Workflow
737MAX
icon
Search documents
失事客机双发一秒内被关闭,调查显示大概率人为因素引发印航空难
Hua Xia Shi Bao· 2025-07-12 11:37
Core Insights - The preliminary report from the Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) regarding the Air India 787-8 crash on June 12 reveals critical operational failures during takeoff, specifically the simultaneous shutdown of both fuel control switches within one second, leading to engine power loss [2][5][6] Investigation Findings - The report includes background information, personnel casualties, weather data, flight recorder details, and the current status of the investigation [2] - The aircraft was carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members, and the crash resulted in 12 crew members, 229 passengers, and 19 ground personnel fatalities, marking it as one of the deadliest aviation disasters in a decade [7] - The flight data indicates that the fuel control switches were switched from "RUN" to "OFF" in a critical phase of flight, which is unusual and raises questions about operational protocols [3][5] Technical Analysis - The design of the fuel control switches on the Boeing 787 requires a specific action to change states, making accidental simultaneous operation unlikely [3][4] - The aircraft was equipped with two enhanced flight data recorders, which provided valuable data despite some damage [3][5] - The investigation has ruled out bird strikes as a cause, as there were no signs of bird activity in the flight path [5] Industry Impact - The crash has significant implications for Boeing, which has faced challenges in rebuilding its reputation following previous incidents, including the 737 MAX crisis [8][9] - The incident occurred just before the 2025 Paris Air Show, leading to cancellations of Boeing's planned activities at the event, which typically serves as a platform for showcasing new products and technologies [7][8] - Air India, under Tata Group's ownership, has ambitious plans to modernize its fleet, including a substantial order for 470 aircraft, which aims to enhance its competitive position in the market [9][10] Market Context - Air India is currently the largest airline in India by fleet size, with a total of 191 aircraft, including 33 Boeing 787s, positioning it favorably for long-haul operations [9][10] - The Indian aviation market has significant growth potential, but local airlines have historically struggled against foreign competitors, highlighting the need for improved competitiveness and brand image [10]
美国恢复对华发动机出口,波音飞机也已重启交付中国航司
第一财经· 2025-07-04 06:18
第一财经记者今日从知情人士处获得确认, 美国已经同意GE航空航天集团等美国相关飞机零部件企 业,恢复向中国供应飞机发动机等关键零部件。 6月份,美国商务部暂停了部分美国公司向中国出售产品和技术的许可证,这些产品和技术被用于制 造国产C919飞机。 对于媒体询问美国恢复EDA软件、乙烷、飞机发动机等产品对华出口,商务部新闻发言人今日表 示,中美伦敦经贸会谈后,双方于近期确认了落实两国元首6月5日通话重要共识和巩固日内瓦经贸 会谈成果的具体细节。目前,双方团队正在加紧落实伦敦框架有关成果。中方正依法依规审批符合条 件的管制物项出口许可申请。美方也采取相应行动,取消对华采取的一系列限制性措施,有关情况已 向中方作了通报。 2025.07. 04 本文字数:1494,阅读时长大约3分钟 作者 | 第一财经 陈姗姗 一个月前被暂停出口中国的美国发动机等飞机零部件,开始恢复出口。 另据记者了解,4月份一度暂停接收的波音飞机,目前也已恢复交付中国的航空公司。 国产C919发动机恢复供应 目前,国产飞机C919所使用的发动机,航电系统等都与美国有关,比如发动机是由美国GE航空航 天集团与法国赛峰集团合资生产的LEAP-1C, ...
美国恢复对华发动机出口,波音飞机也已重启交付中国航司
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-07-04 04:17
Group 1 - The export of American aircraft engines and components to China has resumed after a previous suspension, confirming the restoration of supply from companies like GE Aviation [2] - The C919 aircraft's delivery was not significantly impacted by the suspension of engine exports in June due to existing inventory held by COMAC [1][4] - The LEAP-1C engine, produced by a joint venture between GE Aviation and Safran, is the only overseas powerplant for the C919, highlighting the reliance on foreign technology in China's aviation sector [4] Group 2 - Boeing has resumed the delivery of aircraft to Chinese airlines, including the Boeing 737 MAX and 787, which had been temporarily halted due to trade tensions [3][6] - The exemption of tariffs on aircraft and certain engine components allows Chinese airlines to import planes at previous tax rates, which are 5% for narrow-body and 1% for wide-body aircraft [7] - In 2018, Boeing delivered a quarter of its new aircraft to China, indicating the significance of the Chinese market for Boeing's business [7] Group 3 - The Changjiang-1000A engine, China's first fully independent turbofan engine, is currently undergoing flight testing and awaits certification for commercial use [5] - The Chinese government has emphasized the need for self-sufficiency in aviation engine development, as highlighted in the "13th Five-Year" national strategic emerging industries development plan [4]
惠誉:预计波音(BA.N)减少传统737MAX库存将有助于逐步恢复更为正常的生产与交付节奏。
news flash· 2025-06-30 13:55
惠誉:预计波音(BA.N)减少传统737MAX库存将有助于逐步恢复更为正常的生产与交付节奏。 ...
惠誉对波音的预测:预计737MAX的生产速度将在2025年第三季度达到每月38架。
news flash· 2025-06-26 16:35
惠誉对波音的预测:预计737MAX的生产速度将在2025年第三季度达到每月38架。 ...
【环球财经】调查显示波音和监管机构在客机“掉门”事故中均有责任
Xin Hua She· 2025-06-25 14:50
报告还指出,导致这场事故的还有联邦航空局在监管工作上的责任,"联邦航空局的合规执行监督和审 计规划活动没有发挥作用",未能完全识别并确保波音公司解决其零件拆除过程相关的问题,这些问 题"重复出现并系统性不合规"。 2024年1月5日,美国阿拉斯加航空公司一架波音737MAX 9型客机起飞后不久发生事故,机舱侧面一处 门塞脱落。调查人员检查后发现,4个本应将门塞固定到位的螺栓缺失。事故发生时距离该客机交付阿 拉斯加航空公司仅约两个月。 美国国家运输安全委员会主席珍妮弗·霍门迪在当天的投票听证会上说,波音公司在安全流程上操作不 规范是造成事故的原因之一,而导致此次事故的安全缺陷对于波音和联邦航空局来说,本应是"显而易 见的,因此是可以预防的",因此"这样的事故只有在多个系统发生故障时才会发生"。 调查报告说,这架飞机在交付给阿拉斯加航空公司之前,用于固定门塞的4个螺栓就已经缺失,这可能 导致涉事门塞在此前的飞行中就逐渐松动,直至最终脱落。该事件是由于波音"未能提供充分的培训、 指导和监督以确保制造人员能够始终如一且正确地遵守其零件拆卸流程"而造成。 新华财经华盛顿6月24日电美国国家运输安全委员会24日说,该委员 ...
印度波音 787 坠机,和孩子一起聊聊波音飞机背后的故事|Knock Knock 世界
声动活泼· 2025-06-19 10:46
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent challenges faced by Boeing, particularly focusing on safety issues, declining orders, and the impact of a recent plane crash, highlighting the company's struggle to maintain its reputation and market position in the aviation industry [1][3][18]. Group 1: Recent Incidents and Impact - On June 12, 2025, an Indian Airlines Boeing 787 crashed shortly after takeoff, resulting in 241 fatalities and only one survivor, marking it as one of the worst aviation disasters in a decade [1]. - Following the crash, India's aviation regulatory body ordered inspections of all Boeing 787 aircraft and is considering grounding the model [1]. - The crash has intensified scrutiny on Boeing, contributing to a significant trust crisis and damaging the company's brand image [3]. Group 2: Boeing's Historical Context - Boeing, established in 1916, was once a dominant force in the aviation industry, producing iconic aircraft like the Boeing 707 and 747, which significantly shaped commercial aviation [4][6]. - The Boeing 747, known for its four engines and dual-deck design, was a technological pinnacle for the company, capturing over 60% of the global commercial aviation market at its peak [6]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Order Decline - Boeing's new aircraft orders plummeted by approximately 60% last year, reflecting a severe downturn in demand [3]. - The company has faced continuous losses since 2019, accumulating a net loss of $36 billion (approximately 260 billion RMB) over six years, marking the longest period of losses in its history [9]. Group 4: Cultural and Operational Changes - The decline in Boeing's engineering culture began after its acquisition of McDonnell Douglas in 1997, shifting the focus from safety and quality to profit maximization [10]. - Boeing's decision to outsource critical components led to quality control issues, exemplified by the delayed production of the 787 Dreamliner, which was three years behind schedule due to unusable parts from suppliers [11]. Group 5: Safety Issues and Regulatory Scrutiny - The 737 MAX crisis, resulting from rushed upgrades to compete with Airbus, led to two fatal crashes and revealed significant flaws in Boeing's safety management systems [13][14]. - Investigations uncovered 27 issues within Boeing's safety management, including poor communication and lack of effective reporting channels [14]. Group 6: Future Outlook and Market Position - Despite its challenges, Boeing is unlikely to face bankruptcy due to its dominant position in the commercial aircraft market, which is primarily shared with Airbus [18]. - The company is working with the FAA to implement a new safety management system to address quality and safety concerns, aiming to restore public trust [20].
波音787日本造零部件占3成,坠毁机2天前曾降东京
日经中文网· 2025-06-13 03:13
另一方面,制造飞机的波音公司首席执行官奥尔特伯格发表声明称:"我们正在准备对由印度 航空事故调查局主导的调查提供支持"。为事故飞机提供发动机的GE航空航天表示:"我们已 成立紧急响应小组,全面支持客户和调查工作"。 印度航空客机的坠机现场(6月12日,reuters) 波音787首次发生的坠机事故令全球航空界震惊。目前全球约有1100架787在运营。日本也与该机型有深 厚的渊源,日本全日空是被交付首架的"首发运营商",日本的主要航空零部件供应商还参与了787的制 造…… 印度西部发生的客机坠机事故造成超过240人遇难。坠毁的是美国波音公司的"787型"飞机, 全球约有1100架在运营。这款飞机与日本也有深厚的渊源,日本企业制造了超过三成的机体 零部件。虽然调查事故原因仍需时间,但这是787首次发生坠机事故,全球航空界为之震惊。 事故原因调查"需要时间" 运营事故飞机的印度的航空公司印度航空(Air India)表示:"调查需要时间。我们将全力以 赴,24小时支持调查人员"(该航空首席执行官坎贝尔·威尔逊)。 波音的小型客机"737MAX"曾在2018~2019年连续两年发生坠机事故,累计导致约350人遇 难。 ...
波音787,浑身都是问题
虎嗅APP· 2025-06-13 00:05
以下文章来源于科工力量 ,作者张仲麟 科工力量 . 观察者网科技工业新闻小组官方账号 虎嗅注:综合媒体 消息,印度航空公司12日发表声明说,该公司一架飞往英国的客机在该国古吉拉 特邦艾哈迈达巴德机场附近坠毁。随后该国民航局确认,机上246人遇难。另据印度媒体报道,客机 型号为波音787,坠毁在古吉拉特邦一个居民区附近。目前,通往该居民区的所有道路均已关闭。 本文为旧文重发,首发于2022年12月20日。本文来自微信公众号: 科工力量 (ID: guanchacaijing) ,作者:张仲麟,题图来自:视觉中国 当12月9日C919正式交付东航取得适航许可证之时,太平洋对岸的著名航空媒体《航空周刊》获得了 一份关于波音787的文件,揭露了波音787的大量质量问题。这份文件揭露出来的问题之多不由令人 咋舌,也让"梦想飞机"一夜之间梦碎。 早在2020年9月,波音787就爆出具有生产质量问题。在当时暴露出来的问题,一个是飞机机身后段 两个结构件之间的垫片没有安装到位,使得飞机后部机身的结构强度不足。而另一个则是飞机机身安 装蒙皮的复合材料机身没有打磨光滑,使得蒙皮无法完全贴合,令蒙皮强度下降。在当时,这一问题 直接 ...
航空安全数据透视:事故率降至百万分之一,为何悲剧仍在发生
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-06-12 14:37
数据新闻编辑:陈华罗新媒体设计:许骁校对:李立军 6月12日,印度航空一架计划从艾哈迈达巴德机场起飞前往伦敦的客机,在古吉拉特邦艾哈迈达巴德机场附近居民区坠毁。 据印度媒体报道,该坠毁飞机先低空飞行,努力爬升,最终坠毁在地面并爆炸。飞机飞行了大约五分钟,于当地时间下午1点38分坠毁。据央视新闻当地 时间12日消息,当地警方称在印度客机坠机事故中发现一名幸存者,目前在医院接受治疗。 同时,这架飞机也成为全球首架因空难全损的波音787型飞机。 波音事故率排在各大公司第二位 此次发生事故的印度航空AI171航班的机型是美国波音公司的787-8,2014年1月交付印度航空。值得注意的是,这是波音787首次因空难全损。 2024年12月底,韩国济州航空一架波音737-800型客机因降落失败,冲出跑道后撞墙爆炸,最终造成机上181人中179人遇难。 在更早之前,波音737Max8机型曾于2018年10月和2019年3月发生两起坠机事故,共造成346人死亡,涉事飞机均为刚服役不久的新飞机。这导致737Max8 在全球范围内停飞近两年时间,波音业绩受到重创。 据相关消息,737Max曾是波音的主力销售机型,而此次印度航空空难 ...