + hubs + industries + trade" [1] - This railway network connects 128 cities in China with 232 cities in 26 European countries and over 100 cities in 11 Asian countries, playing a crucial role in stabilizing international supply chains and promoting global economic development [1] Group 1 - The application of technologies such as Beidou positioning, 5G, and electronic seals has significantly improved the efficiency of logistics channels, reducing import processing time at the Horgos port from 2-3 days to under 16 hours [2] - New business models like "trains + cross-border e-commerce," "trains + order agriculture," and "trains + green manufacturing" are emerging, expanding the boundaries of industrial integration [2] - The West Xi'an Aijiu Grain and Oil Industrial Group has utilized the China-Europe Railway Express to establish a planting base in Kazakhstan, achieving a precise connection between overseas production and domestic consumption [2] Group 2 - The global expansion of the photovoltaic industry has heightened the demand for supply chain stability, with the China-Europe Railway Express providing a reliable alternative to traditional sea transport, significantly reducing the risk of cargo damage [3] - The launch of the first green cross-border e-commerce train has reduced transportation costs to one-fifth of air freight, promoting the scale development of the cross-border e-commerce industry [3] - Diverse logistics products such as public trains, boutique trains, and customized trains cater to various industrial needs, facilitating efficient circulation of electronic components, auto parts, and smart home products [3] Group 3 - The deep integration of "trains + industries" has led to the emergence of distinctive industrial clusters, with cities like Erenhot and Ulanqab experiencing rapid growth in related services and trade [4] - The China-Europe Railway Express has injected vitality into countries along the route, providing unique opportunities for Bulgaria to develop a regional distribution center that will enhance employment and related industries [4] - The railway not only facilitates logistics but also connects industrial clusters and fosters win-win cooperation among nations [6]

中央气象台11月18日10时继续发布寒潮蓝色预警。面对寒潮对供暖、供电、交通等带来的影响，黑龙江、四川、安徽等地相关部门积极应对，保 障群众正常生产生活秩序。 据当地气象部门预报，大兴安岭地区22日将出现明显降雪天气，国网大兴安岭供电公司提前部署，对3条220千伏林区用电"生命线"进行拉网式排 查。祁伟、曲善新所在小组要赶在降雪之前把最偏远的88公里线路"踩"一遍，确保每一基铁塔都能走到、看到、摸到。 寒潮之下，如何守好百姓"菜篮子""米袋子"？ 新华社北京11月18日电 题：寒潮持续 多地多措并举保民生 新华社记者 18日，黑龙江省大兴安岭地区的天刚放亮，工人们检修作业的声音便从林海雪原深处传来。"铁塔绝缘子、导线无覆冰，运行正常，请记录！"国 网大兴安岭供电公司输电运检工祁伟、曲善新正仔细检查220千伏加多线每一处金具连接点。 "降温键"按下，"温暖模式"开启。 近日，黑龙江省林口县气温骤降，但居民王先生家中却温暖如春。"手机点一点就能调节温度，入冬以来屋里暖乎乎的。"他边说边向记者展示手 机上的"室温调节"界面。 据了解，林口县以"智慧供热"为核心，筑牢冬季供暖保障线。林口盛烨热电有限责任公司智慧供热项 ...

转自：新华财经 近期，兴业银行济南分行成功为山东某粮油企业高效核定国际业务融资额度，助力企业出口业务拓展。 该企业是集花生种植、加工、销售于一体的农业产业化国家重点龙头企业，其产品连续多年出口量全省 第一。近期客户刚完成生产线技术改造，产能进一步扩大，企业急需一笔资金进口巴西花生仁。了解到 客户情况后，兴业银行济南分行"金融特派员"主动上门对接，收集客户资料，对企业的进出口实绩、履 约能力等关键要素进行快速、客观评估，为客户发起积分卡授信审批，仅用时一周便为企业核定1000万 贸易融资额度，解决了企业燃眉之急。企业负责人表示："兴业银行贷款审批简单高效，为我们外贸企 业提供了实实在在的便利。" 一笔笔及时到位的信贷资金，一项项量身打造的金融方案，正成为稳住外贸基本盘的重要力量。兴业银 行济南分行相关负责人表示，将持续加大对外贸企业的支持力度，不断创新金融产品与服务模式，促进 外贸企业高质量稳定增长。（张永华） 编辑：穆皓 为进一步落实国家"稳外贸"政策导向要求，兴业银行总行于2025年5月创新推出"外向型企业积分卡授信 审批方案"。该方案基于外向型企业经营特点、行业地位及特征、财务状况、年度进出口额等因素设置 ...