Workflow
HTSC(601688)
icon
Search documents
华泰证券(601688) - 华泰证券股份有限公司独立董事候选人声明与承诺
2025-12-31 14:15
华泰证券股份有限公司 独立董事候选人声明与承诺 本人王建文,已充分了解并同意由提名人华泰证券股份有限公司 董事会提名为华泰证券股份有限公司第七届董事会独立董事候选人。 本人公开声明,本人具备独立董事任职资格,保证不存在任何影响本 人担任华泰证券股份有限公司独立董事独立性的关系,具体声明并承 诺如下: 一、本人具备上市公司运作的基本知识,熟悉相关法律、行政法 规、部门规章及其他规范性文件,具有 5 年以上法律、经济、会计、 财务、管理或者其他履行独立董事职责所必需的工作经验。 本人已经参加培训并取得证券交易所认可的相关培训证明材料。 二、本人任职资格符合下列法律、行政法规和部门规章以及公司 规章的要求: (一)《中华人民共和国公司法》关于董事任职资格的规定; (二)《中华人民共和国公务员法》关于公务员兼任职务的规定 (如适用); (四)中共中央纪委、中共中央组织部《关于规范中管干部辞去 公职或者退(离)休后担任上市公司、基金管理公司独立董事、独立 监事的通知》的规定(如适用); (五)中共中央组织部《关于进一步规范党政领导干部在企业兼 1 职(任职)问题的意见》的相关规定(如适用); (六)中共中央纪委、教育部 ...
华泰证券(601688) - 华泰证券股份有限公司独立董事提名人声明与承诺
2025-12-31 14:15
华泰证券股份有限公司 独立董事提名人声明与承诺 提名人:华泰证券股份有限公司董事会,现提名王建文先生为华 泰证券股份有限公司第七届董事会独立董事候选人,并已充分了解被 提名人职业、学历、职称、详细的工作经历、全部兼职、有无重大失 信等不良记录等情况。被提名人已同意出任华泰证券股份有限公司第 七届董事会独立董事候选人。提名人认为,被提名人具备独立董事任 职资格,与华泰证券股份有限公司之间不存在任何影响其独立性的关 系,具体声明并承诺如下: 一、被提名人具备上市公司运作的基本知识,熟悉相关法律、行 政法规、规章及其他规范性文件,具有 5 年以上法律、经济、会计、 财务、管理或者其他履行独立董事职责所必需的工作经验。 被提名人已经参加培训并取得证券交易所认可的相关培训证明 材料。 二、被提名人任职资格符合下列法律、行政法规和部门规章的要 求: (一)《中华人民共和国公司法》关于董事任职资格的规定; (二)《中华人民共和国公务员法》关于公务员兼任职务的规定 (如适用); (三)中国证监会《上市公司独立董事管理办法》、上海证券交 易所自律监管规则以及公司章程有关独立董事任职资格和条件的相 关规定; (四)中共中央纪委、 ...
华泰证券(601688) - 华泰证券股份有限公司第六届董事会第二十一次会议决议公告
2025-12-31 14:15
证券代码:601688 证券简称:华泰证券 公告编号:临 2025-082 华泰证券股份有限公司 第六届董事会第二十一次会议决议公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏,并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 一、董事会会议召开情况 本次会议审议通过了相关议案,并形成如下决议: (一)同意关于选举公司第七届董事会成员(非独立董事)的预 案,并同意提交公司股东会审议。 1、同意王会清先生、周易先生、丁锋先生、于兰英女士、柯翔 先生、晋永甫先生、陈建伟先生为公司第七届董事会非独立董事候选 人; 2、同意将上述人选提交公司股东会审议。 表决结果:13 票赞成,0 票反对,0 票弃权 待上述人选在公司股东会选举通过后,将正式履行公司第七届董 事会董事职责,任期三年。 1 此外,经公司研究,王莹女士为公司第七届董事会职工代表董事 候选人。公司职工代表大会将在公司股东会选举产生第七届董事会非 职工代表董事前,完成职工代表董事的选举。 公司非执行董事将不会从公司领取薪酬。公司执行董事将从公司 领取薪酬,其薪酬按有关规定和制度确定。 华泰证券股份有限公司(以下简称"公司 ...
HTSC(06886) - 海外监管公告
2025-12-31 14:14
香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責,對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明,並明確表示概不對因本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚賴 該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 (於中華人民共和國註冊成立之股份有限公司, 中文公司名稱為華泰證券股份有限公司,在香港以HTSC名義開展業務) (股份代號:6886) 海外監管公告 本公告乃根據上市規則第13.10B條規則作出。 茲載列本公司在上海證券交易所網站刊登之《華泰證券股份有限公司獨立董事提 名人聲明與承諾》,僅供參閱。 釋義 於本公告,除文義另有所指外,下列詞彙具有以下涵義。 「本公司」 指 於中華人民共和國以華泰證券股份有限公司的公司名 稱註冊成立的股份有限公司,於2007年12月7日由前身 華泰證券有限責任公司改制而成,在香港以「HTSC」 名義開展業務,根據公司條例第16部以中文獲准名稱 「華泰六八八六股份有限公司」及英文公司名稱「Huatai Securities Co., Ltd.」註冊為註冊非香港公司,其H股於 2015年6月1日在香港聯合交易所有限公司主板上市(股 票代碼:6886),其A股於2010年2月26日 ...
HTSC(06886) - 建议委任第七届董事会成员
2025-12-31 14:09
香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責,對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明,並明確表示概不對因本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚賴 該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 (於中華人民共和國註冊成立之股份有限公司, 中文公司名稱為華泰證券股份有限公司,在香港以HTSC名義開展業務) (股份代號:6886) 鑒於公司第六屆董事會成員任期屆滿,公司應在近期完成本次董事會換屆工作。 根據公司《章程》規定,董事會由13名董事組成,其中至少包括1/3的獨立董事。 同時,由於公司已發行境外上市外資股(H股)並在香港聯交所主板掛牌上市,為 滿足相關監管要求,公司董事會成員中至少須有一名獨立非執行董事通常居於香 港。在第六屆董事會成員中,由於任期屆滿,張偉先生將退任並不再作為第七屆 董事會執行董事候選人,陳仲揚先生及張金鑫先生將退任並不再作為第七屆董事 會非執行董事候選人。董事會謹此衷心感謝張偉先生、陳仲揚先生及張金鑫先生 過往對本公司作出的巨大貢獻。就董事會經作出一切合理查詢後所知及所信,就 即將退任的董事而言,彼等各自與董事會之間並無意見分歧,且據彼等所知並無 任何就彼等退任須提呈股東 ...
“十五五”定调大力发展新型储能,储能电池ETF(159566)标的指数年内涨超55%
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-31 12:01
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the fluctuations in the new energy sector, with various indices experiencing declines, while there is a notable net subscription for the energy storage battery ETF [1] - The carbon neutrality index of the Shanghai Environmental Exchange fell by 0.1%, while the new energy index and photovoltaic industry index both decreased by 1.1%, and the national new energy battery index dropped by 2.2% [1] - Despite the current downturn, the new energy sector is expected to rebound by 2025, with significant increases in various ETFs, including over 55% for the national new energy battery index and over 42% for the new energy ETF [1] Group 2 - Huatai Securities emphasizes the importance of accelerating the construction of a new energy system, which includes the development of new energy storage and the enhancement of smart grid infrastructure [1] - The company maintains a positive outlook on the development of new energy and the increase in electrification rates, indicating that companies in the energy storage, wind power, and grid sectors are likely to benefit continuously [1]
离岸观澜| 2025年中资离岸债盘点:中国跻身亚洲最大离岸美元债市场
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-31 11:44
Core Viewpoint - The offshore bond market for Chinese enterprises is experiencing stable growth in issuance, with a notable performance in the high-yield sector, as evidenced by a total issuance of approximately $312.26 billion in 2025, marking a 24% increase from 2024 [2][3]. Group 1: Issuance Overview - In 2025, the total issuance of Chinese offshore bonds reached approximately $312.26 billion, with 1,448 bonds issued, reflecting a year-on-year growth of about 24% [2][3]. - The market has become the largest offshore dollar bond market in Asia and the second largest globally [3]. - The issuance structure is diversified, with 791 dollar bonds, 375 renminbi bonds, and bonds in other currencies including Hong Kong dollars, Japanese yen, and euros [3]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The second half of 2025 saw improved issuance conditions due to successful restructuring of real estate debts, with net financing gaps turning positive [2][3]. - The dual-currency structure of the offshore bond market has strengthened, with a continued trend towards currency diversification [3]. Group 3: Sectoral Insights - The structure of offshore debt issuance is dominated by financial bonds (53%), followed by industrial bonds (24%), with real estate and urban investment bonds making up 15% and 8% respectively [4]. - New growth points in the market include industrial bonds, internet company bonds (e.g., Alibaba, Tencent), and green bonds, particularly following the launch of green bond pilot programs [4][6]. Group 4: Secondary Market Performance - The secondary market for Chinese offshore bonds has shown positive returns, with the Markit iBoxx Chinese dollar bond index rising by 6.88% by the end of 2025 [7][10]. - High-yield Chinese dollar bonds outperformed investment-grade bonds, with a return of 7.94% compared to 7.21% for investment-grade bonds [7][10]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The repayment pressure for offshore bonds is expected to remain significant in 2026, particularly from April to July, with a total repayment demand peaking during this period [12]. - Despite the anticipated repayment pressures, the market is expected to continue its recovery trend, although large-scale issuance may not be realized [12].
致尚科技:接受华泰证券等投资者调研
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-31 08:56
(记者 王瀚黎) 每经头条(nbdtoutiao)——2025十大财经新闻出炉!护航、酣战、变局、狂飙分别指向哪些大事件? 每经AI快讯,致尚科技发布公告称,2025年12月31日,致尚科技接受华泰证券等投资者调研,公司董 事会秘书陈丽玉、证券事务代表方笳企参与接待,并回答了投资者提出的问题。 ...
券商投行年度评级洗牌:腰部逆袭巨头掉队 罚单成“胜负手”
Core Insights - The annual evaluation results for the investment banking business in China reveal a shift in the competitive landscape, with non-traditional top firms making significant gains while established leaders face setbacks due to regulatory penalties [1][3][4] Group 1: Overall Evaluation Results - The China Securities Association published comprehensive evaluations covering investment banking, bond business, and financial advisory services for the year 2024, with 93 firms participating [3][5] - Among the evaluated firms, 12 were rated A-class, 66 B-class, and 15 C-class, representing 12.90%, 70.97%, and 16.13% of the total respectively [3] - Notably, half of the A-class firms are not traditional top revenue earners, indicating a diversification in the quality of investment banking services [1][3] Group 2: Bond Business Evaluation - The bond business evaluation included 95 firms, with 14 rated A-class, 62 B-class, and 19 C-class, corresponding to 14.74%, 65.26%, and 20.00% respectively [6] - Major firms like CITIC Securities and Huatai Securities, despite high underwriting volumes, did not achieve A-class ratings due to regulatory issues, while lower-ranked firms like Caixin Securities did [1][6][10] Group 3: Financial Advisory Services Evaluation - The financial advisory services evaluation was limited to 30 firms, with only 5 achieving A-class ratings, all of which are top-tier institutions [2][11] - The evaluation reflects a high concentration of resources among leading investment banks, with a significant disparity between A-class and lower-rated firms [2][12] - The evaluation criteria for financial advisory services differ from those for investment banking, focusing solely on M&A performance, which allows firms like CITIC Jinpu to excel despite lower overall ratings in other categories [12][13] Group 4: Regulatory Impact - Regulatory penalties have a substantial impact on the evaluation outcomes, with firms like CITIC Jinpu receiving multiple penalties that affected their ratings, while others like Shenwan Hongyuan faced scrutiny without major violations [4][5][9] - The evaluation process considers not only the performance during the evaluation period but also significant violations that occur afterward, indicating a long-term view on compliance [10] Group 5: Market Dynamics - The evaluations signal a shift in the investment banking landscape, where compliance and internal control quality are becoming more critical than mere scale, reshaping competition and market dynamics [2][3] - The concentration of top-tier firms in financial advisory services suggests a growing trend towards specialization and expertise in high-stakes areas like M&A [12][16]
2025年A股IPO保荐机构排名:5家分走一半业务,国泰海通17单居首
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-31 04:26
Group 1 - The A-share IPO market in 2025 saw a total of 116 companies complete their listings, representing a 16% year-on-year increase [2] - The total fundraising amount reached 122.025 billion yuan, marking a significant year-on-year growth of 104.25% [2] - The distribution of listings included 23 on the Shanghai main board, 19 on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, 15 on the Shenzhen main board, 33 on the Growth Enterprise Market, and 26 on the Beijing Stock Exchange, with the Growth Enterprise Market and Beijing Stock Exchange accounting for over 50% of the total IPOs [2] Group 2 - A total of 30 underwriting institutions participated in the IPO business for the 116 newly listed companies, with the total number of underwriting business units reaching 117 due to two institutions being hired by Huadian New Energy for one business each [3] - The top five underwriting institutions dominated the market, collectively handling 62 business units, which is over half of the total [3] - Guotai Junan ranked first with 17 business units, followed by CITIC Securities with 15, CITIC Jianzhong with 11, Huatai United with 10, and China Merchants Securities with 9 [3][4]