Group 1: Antitrust Enforcement Achievements - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has focused on addressing monopolistic issues that are of significant concern to the public, resulting in the investigation of 35 monopoly agreement cases and 25 abuse of market dominance cases over the past three years, with a total fine of 2.93 billion yuan [1] - SAMR has concluded 950 cases related to business concentration in the consumer sector, supporting companies in enhancing operational efficiency through mergers and acquisitions [1] - The agency has also resolved 148 cases involving the abuse of administrative power to eliminate or restrict competition, addressing issues such as local protectionism and market segmentation [1] Group 2: Pharmaceutical Sector Focus - SAMR has maintained a stringent enforcement stance in the pharmaceutical sector, investigating 12 major cases over three years, with significant fines imposed on companies such as Shanghai Pharmaceuticals and Tianjin Pharmaceutical, totaling 1.219 billion yuan, 362 million yuan, and 223 million yuan respectively [2] - The enforcement actions have led to price reductions of over 40% for involved drugs, with some prices dropping by as much as 95%, thereby reducing patient medication costs and national healthcare expenditures [2] - SAMR aims to continue prioritizing antitrust enforcement in the pharmaceutical sector, focusing on severe and rapid investigations of major monopolistic cases to maintain fair competition and protect consumer interests [2] Group 3: Platform Economy Regulation - The rapid development of the platform economy in China has introduced unique competitive characteristics, such as significant scale and network effects, leading to a tendency for leading platform companies to engage in cross-industry competition and rapid expansion [3] - The SAMR has identified prominent antitrust risks in the platform economy, noting that platform companies need to enhance their awareness and capability regarding antitrust compliance [3] - To address these challenges, SAMR has developed the "Antitrust Compliance Guidelines for Internet Platforms," aimed at guiding platform companies in risk identification, management, and compliance to effectively mitigate antitrust risks and promote healthy development of the platform economy [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent guidelines issued by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) regarding antitrust compliance for internet platforms, highlighting potential monopolistic behaviors and the need for platforms to ensure fair pricing and transparency in algorithms [1][2]. Group 1: Antitrust Compliance Guidelines - The SAMR has introduced the "Antitrust Compliance Guidelines for Internet Platforms (Draft for Comments)" which outlines eight new types of monopolistic risks [1]. - Platforms requiring merchants to sell products at "the lowest price on the internet" may be deemed as abusing market dominance or engaging in monopolistic agreements [1]. - The guidelines emphasize the importance of transparency in algorithms, warning against "algorithm black boxes" that could harm merchants and consumers [1]. Group 2: Enforcement and Risk Management - The SAMR has previously addressed multiple cases of monopolistic practices, particularly the "choose one from two" behavior by platforms, and the guidelines aim to summarize enforcement experiences to prevent such practices [1]. - The article stresses the complexity of platform economics and the need for regulatory bodies to guide platforms in risk identification, management, and compliance to foster healthy development in the platform economy [2].

刘健介绍，近年来市场监管总局已依法查处多起平台企业"二选一"垄断案件，指引总结执法经 验，提示具有市场支配地位的平台企业避免通过惩罚性或者激励性措施实施"二选一"行为。 据新华社从市场监管总局获悉，平台要求商家"全网最低价"，可能构成滥用市场支配地位或者 垄断协议行为。 当日，市场监管总局举行新闻发布会，介绍民生领域反垄断执法相关情况。市场监管总局反垄 断执法一司副司长刘健介绍，近期发布的《互联网平台反垄断合规指引（征求意见稿）》提出 了8个新型垄断风险，为平台企业提供务实管用的合规指导。 例如，有的平台企业要求平台内商家销售商品价格不得高于其他竞争性平台。指引提示，平台 要求商家"全网最低价"，可能构成滥用市场支配地位或者垄断协议行为。 又如，有的平台算法不公开、不透明，"算法黑箱"损害平台内商家和消费者利益。指引将实现 算法向善作为平台企业重要的合规目标，并列举"算法共谋"等风险示例，同时鼓励平台企业开 展算法筛查，构建算法垄断识别防控体系，从源头上防范垄断行为的发生。 刘健表示，平台经济具有独特的商业逻辑和行为模式，涉及多方主体利益，如何科学划定行为 边界较为复杂。监管部门要引导平台企业加强风险识别、风 ...

又如，有的平台算法不公开、不透明，"算法黑箱"损害平台内商家和消费者利益。指引将实现算法向善 作为平台企业重要的合规目标，并列举"算法共谋"等风险示例，同时鼓励平台企业开展算法筛查，构建 算法垄断识别防控体系，从源头上防范垄断行为的发生。 刘健介绍，近年来市场监管总局已依法查处多起平台企业"二选一"垄断案件，指引总结执法经验，提示 具有市场支配地位的平台企业避免通过惩罚性或者激励性措施实施"二选一"行为。 记者17日从市场监管总局获悉，平台要求商家"全网最低价"，可能构成滥用市场支配地位或者垄断协议 行为。 当日，市场监管总局举行新闻发布会，介绍民生领域反垄断执法相关情况。市场监管总局反垄断执法一 司副司长刘健介绍，近期发布的《互联网平台反垄断合规指引（征求意见稿）》提出了8个新型垄断风 险，为平台企业提供务实管用的合规指导。 例如，有的平台企业要求平台内商家销售商品价格不得高于其他竞争性平台。指引提示，平台要求商 家"全网最低价"，可能构成滥用市场支配地位或者垄断协议行为。 来源｜新华社 编辑｜钉钉 （头图由AI生成） 刘健表示，平台经济具有独特的商业逻辑和行为模式，涉及多方主体利益，如何科学划定行为边界较 ...

又如，有的平台算法不公开、不透明，"算法黑箱"损害平台内商家和消费者利益。指引将实现算法向 善作为平台企业重要的合规目标，并列举"算法共谋"等风险示例，同时鼓励平台企业开展算法筛查， 构建算法垄断识别防控体系，从源头上防范垄断行为的发生。 刘健介绍，近年来市场监管总局已依法查处多起平台企业"二选一"垄断案件，指引总结执法经验，提 示具有市场支配地位的平台企业避免通过惩罚性或者激励性措施实施"二选一"行为。 刘健表示，平台经济具有独特的商业逻辑和行为模式，涉及多方主体利益，如何科学划定行为边界较为 复杂。监管部门要引导平台企业加强风险识别、风险管理和合规保障，有效防范反垄断合规风险，促进 平台经济健康发展。 记者17日从市场监管总局获悉，平台要求商家"全网最低价"，可能构成滥用市场支配地位或者垄断协 议行为。 当日，市场监管总局举行新闻发布会，介绍民生领域反垄断执法相关情况。市场监管总局反垄断执法一 司副司长刘健介绍，近期发布的《互联网平台反垄断合规指引（征求意见稿）》提出了8个新型垄断风 险，为平台企业提供务实管用的合规指导。 例如，有的平台企业要求平台内商家销售商品价格不得高于其他竞争性平台。指引提示，平台 ...

12月17日，据市场监管总局，平台要求商家"全网最低价"，可能构成滥用市场支配地位或者垄断协议行 为。 又如，有的平台算法不公开、不透明，"算法黑箱"损害平台内商家和消费者利益。指引将实现算法向善 作为平台企业重要的合规目标，并列举"算法共谋"等风险示例，同时鼓励平台企业开展算法筛查，构建 算法垄断识别防控体系，从源头上防范垄断行为的发生。 刘健介绍，近年来市场监管总局已依法查处多起平台企业"二选一"垄断案件，指引总结执法经验，提示 具有市场支配地位的平台企业避免通过惩罚性或者激励性措施实施"二选一"行为。 刘健表示，平台经济具有独特的商业逻辑和行为模式，涉及多方主体利益，如何科学划定行为边界较为 复杂。监管部门要引导平台企业加强风险识别、风险管理和合规保障，有效防范反垄断合规风险，促进 平台经济健康发展。（转载自新华社） 当日，市场监管总局举行新闻发布会，介绍民生领域反垄断执法相关情况。市场监管总局反垄断执法一 司副司长刘健介绍，近期发布的《互联网平台反垄断合规指引（征求意见稿）》提出了8个新型垄断风 险，为平台企业提供务实管用的合规指导。 例如，有的平台企业要求平台内商家销售商品价格不得高于其他竞争性平台 ...

市场监管总局反垄断执法一司副司长刘健：近期发布的《互联网平台反垄断合规指引（征求意见稿）》提出了8个新型垄断风险。例如，有的平台企业要求平台内商家销售商品价格不得高于其他竞争性平台。指引提示，平台要求商家“全网最低价”，可能构成滥用市场支配地位或者垄断协议行为。外汇交易员 (@myfxtrader):市场监管总局公布《互联网平台反垄断合规指引（征求意见稿）》：平台经营者要避免利用大数据分析、人工智能等技术手段对转售价格进行自动化设定，避免利用用户画像、预测算法等对转售价格进行直接或者间接限定。确认评估平台经营者是否具有市场支配地位的考虑因素。 https://t.co/np1QxEtgIv ...

新京报讯(记者陈琳)公用事业垄断行为不仅直接影响企业运营，更关系到千家万户的民生冷暖。国家市 场监管总局反垄断执法一司副司长刘健在12月17日举行的新闻发布会上透露，在为期三年的民生领域反 垄断执法专项行动中，公用事业成为查处案件数量最多的领域。市场监管部门通过集中执法，有力遏制 了水电气热等民生关键环节的垄断乱象，取得了"降成本、减负担、立规矩"三重实效。 在查处案件的同时，市场监管总局注重"以案促治、以点带面"，通过举办专题合规讲堂、召开行业指导 会、发布典型案例等方式加强普法宣传。针对执法中发现的共性问题，总局正在加紧制定公用事业领域 反垄断专门指南，旨在为企业提供更清晰、可预期的行为规范，从源头防范垄断风险。 "查处案件不是终点，推动行业整体规范、健康、可持续发展才是目标。"刘健强调。目前相关指南正在 按程序推进，将为公用事业领域公平竞争提供更加明确的制度保障。 比如，在南京10家瓶装液化气经营者垄断协议案中，10家企业约定互不低价竞争抢占客户，并专门召开 会议，协商共同提高销售价格，被依法处罚827万元。三年来，类似侵害消费者利益的协同涨价案件被 查处10余起，及时恢复了市场公平竞争，让群众切实享受 ...

Core Viewpoint - The acquisition battle for Warner Bros. Discovery may conclude with Netflix emerging victorious, as Warner's board is reportedly preparing to reject Paramount's hostile takeover bid due to concerns over financing arrangements and other deal terms [5][10]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - Warner Bros. Discovery's board believes that its existing agreement with Netflix offers better value, certainty, and terms compared to Paramount's proposal [5]. - Paramount's offer includes a bid of $30 per share, totaling over $108 billion including debt, which is a 139% premium over Warner's unaffected stock price [12]. - Warner is expected to respond to Paramount's offer by Wednesday, which could halt CEO David Ellison's plans for a takeover [6]. Group 2: Financing Concerns - Warner's board is particularly worried about the financing structure proposed by Paramount, which relies heavily on a revocable trust supported by Larry Ellison's wealth, raising concerns about asset withdrawal [11]. - Paramount has attempted to address Warner's concerns regarding refinancing debt flexibility and has adjusted bidding terms, including withdrawing a $1 billion investment from Tencent to avoid regulatory issues [11]. Group 3: Market Reactions and Implications - Following the news of Warner's potential rejection of the bid, Warner's stock saw a slight decline, while Paramount's stock dropped by over 1% [7]. - Since the announcement of the acquisition interest in September, Netflix's market value has decreased by approximately $100 billion [12].

Group 1 - The market regulatory authority is set to introduce a series of new regulations aimed at standardizing platform economy, food safety, and anti-monopoly practices [1][3] - New regulations such as the "Live E-commerce Supervision Management Measures" and "Network Trading Platform Rules Supervision Management Measures" will be published soon to ensure orderly development and regulatory compliance [1] - To enhance food safety, two new regulations will be released: "Food Entrusted Production Supervision Management Measures" and "Food Safety Responsibility Supervision Regulations for Chain Enterprises" [3] Group 2 - The revised "Quality Supervision Management Measures for Fiber Products" will be published to better align with industry development and regulatory needs [5] - The market regulatory authority is working on a "first violation not punished" and "minor violation exempt from punishment" list, establishing rigid thresholds for these categories [6] - The upcoming second batch of exemption lists will add three new categories for first violations and four for minor violations, clarifying the boundaries for enforcement [8] Group 3 - The authority emphasizes a zero-tolerance policy for violations related to food safety and public safety, ensuring that penalties are enforced for serious offenses [10] - The goal is to provide a clear framework for both businesses and enforcement personnel, promoting a fair and transparent business environment [3][6]