在亚马孙雨林的门户城市——贝伦，街头行驶的是一辆辆中国新能源汽车比亚迪（002594）。它们车身 印着COP30（联合国气候变化框架公约第三十次缔约方大会），正成为这场气候大会最活跃的移动名 片。 深耕巴西，绿色足迹赢得市场认可 这里是巴西北部的雨林门户，交通网络原本并不发达，但在大会期间，130台比亚迪新能源车组成接驳 车队，穿梭于场馆与酒店之间，稳健地接送着各国元首和与会代表。 它们驶过之处，不排放一丝尾气，以实际行动向世界诠释着"低碳出行"的真实含义。 作为全球新能源汽车行业的领军者，比亚迪此次以官方合作伙伴身份亮相COP30，不仅提供了车辆，也 向全球分享了来自中国的绿色转型智慧。 亮相COP30，创新技术驱动低碳未来 当地时间11月17日，比亚迪巴西分公司总经理李铁在COP30边会上表示，"在全球低碳转型浪潮中，新 能源汽车的普及是交通领域碳减排的核心路径，比亚迪通过第五代DM超级混动技术、兆瓦闪充等创新 科技，让好的技术人人可享，推动了数百万传统燃油车用户向新能源汽车过渡。我们希望与全社会携 手，共筑可持续的低碳城市。" 自2008年提出太阳能、储能与电动汽车三大绿色梦想以来，比亚迪已构建从能源获 ...

（原标题：韩环保汽车销量创新高） 韩国《东亚日报》11月3日报道，韩国环保汽车销量持续攀升。根据韩国汽车与出行产业协会 （KAMA）11月2日发布的数据，今年1至9月，现代、起亚、韩国GM、雷诺韩国与KG Mobility等五大 整车厂在国内共售出41万7838辆环保车型，比去年同期增长31%。这是韩国整车业首次在前三季度就突 破40万辆大关，预计全年将轻松突破50万辆，刷新历史纪录。去年全年销量为45万7321辆。今年电动车 需求回升明显，前三季度累计销售10万3371辆，同比增长49%，已超过去年全年销量（9万2428辆）。 业内分析指出，电动车销量增长得益于多款新车型上市及充电基础设施的持续扩充。同时，混合动 力车市场也表现强劲，今年1至9月销量达30万9529辆，同比增加25%。整体来看，韩国环保车市场正进 入快速增长阶段，成为汽车产业的重要动力来源。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Nissan and Honda are discussing potential collaboration in vehicle and powertrain development in the U.S. market, driven by increasing market challenges such as high tariffs [2][4]. Group 1: Collaboration and Market Challenges - Nissan's president, Ivan Espinosa, indicated that discussions are ongoing regarding joint vehicle and powertrain development with Honda, without specifying whether the focus will be on electric vehicles (EV) or hybrid vehicles (HV) [2][4]. - The collaboration is seen as a response to the challenging market environment in the U.S., where Nissan has struggled with low sales due to delays in launching popular HV models [4][5]. - Both companies aim to enhance their competitiveness in the U.S. market, which is critical for their survival amid rising tariffs and operational challenges [2][4]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Strategic Moves - Honda's automotive business reported losses between April and September 2025, highlighting the urgent need to improve cost competitiveness centered around electric vehicles [5]. - Espinosa emphasized the strong production systems and supply chain coverage of both companies in the U.S., suggesting that collaboration could mitigate tariff impacts and open opportunities in other markets [5]. - Nissan is also considering producing pickup trucks for Honda at its underutilized U.S. factories, although no definitive plans have been announced [5]. Group 3: Corporate Restructuring and Future Prospects - Nissan is undergoing significant restructuring, including a global workforce reduction of 20,000 employees and the closure of seven factories [6]. - Espinosa confirmed that factory reductions will proceed as planned, while expressing no intention for further layoffs [6]. - The future of Nissan's capital relationship with Renault is under review, with both companies agreeing to reassess their investment obligations, potentially reducing them from 15% to 10% by 2025 [5].

Core Insights - In the first ten months of the year, Croatia sold a total of 60,896 new cars, representing an increase of 4,754 vehicles or 8.5% compared to the same period last year [1] - In October alone, 5,158 new cars were registered, which is an increase of 798 vehicles or 18.3% year-over-year [1] - The most popular car brands in Croatia are Škoda, Volkswagen, Opel, Renault, and Suzuki [1] Sales Data - The breakdown of new car sales by fuel type for the first ten months shows that 48.3% were gasoline vehicles, 36.1% were hybrid vehicles, 12% were diesel vehicles, 1.9% were gasoline-powered vehicles, and 1.6% were electric vehicles [1]

Global New Energy Vehicle Trends - In the first nine months of 2025, global new energy vehicle sales reached 1.571 million units, contributing to 29.2% of total vehicle sales, an increase of 2.9 percentage points compared to the entire year of 2024 [2][5] - The penetration rate of new energy vehicles globally is on a rapid rise, reaching 24.5% in the third quarter of 2025, up from 19.5% in 2024 [26][24] - China accounted for 68% of the global increase in new energy vehicles in the first nine months of 2025, while Germany and the United States contributed 5% and 4% respectively [1][27] Market Performance - In 2025, the global automotive market is projected to reach 70.53 million units, with new energy vehicles making up 1.571 million units [2][5] - The share of pure electric vehicles in new energy vehicles reached 14.8%, while plug-in hybrids accounted for 7.5% in the first nine months of 2025 [5][28] - The global new energy vehicle market is expected to continue its upward trajectory, with significant growth observed from 2021 to 2024 [8][10] Regional Insights - By September 2025, China's new energy vehicle penetration rate reached 46%, significantly higher than Germany's 27%, Norway's 80%, the UK's 32%, the US's 13%, and Japan's 2% [26][1] - The European new energy vehicle market is stabilizing, with a share of 17% in the global market as of September 2025, remaining relatively unchanged from the previous year [29][28] - The US new energy vehicle market showed improvement, with sales reaching 1.24 million units in the first nine months of 2025, marking a 16% increase [21][20] Competitive Landscape - Chinese brands have seen a significant increase in their share of the overseas new energy vehicle market, rising from 1.8% in 2021 to 14.5% by September 2025 [15][27] - The contribution of Chinese new energy vehicles to global sales is expected to remain dominant, with projections indicating a continued strong performance in the coming years [1][29] - The disparity in new energy vehicle development across regions highlights the varying levels of government support and market maturity [26][24]

Core Insights - Japan's trade surplus with the United States decreased by 50.5% in August, reaching 323.9 billion yen, the lowest level since January 2023 [2] - Exports to the U.S. fell by 13.8% year-on-year, marking five consecutive months of decline [2] - The decline in automobile exports to the U.S. is attributed to the ongoing impact of U.S. tariff policies [2] Group 1: Trade Statistics - In August, Japan's automobile exports to the U.S. decreased by 28.4%, amounting to 307.6 billion yen, with export volume dropping by 9.5% to 86,480 vehicles [4] - The average price of exported vehicles fell by 20.9% to 3.55 million yen, remaining below the previous year's level for six consecutive months [4] - Japan's overall trade balance showed a deficit of 242.5 billion yen in August, marking two consecutive months of deficit [4] Group 2: Export Trends - Japan's total exports in August decreased by 0.1% to 8.4251 trillion yen, with exports to China declining by 0.5% to 1.5007 trillion yen, continuing a six-month downward trend [4] - Exports to the European Union increased by 5.5% to 780.4 billion yen, marking the first increase in two months [4] - The increase in exports to the EU was driven by higher demand for engineering and mining machinery, as well as hybrid vehicles [4]

Core Viewpoint - The recent policy changes proposed by former President Donald Trump to eliminate federal electric vehicle (EV) purchase incentives and relax emission regulations are expected to provide significant financial benefits to traditional automakers in Detroit, allowing them to redirect investments back to fuel-powered vehicles. Group 1: Impact on Traditional Automakers - General Motors (GM) announced a reduction in electric vehicle production plans at two factories and a shift of a third factory to produce fuel-powered pickups instead of electric trucks [1] - Ford is reallocating funds originally intended for a canceled electric SUV to future fuel and hybrid vehicle projects [1] - Stellantis has restarted production of high-consumption Hemi V-8 engines, indicating a shift back to traditional vehicle manufacturing [1] Group 2: Financial Implications - The policy changes could create opportunities worth billions for automakers over the next two years, as stated by Ford's CEO Jim Farley [2] - The proposed fiscal plan includes the termination of a $7,500 tax credit for EV buyers and the elimination of fines for automakers not meeting fuel economy standards, which could save GM and Stellantis significant amounts in regulatory costs [2] - Ford has reduced its regulatory credit purchase commitments by nearly $1.5 billion this year, reallocating those funds to fuel and hybrid vehicle development [1][2] Group 3: Regulatory Changes and Industry Response - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to withdraw strict greenhouse gas emission regulations, which could lead to a significant reduction in compliance costs for automakers [2] - Critics argue that these regulatory rollbacks undermine efforts to control automotive pollution, which is a major contributor to global warming [3] - Automakers have expressed that previous stringent regulations forced them to produce more plug-in vehicles than the market demanded, indicating a shift in strategy towards fuel-powered vehicles [3] Group 4: Consequences for Electric Vehicle Manufacturers - Electric vehicle manufacturers like Rivian and Tesla are expected to face substantial revenue losses due to the policy changes, with Tesla having earned over $10 billion from selling regulatory credits since 2020 [5] - Rivian anticipates zero revenue from regulatory credit sales for the remainder of the year, significantly impacting its financial outlook [5] - Analysts estimate that about 40% of Tesla's profits could be at risk if unfavorable policies for electric vehicles are implemented [5]

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights a significant decline in South Korea's petrochemical product exports, which fell by 18.7% year-on-year to $3.38 billion in August, while semiconductor and automobile exports reached record highs [1] - Overall exports from South Korea grew by only 1.3% year-on-year to $58.4 billion in August, with imports decreasing by 4.0% to $51.9 billion, resulting in a narrowed trade surplus of $6.51 billion [1] - Semiconductor exports increased by 27.1% year-on-year to $15.1 billion, and automobile exports reached $5.5 billion, marking a historical peak, with growth seen in hybrid, electric, and used car exports [1] Group 2 - The imposition of a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum products by the Trump administration has negatively impacted related exports, and the additional 15% tariff on South Korean goods implemented on August 7 has further strained export performance [1] - The manufacturing PMI for South Korea slightly rose to 48.3 in August, indicating continued contraction in output and new orders, with businesses reporting declines in production and sales due to domestic economic weakness and tariff pressures [1]

Core Viewpoint - In August, South Korea's petrochemical product exports fell by 18.7% year-on-year to $3.38 billion, while semiconductor and automobile exports reached record highs, indicating a mixed performance in the export sector amid external pressures [1] Group 1: Export Performance - South Korea's total exports in August grew by only 1.3% year-on-year to $58.4 billion, while imports decreased by 4.0% to $51.9 billion, resulting in a narrowed trade surplus of $6.51 billion [1] - Semiconductor exports increased by 27.1% year-on-year to $15.1 billion, and automobile exports reached $5.5 billion, marking a historical high [1] - The growth in hybrid, electric, and used car exports did not positively impact the petrochemical product export growth [1] Group 2: Impact of Tariffs - The U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum products, which are at 50%, have led to a decline in related exports [1] - Additional 15% tariffs on Korean goods implemented by the U.S. starting August 7 have further hampered export performance [1] Group 3: Manufacturing Sector - The manufacturing PMI for South Korea in August slightly increased to 48.3, indicating ongoing contraction in output and new orders [1] - Companies reported a decline in production and sales due to weak domestic economic conditions compounded by tariff pressures [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Treasury Secretary, Bessent, emphasizes that China is both the largest economic and military competitor to the U.S., differing fundamentally in economic policies aimed at job creation compared to Western and Asian democratic nations [2][12][13]. Group 1: Economic Policies - The Trump administration's economic policies are built on three pillars: tax reform, trade, and deregulation, with the "Big and Beautiful Act" (OBBB) being passed at record speed [4]. - The trade policy shift towards tariffs aims to rebalance international payments, as the U.S. has lost many manufacturing jobs and production bases to overseas locations [5][12]. - The U.S. is a proponent of free trade, and the goal of changing trade policies is to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. and promote fair trade [5][12]. Group 2: Trade Relations - If progress is made in reducing trade deficits, there is a possibility of reducing or eliminating reciprocal tariffs over time [6]. - The U.S. and Japan have agreed to reduce Japanese auto tariffs from 27.5% to 15%, with implementation expected to take around 50 days [8][9]. - Economic security is viewed as synonymous with national security, and the U.S.-Japan trade and investment agreement is seen as a central axis for economic growth and security for both nations [11]. Group 3: International Imbalances - China is identified as the primary cause of international economic imbalances, with many of its products sold below production costs due to significant government support [12]. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary expresses concerns about China's increasing production capacity, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic [14]. - The U.S. aims to address the issue of international imbalances, which may take years to resolve, depending on each country's situation [7]. Group 4: Currency and Monetary Policy - The concept of a "strong dollar" is defined not by nominal exchange rates but by maintaining the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency through sound economic policies [17]. - The OBBB Act aims to attract foreign capital and make the U.S. the most attractive place for investment, which includes both securities and direct investments in manufacturing [18]. - The next Federal Reserve Chair must be capable of gaining market trust and analyzing complex economic data, with a focus on maintaining the independence of monetary policy [19].