Group 1 - The core event is the "Hello Boat" cultural cruise along the Yangtze River, which aims to promote tourism and engage users through interactive light and art displays [1][4] - The cruise will cover over 2000 kilometers in approximately 20 days, connecting cities like Chongqing, Yichang, and Shanghai, and is part of the Hello Holiday Carnival [1][4] - The event encourages users to plan their trips in advance and participate in cultural tourism, enhancing the night economy and promoting local attractions [4][8] Group 2 - The "Hello Boat" serves as a mobile landmark for cultural tourism, featuring interactive installations and allowing users to share their hometown stories via the Hello App [4][5] - The initiative is part of Hello's broader strategy to integrate travel and cultural experiences, responding to increased travel demand during the National Day holiday [4][8] - Hello has launched various promotional activities, including discounts and incentives for car rentals and ride-sharing, to enhance user experience and meet diverse travel needs [10][11] Group 3 - The company aims to provide a seamless travel experience by offering a comprehensive range of services, including bike-sharing, ride-hailing, and car rentals, with over 800 million registered users [8][10] - Hello's marketing strategy focuses on user experience and creating real value, addressing the challenges of conventional internet marketing [10] - The anticipated demand for ride-sharing during the National Day period is expected to reach approximately 60 million orders, with the company investing 100 million yuan in incentives to promote shared rides [11]

每经记者｜赵雯琪 每经编辑｜段炼 余婷婷 近日，有媒体报道，有用户在骑行共享单车时遭遇了自动落锁车轮抱死，导致严重摔伤。事情似乎并非个案，有媒体粗略统计，近两年来，网友爆料在骑 行过程中突然落锁的共享单车事故至少41起，涉及多个平台。 9月11日，共享单车品牌青桔单车向《每日经济新闻》记者表示，经核查，涉事车辆存在因车链条有松动造成骑行卡顿的可能，不存在软件技术等问题。 哈啰也回应《每日经济新闻》记者称，技术团队依据用户大数据严谨排查，未发现车辆存在因技术缺陷导致自动落锁的异常。 虽然两家头部企业均否认了"技术缺陷导致自动落锁"的说法，但频发的骑行事故与用户质疑，仍将共享单车的安全问题推至舆论焦点。 图片来源：视觉中国 哈啰、青桔回应：不存在 因技术缺陷导致自动落锁情况 据公开报道，今年8月底，马女士扫码骑上了一辆青桔单车，但没骑几分钟就因突如其来的刹车而措手不及地摔了一跤。医院诊断显示，马女士右脚三处 骨折，双腿软组织挫伤，至少需要休养一个月。 青桔单车回应《每日经济新闻》记者称，接到用户进线后，已在第一时间核实情况，并安排安全专员专项对接事故处理和保险理赔事宜。基于用户反馈的 情况，公司针对涉事的单车进行 ...

正骑着共享单车，突然落锁制动，用户被猛地摔在地上，脚部多处骨折。据报道，骑行中突然落锁的共 享单车涉及多个平台，仅网友爆料的至少41起。今年7月以来，上海仅一个单车平台，针对应锁未锁、 未锁硬锁等问题的相关投诉达到17条。 张悦 目前，全国共享单车的用户数量已经突破6亿。如此庞大的用户基数，意味着每一个看似微小的风险都 可能带来极大的安全隐患。毫无来由的落锁、讳莫如深的平台，悬置的是用户的安全感，也是共享单车 未来的"骑行之路"。 事关用户生命安全，共享单车突然落锁的安全责任不能没有下文。企业该认真寻找落锁原因，仔细查找 单车可能存在的安全隐患。市场监管等部门有必要及时介入，厘清单车落锁的来龙去脉。解锁真相，才 能给共享单车上好"安全锁"。 车子为何突然落锁，平台查查运行数据不就能找出真相？可麻烦就出在这里。在用户看来，自己骑车规 规矩矩，是单车莫名其妙落锁。平台或称后台没有任何涉事单车骑行中落锁的信息，否认用户受伤是自 动落锁导致；或表示与链条卡顿等机械故障有关。网友也开启"侦探"模式，猜测是上一用户在新用户骑 行中突然结束行程所致。 用户不能白白挨摔，落锁原因更不能靠猜。单车落锁到底是哪里出了故障？如果是 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent reports from multiple users indicate that Hello Bike experiences automatic locking during rides, leading to injuries. The company has stated that no technical defects were found to cause this issue, suggesting alternative scenarios for the incidents [1][3][4]. Group 1: User Reports and Reactions - Several users reported incidents of Hello Bike locking unexpectedly while riding, resulting in injuries such as abrasions and falls [3]. - Users expressed dissatisfaction with the platform's response, stating that customer service offered minimal compensation and suggested reporting to the police [3]. Group 2: Company Response and Findings - A representative from Hello Bike stated that a thorough investigation found no technical defects causing automatic locking. They identified three potential scenarios that could lead to such incidents [3][4]. - The identified scenarios include accidental activation of the "return" button, previous users failing to lock the bike properly, and electric assist bikes triggering a power cut when exceeding designated areas [3][4]. Group 3: Technical Explanation - The company explained that the locking mechanism is designed to prevent locking while the bike is in motion, with a speed threshold of 0.5 m/s. The mechanical design ensures that the lock remains in the open position during rides [4]. - Hello Bike is actively optimizing user prompts and upgrading its vehicle safety monitoring system in response to user feedback [4]. Group 4: Company Background - Hello Bike was established in September 2016, initially focusing on shared bicycle services and has since expanded to provide mobility and emerging local services [5].

2025.09. 11 本文字数：1714，阅读时长大约3分钟 作者 | 第一财经 刘晓洁 陆涵之 近日，一则"女子骑共享单车时车辆突然锁死导致摔伤"的消息引发广泛关注。作为超6亿人使用的日 常出行工具，共享单车的安全问题再次被推到舆论中心。 第一财经就此事向滴滴青桔与哈啰单车进行询问，两家企业均回应称，经排查未发现软件或技术漏 洞，推测事故原因可能包括链条故障、用户误触还车按钮等场景。截至目前尚无消息披露第三方检测 机构介入。 据了解，共享单车具备远程锁车功能，但哈啰方面表示，其系统设定当车速高于0.5m/s时不执行锁车 指令，仅在近乎停车的状态下才会响应用户操作。 自动落锁事件甚至可以追溯到2021年，在黑猫投诉平台，记者发现，2021年9月就有一个投诉称，在 哈啰单车骑行过程中，车辆自动落锁，导致急停，骑行者因惯性摔伤。 从这些事件来看，共享单车自动落锁的隐患是长期存在的。 不过，企业平台方均坚持认为，并不存在技术问题。滴滴青桔对第一财经记者表示，基于用户反馈的 情况，公司针对涉事的单车进行了硬件和软件的并行检查。经核查，涉事车辆存在因车链条有松动造 成骑行卡顿的可能，不存在软件技术等问题。滴滴青桔表示 ...

Core Viewpoint - The safety issues surrounding shared bicycles, particularly the automatic locking feature, have come under scrutiny following incidents of users being injured due to sudden lock-ups while riding [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Reports - A recent incident involved a woman who suffered multiple fractures after a shared bicycle suddenly locked while in motion, with the platform indicating no automatic lock records were found [2][5]. - Similar incidents have been reported on social media, with users from various brands, including Hello and Meituan, sharing experiences of unexpected lock-ups leading to injuries [3][5]. - Historical complaints date back to 2021, indicating that the issue of automatic locking has been a persistent concern among users [3][5]. Group 2: Company Responses - Both Didi Qingju and Hello have stated that their investigations found no software or technical faults, attributing incidents to potential chain malfunctions or user errors [1][5]. - Hello's system is designed to prevent locking when the bicycle is moving above 0.5 m/s, and they assert that the locking mechanism is not triggered during normal riding conditions [6][5]. - The companies emphasize that user feedback and data analysis have not revealed any technical defects leading to automatic locking incidents [5][6]. Group 3: Industry Concerns - The automatic locking feature is intended to prevent users from forgetting to lock the bicycles after use, but there is inconsistency in how long a bicycle remains unlocked before it automatically locks [7]. - The safety of shared bicycles is a significant public concern, with over 600 million users reported in China, and the need for reliable safety mechanisms is critical [7]. - There are calls for the introduction of third-party testing and government oversight to address public concerns and resolve the discrepancies between user reports and company claims [7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to strengthen antitrust measures and promote fair competition policies as an inherent requirement for improving the socialist market economy system [1] - During the 2025 China Fair Competition Policy Promotion Week, the Supreme People's Court released five typical antitrust cases to clarify and standardize the rules for antitrust adjudication, providing clearer behavioral guidelines for various enterprises [2][4] - The Supreme People's Court's ruling against exclusive operating rights granted to a specific company in the shared electric bike sector highlights the violation of antitrust laws and the importance of maintaining fair competition [3][4] Group 2 - The case regarding the cement association's horizontal monopoly agreement illustrates the potential for industry associations to engage in monopolistic behavior, prompting the need for clear boundaries in their operations [5][6] - The Supreme People's Court's decision in the cement association case reinforces the prohibition of industry associations from facilitating monopolistic agreements among their members [6] - The ruling clarifies that industry associations must operate within legal frameworks and cannot manipulate prices or undermine fair competition [6] Group 3 - A significant ruling addressed the rights of victims of horizontal monopolistic agreements, establishing that damages can be claimed even when contracts were signed during the period of monopolistic behavior [7][8] - The court determined that the price increases during the contract period were a result of the monopolistic agreement, allowing for the presumption of damages suffered by the victim [8] - The ruling also clarified the burden of proof regarding claims of price increases due to non-monopolistic factors, placing the onus on the monopolistic entity to provide evidence [8]

共享单车远程落锁，本意是帮忘锁的用户代关。但技术一掉链子，便利就成安全隐患。主板故障会锁， 弱网环境会锁，甚至骑久了也可能被判定"恶意占用"而锁。这些漏洞不堵，谁骑车都得提心吊胆。更何 况，用户说"落锁急停"，平台称"查无记录"，安全账岂能各算各的？关乎千万人的出行安全，容不得半 点侥幸。监管部门该出手了，把远程落锁的账算明白，为用户安全托底。 袁媛/文 张永文/图 近日，有市民向媒体反映，在骑行共享单车时，遭遇自动落锁车轮抱死，致使严重摔伤。据调查，类似 情况在多个城市发生，涉及数个共享单车平台。 ...

最高人民法院10日发布5件反垄断典型案例，涉及滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为，固定商品价格及 分割销售市场的横向垄断行为以及行业协会组织本行业的经营者从事垄断行为等重要法律问题，涵盖交 通、建材、原料药、化工等民生行业。 "共享电单车"滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争案是最高法首例认定滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争的案件。 互联网租赁自行车服务提供商青某公司，以某行政审批局、某市大数据中心在该市违法设定并实施共享 电单车特许经营，构成滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争为由，提起行政诉讼，请求撤销被诉具体行政行 为。最高法二审认为，某行政审批局在该市共享电单车领域设定特许经营权，缺乏法律依据，超越职权 范围，且在案证据不足以证明撤销被诉行为会损害国家利益和社会公共利益，判决撤销被诉行政行为。 （文章来源：人民日报） ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Hello Bike, responded to recent reports regarding user injuries caused by automatic locking of shared bicycles, asserting that their technical team found no evidence of technical defects leading to such incidents [1] Group 1: Technical Response - Hello Bike's hardware logic for bike locks states that as long as the riding speed is above 0.5 m/s, the lock will not execute a locking command, only doing so when the bike comes to a complete stop [1] - The company identified potential causes for the locking issue, including users not closing the lock page while riding, accidental touches on the "return" button, and situations where a previous user did not lock the bike before the next user began riding [1]