平安基金在主动权益和被动指数领域同样布局深远。其中，主动权益产品建立了全市场选股、主题赛 道、指数增强和绝对收益四大系列的三级目录体系，积极把握市场机遇。特别是在港股投资上，平安基 金携手平安资产管理（香港），推出了覆盖红利、科技、医药、成长等多策略的产品线，充分利用港股 市场估值洼地和高股息率优势。 在ETF赛道，平安基金则展现出创新基因，产品线覆盖宽基、行业主题、债券、策略、境外指数及指数 增强六大类，并推出国内多个"首只"产品，如首只新能源汽车主题ETF、首只人工智能主题ETF等，为 投资者提供了高效、透明的市场工具。 此外，平安基金还创新性地推出"FOF固收+"产品，通过基金中的基金模式进行二次分散风险，并将资 产配置范围扩展至全球股票、债券、商品等多类资产，策略标签涵盖红利、美股等。进入2026年，平安 基金还规划推出由权益与固收部门协同管理的"工具型固收+"，聚焦红利、科技、周期、量化四大清晰 赛道，力求在严控回撤的基础上增强收益弹性。 本报讯 （记者昌校宇）1月7日，以"正启新程"为主题的平安基金2026年投资策略会在深圳举行。平安 基金产品研发部总经理谢娜在做《多团队、多风格、多策略——平安基 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese economy is transitioning from high-speed growth to high-quality development, with public funds playing a crucial role in supporting the real economy and stabilizing the market [1] Group 1: Strategic Positioning of Fund Companies - The development landscape of public funds will further optimize, with a clear differentiation between large comprehensive fund companies and small specialized fund companies [1][2] - Large fund companies will focus on being "big and comprehensive," while small fund companies will adopt a "small and beautiful" strategy [1] Group 2: Industry Structure and Trends - The public fund industry will continue to concentrate towards the top, highlighting a "Matthew Effect" where strong companies become stronger [2] - Large fund companies will benefit from brand effects, research resources, and sales channels, leading to increased concentration in equity and index products [2] Group 3: Development Strategies for Comprehensive Fund Companies - Comprehensive fund companies should maintain their strengths while expanding into other product types, as demonstrated by E Fund and Huaxia Fund, which have seen significant growth in non-monetary management scale [3] - E Fund's non-monetary scale growth rate is approximately 79% since the end of 2020, while Huaxia Fund's growth rate is around 147% [3] Group 4: Development Strategies for Specialized Fund Companies - Small fund companies should pursue differentiated development strategies, focusing on their unique strengths, as seen with Guojin Fund and Pengyang Fund [4] - Guojin Fund's non-monetary management scale grew from 10.2 billion to 37.2 billion, a 265% increase, by focusing on quantitative and fixed-income investments [4] Group 5: Research and Investment System Construction - Strengthening research and investment capabilities is essential for fund companies to enhance investor returns, with a push towards a "platform-based, integrated, multi-strategy" research system [5] - Fund companies are shifting from relying on star fund managers to building a comprehensive research brand [6] Group 6: Enhancing Efficiency through AI - Talent development is crucial for fund companies' core competitiveness, with a focus on long-term assessment and a robust training system [7] - Employee stock ownership plans are still in early stages in China, and enhancing these plans can improve team stability and operational efficiency [8] - AI is becoming essential for optimizing workflows, enhancing customer experiences, and improving investment performance across the entire business chain of fund companies [9]

2025.11.20 本文字数：2770，阅读时长大约4分钟 作者 |第一财经 曹璐 A股震荡上行催动资金入场，公募基金发行市场强势复苏，但"冰火两重天"的分化格局亦同步加剧。 Wind数据显示，截至11月19日，今年新发基金达1332只，创近三年新高，一扫过去三年连降阴霾。市 场热度肉眼可见，不仅新基金平均认购周期大幅缩短，"日光基"与"小爆款"也频频出现。 然而，繁荣景象之下，行业"贫富差距"正急剧拉大。发行资源高度向头部集中，富国、南方、易方达、 华夏四大基金公司年内狂揽近2000亿规模；与之形成鲜明对比的是，多家中小机构面临发行数量少、发 行规模小的困境，更有34家机构甚至一基未发。 站在年末关口，机构已将目光投向跨年以及明年的布局计划，含权产品成中大型机构的共同选择， ETF、"固收+"以及主动权益产品构成产品规划的"三驾马车"，同时，部分中型公司则倾向于在细分赛 道寻求差异化突破。 新发复苏背后分化加剧 市场热度回升直接体现在募集周期的大幅缩短，甚至频频出现"日光基"。据第一财经计算，今年以来新 基金的平均认购天数为16天，较去年同期的23.31天缩短超7天，效率提升显著。截至目前，年内已有 37 ...

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing a rebound, leading to a significant recovery in the public fund issuance market, but a stark disparity is emerging between large and small fund companies [4][5]. Group 1: Fund Issuance Recovery - As of November 19, 2023, a total of 1,332 public funds have been issued this year, with a total issuance scale exceeding 1.03 trillion units, marking a three-year high and reversing the previous downward trend [5][8]. - The average subscription period for new funds has decreased significantly to 16 days, down from 23.31 days last year, indicating improved efficiency in fund raising [7][8]. - Notably, 379 new products have announced early closure of subscriptions, with several actively managed equity funds selling out on the first day, such as the招商均衡优选, which raised over 8.7 billion yuan on its first day [7][8]. Group 2: Market Disparity - The recovery in the market is increasingly benefiting large fund companies, with the top four firms collectively raising over 194.5 billion yuan, accounting for 18.33% of the total issuance [8][9]. - In contrast, many small and medium-sized firms are struggling, with 61 companies issuing fewer than five new funds this year, and 34 firms not issuing any new products at all [8][9]. - The survival space for smaller institutions is shrinking, with 39 firms raising less than 1 billion yuan in total this year, highlighting the growing divide in the industry [8][9]. Group 3: Future Investment Strategies - Large and medium-sized institutions are focusing on "rights-containing" products, with ETFs, "fixed income plus," and actively managed equity products being the main components of their investment strategies [10][11]. - There is a consensus among large institutions to maintain a diversified product matrix to capture various market opportunities, avoiding over-reliance on any single product type [10][11]. - Medium-sized firms are also seeking differentiation by focusing on less crowded, high-growth potential segments while ensuring stable growth across different market conditions [11][12].

A股震荡上行催动资金入场，公募基金发行市场强势复苏，但"冰火两重天"的分化格局亦同步加剧。 Wind数据显示，截至11月19日，今年新发基金达1332只，创近三年新高，一扫过去三年连降阴霾。市场热度肉眼可见，不仅新基金平均认购周期 大幅缩短，"日光基"与"小爆款"也频频出现。 然而，繁荣景象之下，行业"贫富差距"正急剧拉大。发行资源高度向头部集中，富国、南方、易方达、华夏四大基金公司年内狂揽近2000亿规 模；与之形成鲜明对比的是，多家中小机构面临发行数量少、发行规模小的困境，更有34家机构甚至一基未发。 站在年末关口，机构已将目光投向跨年以及明年的布局计划，含权产品成中大型机构的共同选择，ETF、"固收+"以及主动权益产品构成产品规 划的"三驾马车"，同时，部分中型公司则倾向于在细分赛道寻求差异化突破。 撕裂的发行市场：4家狂揽近2000亿，34家却吃下"零蛋" 新发复苏背后分化加剧 伴随A股市场震荡上行，资金入场意愿显著增强，公募基金发行市场同步迎来复苏态势。Wind数据显示，截至11月19日，以基金成立日来计算， 今年以来全市场共计发行公募基金1332只（仅计算初始基金，下同），合计发行规模突破1.03 ...

Core Insights - The number of technology-themed fund applications has surged significantly in 2023, with 106 funds reported as of September 5, compared to 19 in the same period last year, marking a 4.6-fold increase [3][4] - The increase in fund applications is attributed to a combination of policy support, market performance, and sector earnings, making the technology sector a key area for both long-term value and short-term gains [4][5] Fund Application Trends - Among the 106 technology-themed funds, 64 are stock index funds, with 44 being ETFs, representing over 60% of the total applications [4] - The applications include 22 actively managed equity products aimed at capturing excess returns in the tech sector, 15 bond index funds for fixed-income investments, 4 QDII funds, and 1 REIT [4] Participating Institutions - A total of 50 fund managers are involved in the surge of technology-themed fund applications, with notable contributions from Huatai-PineBridge, which applied for 7 funds, and other firms like E Fund and China Merchants Fund applying for 5 each [4] Investment Focus - The technology sector is seen as a core path to share in China's technological development dividends, especially with the ongoing support from national innovation-driven development strategies [5] - The TMT sector has shown high profit growth, with significant innovations in AI, robotics, new energy vehicles, and innovative pharmaceuticals, indicating a new economic cycle [5] Research and Development Investments - Several fund companies are enhancing their investment research capabilities and product offerings in the tech sector, aiming to build a "technology investment army" [6] - For instance, Bosera Fund has established a dedicated research team for tech investments since before the establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, focusing on sectors like TMT, new energy, and biomedicine [6] Strategic Focus Areas - Fund companies are diversifying their technology investment strategies, with a focus on both "hard tech" (like semiconductors and advanced manufacturing) and "soft power" (like AI and biomedicine) [7] - Southern Fund emphasizes technology finance as a core strategy, enhancing research on strategic emerging industries and developing specialized tech-themed products [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the fundamental shift in international investors' asset allocation strategies towards China, driven by the upcoming interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve and increasing global geopolitical uncertainties [1][2]. Group 1: Foreign Investment Trends in China - Foreign investors are actively diversifying their sources of returns, with a growing willingness to allocate funds to A-shares in China [1][2]. - The long-term resilience of the Chinese economy, the valuation advantages of A-shares compared to mature markets, and the ongoing deepening of China's capital market opening policies are key factors supporting the increased foreign investment in A-shares [2][3]. - The Shanghai Composite Index has risen over 10% in the past two months, indicating a structural market trend that enhances the attractiveness of A-shares to foreign capital [2]. Group 2: Investment Focus Areas - The investment research team has identified three main focus areas: 1. Technology innovation sectors, particularly artificial intelligence, to capitalize on global tech trends [3]. 2. High-quality dividend assets in a low-interest-rate environment, emphasizing stable cash flow and high dividend capabilities [3]. 3. Opportunities arising from Chinese companies expanding overseas and the rapid rise of new consumption [3]. Group 3: Strategic Development in China - Fidelity has consistently viewed China as a core strategic market since entering in 2017, making steady progress in client accumulation, channel construction, team building, and product layout [4]. - The company plans to leverage its strengths through three core strategies: 1. Emphasizing the value of active management amidst the growing trend of passive investment [5]. 2. Utilizing its experience in North American pension investments to enhance domestic market offerings [5]. 3. Capitalizing on its global network to explore cross-border investment opportunities and provide comprehensive investment services [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of fund managers "dodging the bull market" amidst a strong market rally, highlighting the challenges faced by active equity products in outperforming indices despite a high percentage of positive returns [1][4]. Group 1: Fund Performance - As of August 29, 98.48% of active equity products recorded positive returns, yet 68 funds underperformed, indicating a mismatch between fund strategies and market trends [2][4]. - The A-share and Hong Kong markets have shown significant structural characteristics, with sectors like innovative drugs, humanoid robots, and artificial intelligence performing well, while others like coal and retail have lagged [4][5]. Group 2: Investment Strategy - Funds that did not align their holdings with market hotspots faced severe "missed opportunities," with some managers adhering strictly to their investment themes, such as coal or high-dividend stocks, leading to underperformance [5][6]. - High cash positions during market uptrends can result in underperformance, as seen with several funds maintaining low positions despite rising indices [5][6]. Group 3: Future Opportunities - Analysts suggest that the previously overlooked dividend and consumer sectors may become new focal points for investment as they offer stability amidst market volatility [8][9]. - The "self-pleasing consumption" trend is gaining traction, driven by changing consumer behaviors and preferences, indicating potential growth in related markets [9][10]. Group 4: Market Dynamics - The article notes that as new high-growth stocks emerge, there may be a valuation reassessment, leading to increased market volatility [8][9]. - The current market environment is seen as suitable for dividend stocks, which can provide a safety net for investors amid fluctuations [8][9].

Core Insights - The A-share market has been performing strongly, with major indices rising and trading volumes exceeding 2 trillion yuan on multiple days, while quantitative index products have faced challenges in outperforming the market [2][3] Group 1: Market Performance - The CSI 500 index rose by 3.88% and 3.87% over two weeks, while the CSI 1000 index increased by 4.09% and 3.45% during the same periods [2] - Notably, many quantitative private equity products have reported negative excess returns, with only a few outperforming their respective indices [2][3] Group 2: Shift in Investment Strategies - Investors are increasingly reallocating funds from quantitative products to actively managed equity products, with some private equity managers also increasing their exposure to aggressive active strategies [4] - A survey revealed that individual investors are planning to redeem profits from quantitative products to invest in subjective products, with some reporting significant gains from recent investments [4] Group 3: Performance Comparison - Active equity products have shown remarkable performance, with some private equity products returning nearly 14% and over 10% in net asset value increases during specific periods [3] - Since late June, several private equity products have seen net value increases exceeding 30%, significantly outperforming quantitative products [3] Group 4: Future Trends - The market environment is shifting, with a growing belief that both subjective and quantitative strategies have their advantages, and a trend towards combining both approaches is emerging [8] - The integration of subjective and quantitative strategies may represent a future direction for the asset management industry, as firms seek to leverage the strengths of both methodologies [8]

Core Insights - The A-share market has been performing strongly, leading to a notable shift in investor preferences from quantitative products to actively managed equity products [1][2][3] - Quantitative products, which aim to track indices while generating excess returns, have recently struggled to outperform the market, resulting in a phenomenon of "negative excess returns" [2][4] - In contrast, actively managed products have seen significant returns, with some private equity funds reporting returns close to 14% in mid-August [2][5] Market Performance - Major indices in the A-share market have risen, with the CSI 500 and CSI 1000 indices increasing by 3.88% and 4.09% respectively from August 11 to August 15 [1] - Quantitative private equity products have largely underperformed, with a notable example showing returns of only 1.56% and 0.98% for the same period [1][2] Investor Behavior - Investors are increasingly reallocating their funds from quantitative products to actively managed products, with some private investors planning to redeem their quantitative investments [3][4] - FOF fund managers are also reducing their allocation to quantitative strategies in favor of more aggressive active products, reflecting a broader trend in investment strategy [3][4] Strategy Shift - The shift in investor sentiment is supported by data indicating a decline in the proportion of aggressive quantitative products, which fell from 46% in July to 36% in August [4] - The active management strategy is regaining prominence as market conditions become more favorable for its application, with many actively managed products reporting gains exceeding 30% since late June [2][4] Comparative Analysis - Both quantitative and active management strategies have their respective advantages, with quantitative strategies relying on strict models and data, while active management focuses on fundamental analysis and market timing [5][6] - The integration of both strategies is emerging as a potential future direction for asset management, as firms seek to combine the strengths of quantitative and subjective approaches [6]