日前，《北京市建立未来产业投入增长机制 促进未来产业发展的若干措施》发布。据悉，北京 市将通过16条措施，促进未来产业实现从研发创新、企业生成、业态培育到集群化规模化发 展，支撑北京在因地制宜发展新质生产力方面走在前、作表率。 未来产业发展需要各类要素的持续投入。对于企业关心的融资，北京将打出一套组合拳。新政 提出，推动形成更具前瞻性、针对性和包容度的投融资服务新体系，科技、经济和信息化等主 要产业部门投向未来产业的资金比例不低于20%。 像前沿生物这样的未来产业，往往需要巨额前期投入，市场不确定性也高。投资既考验眼光， 也需要包容。如何才能为创新主体在合适时机引来关键投资？ 据介绍，本市将在中心城区及有关高校院所周边重点布局一批服务前沿技术创新和成果转化的 标杆孵化器。政策还鼓励科研岗位人员参与创业孵化，推行科研人员离岗创业期间保留编制、 职称评聘资格以及基本工资待遇的政策，允许5年内随时返岗续聘原职级。 政府如何服务好各种创新力量，助企业快速成长？ 根据《若干措施》，北京将加速布局未来产业先导区，积极争取和探索先行先试政策，市区共 建未来产业育新基地，集中投入资源。特别是为了适应未来产业新技术、新业态、新 ...

Core Viewpoint - The assessment criteria for guiding funds towards sub-funds have become increasingly stringent, with new penalties for failing to meet investment return and exit plans [2][3][4]. Group 1: Fund Management Fees - Recent regulations have changed the management fee structure, limiting it to a maximum of 2% of the actual investment amount rather than the subscribed amount, which may lead to a decrease in overall management fees [4][5]. - Many GP institutions are facing deductions in management fees due to unsatisfactory performance evaluations, with some required to return previously received fees if performance metrics are not met [3][4]. - The industry is experiencing a downward trend in management fees, as new guidelines emphasize actual contributions over subscribed amounts, indicating a shift in how fees are calculated [5]. Group 2: Exit Strategies and Challenges - The current market conditions have created a backlog of projects awaiting exit, with a heavy reliance on IPOs for exits, which is becoming increasingly difficult due to a slowdown in IPO activity [6][9]. - Many GPs are struggling to meet the required DPI (Distributions to Paid-In) ratio of 1, which is critical for securing agreement from LPs for extensions on fund timelines [7][9]. - There are instances of forced exit clauses in agreements, allowing guiding funds to mandate exits under specific conditions, which adds pressure on GPs to perform [8][9]. Group 3: Relationship Between GPs and LPs - The relationship between GPs and LPs is strained, particularly with state-owned LPs who have strict requirements for performance and exit timelines, leading to potential legal actions against GPs [9][10]. - Some regions are exploring solutions to ease the pressure on GPs, such as extending the duration of fund management to accommodate current market conditions [11]. - The need for a more flexible approach in assessing GPs' performance and allowing for extensions is recognized as essential for maintaining healthy relationships in the investment ecosystem [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent reforms in the management fee payment mechanism for government investment funds in Guangdong Province, highlighting the potential impact on venture capital firms and the broader investment ecosystem [3][4]. Group 1: Management Fee Reforms - The new management fee payment mechanism is based on market principles and fund performance evaluations, which may lead to a reduction in management fees for some general partners (GPs) [4][5]. - The previous model allowed GPs to rely on management fees as a stable income source, but the new regulations may force GPs to adapt or face financial difficulties if their funds do not generate profits [5][6]. Group 2: Market Irregularities - The article identifies several irregularities in the investment landscape, including the misuse of buyback clauses that turn funds into debt collection tools, which misaligns with industry norms [7][8]. - There is a concern that some GPs may resort to unethical practices, such as manipulating financial data to achieve exits, which could harm the innovation ecosystem [8][10]. Group 3: Kickback Practices - The article highlights the prevalence of kickbacks in financing, where companies inflate valuations and pay back a percentage of the investment to incentivize investors, creating a cycle of poor investment decisions [11][12]. - This practice can lead to a situation where honest companies struggle to secure funding, while those willing to offer kickbacks thrive, ultimately harming the overall market integrity [12][13]. Group 4: Challenges for Financial Advisors (FAs) - FAs are facing significant challenges, including being bypassed in the investment process, which diminishes their role and value in facilitating deals [16][19]. - The decline in investment activity has led to reduced commissions for FAs, forcing some to adopt questionable practices to survive in a competitive environment [19][20]. Group 5: Conclusion - The article concludes that the conflicts between capital cycles, human greed, and institutional flaws pose significant challenges to the investment landscape, urging stakeholders to prioritize genuine innovation over mere financial returns [22].

2 0 2 5年7月3 1日， 水木资本董事长、中国国际科技促进会母基金分会会长、母基金研究中心创 始人唐劲草 与 瑞士驻华大使白瑞谊（ Jür g Bur r i）先生 在京会面 ，双方就即将 举办 的第 四届达沃斯全球母基金峰会事宜进行了交流。 据悉， 2 0 2 6年1月2 1日，第四届达沃斯全球母基金峰会将于瑞士达沃斯举办，本届峰会由全球 母基金协会主办，母基金研究中心承办 ， 峰会行程安排将于 2 0 2 6年1月1 9日持续至2 0 2 6年1 月2 3日。本届峰会将邀请百余位全球母基金与基金行业的重量级人物共聚一堂，共同商议跨越 经济周期的奥秘，展望全球母基金行业发展的未来。 唐劲草会长向瑞士驻华大使白瑞谊（ Jür g Bur r i）先生介绍了第四届达沃斯全球母基金峰会 的 筹备 情况 ，包括会议议题、邀请 情况 及合作 情况 ，强调希望进一步深化 中国 与瑞士方 面的 交流，推动双方在技术和资本方面的深度交流与合作 。同时，唐劲草会长也对瑞士驻华 大使馆提供的 有关 瑞士科技公司信息共享的支持表达了感谢。 瑞士驻华大使白瑞谊（ J ü rg Bu rri）先生及相关负责人充分肯定峰会的重要 ...

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the recent developments in China's mother fund industry, with a total management scale of 1,540 billion RMB, focusing on investments in sectors such as biomedicine, emerging industries, and semiconductors [2]. Group 1: National Developments - A national-level mother fund, the Service Trade Innovation Development Guidance Fund Phase II, has been established with a capital of 10 billion RMB, focusing on equity investment and asset management [4]. Group 2: Regional Developments - Shanghai has initiated the selection process for the third batch of sub-funds under its three major leading industry mother funds, targeting integrated circuits, biomedicine, and artificial intelligence [5]. - Zhejiang Province is recruiting general partners for its third phase of the Science and Technology Innovation Mother Fund, with a scale of 30.02 billion RMB [6]. - In Hubei, a humanoid robot industry investment mother fund has been established with a total scale of 10 billion RMB, focusing on core technologies and applications in various sectors [10]. - A regional mother fund in Hubei, the Xianning High-tech Industry Investment Mother Fund, has been set up with a total scale of 30 billion RMB, focusing on health, electronic information, and green energy [11]. - The Yunnan Dianzhong New Area Industry Guidance Fund has been officially established with a scale of 50 billion RMB, focusing on non-listed enterprises [13]. - Two provincial government investment mother funds have been launched in Shanxi, focusing on angel investment and low-altitude economy [14]. - The Henan Provincial Equity Investment Fund has been established with a capital of 10 billion RMB, aiming to attract venture capital and private equity institutions [15]. - The Ningbo Angel Investment Guidance Fund is planning to establish two sub-funds [18]. - The Suzhou High-end Equipment Industry Special Mother Fund is set to invest in sub-funds with a target scale of 15 billion RMB [19]. - The Yangzhou Aerospace Industry Special Mother Fund has successfully registered its first sub-fund with a total scale of 5 billion RMB [21]. - The Guangzhou Development Zone has established a 50 billion RMB technology innovation and entrepreneurship investment mother fund [22].

Core Insights - The total number of newly registered private equity and venture capital funds reached 1,165 in Q2 2025, marking a year-on-year increase of 38.2% and a quarter-on-quarter increase of 20.3% [2][4] - The cumulative contribution from Limited Partners (LPs) reached 427 billion RMB, with state-owned capital dominating at 231.72 billion RMB, accounting for 54.26% of the total [9][10] Fund Overview - In Q2 2025, there were 416 newly registered private equity funds and 749 venture capital funds, with venture capital funds maintaining a dominant position [2] - The registration of funds was concentrated in Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Guangdong provinces, indicating strong GP activity and industrial attraction in the Yangtze River Delta and Greater Bay Area [2] LP Contribution Trends - The frequency of LP contributions showed slight fluctuations in Q2 2025, with a general downward trend observed [4] - A total of 2,651 contributions were made by institutions with a contribution ratio of 1% or more, with government-guided funds and state-owned capital continuing to dominate the LP market, accounting for 52.7% of contributions [6][9] LP Contribution Distribution - The cumulative contribution from institutions with a contribution ratio of 1% or more reached 427 billion RMB, with state-owned capital leading at 231.72 billion RMB [9] - Financial institutions contributed 74.61 billion RMB, representing 17.47% of the total, while government-guided funds contributed 71.46 billion RMB, accounting for 16.73% [9][10] Active LP Analysis - State-owned capital maintained a strong position in Q2 2025, with a cumulative contribution of 231.72 billion RMB, reflecting its significant scale and stability [16] - Government-guided funds demonstrated a stable contribution pattern, with a total of 71.46 billion RMB, showcasing their role in leveraging small amounts of capital for larger investments [18] - Financial institutions contributed 74.61 billion RMB, focusing on large single contributions, indicating their professional asset allocation capabilities [19] - Private capital's participation remained low, with a total contribution of 23.89 billion RMB, highlighting the need for mechanisms to stimulate greater involvement [20]

Core Viewpoint - The article outlines the establishment of the Fujian Province Science and Technology Innovation Relay S Fund, aimed at supporting high-quality development of technology-oriented enterprises in Fujian Province, in line with national and provincial policies [1]. Group 1: Fund Overview - The fund is named "Fujian Province Science and Technology Innovation Relay S Fund" and must include relevant terms in its official name [2]. - The target scale for the fund is set at no less than 5 billion yuan, with an initial subscription scale of at least 2 billion yuan [3]. - The provincial mother fund's contribution will not exceed 30% of the fund's subscribed scale [4]. - The fund must be registered within Fujian Province [5]. Group 2: Investment Focus and Social Impact - The fund will focus on supporting strategic emerging industries, future industries, and the transformation and upgrading of traditional industries, aligning with national strategies [6]. - The fund is required to invest at least double the amount contributed by various levels of government in Fujian Province [7]. Group 3: Management Requirements - The fund management institution must be a legally established company or partnership with a minimum registered capital of 10 million yuan and must be registered as a private equity or venture capital fund manager [9]. - The management team must include at least three senior managers with over three years of asset management experience [9]. - The management institution and its affiliates must contribute no less than 10% of the fund's subscribed scale [11]. Group 4: Application Process - The selection process will identify 1-2 fund management institutions through a public solicitation [12]. - Interested institutions must submit a self-assessment and relevant documents to participate in the selection [13]. - The deadline for submitting application materials is set for August 29, 2025 [14].

Core Viewpoint - Yinggang Capital is focusing on technology-driven investments that enhance people's livelihoods, emphasizing the importance of practical applications and sustainable monetization paths for technology [12][16][27]. Group 1: Investment Strategy - In 2025, Yinggang Capital established several funds in Jiangsu, including digital industry, robotics, and AI funds, to align with local government strategies and technology enterprise needs [1]. - The company has a cumulative management scale exceeding 8 billion RMB and USD, covering sectors such as robotics, AI, smart driving, low-altitude economy, semiconductors, internet, and medical technology [1][2]. - Yinggang Capital emphasizes a dual coupling of "underlying technology + practical scenarios," prioritizing projects with strong implementation capabilities and clear monetization paths [4][12]. Group 2: Key Investments - Recent investments include participating in the D-round financing of smart driving company "Tian Tong Wei Shi" and leading investments in low-altitude economy firm "Fu Lin Lan" [1][12]. - The humanoid robot company "Jia Su Jin Hua" is set to launch commercial products, marking a significant step towards industrialization [2]. - The medical AI company "An De Yi Zhi" has successfully entered clinical systems in multiple countries, showcasing the global reach of Yinggang's investments [2]. Group 3: Founder and Leadership - Liu Zidi, the founder of Yinggang Capital, has a background in investment banking and has been recognized as one of the best female investors in various platforms [6][9]. - Liu Zidi's investment philosophy combines rational analysis with emotional intelligence, allowing her to support entrepreneurs through challenges [20]. - The company promotes a culture of trust and collaboration, encouraging team members to take ownership and participate actively in investment processes [18][20]. Group 4: Market Positioning and Future Outlook - Yinggang Capital's approach to "long-termism" is dynamic, focusing on identifying value that can withstand market cycles rather than static long-term holding [22][23]. - The firm is strategically positioned to leverage local government funding and international family offices, enhancing its investment capabilities [23]. - Future focus areas include AI, robotics, quantum computing, and brain-computer interfaces, reflecting a commitment to sustainable development and global opportunities [27][28].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing restrictions on state-owned limited partners (LPs) in China regarding their investments in sub-funds, highlighting a shift towards favoring state-owned general partners (GPs) over private ones due to performance and compliance concerns [1][2][3]. Group 1: Investment Restrictions - State-owned LPs have implemented new limitations on the number of sub-funds they can invest in, alongside restrictions on investment ratios and single-transaction amounts [1]. - There is a growing trend among LPs to collaborate primarily with state-owned GPs, as they are perceived to have better performance and compliance, making them more attractive in the current market environment [1][2]. Group 2: Market Conditions - The private equity investment market in China has seen a significant decline, with the number of newly established funds dropping by 44.1% year-on-year in 2024, and the total fundraising amount decreasing by nearly 40% [4]. - The average size of newly established funds has fallen to 1.338 billion yuan, marking a ten-year low, while the number of registered private equity fund managers has decreased significantly [4][5]. Group 3: Challenges for Private GPs - Private GPs are facing intensified competition and difficulties in fundraising, with many unable to meet their fundraising targets, leading to potential deregistration of their management qualifications [5]. - The current market environment has created a "bottleneck" for fundraising, as state-owned investors require a certain proportion of market-oriented funds, complicating the establishment of new private funds [5]. Group 4: New Opportunities - Recent policy changes, such as the introduction of technology innovation bonds, aim to alleviate fundraising challenges for private GPs by providing low-cost, long-term financing options [8][9]. - The issuance of technology innovation bonds has gained momentum, with several equity investment institutions announcing plans to issue bonds totaling over 200 billion yuan [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining stability while seeking progress in China's economic work for the second half of the year, highlighting the need for continuous and flexible policy implementation to boost consumption and ensure economic recovery [1][3]. Summary by Sections Economic Situation and Policy Direction - The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) held a meeting to discuss the current economic situation and plans for the second half of the year, with a focus on stabilizing employment, enterprises, markets, and expectations [1][2]. - The meeting included representatives from various democratic parties and organizations, who expressed support for the CPC's analysis of the economic situation and provided suggestions for promoting technological and industrial innovation, enhancing service consumption, and improving social security for flexible employment groups [2][3]. Challenges and Strategic Focus - Despite the positive developments in the first half of the year, challenges and risks remain in the economic landscape. The CPC emphasizes the need for a proactive approach to macroeconomic policies, focusing on expanding domestic demand and deepening reforms [3][4]. - The CPC aims to consolidate the economic recovery momentum by leveraging development opportunities and addressing potential risks in key sectors [3]. Collaborative Efforts and Future Directions - The CPC acknowledges the contributions of various democratic parties and organizations in providing insights and suggestions for economic development, reflecting a spirit of cooperation under CPC leadership [4][5]. - The CPC encourages these organizations to unify their understanding of the economic situation and to promote high-quality development by utilizing their resources and expertise effectively [5].