Core Viewpoint - The Republican Party in the United States is seeking to limit the antitrust regulatory power of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and transfer that authority to the Department of Justice [1] Group 1 - The proposed shift in regulatory power indicates a significant change in how antitrust enforcement may be approached in the U.S. [1] - This move could lead to a more centralized approach to antitrust issues under the Department of Justice, potentially impacting various industries [1]

以下文章来源于牲产队 ，作者牲产队长 牲产队 . 挣工分，磨洋工，舒服一会儿是一会儿 作者：牲产队长 来源：牲产队（ID：gh 9adbf3261554） 这一次，李嘉诚的港口交易真要黄了。 市监总局直接要求，交易各方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获批准前，不得实施集中，否则将 承担法律责任。啥意思呢？这就是打明牌了。李嘉诚也好，贝莱德也罢，还是新引入的地中海航 运集团，都不得垄断全球航运权。李嘉诚想一次性甩卖 43 个海外港口，套现跑路，是彻底搞不 成了。 这时候，为什么市监总局要发出这个信号？主要就在于，李嘉诚不甘心，始终还是想卖。而且， 长和集团在想办法，对抗反垄断审查，想玩一招 " 金蝉脱壳 " 之计。就在市监总局对长和集团 发起反垄断调查后，长和集团就宣布，要对旗下资产进行拆分。怎么拆分呢？把长子李泽钜旗下 的电讯盈科等产业，独立拆分，远赴英国伦敦上市。 为什么要拆分？一个是，规避反垄断调查。你说它垄断了，它马上拆分，变成一个个小公司。家 族产业一部分留在李嘉诚旗下，另一部分就转移给长子李泽钜。而李泽钜呢？既不是中国人，带 走的也不是中国资产，而是长和旗下的海外资产。尤其是电信产业，主要都位于欧洲。像 ...

Core Points - The European Commission imposed a €500 million fine on Apple for restricting app developers from directing users to third-party channels, depriving users of alternative service options [1][3][4] - Apple failed to demonstrate that these restrictions were necessary, leading to the fine and a requirement to lift the restrictions within 60 days or face further penalties [2][3] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - This fine is the first issued under the EU's Digital Markets Act, which came into effect on November 1, 2022, and follows a previous fine of over €1.8 billion against Apple in March 2024 [3][4] - The EU has designated Apple, along with other tech giants, as "gatekeepers," requiring them to allow users to install and use third-party applications and software [3][4] - Apple has made some adjustments to its business terms in the EU, including allowing "sideloading" and reducing its commission rates, but these changes have not satisfied developers [5][6][10] Group 2: Developer Reactions - Developers have expressed dissatisfaction with Apple's new "core technology fee," which imposes additional costs for apps with over 1 million downloads, potentially leading them to stick with the original 30% commission [7][8][9] - Spotify's CEO highlighted that the new fee could increase customer acquisition costs significantly, while Epic Games' CEO criticized Apple's compliance measures as a means to maintain control over the app ecosystem [11][12] Group 3: Financial Implications - Apple's services segment, which includes the App Store, generated $22.31 billion in revenue for the fiscal year 2023, growing 16% year-over-year [16] - The company anticipates a 13% growth in its services revenue for the fiscal year 2025, indicating the importance of the App Store to its overall financial health [17] Group 4: Market Dynamics in China - China is Apple's second-largest revenue source, with ongoing antitrust lawsuits from developers and consumers challenging the company's practices [18][22] - Despite a slight decline in iPhone sales, Apple's service revenue in China continues to grow, benefiting from a differentiated approach to the "Apple tax" compared to other regions [19][20] - A report indicated that over 95% of developers in China do not pay any commission to Apple, and many benefit from lower rates [20] Group 5: Ongoing Legal Challenges - Chinese consumers and small developers have been actively challenging Apple's "Apple tax," with a notable antitrust lawsuit resulting in a ruling that Apple did not abuse its market position [22][24] - Multiple lawsuits against Apple in China highlight ongoing tensions regarding its App Store practices and commission structures [26][28]

昨天，当我们"调休"五一假期而周日加班"摸鱼"的时候，相关监管部门却一点都没闲着！ 近日，国家市场监督管理总局就长和集团出售海外港口交易连续发声，明确要求交易各方不得采取任何方式规避反垄断审查，否则将承 担法律责任。 上述相关部门官网于当天（4月27日）下午17时整，公布了有关"李嘉诚卖港口"的最新消息。 针对"李嘉诚卖港口"，市场监管总局第二次表态！ 下面，我们可以从全国唯一一份以"中国"冠名的资产管理行业专业媒体（中国基金报），在昨天发布的相关报道（10W+）中，援引了外 媒的上述相关报道。 记者援引外媒从知情人士称处获悉的消息：控制地中海航运的意大利阿庞特家族，考虑将与贝莱德合作，从43个港口中剥离出其中的巴 拿马港口，分别为巴尔博亚和克里斯托瓦尔2个港口。 值得一提的是，这已经是该相关部门近期第二次就此交易表态。 就在1个月之前（3月28日），上述相关部门反垄断二司负责人在回复港媒（大公文汇全媒体）记者关于"长和拟售巴拿马港口"的提问 时，就明确表示将依法审查，以"保护市场公平竞争，维护社会公共利益"。 据上述信息显示：在日前的一次答记者问环节，有记者提到了外媒（华尔街日报）于早前（4月16日）关于" ...

Regulatory Developments - The National Health Commission and other departments have released the 2025 National Random Supervision and Inspection Plan, which includes new regulatory areas such as internet diagnosis and treatment, and mental health, while explicitly targeting online medical fraud [1] - The regulatory focus on combating online medical fraud represents a significant upgrade in medical supervision, aiming to purify the medical online space [1] Pharmaceutical Approvals - Innovent Biologics announced that its third-generation EGFR TKI drug, Olitinib (Leratinib), has received approval from the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for first-line treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific EGFR mutations [2] - Olitinib is the only approved third-generation EGFR TKI based on a naphthalene structure, expanding treatment options for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients [2] Market Regulation and Antitrust Issues - Xianju Pharmaceutical is facing a potential fine of approximately 195 million yuan for alleged monopolistic practices related to the pricing of dexamethasone phosphate raw materials, with the case still under review by the Tianjin Market Supervision Administration [3] - This incident highlights the regulatory authorities' emphasis on antitrust measures within the pharmaceutical industry, which could disrupt normal market operations [3] Combination Therapy Approvals - Pfizer announced that its oral targeted drug, Axi-cabtagene ciloleucel (Axitinib), has been approved for first-line treatment in combination with Toripalimab for high-risk, unresectable, or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients [4] - This approval marks the first and only approved first-line targeted and immune combination therapy for advanced kidney cancer in China, indicating a shift towards combination therapies in the treatment landscape [4]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has initiated a historic antitrust lawsuit against Meta, accusing the company of abusing its market power through acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, aiming to dominate the social media market [1][3]. Group 1: Antitrust Lawsuit - The FTC's lawsuit claims that Meta has employed a "buy or bury" strategy to eliminate potential competitors, with evidence including a message from Mark Zuckerberg discussing the importance of "destroying" Instagram [1]. - Zuckerberg is personally testifying in court to address the FTC's allegations, having initially sought to settle the case with a significantly lower fine than the FTC's expectations [3][5]. - The FTC, backed by the Department of Justice, has imposed a hefty $30 billion fine on Meta, which could severely impact the company's financials, as it represents a substantial portion of Meta's projected annual profits [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Meta's core advertising business is projected to suffer a loss of $7 billion this year due to the impact of Trump's tariff policies on Chinese retail companies, which may lead to reduced advertising budgets on Meta's platforms [4]. - In its latest annual report, Meta disclosed that its revenue from China for 2024 is expected to be $18.35 billion, accounting for slightly over 11% of its total revenue [4]. - The potential fine and the anticipated loss in advertising revenue could significantly strain Meta's financial health, as the fine alone could take away 80% of its projected profits for the year [3][4]. Group 3: Political and Regulatory Context - The lawsuit and fine are perceived as a demonstration of political power, with implications for the broader tech industry, which has enjoyed a relatively lenient regulatory environment until now [7]. - The FTC's actions are seen as a response to concerns over tech monopolies, signaling a shift in regulatory attitudes towards major tech companies [7]. - Zuckerberg's attempts to negotiate a lower settlement and his outreach to Trump highlight the intertwining of business interests and political dynamics in the current regulatory landscape [4][7].

李嘉诚卖港口一事，有新消息。 市场监管总局：长和港口交易各方不得采取任何方式规避反垄断审查 最初的交易方案是，阿庞特家族现有的港口运营商Terminal Investment Limited（TiL）获得全球港口资产51%的股份，贝莱德旗下的一家实体获得 49%的股份。那部分占了该交易中涉及的大部分资产，包括位于荷兰、德国、马来西亚和其他地方的集装箱码头。 对于这两个巴拿马港口，所有权结构正好相反：TiL获得49%的股份，贝莱德最近收购的基础设施投资机构Global Infrastructure Partners获得51%的 股份。 3月4日深夜，李嘉诚旗下长江和记实业有限公司在港交所公告，宣布与贝莱德牵头的财团达成原则性协议，出售其全球港口业务核心资产。 标的资产覆盖亚欧美洲23个国家的43个港口，涵盖199个泊位及配套的智能码头管理系统、全球物流网络等核心资源。其中涉及巴拿马港口公司 90%股权。 如此一来，该公司运营的巴拿马巴尔博亚和克里斯托瓦尔两个港口将被美国企业控制。 4月27日消息，日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月16日报道，长和出售海外港 ...

日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月 16日报道， 长和出售海外港口将分拆为两个交易继续进行，国家市场监督管理总局对此有何评论？ 答：我们高度关注有关交易，将依法进行审查。交易各方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获批准前，不 得实施集中，否则将承担法律责任。 ...

Core Viewpoint - In 2024, Google was found guilty of monopolistic practices by a U.S. court due to exclusive agreements with Apple and Samsung, leading to a hearing to determine the penalties for Google, with the U.S. Department of Justice advocating for severe measures, including the divestiture of the Chrome browser and opening search data to competitors, while Google proposed milder remedies [1]. Group 1: Network Effects and Market Barriers - Network effects create a barrier to entry in the search engine industry, where the value of a service increases with the number of users, making it difficult for new entrants to compete against established players like Google [2]. - The self-reinforcing nature of network effects, combined with the Matthew effect, allows Google to continuously enhance its search engine and related products, resulting in a significant competitive advantage [3]. Group 2: Proposed Penalties by the DOJ - The DOJ's proposed penalties include prohibiting Google from entering into exclusive contracts that prevent competitors from gaining market access, which would lower the switching costs for users and weaken Google's network effects [5]. - The DOJ also suggested the divestiture of the Chrome browser, although recent discussions indicate that this requirement may be softened, focusing instead on preventing bundled sales [6]. - Another key proposal involves mandating Google to share search index, advertising data, and user behavior data to eliminate information barriers, which could significantly undermine Google's competitive edge [7]. Group 3: Google's Suggested Remedies - Google proposed to cease exclusive agreements that limit market competition, including not forcing the pre-installation of its services on devices, which would impact its search engine's network effects [10]. - Google also agreed to submit annual compliance reports and allow third-party complaints regarding its compliance with antitrust regulations, indicating a willingness to cooperate with oversight mechanisms [12].

如果说2025年之前，出海还只是部分公司的选择， 那在2025年之后，出海已经成为了一个"必答题"。 因为对于国内大部分企业来说，海外市场都是远大于国内市场的。 然而，在贸易战、关税壁垒和逆全球化冲击下，当前企业出海的风险和困难比大部分人想象的还要大， 为了提升企业出海的成功率， 我们已经把企业出海最容易失败的地方和重点注意事项逐一梳理好了， 就在最新上线的 《中国企业出海指南》 中。 中国企业出海指南 1.纸质资料《中国企业出海指南》 2.线上课程《境内企业赴美国上市的法律实务解读》 3.梧桐定制笔记本1个 中国企业出海指南 新品特惠 扫码 立减20元 《中国企业出海指南》共有 332页 ， 15.5万字 ，9个章节，主要从海外布局、监管要求、股权架构、 审批流程、交易文件、合规风险、税务考量、区域国别等角度出发，全景式梳理了企业出海的实务要 点。 境外投资的主要法律文件 操作时间境外投资敏感类项目 0 限制/禁止开展的境外投资 商务流程 ODI备案/核准流程 境外投资的常见流程与风险 ⊙ 没有办理ODI备案的后果 发改委备案/核准 3. 境外投资的境 商务部备案/核准 内审批流程 外汇登记 境外投资的境内 ...