Workflow
大豆种植
icon
Search documents
拿不到中国购买协议,美国部长不想服软:中国买大豆才是麻烦事?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-24 05:18
Core Viewpoint - The upcoming US-China trade negotiations are expected to focus on various issues, with rare earths being a central topic, while US soybean farmers are primarily concerned about soybean orders from China [1][4]. Group 1: Current Situation of US Soybean Farmers - US soybean farmers are facing significant challenges as China has not placed any orders for US soybeans, partly due to China's shift to alternative markets like Brazil and Argentina [3][6]. - The US government, under Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, has indicated that if China were to place soybean orders, it could create complications, suggesting a complex dynamic in the negotiations [4][6]. - Farmers are increasingly frustrated with reliance on government subsidies, which are seen as a temporary fix rather than a long-term solution to their market access issues [6][10]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Alternatives - The entry of Argentina into the soybean market, particularly with its zero-tariff policy, has complicated US negotiations, as US farmers feel disadvantaged [3][7]. - The US government is actively seeking alternative markets to reduce dependence on China, but efforts to sell soybeans to countries like Japan, India, and the UK have not yielded significant results [9][10]. - The core issue remains that US farmers need access to the Chinese market, as no other market can match China's demand for soybeans [9][10]. Group 3: Government Response and Future Outlook - The US government's approach appears to prioritize reducing reliance on China rather than addressing the immediate needs of soybean farmers, leading to concerns about long-term market opportunities [10][12]. - Farmers are anxious about their unsold soybeans and the lack of effective government action to resolve the situation, highlighting a disconnect between farmer needs and government policy [12].
从被做局到如今一粒不买:中国停购美国大豆背后,局面为何反转?
首席商业评论· 2025-10-24 04:07
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the severe impact of China's halt in purchasing U.S. soybeans, leading to a crisis for American soybean farmers, despite record-high production levels. This situation is exacerbated by the historical context of U.S.-China trade relations and the strategic shifts in China's agricultural policies [5][7][9]. Group 1: Current Situation of U.S. Soybean Farmers - U.S. soybean production has reached a historical high, yet farmers face a "devastating blow" due to a lack of export orders, particularly from China, which has not placed any orders for the first time in nearly 20 years [5][7]. - In North Dakota, 70% of soybean storage facilities are full, leading to temporary outdoor storage and increased risk of spoilage, with insurance claims exceeding $500 million due to unsold soybeans [6][9]. - The absence of Chinese orders, which typically account for over 50% of U.S. soybean exports, has left farmers in a dire financial situation, struggling to repay loans taken against their crops [9][12]. Group 2: Historical Context and Trade Dynamics - The article outlines the historical shift of China from a soybean exporter to the largest importer, driven by U.S. agricultural policies and the introduction of genetically modified soybeans [14][18]. - The U.S. soybean industry has been heavily reliant on the Chinese market, with average annual imports from China supporting over 200,000 jobs in the Midwest [29][30]. - The trade tensions initiated by the Trump administration, including tariffs on Chinese goods, have led to retaliatory measures from China, significantly reducing U.S. soybean competitiveness [23][30]. Group 3: China's Strategic Response - China has been actively working to reduce its dependency on U.S. soybeans by diversifying its import sources, including increasing purchases from Brazil and Argentina, which offer lower prices and favorable tariffs [25][28]. - The Chinese government has implemented policies to boost domestic soybean production and reduce reliance on imported genetically modified soybeans, with plans to increase planting areas significantly [22][20]. - As of 2025, Brazil has become the largest supplier of soybeans to China, capturing 71.6% of the market share, while U.S. exports have plummeted to 12% [25][28].
美国大豆被清零,特朗普称愿降低关税,但中国需“回报”做三件事
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-21 11:50
Core Points - The ongoing trade tensions between the US and China have severely impacted US soybean exports, with exports to China dropping to zero in September 2023, marking the first time since 2018 that such a decline has occurred [2][5] - The US soybean market has been significantly affected, with exports to China falling to 21.8 million bushels from January to August 2023, a substantial decrease compared to the previous year [2][9] - The US government has previously provided subsidies to farmers, but there is a growing urgency for a trade agreement to restore soybean purchases from China [5][9] Trade Dynamics - China has shifted its soybean imports to countries like Argentina and Brazil, purchasing 2 million tons from Argentina and significantly increasing imports from Brazil [4][9] - The US soybean prices have plummeted, leading farmers to rely on government subsidies for survival [4][5] - The overall agricultural exports from the US to China have decreased by 53%, with soybeans being the most affected commodity [2][4] Policy Responses - President Trump has indicated a willingness to lower tariffs on Chinese goods, contingent upon China meeting three conditions: resuming soybean imports, controlling fentanyl trafficking, and not restricting rare earth exports [7][11] - The US has implemented a series of tariffs, with the total rate reaching as high as 55%, which has prompted retaliatory measures from China [2][5] - The US administration is facing pressure from domestic farmers and the economy, as the trade war has led to increased manufacturing costs and consumer prices [7][11] Future Outlook - The ongoing negotiations between the US and China may lead to a potential breakthrough, with discussions around increasing soybean purchases and tariff adjustments [7][11] - The core issues of technology competition and geopolitical tensions remain unresolved, indicating that the trade conflict is likely to persist [9][11] - The US agricultural sector's vulnerability has been exposed, necessitating a search for new markets to compensate for the loss of Chinese demand [9]
中国9月未从美国进口大豆
券商中国· 2025-10-20 15:28
Core Insights - In September 2023, China did not import any soybeans from the United States for the first time since November 2018, marking a significant shift in trade dynamics [1] - China, the world's largest soybean importer, is increasing its purchases from South American countries, particularly Brazil and Argentina, to replace U.S. soybeans [1] - From January to September 2023, China imported 63.7 million tons of soybeans from Brazil, a year-on-year increase of 2.4%, and 2.9 million tons from Argentina, a year-on-year increase of 31.8% [1] Import Data - In the first nine months of 2025, China imported a total of approximately 12.01 billion USD worth of soybeans, with significant contributions from Brazil [2] - The import figures from Brazil for the same period include various monthly totals, indicating a consistent and high volume of soybean imports [2] Market Impact - If U.S.-China trade negotiations do not yield breakthroughs, U.S. farmers may face billions of dollars in losses due to the ongoing shift in soybean purchases to South America [3] - There is growing dissatisfaction among U.S. farmers as they deal with declining soybean prices and are awaiting government assistance, which is currently stalled due to a government shutdown [3]
美国大豆滞销之后,东南亚接盘却出了乱子?
Hu Xiu· 2025-10-20 04:07
Core Insights - The U.S. is attempting to shift the soybean crisis to Southeast Asia, pressuring Indonesia and Vietnam to take over the supply [1] - Vietnam's livestock industry is suffering due to excessive impurities and pesticide residues in soybeans [1] - Indonesia faces economic losses due to heavy metal contamination in soybean oil cake [1] - Drought conditions in the U.S. Midwest are exacerbating delivery delays, putting Southeast Asian livestock industries in a difficult position [1]
中国反制美国大豆,特朗普破防怒发小作文,引美国资本市场遭震荡
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-19 15:06
Core Viewpoint - The recent adjustments in China's soybean procurement from the U.S. have caused significant concern for the Trump administration, leading to market volatility, highlighting the strategic depth of the ongoing U.S.-China trade conflict [1][3][21] Group 1: China's Countermeasures - China's countermeasures have been targeted, starting with special port fees on U.S. vessels, increasing operational costs for American shipping companies [3] - The introduction of rare earth export controls directly impacts U.S. high-end industries, as over 90% of U.S. rare earth needs are met through imports [3] - The combination of these measures has led to panic in the U.S., with significant market repercussions, including a chaotic stock market response [3][5] Group 2: U.S. Response and Market Implications - Trump's reaction to China's soybean procurement changes has been notably intense, indicating deeper implications beyond just agricultural interests [5][7] - The U.S. soybean market is currently facing an oversupply due to reduced Chinese purchases, disrupting the usual price signals in the futures market [13] - Speculation arises that Trump's family may be positioned to profit from these market fluctuations, suggesting a financial motive behind his public statements [13][19] Group 3: Broader Economic Impact - The ongoing trade conflict is not merely a dispute over agricultural products but reflects a broader struggle over industrial security and financial stability between the two nations [21] - Trump's public comments risk undermining the stability of U.S. financial markets, which are crucial for the credibility of the dollar [19] - The strategic nature of China's countermeasures demonstrates a calculated approach to target vulnerabilities in the U.S. economy, indicating a sophisticated level of economic warfare [21]
中国停购后,美豆农损失惨重,特朗普发文威胁,要终止食用油贸易
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-17 04:38
Core Insights - The article highlights the stark contrast between the media's portrayal of a "bumper harvest" for U.S. soybean farmers and the grim reality of unsold crops and significant financial losses due to a lack of Chinese demand [1][10]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - U.S. soybean exports for the fiscal year 2024 are projected at $24.58 billion, with over half, approximately $12.64 billion, coming from China [3]. - Historically, September to January is a critical period for Chinese soybean purchases, typically accounting for 8% to 9% of U.S. soybean exports, but this year has seen no purchases during this timeframe [5]. - If China does not resume purchases by mid-November, the U.S. could face a shortfall of 14 to 16 million tons in orders, a significant concern for the industry [8]. Group 2: Financial Struggles of Farmers - Farmers are experiencing severe financial distress, with losses of $120 per acre for soybeans and $220 per acre for corn, leading to annual losses exceeding $50,000 for medium-sized farms [10]. - The number of small business bankruptcy filings by farmers has reached a five-year high, with 259 farm bankruptcies projected from April 2024 to March 2025, doubling from the previous year [11]. Group 3: Government Response and Market Strategy - The U.S. government's response to the loss of the Chinese market has been criticized as ineffective, with strategies like "global marketing" failing to compensate for the loss of Chinese demand [11]. - The USDA's announcement of soybean transactions with "unknown buyers" has been met with skepticism, as it appears to be an attempt to mask the lack of substantial sales [13]. Group 4: Long-term Market Position - The competitiveness of U.S. soybeans in the global market has significantly declined, with South American suppliers increasingly dominating the market, shipping over 40 vessels monthly to China [19]. - The article suggests that the current crisis is benefiting wealthy individuals who are acquiring farmland at low prices, while the number of farms in the U.S. has decreased by 7% since 2017 [17].
从大豆到食用油,怎么回事
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-16 07:50
Core Viewpoint - The U.S. is considering stopping imports of edible oil from China as a retaliatory measure against China's reduced purchases of U.S. soybeans, which could lead to a loss of 16 million tons of soybean orders for the U.S. [1] Group 1: U.S.-China Trade Dynamics - The U.S. claims that China's refusal to buy American soybeans is causing difficulties for U.S. soybean farmers, prompting the consideration of halting edible oil imports from China [1] - China is the world's largest consumer of edible oil, making the U.S. strategy of stopping imports a complex issue [1] - In 2024, China's exports of edible oil to the U.S. are projected to be around 4,000 tons, valued at approximately $1 million, indicating limited impact on China's edible oil industry if the U.S. halts imports [4] Group 2: Nature of U.S. Imports from China - The U.S. primarily imports waste cooking oil from China, which is processed for use as biodiesel and other renewable energy sources, rather than traditional edible oils [5][6] - In 2024, China is expected to export over 1 million tons of waste cooking oil to the U.S., valued at over $1 billion, highlighting the significance of this trade [6] Group 3: Impact on U.S. Soybean Farmers - The U.S. soybean export structure is heavily reliant on whole soybeans, with 78% of exports being whole beans, while soybean meal and oil account for only 21% and 1%, respectively [13] - The reduction in Chinese purchases could create a significant gap in the U.S. soybean market, as China is the primary buyer of U.S. whole soybeans [13][15] - U.S. farmers are facing challenges in finding alternative markets for their soybeans, leading to price declines and a difficult situation for the agricultural sector [18]
Trump threatens China with cooking oil embargo as soybean spat escalates
Yahoo Finance· 2025-10-15 09:30
Core Points - The U.S. President has labeled China as "economically hostile" due to its refusal to purchase American soybeans, which has led to threats of halting imports of cooking oil and other products from China as retaliation [1][2] - The U.S. administration is considering terminating business relations with China regarding cooking oil and other trade elements, emphasizing the capability to produce cooking oil domestically [3] - China's recent export controls on rare earth elements have prompted a significant escalation in trade tensions, leading to increased tariffs on imports from China [5][6] Industry Impact - Soybeans are a critical agricultural product in the U.S., with cooking oil being one of the main derivatives, alongside animal feed [4] - The U.S. primarily imports cooking oil from Canada, but China is a significant supplier of used cooking oil (UCO) for biofuels, indicating a potential disruption in the biofuel supply chain due to trade tensions [4] - The demand for used cooking oil in the U.S. has surged, particularly as the previous administration aimed to support green transportation initiatives [7]
美国丢失中国大豆订单,又遭稀土领域重击,渐渐不支!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-14 08:55
Group 1 - The core viewpoint highlights China's strengthened control over rare earth resources, leading to a significant shift in the U.S. administration's approach, from aggressive tariffs to a more conciliatory stance [2] - Since May, China has ceased purchasing U.S. soybeans, potentially resulting in a loss of 14 to 16 million tons for the U.S., which could negatively impact support for the Trump administration [4] - The U.S. continues to impose tariffs but faces strong resistance from China, leading to a situation where the U.S. is increasingly on the defensive as the soybean harvest approaches [5] Group 2 - China has implemented a series of strategic measures to deter U.S. aggression, including showcasing advanced military capabilities and tightening controls over rare earth resources, which are crucial for the U.S. military industry [5] - The combination of tariff strategies, refusal to purchase U.S. soybeans, and the rare earth strategy is designed to provoke the U.S., gradually exhaust its resources, and compel it to compromise with minimal costs [7]