工业旅游新体验 沉浸式感受"大国重器" 记者跟随参观人群的脚步，走进江南造船展示馆大厅，一面满载造船发展历程的照片墙，格外引人注目，上面挂满了由江南造船自主制造交付的各类 船舶照片。从古老的木船模型到现代的高科技船舶设计图，每一幅照片都诉说着造船人的故事。孩子们听着讲解，不时提问，饶有兴趣。 在这个国庆中秋假期，工业旅游也掀起热潮。位于上海崇明长兴岛上的江南造船工业旅游基地，在假期期间吸引了众多亲子家庭和研学团队。 当旅游打卡点来到巨型龙门吊下，当书本上的万吨巨轮呈现眼前，是一种怎样的体验呢？我们一起跟随记者镜头，去这家拥有着160年历史的"中国第 一厂"，感受大国重器的独特魅力。 国庆期间，在徐汇滨江，曾经的工业"锈带"经过精心地规划与改造，变身为被赋予全新城市功能的生活"秀带"，焕发出全新的活力，成为这座城市的 新客厅。 总台记者 肖冰毅：现在就在位于上海徐汇滨江的西岸梦中心，昔日的工业厂房被精心设计打造成了艺术中心、剧院舞台、潮流街区、运动场所，国 庆期间吸引着全国各地的游客来到这里打卡。 跟随观光车，研学师生们踏上了江南造船的码头。伴随着生产现场机器的轰鸣声，在巨型龙门吊下，正在船坞内紧张建造的大型集 ...

Core Insights - China's shipbuilding industry is a global leader, dominating both in terms of output and order volume, with a completion volume of 46.4 million deadweight tons, accounting for 56.7% of the global total in 2024 [2][3] - Jiangsu province is a significant contributor, with its shipbuilding industry achieving a completion volume of 22.8 million deadweight tons, representing nearly half of China's total [3][5] - The city of Jingjiang in Jiangsu has emerged as a powerhouse, surpassing Japan's entire shipbuilding industry in order volume, securing 22.9 million deadweight tons in new orders in 2024 [5][6] Industry Overview - In 2024, global shipbuilding completion volume reached 81.86 million deadweight tons, with China contributing 46.4 million deadweight tons [2] - Chinese shipyards received 76.2% of the global new orders, totaling 115.93 million deadweight tons [2] - The backlog of unfulfilled orders in the global shipbuilding industry stands at 28.82 million deadweight tons, with China holding 57% of this volume [2] Regional Insights - Jiangsu province's shipbuilding industry is characterized by significant output, with Jingjiang leading the way, completing 906.9 thousand deadweight tons in 2024 [3][5] - Jingjiang's shipbuilding sector has captured one-fifth of China's orders and one-tenth of global orders, highlighting its competitive edge [5][6] - The strategic location of Jiangsu along the Yangtze River provides logistical advantages that bolster its shipbuilding capabilities [33][34] Historical Context - The evolution of the global shipbuilding industry has seen shifts in leadership, with the U.S. dominating during WWII, followed by Japan and South Korea's rise in the latter half of the 20th century [7][18] - China's entry into the global shipbuilding market began in the late 1970s, facing significant technological and capital challenges compared to established players [21][22] - The transformation of China's shipbuilding industry involved learning from international standards and practices, leading to significant advancements by the late 1990s [24][25][29] Competitive Dynamics - The competition within China's shipbuilding sector has intensified, particularly between Jiangsu's Jingjiang and Nantong, with both regions vying for dominance [31][34] - The influx of private capital into the shipbuilding industry has led to increased efficiency, although it also resulted in a proliferation of smaller, less capable shipyards [35][36] - The consolidation phase of the industry has seen the survival of only the most competitive players, with Jingjiang emerging as a leader in high-value shipbuilding [39][40]

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the ongoing US-Japan tariff negotiations, where the US is urging Japan to increase investments in the American manufacturing sector, particularly in shipbuilding [1] - Japan is considering establishing a US-Japan shipbuilding fund to revitalize the American shipbuilding industry, which is deemed crucial for national security [1] - Nomura believes that the current tariff negotiations could inject new vitality into Japan's shipbuilding initiatives, impacting various sectors including shipbuilding and cybersecurity [1] Group 2 - The US shipbuilding industry faces significant challenges, with an average annual delivery of only 18 vessels and a mere 0.1% share of the global market, in stark contrast to China's 70% market share expected by 2024 [3] - The decline in the US shipbuilding sector has severely hindered the expansion and maintenance of the US Navy, leading to increased costs for military vessels compared to China [3] - For instance, the cost of a new US medium landing ship is approximately $429 million, which is over 13 times that of similar Chinese vessels, while the average cost of a US frigate has soared to $1.6 billion, significantly higher than China's 054B frigate [3] Group 3 - The US civilian shipbuilding market is relatively small and lacks competitiveness, making it difficult to rely solely on military vessels to support the entire industry [4] - Despite efforts to revitalize the shipbuilding sector, high labor costs, a shortage of skilled workers, and outdated infrastructure have impeded progress, prompting the US to seek increased investments from Japanese and Korean companies [5] - The complexity of modern shipbuilding supply chains necessitates a comprehensive rebuilding of the entire industry, not just increasing shipyard capacity, which will significantly raise the demand for skilled labor [7] Group 4 - Over the past decade, Japanese shipbuilding companies have seen a significant decline in market competitiveness and share, dropping to about 6% by 2024, while South Korea's share has also decreased to around 17% [7] - Japan's shipbuilding costs are notably higher than those of China and South Korea, compounded by labor shortages and an aging workforce, which limits production capacity [7] - Even with the introduction of Japanese technology and capital, the shortage of skilled workers poses a challenge, making it unlikely to achieve significant reductions in manufacturing costs in the short to medium term [7]