Core Viewpoint - The U.S. military operation "Midnight Hammer" aimed to incapacitate Iran's nuclear capabilities but ultimately damaged the U.S.'s international credibility instead [1][9]. Group 1: Military Operation Details - The operation involved 125 U.S. military aircraft, including the B-2 bombers, which dropped 14 GBU-57 bunker buster bombs on Iran's Fordow and Natanz nuclear facilities [2][3]. - A U.S. submarine launched 24 Tomahawk cruise missiles targeting the Isfahan nuclear facility, while fighter jets attacked Iranian air defense systems [3]. Group 2: Impact on Iran's Nuclear Facilities - Initial assessments indicated that Iran's nuclear facilities suffered "severe damage," but Iran denied significant impacts, claiming that key components remained operational [5][6]. - The Isfahan facility reportedly had 18 buildings damaged, but the extent of damage to critical nuclear research facilities remains uncertain [7]. Group 3: International Reactions and Consequences - The operation has been criticized as a violation of international law, with concerns that it undermines global trust and could escalate tensions in the region [10]. - U.N. Secretary-General expressed shock at the U.S. actions, labeling them a direct threat to international peace and security [10]. - Critics, including U.S. political leaders, argued that the operation lacked congressional authorization and could lead to further conflict rather than resolution [10].

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the significant reduction of U.S. Treasury holdings by China and other foreign investors, indicating a broader trend of declining confidence in U.S. debt instruments [1][10] - In April, China reduced its U.S. Treasury holdings by $8.2 billion, bringing its total to $757.2 billion, while foreign holdings overall decreased by $36.1 billion [1] - The total U.S. debt has surpassed $36 trillion, with a rapid increase of $1 trillion in less than six months, raising concerns about fiscal sustainability [3] Group 2 - The U.S. Treasury market is experiencing a supply-demand imbalance, with foreign official holdings dropping from 45% in 2014 to 28% in 2023, indicating a shift in investment strategies [8] - The Federal Reserve's balance sheet has ballooned due to quantitative easing, complicating the reduction of Treasury holdings, as the Fed has reduced its monthly Treasury purchases from $60 billion to $25 billion [8] - Recent legislative proposals, such as the "Big and Beautiful Tax Cut Act," may exacerbate the debt situation, potentially increasing U.S. debt by over $2 trillion [8] Group 3 - The article discusses the internal conflicts within the U.S. government regarding debt management, with former President Trump proposing to raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, facing resistance from the Federal Reserve [3][5] - International investors, including Australian funds, are reducing their exposure to U.S. Treasuries due to perceived risks and low yields, reallocating funds to higher-quality credit assets [5] - The article emphasizes that the global community is concerned about U.S. policy uncertainties, which could lead to a potential debt crisis if not addressed constructively [10]

Core Viewpoint - The report titled "Promoting the 'China-Central Asia Spirit': Achievements, Opportunities, and Prospects of Regional Cooperation" highlights the significant achievements and challenges of China-Central Asia cooperation in the new era, emphasizing the need for mutual respect, trust, benefit, and assistance to advance high-quality development and modernization [1][2]. Group 1: Achievements and Cooperation - China and Central Asian countries have enhanced their economic and trade exchanges, improved infrastructure connectivity, and collaborated on green energy development, creating a new model of regional cooperation [1]. - The historical ties between China and Central Asia have fostered a spirit of cooperation, contributing to the prosperity of the Silk Road and establishing a foundation for mutual development [1]. Group 2: Challenges and Global Context - The current global landscape is marked by unilateralism and trade protectionism, which pose risks to international supply chains and global trade prospects, impacting China-Central Asia cooperation [1]. - Despite the fruitful outcomes of cooperation, multiple risks and challenges remain, necessitating a strategic approach to navigate the evolving geopolitical environment [1]. Group 3: Future Prospects - China is committed to expanding high-level openness and enhancing cooperation with Central Asian countries, aiming to inject stability into the regional economy and set an example for global cooperation [2]. - The acceleration of technological revolutions and industrial transformations presents new opportunities for innovative collaboration between China and Central Asia, contributing to regional prosperity and a more positive global outlook [2].

2025年6月17日，随着特朗普意外宣布他将提前返回华盛顿，G7的剩余会议已经实际上演变为残余的 G6。原本对与特朗普会面满怀期待的乌克兰总统泽连斯基也在短暂出席后提前回国。与此同时，鉴于 特朗普政府的明确反对，G7也仅以加拿大总理发表"主席声明"的方式发表对国际地缘政治局势的简单 看法。 实质上，绝大部分观察家对本次G7会议几乎都没有抱有过多期待。与会的各国政府也仅仅试图在最后 一刻指望特朗普能否回心转意，在伊朗和乌克兰问题上支持它们。甚至在特朗普提前回国的情况下，马 克龙还挽尊表示"美国保证他们会达成停火协议，而且由于他们可以向以色列施压，情况可能会有所改 变。" 然而特朗普毫不留情地批评"一心想出名的法国总统马克龙误以为我离开加拿大的七国集团峰会，是为 了回华盛顿推动以色列和伊朗之间的'停火'。错了！"这种直接"打脸"的行为显然展示出特朗普对马克龙 小丑行为的不耐烦。 回想起上一次在加拿大举办G7会议时，默克尔率领"正道同盟围剿特朗普"的不同表现，西方建制派日 益屈从美国单边力量已经是毋庸置疑的事实。如果英国首相斯塔默跪在特朗普面前捡文件只是媒体拍摄 画面下的象征意义，那么对俄罗斯制裁的失败则更能说明这 ...

这样的遭遇不只发生在库利一个人身上。据"同一个海洋科学大会"联合主办方法国国家科学研究中心的 消息，除了库利，还有几名来自美国国家海洋和大气管理局的科学家无奈缺席。 英国《自然-生态与演化》杂志日前刊文说，受美国近期政策影响，美国国家海洋和大气管理局在新财 年面临25%的预算缩减，已有超过1500名工作人员遭解雇或劝退。美方的做法将在海洋预测预报、数据 同化、国际合作等方面造成严重阻碍，拖累联合国制定的海洋相关可持续发展目标的实现。 佩尔内说，美国近期在海洋科研等领域的政策给全球海洋科研和保护行动蒙上阴影，"我们也不知道这 种情况将持续多久"。 美国近期政策降低了国际社会对其参与国际合作的预期。许多业界人士起初预计美国将缺席第三届联合 国海洋大会，最终美国只派出"技术和工作层面"的代表。法国总统马克龙对媒体表示，"这并不意外， 我们了解本届美国政府的相关立场"，国际海洋行动和进展不会因此止步。 在职业社交网站领英上，美国科学家萨拉·库利目前显示的状态为"求职"。她曾是美国国家海洋和大气 管理局的海洋酸化研究项目负责人。今年2月，她在美国政府换届后的联邦机构"裁员潮"中失业。 职业突变打乱了库利的计划。她原本受 ...

面对单边主义阴云笼罩全球供应链、技术封锁与碳壁垒等新型贸易摩擦加剧的严峻挑战，潘基文始终如一地发出警示：人类正面临"日益扩大的全球治理赤 字"。在动荡与分化加剧的时代，他掷地有声地重申"多边主义是应对共同挑战的有效途径"。本届论坛上，世界期待这位联合国前秘书长以更具魄力的行动 号召，推动国际社会弥合分歧—— 全球化困局下的破局宣言 当前，一幅空前复杂的全球图景正徐徐展开：地缘政治冲突多点爆发、气候危机步步紧逼、经济复苏前景晦暗不明。重重危机交织叠加，给全球治理体系带 来巨大压力。尤其令人忧心的是，以联合国为基石的多边治理框架，正遭遇前所未有的严峻挑战——部分国家公然倒行逆施，大行单边主义，以邻为壑，筑 起贸易壁垒，拒绝履约担当。这股逆流不仅严重侵蚀了国际合作的政治土壤，更对凝聚共识、协同应对的全球化进程造成沉重打击。在如此波诡云谲的全球 变局之中，人类对全球治理的未来路径充满了深刻的反思和广泛的探讨。 在联合国成立80周年的全球格局关键节点，联合国第八任秘书长、博鳌亚洲论坛理事长潘基文将亮相2025年6月28日于深圳开幕的凤凰网"2025中国企业出海 高峰论坛"。 "加强本地区团结合作，以更高水平的互联互通和 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for China and the EU to work together to prepare for important economic and trade agendas, promoting a healthy and stable development of their economic relationship [1][3] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has maintained close communication with the EU at all levels, focusing on enhancing bilateral trade and investment cooperation, and addressing trade disputes through dialogue [3][4] - China is committed to high-level openness and aims to provide European companies with a broad market and development opportunities, while opposing any actions that undermine China's development rights [5][6] Group 2 - The EU has been implementing various industrial policies and providing substantial subsidies to support European companies, with over €1.44 trillion in subsidies planned from 2021 to 2030, and more than €300 billion already disbursed by 2024 [4][6] - The Chinese government criticizes the EU's protectionist measures, which it views as a double standard, and calls for a fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises [6][7] - The EU's recent decision to restrict Chinese companies from participating in public procurement projects over €5 million has raised concerns about fairness and the impact on long-standing cooperation in the medical sector [7][8]

Group 1 - The U.S. is pressuring Vietnam to reduce reliance on Chinese technology in equipment assembled and exported to the U.S., indicating a broader strategy to decouple from China in high-tech sectors [1] - Since April, the U.S. has been using "reciprocal tariffs" as a tool to exert unilateral pressure on trade partners, significantly impacting the international trade system and increasing economic pressures on export-oriented economies [1][2] - Historical examples, such as Canada's concessions in the past, illustrate that appeasement does not guarantee protection from U.S. tariffs, as the U.S. continues to impose additional tariffs regardless of prior agreements [2] Group 2 - The unilateral concessions by trade partners do not lead to U.S. economic prosperity, as high tariffs negatively affect both supply and demand, ultimately increasing costs for U.S. suppliers and reducing global competitiveness [2][3] - The World Trade Organization (WTO) has played a crucial role in maintaining a multilateral trade system based on mutual respect and equal benefits, and any unilateral concessions could undermine this foundational principle [3] - Countries are prioritizing the maintenance of a stable international order and enhancing supply chain resilience, recognizing that the U.S. market, while important, is not the only option for export-oriented economies like Vietnam [4]

来源：商务部新闻办公室 责编：汪云鹏 原标题：商务部有关负责人解读中国愿通过商签共同发展经济伙伴关系协定落实对53个非洲建交国实施100% 税目产品零关税举措 2025年6月11日，习近平主席在致中非合作论坛成果落实协调人部长级会议的贺信中表示，中方愿通过商签共 同发展经济伙伴关系协定，落实对53个非洲建交国实施100%税目产品零关税举措，同时为非洲最不发达国家 对华出口提供更多便利。商务部有关负责人介绍了有关情况。 共同发展经济伙伴关系协定是中国与非洲国家之间的创新自贸协定。在协定下对53个非洲建交国实施100%税 目产品零关税，是贯彻落实党的二十届三中全会精神，扩大自主开放的具体行动，也是推动中非合作论坛北京 峰会成果进一步落地、服务共筑新时代全天候中非命运共同体的生动体现。当前单边主义、保护主义乱象频 出，中非决心共同应对挑战，为全球贸易发展注入稳定性和正能量。这一重大举措顺应经济全球化发展方向， 回应非洲国家期待，符合世贸组织规则。 下一步，商务部将会同相关部门，按照平等协商、互利共赢原则，推动与非洲国家商签共同发展经济伙伴关系 协定工作。中方将充分考虑非洲国家实际情况和具体诉求，以灵活务实方式就更便 ...

Core Viewpoint - The statement emphasizes that there are no winners in trade wars and that unilateralism, protectionism, and hegemonism ultimately harm all parties involved [1] Group 1 - The current global situation is characterized by accelerated changes and a new period of turmoil and transformation [1] - The importance of fairness, justice, and mutual benefit is highlighted as essential for maintaining world peace and achieving common development [1] - The call for unity and the rejection of a return to the "law of the jungle" is made, advocating for the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind [1]