香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚 賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 光大證券股份有限公司 Everbright Securities Company Limited （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） （股份代號：6178） 公告 建議修訂公司章程 光大證券股份有限公司（「本公司」）第七屆董事會第八次會議於2025年6月25日審 議通過了《關於修訂<光大證券股份有限公司章程>及其附件的議案》，擬根據《中 華人民共和國公司法》及中國證券監督管理委員會配套制度規則、《境內企業境外 發行證券和上市管理試行辦法》等相關規定對本公司的公司章程（「公司章程」）及 其附件《股東大會議事規則》《董事會議事規則》進行修訂，並廢止附件《監事會議 事規則》。具體內容請見本公告附件中所載之修訂對照表。除該等修訂外，公司章 程及其附件其他條款不變。 本次公司章程及其附件的修訂尚需本公司股東大會審議及批准。本公司將適時刊 發載有（其中包括）該等修訂議案詳情的通函及股東大會通告。 承董事會命 ...

证券代码：601788 股票简称：光大证券 公告编号：临 2025-020 H 股代码：6178 H 股简称：光大证券 光大证券股份有限公司 关于修订《公司章程》的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记 载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完 整性承担法律责任。 | 序号 | 修改前 | 修改后 | 依据 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 第一条 为维护光大证券股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）、 | 第一条 为维护光大证券股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）、 | 《上市公司章程指引》第 | | | 股东和债权人的合法权益，规范公司的组织和行为，根据《中 | 股东、职工和债权人的合法权益，规范公司的组织和行为，根 | 一条 | | | 华人民共和国公司法》（以下简称"《公司法》"）、《中华人民 | 据《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下简称"《公司法》"）、《中 | | | | 共和国证券法》（以下简称"《证券法》"）、《国务院关于股份 | 华人民共和国证券法》（以下简称"《证券法》"）、《国务院关 | 《国务院关于股份有限公 | | | 有限公司境 ...

证券代码：601788 股票简称：光大证券 公告编号：临 2025-019 H 股代码：6178 H 股简称：光大证券 本议案尚需提交公司股东大会审议。 1 光大证券股份有限公司 第七届董事会第八次会议决议公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、 误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承 担法律责任。 光大证券股份有限公司（以下简称公司）第七届董事会第八次会 议通知于 2025 年 6 月 20 日以电子邮件方式发出。会议于 2025 年 6 月 25 日上午 9:30 以现场、视频结合通讯方式召开。本次会议应到董 事 12 人，实到董事 12 人。其中，赵陵先生、连涯邻先生现场参会； 刘秋明先生、马韧韬女士、潘剑云先生、任永平先生、殷俊明先生、 吕随启先生以视频方式参会；尹岩武先生、秦小征先生、刘应彬先生、 陈选娟女士以通讯方式表决。赵陵先生主持本次会议，公司监事长和 部分监事、高管列席会议。本次会议符合《中华人民共和国公司法》 和《公司章程》关于召开董事会的规定。 公司董事经认真审议，通过了以下决议： 一、审议通过了《关于修订<光大证券股份有限公司章程>及其附 件 ...

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚 賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 光大證券股份有限公司 Everbright Securities Company Limited （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） （股份代號：6178） 海外監管公告 本公告乃根據香港聯合交易所有限公司證券上市規則第13.10B條刊發。 中國上海 2025年6月26日 於本公告日期，本公司董事會成員包括趙陵先生（董事長、執行董事）、劉秋明先 生（執行董事、總裁）、馬韌韜女士（非執行董事）、連涯鄰先生（非執行董事）、潘 劍雲先生（非執行董事）、尹岩武先生（非執行董事）、秦小徵先生（非執行董事）、 任永平先生（獨立非執行董事）、殷俊明先生（獨立非執行董事）、劉應彬先生（獨 立非執行董事）、陳選娟女士（獨立非執行董事）及呂隨啟先生（獨立非執行董事）。 证券代码：601788 股票简称：光大证券 公告编号：临 2025-019 H 股代码：6178 H 股简称：光大证券 光大证券股份有限公司 第七届 ...

Core Viewpoint - The domestic excavator sales in May 2025 are under short-term pressure due to weak downstream construction activity and the earlier high growth in sales that has overstated future demand [1][2] Group 1: Sales Performance - In the first five months of 2025, China's excavator sales (including exports) reached 101,716 units, a year-on-year increase of 17.4%, with domestic sales at 57,501 units, up 25.7% [1] - In May 2025, excavator sales (including exports) totaled 18,202 units, a year-on-year increase of 2.1%, while domestic sales were 8,392 units, showing a decline of 1.5% [1] - The average working hours for major construction machinery products in May 2025 were 84.5 hours, down 3.9% year-on-year and 6.3% month-on-month [1] Group 2: Future Outlook - The company remains optimistic about the continuous growth in the replacement of construction machinery, which is expected to support future excavator sales, with a projected compound growth rate of around 30% for replacement demand in the coming years [2] - The government plans to issue 1.3 trillion yuan in special bonds and increase local government special bonds to 4.4 trillion yuan, which is expected to stimulate infrastructure investment and subsequently boost equipment demand [3] Group 3: Export Trends - In the first five months of 2025, excavator exports reached 44,215 units, a year-on-year increase of 8.2%, with May exports at 9,810 units, up 5.4% [4] - The company sees opportunities in Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Middle East for construction machinery exports, despite challenges such as the changing geopolitical landscape and uncertainties related to US-China tariffs [4] Group 4: Electrification Trends - In the first five months of 2025, electric loader sales surged to 10,904 units, a remarkable year-on-year increase of 207.7%, with an electrification rate of 20.7%, up 14.5 percentage points [5] - The government emphasizes green transformation and the promotion of electric machinery, which is expected to accelerate the electrification process in the construction machinery sector, enhancing revenue and profits for manufacturers [5]

Group 1 - The report from Everbright Securities indicates a positive outlook for the domestic urban intelligent driving penetration rate, expecting a turning point in 2025E and rapid growth thereafter in 2026E and beyond [1] - The focus for the L2+ market is on promoting affordable intelligent vehicles priced between 100,000 to 200,000 yuan, while the L4 market is centered on the breakthrough of commercial scale for Robotaxi [1] - Recommendations include Tesla and the steering supplier Nextracker for L4 pure vision Robotaxi commercialization, as well as Xpeng Motors, with a suggestion to pay attention to Li Auto, NIO, and Pony.ai [1] Group 2 - The acceleration of Robotaxi commercialization is nearing a scale-up inflection point, with significant breakthroughs in order volumes and external collaborations among leading global Robotaxi companies since the second half of 2024 [1] - The report suggests that the core methodology for achieving L4 may involve reinforcement learning combined with world models, contrasting with L2+ which primarily relies on imitation learning [2] - The complexity of L4 implementation is expected to increase due to challenges in data construction, algorithm development, and the need for substantial computational resources [2] Group 3 - The report highlights that the dual paths of lidar and pure vision technology will continue from L2+ to L4, despite the drawbacks of lidar technology such as delays and conflicts in multi-sensor fusion [3] - The key to achieving commercial scalability for L4 lies in technological upgrades and cost reductions, as hardware costs are expected to rise [3] - The VLA (Vision-Language-Action) model combined with world models is anticipated to be a mainstream trend in the intelligent driving industry, although it has not yet been fully realized [4]

Group 1: Pet Economy - The pet economy continues to show high growth, with over 400 pet brands achieving sales growth of over 100% year-on-year during the "618" shopping festival [1] - The number of pet transaction users increased by 32% year-on-year, while new pet owners grew by 39% [1] - Top brands in various pet food categories include Royal Canin and Maffidi for cat and dog dry food, and Maffidi and Zeal for cat and dog snacks/wet food [1] Group 2: Pig Prices - The average price of external three yuan pigs rose to 14.22 yuan/kg, a week-on-week increase of 1.43% [2] - The average price of piglets decreased to 31.85 yuan/kg, down 3.16% week-on-week [2] - The average weight of market pigs decreased slightly to 128.28 kg, while the inventory rate of frozen products increased to 14.04% [2] Group 3: Grain Prices - Prices for corn, soybean meal, and wheat have increased, with corn averaging 2417.06 yuan/ton (up 0.47%), soybean meal at 3015.14 yuan/ton (up 1.59%), and wheat at 2441.67 yuan/ton (up 0.46%) [3] - Weather conditions and trade dynamics are influencing corn prices, while soybean meal prices are affected by supply concerns from the U.S. and geopolitical tensions [3] Group 4: Investment Recommendations - The pig farming sector is expected to enter a long-term profit growth phase after inventory reduction, with recommended companies including Juxing Agriculture, Shennong Group, and Muyuan Foods [4] - The post-cycle sector is seeing a recovery in feed and veterinary demand, with companies like Haida Group and Ruipu Biotech recommended [4] - The planting chain is showing positive fundamentals with rising grain prices, suggesting investment opportunities in companies like Suqian Agricultural Development and Beidahuang [4] - The pet food industry is in a growth phase, with increasing recognition of domestic brands and recommended companies including Guibao Pet and Zhongchong Co. [4]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report The report analyzes the bond custody volume data in May 2025, indicating that the month - on - month increase in the total bond custody volume has widened, with different trends in various bond types and significant differences in the custody volume changes of different institutions. The bond market leverage ratio has slightly increased [1][22]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Bond Custody Volume and Structure - The total bond custody volume has a wider month - on - month increase. As of the end of May 2025, the total bond custody volume of CCDC and SHCH was 169.99 trillion yuan, with a net month - on - month increase of 2.16 trillion yuan, 0.56 trillion yuan more than that at the end of April [10]. - The total credit bond custody volume slightly decreased, while the custody volumes of other bonds all increased month - on - month. In May 2025, the interest - rate bond custody volume was 115.73 trillion yuan, accounting for 68.08% of the inter - bank bond market custody volume, with a net increase of 1.70 trillion yuan; the credit bond custody volume was 18.35 trillion yuan, accounting for 10.79%, with a slight month - on - month decrease of 5254 million yuan; the non - policy financial bond custody volume was 12.17 trillion yuan, accounting for 7.16%, with a net increase of 0.22 trillion yuan; the inter - bank certificate of deposit (NCD) custody volume was 21.83 trillion yuan, accounting for 12.84%, with a net increase of 0.27 trillion yuan [10]. 3.2 Bond Holder Structure and Changes 3.2.1 Month - on - Month Changes in Custody Volume by Institution - Policy banks continued to increase their holdings of NCDs and major credit products while continuously reducing their holdings of major interest - rate products. - Commercial banks continued to increase their holdings of major interest - rate products while reducing their holdings of NCDs and major credit products. - Credit unions and non - legal entity products comprehensively increased their holdings of major bond types. - Insurance institutions increased their holdings of major interest - rate products and major credit products while continuously reducing their holdings of NCDs. - Securities companies and overseas institutions comprehensively reduced their holdings of major bond types [22]. 3.2.2 Month - on - Month Changes in Custody Volume by Bond Type - The custody volume of treasury bonds continued to increase month - on - month, with commercial banks continuously increasing their holdings and policy banks continuously reducing their holdings. - The custody volume of local government bonds continued to increase month - on - month, with commercial banks continuously increasing their holdings and policy banks continuously reducing their holdings. - The custody volume of policy financial bonds changed to an increase, with commercial banks being the main buyers. - The custody volume of NCDs continued to increase month - on - month, with non - legal entity products continuously increasing their holdings and commercial banks continuously reducing their holdings. - The custody volume of enterprise bonds continued to decrease month - on - month, and all institutions reduced their holdings. - The custody volume of medium - term notes continued to increase month - on - month, with non - legal entity products significantly increasing their holdings and commercial banks changing to reducing their holdings. - The custody volume of short - term commercial paper and super short - term commercial paper changed to a decrease, with non - legal entity products being the main sellers. - The custody volume of privately placed bonds continued to decrease month - on - month, with commercial banks being the main sellers [24]. 3.2.3 Holder Structure of Major Bond Types - As of the end of May 2025, the holder structure of treasury bonds: commercial banks accounted for 67.72%, overseas institutions 6.11%, policy banks 10.97%, non - legal entity products 8.38%, securities companies 3.10%, insurance institutions 2.56%, and credit unions 1.16% [29]. - The holder structure of policy financial bonds: commercial banks accounted for 54.39%, non - legal entity products 32.12%, overseas institutions 3.32%, credit unions 3.23%, insurance institutions 2.10%, securities companies 1.01%, and policy banks 3.83% [31]. - The holder structure of local government bonds: commercial banks accounted for 75.11%, non - legal entity products 9.07%, policy banks 9.50%, insurance institutions 4.82%, securities companies 0.93%, credit unions 0.55%, and overseas institutions 0.02% [35]. - The holder structure of enterprise bonds: non - legal entity products accounted for 53.61%, commercial banks 32.85%, securities companies 9.09%, insurance institutions 3.29%, policy banks 0.74%, credit unions 0.33%, and overseas institutions 0.09% [37]. - The holder structure of medium - term notes: non - legal entity products accounted for 62.74%, commercial banks 20.49%, nominal holder accounts (domestic) 7.16%, policy banks 4.85%, securities companies 4.32%, others 0.24%, credit unions 0.17%, overseas institutions 0.01%, and insurance institutions 0.00% [41]. - The holder structure of privately placed bonds: non - legal entity products accounted for 59.37%, commercial banks 25.05%, policy banks 1.35%, credit unions 2.10%, others 3.26%, nominal holder accounts (domestic) 2.01%, securities companies 1.18%, overseas institutions 5.60%, and insurance institutions 0.09% [44]. - The holder structure of NCDs: non - legal entity products accounted for 64.77%, commercial banks 28.59%, nominal holder accounts (domestic) 3.32%, securities companies 0.81%, policy banks 1.39%, others 0.25%, insurance institutions 0.09%, credit unions 0.05%, and overseas institutions 0.74% [46]. 3.3 Observation of Bond Market Leverage Ratio As of the end of May 2025, the estimated balance of repurchase - to - be - bought under pledged repurchase was 107,343.28 billion yuan, with a month - on - month increase of 1,870.36 billion yuan. The leverage ratio was 106.74%, with a month - on - month increase of 0.03 percentage points and a year - on - year decrease of 0.05 percentage points [47].

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the recent personnel change at Everbright Securities, where Mei Jian has transitioned from Vice President to Senior Expert, raising questions about the implications of this shift [1][5]. - Mei Jian, born in 1970, has a Master's degree in Business Administration and has had a long career in the securities industry, starting from Hubei Securities and holding various significant positions before joining Everbright Securities in 2006 [3][5]. - The announcement from Everbright Securities indicates that Mei Jian's responsibilities will remain unchanged despite the title change, continuing to oversee wealth management, futures, and the Hong Kong subsidiary [5]. Group 2 - Following this personnel adjustment, Everbright Securities now has only two remaining executives: President Liu Qiuming and Vice President Zhu Qun, who holds multiple roles including Compliance Director and Chief Risk Officer [5]. - In 2024, Everbright Securities reported a total revenue of 9.598 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 4.3%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 3.058 billion yuan, down 28.4% compared to the previous year [5].

Core Viewpoint - The report discusses the resignation of Liu Tao, the general manager of Xinxing Casting Co., Ltd., and its implications for the company's operations and debt repayment capacity [4]. Group 1: Company Overview - Xinxing Casting Co., Ltd. is located in Wuan City, with its legal representative being He Qishu [3]. - The company issued bonds in 2021 aimed at qualified investors, with specific provisions for interest rate adjustments and investor redemption options [3]. Group 2: Management Changes - Liu Tao submitted his resignation on June 13, 2025, due to work-related reasons, and will no longer hold any position within the company [4]. - His resignation will not affect the minimum number of board members required by law, and the company will proceed with the necessary procedures to appoint a new general manager [4]. Group 3: Impact on Debt Repayment Capacity - The change in management is considered a normal occurrence in the company's operations and is not expected to adversely affect daily management, production, or debt repayment capabilities [4]. - The trustee, Everbright Securities, will continue to monitor the company's operational and financial status, as well as the repayment of bond principal and interest [4].