Group 1 - The fund "Changjiang Lexin Pure Bond Regular Open-End Fund" will have its 27th open period from February 24, 2026, to March 9, 2026, during which investors can apply for subscription and redemption [1][2] - The fund operates on a regular open-end basis, with a closed period of three months between open periods, and will enter its 28th closed period starting March 10, 2026 [1][2] - The minimum subscription amount for the fund is set at RMB 10 for the first subscription and RMB 1 for additional subscriptions through sales institutions, while the minimum for direct sales is RMB 1 [4][5] Group 2 - The fund's subscription fee is structured to decrease as the subscription amount increases, and it is charged on a front-end basis [6] - Investors must submit their subscription applications during the specified business hours on open days, and the confirmation of successful subscriptions will occur on the next business day [7][10] - The fund allows a minimum redemption of 10 fund shares per transaction, and if the balance falls below this threshold, the sales institution may process a full redemption [8][9] Group 3 - The fund management company is responsible for disclosing the fund's net asset value at least weekly during the closed period and daily during the open period [12] - Investors are encouraged to refer to the fund's prospectus and other legal documents for detailed information regarding the fund's operations and regulations [14] - The fund allows a single investor to hold more than 50% of the fund shares and is not available for individual investors [15]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the announcement of the "Top Ten Macroeconomists of 2025," emphasizing the challenges and transformations in the Chinese economy, with a focus on proactive fiscal policies and moderately loose monetary policies to achieve high-quality development [1][2][3] - The evaluation of the economists was based on five dimensions: professionalism, influence, innovation, foresight, and activity level, with results determined through a voting process by a review panel [3] - The macroeconomists are expected to provide insights on new productive forces, boosting domestic demand, risk mitigation, and long-term growth strategies, clarifying development logic amid changing circumstances [1][2] Group 2 - Wu Ge, Chief Economist and Assistant President of Changjiang Securities, was awarded the title of "Top Ten Macroeconomists of 2025," with notable viewpoints on economic expectations and macroeconomic understanding [4] - Wu Ge's perspectives include analyzing the economic outlook for the new year, discussing the economic closure, and addressing the concept of "anti-involution" from multiple dimensions [4]

Market Overview - The A-share market exhibited a pattern of reduced volume and mixed fluctuations, with essential consumer and industrial sectors leading weekly gains[1] - The growth style's congestion level has decreased over the past two weeks, but remains lower than that of high-quality and growth stocks in absolute terms[1] Industry Insights - Congestion levels for agricultural products and banks have increased, while transportation and telecommunications sectors lag behind in weekly trading congestion[1] - Essential consumer and industrial sectors showed strong weekly performance, indicating a potential shift in market focus[4] Investment Trends - Institutional funds generally experienced a pullback as growth stocks declined, reflecting a broader trend of profit-taking among funds[4] - The Longjiang Manufacturing Champions and Low-Carbon Leaders indices performed well, highlighting specific thematic investment opportunities[4] Performance Metrics - The growth style indices showed a notable decline, with the Longjiang Growth Index down by 4.08% and the Longjiang High Valuation Index down by 6.20%[21] - In contrast, the Longjiang Low Valuation Index recorded a modest gain of 0.56%, indicating a preference for value-oriented investments during this period[31]

Group 1: Report Highlights - The widening spread between special-purpose bonds and general bonds was mainly driven by supply shocks and the differentiated risk weights of commercial banks. The relative relationship of spreads between 20Y and 30Y local government bonds was driven by changes in Treasury yields. There were regional differentiations in the primary spread levels of local government bonds, and the difference between primary and secondary spreads verified the differences in the marketization degree of issuance in each region. The liquidity level of local government bonds affected the historical spread changes. There were certain differences in the number of market quotes from brokers in each region, reflecting the differences in liquidity. Moreover, there were regular differentiations in the trading preferences of each province and various institutional entities [3]. Group 2: Core Views - The report systematically analyzed the investment value of local government bonds from two core dimensions: the changes in local government bond spreads and their influencing factors, and the trading and buying situations in the local government bond market. It provided in - depth analyses of the driving factors behind the widening of the spread between special - purpose bonds and general bonds from late 2024 to early 2025 and the change in the relative relationship between 20Y and 30Y local government bonds around Q4 2024. It also focused on the regional differentiations in primary and secondary spreads and their causes, and summarized the regular characteristics in trading and net - buying preferences in the market [78]. Group 3: Summary by Directory 1. Exploration of Factors Affecting Local Government Bond Spreads 1.1 Widening of Spread between Special - Purpose Bonds and General Bonds - From 2020 to early 2024, the spread between special - purpose bonds and general bonds remained stable within the range of - 4 to 4bp. However, from late 2024 to early 2025, the spread widened significantly, reaching a peak of 8bp in early May 2025 and then gradually falling back to around 2bp. The main reasons were the concentrated supply shock of special - purpose bonds and the differentiated risk weights of commercial banks. In November and December 2024, over 2 trillion yuan of special - purpose bonds were issued, which exceeded the market demand and broke the supply - demand balance. The "Commercial Bank Capital Management Measures" implemented on January 1, 2024, differentiated the risk exposure weights of general bonds (10%) and special - purpose bonds (20%), which increased the capital occupation cost of commercial banks for special - purpose bonds and reduced their allocation demand [14][18]. 1.2 Changes in Spreads of 20Y and 30Y Local Government Bonds - The spread between 20Y and 30Y local government bonds changed around Q4 2024, with the spread of 30Y local government bonds minus that of 20Y local government bonds turning from negative to positive. This change was mainly due to the change in the relative level of 20Y and 30Y Treasury yields, as the change point of Treasury yields coincided with that of local government bond spreads [32]. 1.3 Difference between Primary and Secondary Spreads - From 2015 - 2025, the primary spreads of local government bonds showed significant regional differentiations and term - related characteristics. Regionally, the primary spreads were inversely related to the regional economic development level, with higher spreads in the central, western, and northeastern regions. In terms of term, the primary spread of 1Y local government bonds was relatively low, while those of 2 - 10Y bonds were generally over 20bp, and the spread of 5Y bonds was the highest at 23.21bp. The spreads of 15 - 30Y long - term local government bonds fluctuated around 18bp. The difference between primary and secondary spreads reflected the regional differentiations in the marketization degree of local government bond issuance. Some provinces had a small difference between primary and secondary spreads, while in some areas such as Ningbo, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, the non - marketization of issuance was more serious [35][40]. 1.4 Factors Affecting Spreads - The offensive and defensive characteristics of local government bonds changed significantly around August 2023. Before August 2023, local government bonds had stronger defensive attributes than Treasury bonds, and their spread changes were mainly passive. After August 2023, their offensive attributes became prominent, and the active widening and narrowing of spreads were obvious. The main reasons were the change in the participation of trading desks and the impact of policies on the supply term structure of local government bonds. The increase in the supply of special - purpose bonds also led to the widening of spreads in some stages [45][49][52]. 2. Analysis of Local Government Bond Trading and Buying 2.1 Bid/Ofr Quote Quantity and Spread - According to the sampling data of 10Y new local government bonds issued after August 8, 2025, in the broker market, there were significant differences in the liquidity of local government bonds in each region. Some regions had high broker - market activity, with sufficient bid and ofr quotes and active trading, while some regions had poor liquidity. The average bid - ofr difference of the sampled provinces was about 1.68bp, and the ChinaBond valuation price was generally 1 - 2bp higher than the ofr price [58]. 2.2 Regional Trading Patterns - By comparing the trading volume and trading value of local government bonds in 2024 and 2025, it was found that some regions had obvious trading preferences for certain - term local government bonds. For example, 1 - 3Y bonds were more actively traded in Zhejiang, 5 - 7Y bonds were more popular in Shenzhen, Chongqing, and Jiangsu, and long - term bonds with a term of over 20Y were actively traded in Fujian, Shandong, and Sichuan. The weighted average trading terms calculated by trading volume and trading value were consistent with the above - mentioned trading preferences [63]. 2.3 Net Buying - Based on the data from 2021 - 2025, different institutional entities had different net - buying preferences for local government bonds of different terms. Large - scale banks mainly focused on local government bonds with a term of less than seven years, rural commercial banks had a more diverse range of term preferences, city commercial banks' net - buying characteristics were similar to those of rural commercial banks, securities firms' self - operation mainly concentrated on 1 - 5Y local government bonds, funds' net - buying terms were more dispersed, and insurance companies showed an increasing preference for long - term local government bonds and were the largest net - buying entities for 15 - 30Y local government bonds [68]. 2.4 Cross - Market Trading Comparison - After the optimization of the local government bond transfer - custody business, it became more convenient to transfer local government bonds between the inter - bank market and the exchange market. The inter - bank market had the largest trading volume of local government bonds, and the absolute values of the differences between the trading prices in the inter - bank and broker markets and the ChinaBond valuation were smaller. The Shanghai Stock Exchange had a larger trading volume than the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, with higher trading yields [73][76].

Core Insights - Longhua Technology (联化科技) is positioned as a leading player in the agricultural and pharmaceutical CDMO sectors, with significant achievements in small nucleic acid CDMO and potential in functional chemicals [1][2] Business Overview - Longhua Technology has established a collaborative development framework across four core industrial segments: agricultural protection, pharmaceuticals, functional chemicals, and equipment & engineering services [2] - The agricultural protection segment generated revenue of 1.702 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, with a gross margin increase of 9.48% year-on-year [2] - The pharmaceutical segment, focusing on APIs and intermediates, achieved revenue of 1.018 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 42.80% [2] Small Nucleic Acid CDMO - The company is leveraging small nucleic acid CDMO to tap into new growth opportunities, with advantages over traditional small molecule and antibody drugs, including broader target selection and higher success rates [3] - Since 2022, the market for small nucleic acid drugs has seen significant activity, with 32 transactions totaling 29.022 billion USD in 2025, indicating strong commercial value [3] - Longhua Technology has developed scalable production processes for modified nucleotides and has established a high-efficiency delivery system for nucleic acid drugs, enhancing its competitive edge [3] Functional Chemicals and Market Potential - The functional chemicals segment reported revenue of 0.265 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, marking a year-on-year doubling [4] - The company is focusing on lithium battery materials, including lithium hexafluorophosphate and LiFSI, with ongoing product development in various testing phases [4] - The National Development and Reform Commission's new storage action plan aims for over 1.8 million kilowatts by 2027, which is expected to drive significant market demand in the energy storage sector [4] Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, Longhua Technology reported total revenue of 4.718 billion yuan, an increase of 8.25% year-on-year, and a net profit of 316 million yuan, surging by 871.65% [1] - The projected net profit for 2025 is estimated to be between 350 million and 420 million yuan, representing a year-on-year growth of 239.35% to 307.22% [4]

Group 1 - The overall A-share pre-announcement rate has improved, indicating a potential recovery in profitability [1][7] - As of February 3, 2026, approximately 3,000 out of 5,478 A-share companies have disclosed their 2025 annual performance forecasts, resulting in a disclosure rate of 54.0% and a pre-announcement rate of 37.0%, up from 33.7% in 2024 [1][7] - In the 2025 annual performance forecasts, there are 623 companies expecting profit increases and 378 companies expecting profit decreases [1][7] Group 2 - Large-cap stocks are expected to show better profitability compared to small-cap stocks, with the ChiNext board having a higher pre-announcement rate [2][8] - The maximum profit change for major indices in 2025 is projected to be 55.2% for CSI 300, 82.8% for SSE 50, 54.7% for CSI 500, and 50.8% for CSI 1000 [2][8] - The pre-announcement rates for major indices are 63.2% for CSI 300, 83.3% for SSE 50, 59.0% for CSI 500, and 49.4% for CSI 1000 [2][8] Group 3 - In terms of industry performance, the defense and electronics sectors have shown high disclosure and pre-announcement rates, indicating a strong potential for profitability improvement [3][9] - The highest disclosure rates among primary industries are coal (81%), real estate (78%), agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery (74%), and computer industry (72%) [3][9] - The highest pre-announcement rates are in non-bank financials (96.2%), non-ferrous metals (67.6%), automotive (52.7%), and steel (50.0%) [3][9] Group 4 - The market outlook for 2026 suggests a gradual bull market, with signs of a profitability bottom emerging and ample liquidity supporting corporate earnings [4][10] - Valuation metrics are near historical averages, with a low interest rate environment providing upward valuation momentum [4][10] - There is significant potential for increased market capitalization in the Chinese stock market as long-term capital flows in [4][10] Group 5 - The industry allocation outlook favors technology and cyclical sectors, with a focus on U.S. stocks and commodities [5][11] - Key areas of interest include technology, domestic circulation, strategic security, and opening up to foreign markets, driven by policy directions from the next five-year plan [5][11] - The market is expected to experience a more comprehensive bull market driven by technological manufacturing and certain cyclical trends [5][11]

Core Viewpoint - Despite the positive earnings forecasts from 28 brokerage firms, investor anxiety persists as stock prices continue to decline even with increasing profits [1][2]. Group 1: Earnings Performance - As of February 4, 2026, 29 brokerage firms have reported significant earnings growth, with CITIC Securities achieving a net profit exceeding 30 billion yuan, setting a new industry record [2][6]. - The overall performance of the brokerage sector has been lackluster, with the CSI Securities Index showing a year-to-date decline of 1.83%, underperforming the Shanghai Composite Index, which rose by 3.36% [2][11]. - Notably, the net profit of Guolian Minsheng surged by 406%, highlighting the disparity in performance among different firms [2][7]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - On February 2, 2026, while the A-share market experienced a pullback, brokerage stocks also dipped, but on February 3, they continued to decline despite a market rebound [3][4]. - The CSI Securities Index saw a collective rise on February 4, with all 49 constituent stocks closing in the green, indicating a potential recovery in sentiment [4][5]. Group 3: Future Outlook - Analysts predict that the brokerage sector will experience a significant earnings growth of approximately 46% in 2025, driven by improved market conditions and policy benefits [8][9]. - The brokerage industry's profitability is expected to be bolstered by three main factors: improved market conditions, optimized business structures, and ongoing policy support [9][12]. - Current valuations of brokerage stocks are considered low, with a price-to-book ratio of 1.36, suggesting potential for recovery as the sector enters a new growth cycle [11][12].

丨证券研究报告丨 金融工程丨点评报告 [Table_Title] 锚点重塑（二）：基准要素库发布，会否引起基 准大量变动？ 报告要点 research.95579.com 1 [Table_Title 锚点重塑（二）：基准要素库发布，会否引起基 2] 准大量变动？ [Table_Summary2] 事件描述 2026 年 1 月 27 日，中国证券投资基金业协会（以下简称"基金业协会"）发布公募基金业绩 比较基准要素库（以下简称"基准要素库"）及运作说明的公告。该基准库经第一届公募基金业 绩比较基准要素库专家工作组第一次会议评议通过，具体内容包括《公募基金业绩比较基准要 素库运作说明》和股票指数一类库、二类库。 事件评论 [Table_Summary] 2026 年 1 月 27 日，中国证券投资基金业协会发布公募基金业绩比较基准要素库及运作说明的 公告。该基准库经第一届公募基金业绩比较基准要素库专家工作组第一次会议评议通过，具体 内容包括《公募基金业绩比较基准要素库运作说明》和股票指数一类库、二类库。综合来看， 一类库覆盖度较高，可能不会引发较大数量的主动权益基金基准调整，随着基准规范化持续推 进，二类库覆 ...

证券之星消息，2月2日证券板块较上一交易日下跌0.01%，长江证券领跌。当日上证指数报收于 4015.75，下跌2.48%。深证成指报收于13824.35，下跌2.69%。证券板块个股涨跌见下表： | 代码 | 名称 | 收盘价 | 涨跌幅 | 成交量(手) | 成交额(元) | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 000712 | 锦龙股份 | 12.23 | 3.38% | 43.25万 | | 5.34亿 | | 601881 | 中国银河 | 15.11 | 0.60% | 63.91万 | | 9.751Z | | 601456 | 国联民生 | 9.75 | 0.41% | 55.55万 | | 5.47亿 | | 002670 | 国盛证券 | 16.43 | 0.18% | 35.99万 | | 5.97亿 | | 600918 | 中泰证券 | 6.40 | 0.16% | 57.54万 | | 3.74亿 | | 6501059 | 信达证券 | 17.59 | 0.00% | 32.92万 | | 5.83亿 | | 60123 ...

2月2日，长江证券跌5.08%，截至发稿，报8.22元/股，成交8.86亿元，换手率1.92%，总市值454.57亿 元。 资料显示，长江证券股份有限公司位于湖北省武汉市江汉区淮海路88号，成立日期1997年7月24日，上 市日期1997年7月31日，公司主营业务涉及证券代理买卖、证券自营、证券承销、受托资产管理等证券 类业务。主营业务收入构成为：经纪及证券金融业务分部60.03%，证券自营业务分部21.94%，另类投 资及私募股权投资管理业务分部9.27%，投资银行业务分部3.97%，资产管理业务分部3.23%，其他业务 分部0.99%，海外业务分部0.55%。 申万菱信中证500指数优选增强A（003986）基金经理为刘敦。 截至发稿，刘敦累计任职时间8年118天，现任基金资产总规模28.08亿元，任职期间最佳基金回报 89.05%， 任职期间最差基金回报-70.72%。 声明：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。 本文基于第三方数据库自动发布，不代表新浪财经观点，任何在本 文出现的信息均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建议。如有出入请以实际公告为准。如有疑问，请联系 biz@staff.sina.com.cn。 责任编辑 ...