Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of translating technical achievements into business value to enhance career advancement opportunities for technical professionals [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Communication - Technical professionals often focus solely on their work quality, neglecting the need to communicate the business impact of their contributions [1]. - A successful presentation of technical work should include metrics that demonstrate the positive outcomes, such as revenue increases or cost savings, rather than just technical jargon [2]. Group 2: Case Studies - A technical expert implemented a system optimization that saved the company 3 million annually but failed to articulate its value effectively, leading to missed recognition [1]. - Another example involved fixing a payment module bug, which improved the payment success rate from 92% to 99%, resulting in an estimated additional revenue of 20,000 per month. This was highlighted in a report, leading to recognition from management [2]. Group 3: Mindset Shift - There is a need for technical professionals to elevate their thinking to understand and communicate how their work aligns with business objectives [3]. - The article suggests that merely executing tasks without understanding their business implications limits career growth potential [3].

Core Viewpoint - Nvidia is under investigation by China's State Administration for Market Regulation for potential violations of antitrust laws related to its acquisition of Mellanox Technologies, particularly concerning supply commitments to the Chinese market and bundling practices [3][10]. Group 1: Violation Facts - In 2020, Nvidia acquired Mellanox for $6.9 billion, with conditions imposed by the Chinese authorities to prevent bundling sales of GPUs with Mellanox's network equipment [7]. - Nvidia has reportedly ceased supplying several GPU products to China since 2022, which may violate its previous commitments and could be seen as an abuse of its dominant market position in the high-end GPU market [8]. Group 2: Potential Penalties - Under antitrust laws, Nvidia could face fines up to 10% of its previous year's sales in China, estimated to be around $1 to $1.5 billion [9]. - If the situation is deemed particularly severe, Nvidia could incur punitive fines of 2 to 5 times the original penalty, or be required to divest parts of its business to restore market competition [9]. - Nvidia may also be mandated to rectify its business practices by lifting bundling agreements and resuming supply commitments [9].

Core Viewpoint - Xiaomi is set to launch the new Xiaomi 17 series, skipping the 16 series, which signifies a significant transformation in its high-end strategy over the past five years, aiming to compete directly with Apple's iPhone series [1][3]. Group 1 - The Xiaomi 17 series will include three models: Xiaomi 17, Xiaomi 17 Pro, and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, all featuring the world's first Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 mobile platform [1]. - Xiaomi's president, Lu Weibing, emphasized that the new series represents a cross-generational upgrade in product capabilities [1]. - Xiaomi's founder, Lei Jun, reiterated the company's commitment to directly compete with the iPhone, indicating a strong alignment in product naming conventions [3]. Group 2 - Speculation exists regarding new features in the Xiaomi 17 series, particularly a potential secondary screen integrated into the rear camera module, which may resemble design elements of the iPhone 17 Pro [3]. - The naming strategy of the Xiaomi 17 series, mirroring that of the iPhone 17 series, reinforces Xiaomi's intent to position itself as a direct competitor to Apple [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the public apology issued by Xibei, acknowledging a significant gap between their production processes and customer expectations, leading to a commitment to rectify these issues [3][4]. - Xibei has outlined nine specific corrective actions, including the decision to stop using genetically modified soybean oil and to adjust their central kitchen processing to on-site preparation at stores [4][5]. - The company has set a deadline to complete these adjustments by October 1, 2025, indicating a structured approach to addressing customer concerns [5]. Group 2 - The article highlights the ongoing conflict between Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, and public figure Luo Yonghao, with Jia's derogatory remarks about Luo being noted, which adds to the controversy surrounding Xibei [6][8]. - Luo Yonghao has publicly challenged Xibei's practices, questioning their transparency regarding pre-prepared dishes and the implications of their business decisions on customer trust [9]. - The public response to Xibei's apology has been overwhelmingly critical, with comments reflecting a sentiment that the company is deflecting blame onto customers rather than taking full responsibility for its actions [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The founder of Xibei, Jia Guolong, acknowledged his mistakes in handling customer feedback and expressed a commitment to transparency and learning from competitors like Pang Donglai [2][4]. Group 1: Customer Feedback and Response - There has been a significant increase in complaints about Xibei, particularly following their attempt to engage customers through kitchen live streams, which backfired [4]. - Jia Guolong's public apology reflects a shift in strategy to prioritize customer satisfaction and transparency in operations [2][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Environment - A draft national standard for pre-prepared food has passed expert review and will soon be open for public consultation, indicating a move towards stricter regulations in the food industry [4]. - The new regulations will require restaurants to disclose their use of pre-prepared foods, impacting how companies like Xibei operate [4]. Group 3: Public Relations and Media - The media, including Xinhua News Agency, has taken a stance on the issue, emphasizing the importance of transparency regarding the use of pre-prepared foods in restaurants [4]. - Influencer Luo Yonghao's involvement in the situation has drawn attention, with him expressing a desire for a direct conversation with Jia Guolong to address the contradictions in his statements [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the behavior of JavaScript's `setTimeout` function, highlighting that it does not execute with a true delay of 0 milliseconds, but rather has a minimum delay of approximately 4 milliseconds due to browser limitations aimed at preventing abuse and ensuring user experience [6][8]. Group 1: Timer Behavior and Limitations - Browsers impose a minimum delay of 4 milliseconds for `setTimeout` to prevent excessive battery drain and maintain page interactivity [8]. - Different browsers have varying restrictions, with older versions of Edge increasing the delay to 16 milliseconds on battery-powered devices, and Chrome imposing a 1-second delay on background tabs [8]. - A benchmark test showed that `setTimeout` in Chrome took 4.2 milliseconds, while alternatives like `MessageChannel` and `scheduler.postTask` performed significantly better [10][11]. Group 2: Alternatives to setTimeout - The article evaluates alternatives to `setTimeout`, including `setImmediate`, `MessageChannel.postMessage`, `window.postMessage`, and `scheduler.postTask`, with the latter being recommended for its ease of use and performance [9][11]. - The benchmark results indicated that `scheduler.postTask` and `MessageChannel.postMessage` had comparable performance, while `setTimeout` was consistently slower across different browsers [10][11]. Group 3: Developer Responsibility and Browser Design - There is a debate within the industry regarding whether developers should be held accountable for their code or if browsers should impose restrictions to prevent misuse of APIs like `setTimeout` [12]. - The article suggests that providing developers with better tools for task scheduling could reduce reliance on `setTimeout` and the need for browser interventions [12][13]. - The existence of the Scheduler API indicates a shift towards empowering developers while aligning with browser rendering processes [13].

Core Viewpoint - The article presents humorous illustrations related to programming, highlighting the challenges and quirks faced by developers in their daily tasks. Group 1 - The first illustration depicts the humorous consequences of interns modifying legacy code, emphasizing the risks associated with inexperienced developers handling critical systems [2] - The second illustration showcases six different approaches programmers take to fix bugs, reflecting the diverse problem-solving strategies within the software development community [3] - The third illustration contrasts backend and frontend development, illustrating the different skill sets and challenges faced by developers in these two areas [4]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing debate between Xi Bei and Luo Yonghao highlights the complexities and misunderstandings surrounding the concept of "pre-prepared dishes" in the Chinese food industry, with implications for consumer rights and industry transparency [3][10][17] Definition of Pre-prepared Dishes - The National Market Supervision Administration, along with five other departments, officially defined "pre-prepared dishes" on March 18, 2024, as dishes made from one or more food products that undergo industrial pre-processing and are packaged for sale, requiring heating or cooking before consumption [3][4] Central Kitchen Clarification - The dishes produced in central kitchens by chain restaurants do not fall under the category of pre-prepared dishes, as they must comply with food safety laws and standards [4][5] Legal Context - Xi Bei's legal action against Luo Yonghao may have a basis in the definitions provided by regulatory authorities, suggesting a potential for Xi Bei to win the case [6] Public Perception and Criticism - Xi Bei's management appears to misunderstand the source of public criticism, which is not solely directed at Luo Yonghao but rather at the broader issues of transparency and consumer rights in the pre-prepared food sector [7][9] Media Exposure and Backlash - A media visit to Xi Bei's kitchen revealed concerning practices, including the use of genetically modified soybean oil, frozen meats, and the admission of using overnight dishes, which led to significant public backlash [14][15] Consumer Rights Advocacy - Luo Yonghao's stance emphasizes the importance of consumer awareness regarding the nature of pre-prepared dishes, advocating for transparency in the food industry [10][12][17]

Core Viewpoint - Tencent has officially denied rumors regarding former OpenAI researcher Yao Shunyu joining the company with a salary of approximately 100 million RMB, stating that the claims are untrue [3][5]. Group 1: Yao Shunyu's Background - Yao Shunyu graduated from Tsinghua University and obtained his PhD from Princeton University. He joined OpenAI in August 2024 and quickly became a key member, contributing significantly to the development of intelligent agent products and Deep Research [7]. - In May 2025, Yao was recognized as the youngest member in the China region of MIT Technology Review's "35 Innovators Under 35" list [7]. Group 2: Reactions and Speculations - Following Tencent's denial, many netizens questioned whether the company was refuting the claim of Yao not joining or the claim regarding the high salary [8]. - Yao Shunyu's LinkedIn profile has not been updated, leaving his future career moves under scrutiny [9].

Core Points - The core issue revolves around the discontinuation of internet connectivity services for Nezha cars due to unpaid fees by Hozon Auto, leading to significant inconvenience for car owners [4][5][9]. Group 1: Service Disruption - Multiple Nezha car owners received messages from Hozon Auto stating that Guangdong Lenovo Communication Co., Ltd. would cease providing internet connectivity services, requiring users to purchase data plans themselves [1]. - Car owners reported that they were promised lifetime or five years of free 5G data upon purchase, yet they experienced service interruptions starting from September 9, 2025, affecting remote control and entertainment features [3]. Group 2: Financial Issues - Lenovo Communication issued a statement indicating that Hozon Auto had failed to pay service fees on time, resulting in significant operational cost pressures and service risks for car owners [4]. - The management of Hozon Auto announced that the company is undergoing bankruptcy restructuring, with a court ruling on June 12, 2025, and has been working to protect owner rights while facing unilateral service termination by Lenovo Communication [9].