Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emerging "donkey shortage" crisis in China, highlighting the paradox of increasing consumer demand for donkey products while the supply is dwindling due to declining breeding interest among farmers [1][4][7]. Group 1: Current Market Situation - The term "donkey shortage" has gained popularity on social media, with discussions indicating that while cattle and horses are abundant, donkeys are in short supply [1][2]. - China's donkey population has drastically decreased from 11.2 million in the early 1990s to approximately 1.46 million in 2023, primarily due to changes in agricultural practices and consumer preferences [2][6]. - The demand for donkey-derived products, such as donkey-hide gelatin (Ejiao), has surged, necessitating the slaughter of over one million donkeys annually to meet consumer needs [4][6]. Group 2: Economic Factors - The high costs associated with donkey farming, including long breeding cycles (one offspring per year and 2-3 years to reach market weight), deter farmers from raising donkeys compared to more profitable livestock like pigs and chickens [2][3][6]. - The limited economic return from donkey products compared to other livestock further contributes to the decline in domestic donkey farming [2][3]. Group 3: Import Trends - As domestic supply fails to meet rising demand, imports of donkeys are becoming increasingly important, with Pakistan emerging as a key supplier due to its large donkey population [6][7]. - The global donkey market is shifting, with countries like Ethiopia, Sudan, and Pakistan leading in donkey farming, while new regulations in Africa may impact supply chains [6][7]. Group 4: Market Dynamics - The donkey market has experienced a U-shaped demand curve, initially declining due to mechanization and then rebounding as health trends favor donkey products [7][9]. - Companies are expected to adapt by establishing their own breeding bases and creating a dual supply model to stabilize the supply chain, addressing the current "donkey shortage" [9].

Core Viewpoint - A criminal and civil public interest lawsuit was filed against a supplier for selling counterfeit products, resulting in a prison sentence and significant fines, highlighting the importance of food safety and consumer protection in the industry [1][4][6]. Group 1: Case Details - The supplier, Zhang, was found guilty of selling horse meat disguised as donkey meat, which he did to increase profits after initially providing a mix of both [2][3]. - Zhang paid the restaurant's chef a kickback of 1-2 yuan per kilogram, totaling approximately 600 yuan per month, to facilitate the fraudulent sales [2]. - The restaurant was penalized for selling unverified donkey meat and failing to provide necessary documentation, leading to administrative sanctions [2][4]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The case was escalated to the public interest litigation department after it was determined that the actions harmed food safety and public interest [4][6]. - The total sales amount of unverified donkey meat sold by the restaurant was approximately 807,993.85 yuan, with both parties violating food safety laws [4][6]. - The court sentenced Zhang to 18 months in prison (suspended for 18 months) and imposed a fine of 90,000 yuan, along with a punitive compensation of over 800,000 yuan to be paid jointly with the restaurant [6][8]. Group 3: Implications for Food Safety - The case underscores the risks associated with selling uninspected meat, including the potential spread of zoonotic diseases and contamination from harmful substances [5][6]. - The public interest litigation aims to deter similar illegal activities and enhance consumer confidence in food safety [7][8]. - The prosecution emphasized the need for strict regulatory measures and accountability in the food industry to protect consumer rights and ensure food safety [8].

Core Viewpoint - A criminal and civil public interest lawsuit was filed against supplier Zhang for selling counterfeit products, resulting in a prison sentence and significant financial penalties [1][4]. Group 1: Case Background - Zhang, a meat supplier for a restaurant, began collaborating with the chef in January 2023, offering kickbacks of 1-2 RMB per kilogram, totaling over 600 RMB monthly [2]. - To increase profits, Zhang started substituting horse meat for donkey meat, which was sold at a higher price, leading to significant financial gains [2][3]. - The restaurant was later found to be selling uninspected donkey meat, resulting in administrative penalties [2][4]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The case was transferred to the Stone District Prosecutor's Office in September 2024, where it was determined that the actions violated food safety laws and harmed public interests [4][6]. - The prosecutor's office conducted thorough investigations, revealing that the restaurant purchased uninspected meat worth 807,993.85 RMB from Zhang over a 14-month period [4][6]. - This case marked a precedent for criminal civil public interest lawsuits in Beijing, with prosecutors seeking punitive damages based on the sales amount [4][6]. Group 3: Sentencing and Penalties - On August 20, 2025, the court sentenced Zhang to 18 months in prison (6 months suspended) and imposed a fine of 90,000 RMB [1][6]. - Zhang and the restaurant were ordered to pay over 800,000 RMB in punitive damages and publicly apologize [1][6]. - The case emphasizes the importance of food safety and the legal consequences of violating regulations, aiming to deter similar future offenses [5][6].

商家"挂驴头卖猪肉"的行为涉嫌以假充真，太仓市市场监管局执法人员已对涉案商家进行立案调查，对现场在售的原材料进行查封并溯源。其中一家涉嫌 构成犯罪，已移送公安机关处理。 驴肉火烧是不少食客喜欢的一种传统小吃，但有一些商家为了牟利，竟然上演"挂驴头卖猪肉"，让价廉的猪肉、马肉摇身一变，变成了昂贵的"驴肉"。近 日，太仓市市场监管局会同公安机关对本地销售驴肉火烧的商户进行了专项暗访抽检，对2家商户的5批次产品进行动物源性检测。 检测结果显示，部分店铺销售的"驴肉火烧""驴肉""驴排"未检出驴源性成分，反而检出了猪源性成分以及马源性成分，这意味着消费者购买的"驴肉火 烧"实际上是"猪肉火烧""马肉火烧"。 为了更好地解决驴肉有假货和掺假现象的问题，消费者可以选用正规的超市供货渠道购买驴肉。同时，在购买前也要留意检查有没有过期、变质、剁得散 乱等问题。驴肉作为一道美食，选购应该谨慎，切不可盲目相信低价诱惑，要选择正规渠道进行购买，同时也需要提高自己的判断能力，辨认驴肉的真 假，避免食品安全问题的发生。同时，也提醒广大商家，要诚信经营，严格遵守法律法规，切勿触碰法律红线。太仓市市场监管局将持续加大食品安全监 管力度，常 ...

Core Viewpoint - The event held on September 11, 2023, in Beijing, focused on food safety and highlighted the government's commitment to combating food safety crimes through various measures and case studies [1][3]. Group 1: Government Actions - The event was organized by 28 departments, including the State Food Safety Office and the Central Civilization Office, emphasizing a collaborative approach to food safety [1][3]. - The police have implemented a series of measures to address food safety crimes, including the "Kunlun-2025" special operation, which has led to the resolution of significant cases and the arrest of numerous suspects [3][4]. Group 2: Case Studies - A notable case involved the "11·18" fake weight-loss candy incident, where illegal substances were added to products sold via live streaming, prompting increased scrutiny of online food sales [3][4]. - In Zhejiang, a series of cases involved the illegal addition of borax to food products, leading to enhanced regulation of e-commerce platforms and the removal of hazardous items [4]. - The "8·26" case in Hunan highlighted issues of meat fraud, resulting in comprehensive inspections across the meat product supply chain [4]. - The "5·08" case in Sichuan involved the sale of repackaged expired rice dumplings, prompting seasonal market safety checks [4]. - The "12·5" case in Gansu focused on water-injected pork, leading to improved investigative techniques and a sustained crackdown on similar crimes [4]. Group 3: Future Initiatives - The police plan to focus on food safety issues in schools, meat products, and health foods, maintaining a strict enforcement stance to ensure public safety [4]. - A new reporting platform for environmental and food safety crimes was launched on September 9, 2023, encouraging public participation in reporting food safety violations [5].