Core Viewpoints - The current liquidity easing is primarily driven by the relocation of household deposits, leading to a market logic that favors equities over bonds, rather than a simultaneous bull market in both [3][5][6] - Unlike previous instances where household deposit relocation occurred after economic expectations improved, this time it is policy-driven, with the underlying fundamentals still in a bottoming phase, resulting in strong market expectations for further central bank easing [3][6][19] - Continuous relocation of household deposits may raise concerns for the central bank regarding idle funds, and the necessity for further loans to stimulate investment is decreasing, unless specific adverse economic events occur [3][7][19] Financial Data Summary - In June 2025, new social financing increased by 4.20 trillion yuan, up from 2.29 trillion yuan previously, with a year-on-year growth of 8.9% [2][25] - M2 money supply grew by 8.3% year-on-year, while new M1 increased by 4.6%, indicating a shift in liquidity dynamics [2][28] - The increase in corporate loans was significant, with a total of 2.24 trillion yuan in new loans, reflecting a strong demand for credit [21][27] Analysis of Liquidity Dynamics - When household deposit relocation is the main driver of liquidity, the market logic tends to favor equities, creating a seesaw effect between stocks and bonds [5][12] - The current environment suggests a preference for equities over bonds, as household deposit relocation is not linked to improved economic expectations but rather to policy initiatives [6][15] - The central bank's future actions may focus more on structural adjustments rather than broad monetary easing, aiming to stabilize liquidity in both equity and bond markets [9][19]

Group 1: Macro Overview - In June 2025, new social financing (社融) reached 4.20 trillion, up from 2.29 trillion previously, with a year-on-year growth of 8.9% compared to 8.7% before[1] - M2 growth was 8.3% year-on-year, an increase from 7.9% previously, while new M1 (新口径) grew by 4.6% compared to 2.3% before[1] - The current market logic reflects a "look at stocks, act like bonds" approach rather than a dual bull market for stocks and bonds, primarily driven by the relocation of household deposits[1] Group 2: Liquidity and Policy Implications - The current liquidity easing is mainly driven by policy rather than economic improvement, leading to strong market expectations for further central bank easing[2] - The central bank's probability of further easing is decreasing unless triggered by significant adverse economic events or market shocks[2] - Future central bank actions may focus more on structural adjustments rather than broad monetary easing, aiming to stabilize liquidity in both stock and bond markets[2] Group 3: Financial Data Insights - In June, corporate loans increased by 1.77 trillion, a year-on-year increase of 1.4 trillion, while household loans rose by 597.6 billion[1] - The social financing scale in June showed an increase of 4.2 trillion, with a year-on-year growth of 8.9%, reflecting a significant rise in government bond issuance[1] - The total amount of deposits increased by 3.21 trillion in June, with household deposits rising by 2.47 trillion, indicating a strong inflow into the banking system[1]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report The report focuses on the correlation between stocks and bonds, exploring whether the "see - stock - do - bond" approach will become a new trading theme in the bond market. It analyzes the stock - bond pattern this year, historical "stock - bond seesaw" situations, and provides an outlook for the bond market. Currently, the "stock - bond seesaw" effect may be more prominent, and the bond market may face certain disturbances, but the liquidity environment is still relatively favorable [1][9]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 This Year's Stock - Bond Pattern Deduction - In the first quarter, it was a "tight money + wide credit" environment, with a typical stock - bond "seesaw" effect. The stock market was strong, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 6.8% and the CSI 300 rising 6.0% from January 6 to March 17. The bond market was in shock consolidation, with short - end yields rising significantly [11][13][14]. - In the second quarter, it shifted to a "wide money + wide credit" environment, showing a stock - bond double - bull pattern. The stock market continued to rise, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 11.2% and the CSI 300 rising 9.7% from April 1 to June 30. The bond market had a recovery, with short - end yields falling significantly [11][18][19]. 3.2 Historical Stock - Bond "Seesaw" - **2016.10 - 2018.01: Economic Recovery + Monetary Tightening, Bullish Stocks and Bearish Bonds** - The stock market rose 15%, and the 10 - year Treasury yield rose 134BP. The economic fundamentals were good, and the central bank tightened monetary policy, leading to a tight money supply [24][27][31]. - **2020.04 - 2020.12: Economic Repair + Monetary Neutrality, Bullish Stocks and Bearish Bonds** - The stock market rose 27%, and the 10 - year Treasury yield rose 79BP. The economy recovered, and the central bank's monetary policy returned to normal. The supply pressure of government bonds increased, tightening the money supply [32][34][39]. - **2022.11 - 2023.02: Policy Intensification + Expectation Change, Strong Stocks and Weak Bonds** - The stock market rose 11%, and the 10 - year Treasury yield rose 27BP. Policy adjustments boosted the expectation of economic recovery, and the bond market was affected by the negative feedback of wealth management redemptions [40][41][45]. - **2024.09 - 2024.10: Policy Tailwind + Institutional Profit - Taking, Strong Stocks and Weak Bonds** - The stock market rose 28%, and the 10 - year Treasury yield rose 15BP. A series of policies boosted economic recovery expectations, and the central bank's monetary policy "good news was exhausted." Institutional profit - taking increased the bond market adjustment risk [47][49][55]. 3.3 Bond Market Outlook: See - Stock - Do - Bond? - The current bond market trading is crowded, while the stock's cost - performance is relatively high. The central bank's overall further easing policy may be limited in the short term, and the money supply may maintain a "low - volatility and rigid" state [5]. - The "stock - bond seesaw" effect may be more obvious, and the logic of "see - stock - do - bond" may disturb the bond market sentiment. It is advisable to moderately participate in curve steepening trading, with a strategy of "defending and squeezing spreads at the short - to - medium end + allocating on dips at the long end" [59][60][65].

Core Viewpoint - The current macro asset allocation logic is primarily driven by the "look at stocks to do bonds" approach, as the main liquidity improvement is due to the migration of household deposits rather than central bank monetary easing [2][9][21]. Group 1: Macro Asset Allocation Analysis - Analyzing the stock-bond relationship is crucial in macro asset allocation, where the environment can either favor "look at stocks to do bonds" or "look at bonds to do stocks" [8][13]. - In a "look at stocks to do bonds" environment, the upward movement of stock prices influences bond trading behavior, while in a "look at bonds to do stocks" environment, falling interest rates affect stock market valuations [8][13]. - The current liquidity improvement is characterized by a significant migration of household deposits to non-bank financial institutions, with approximately 6.2 trillion yuan moving in the first five months of 2025, marking the highest level since 2009 [9][21]. Group 2: Special Characteristics of Current Liquidity - The current migration of household deposits is unique as it does not follow an improvement in economic expectations, contrasting with past trends where such migrations occurred after economic recovery [3][28]. - The "stabilize the stock market" policy from the top down has limited the extent to which risk appetite can express downward movements in the stock market [4][28]. - Financial regulations established in 2017 and 2022 have heightened vigilance against financial practices that lead to asset bubbles, impacting the current liquidity dynamics [5][28]. Group 3: Implications of Current Trends - The current environment suggests that as the stock market strengthens, the risk of systemic asset price bubbles increases, leading to tighter monetary policy and pressure on the bond market [30]. - Conversely, if the stock market weakens, the central bank's focus on stabilizing market expectations increases, potentially leading to short-term dual bullish trends in both stocks and bonds [30].

Group 1: Macro Analysis - Understanding the relationship between stocks and bonds is crucial for macro asset allocation decisions[2] - Current liquidity improvement is primarily driven by the migration of household deposits, differing from the monetary easing seen in 2014-2015[5] - The scale of non-bank liquidity growth in the first five months of 2025 is approximately CNY 6.2 trillion, compared to CNY 1.6 trillion in the same period of 2015[5][20] Group 2: Market Dynamics - The prevailing logic is to "look at stocks to do bonds," indicating a stock-driven market where risk appetite influences bond trading[3][4] - In the current environment, if stocks rise, bond yields are likely to follow, while a decline in stocks may lead to bond price increases[3][4] - The current market is characterized by a "see-saw" effect between stocks and bonds, rather than a simultaneous bullish trend in both[3][4] Group 3: Special Considerations - Unique factors this round include the difficulty for household deposits to return to real estate, leading to a stronger migration towards non-bank institutions[3] - The "stabilize the stock market" policy from the top down limits the downward expression of risk appetite in the stock market[3] - The current liquidity situation is not a result of improved economic expectations, contrasting with past trends where deposit migration followed economic recovery[8][27]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current financial market dynamics influenced by geopolitical events, particularly the ceasefire between Iran and Israel, and the implications for stock and bond markets. It highlights the importance of waiting for system signals rather than acting on uncertainty. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The ceasefire between Israel and Iran has led to a significant drop in oil prices and an increase in stock index futures [3] - The bond market showed stability in response to the ceasefire news, with the 10-year government bond yield opening at 1.64% and fluctuating slightly [3] - The central bank conducted a small incremental operation of MLF, leading to a slight decrease in bond yields [3] Group 2: Financial Indicators - The central bank's open market operations included a 406.5 billion yuan reverse repurchase operation, with a net injection of 209.2 billion yuan after 197.3 billion yuan matured [1] - The overnight funding rate remained stable at around 1.37%, while the 7-day funding rate increased by 16 basis points to approximately 1.67% [1] - The weighted rates for various repo codes showed slight changes, with R001 at 1.44% and R007 at 1.82%, indicating a mixed sentiment in the interbank funding market [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is to "look at stocks and then bonds," indicating that stock market performance should be assessed before making judgments on bonds [2][4] - The current economic state is described as "weak but not collapsing," with policies providing support but not fully lifting the economy, leading to limited downward pressure on corporate profits [2][3] - Inflation is expected to remain low, with CPI and PPI readings unlikely to hit new lows, and a risk of CPI not turning positive in the first half of the year due to weak price increases [2][3] Group 2 - The analysis of stock and bond markets indicates a competitive relationship, where a bull market in stocks could lead to a bear market in bonds, and vice versa [4][5] - The likelihood of a broad-based bull market is low, but there is a significant chance for a "technology sector rally," driven by high growth rates in the information transmission industry [5][6] - The economic environment is favorable for technology stocks, with fiscal spending growth matching nominal GDP growth, creating a conducive atmosphere for tech industry development [6][7] Group 3 - The bond market has likely passed its most severe adjustment phase, with current interest rates challenging the monetary policy framework, and the potential for new investment opportunities in bonds contingent on changes in economic conditions [8][10] - The focus on the second quarter's economic uncertainty suggests that defensive high-dividend sectors and elastic stocks may yield short-term gains, while the bond market could react to expectations of monetary easing [9][10] - The overall asset conclusion indicates a consensus on the technology sector's growth potential, with expectations that Hong Kong stocks may outperform A-shares, and bond investments will primarily focus on yield rather than capital appreciation unless significant economic changes occur [10]

Economic Situation - The current economic environment is characterized by oversupply, weak prices, and subdued profits, with fiscal spending growth expected at 3.4-3.5% against a budgeted 5% due to income uncertainties [2] - Retail sales growth is projected around 4%, while fixed asset investment is also expected to be in the range of 3%-4%, indicating a lack of strong demand [2] - Inflation forecasts suggest a PPI of -1.7% and a CPI around 0%, with nominal GDP growth estimated between 4.3%-4.5%, indicating a weak pricing environment [2] Trading Volume - A-share trading volume is anticipated to remain high, primarily driven by the significant increase in non-bank deposits, which reached historical peaks [3][4] - The increase in non-bank deposits is largely attributed to residents moving their savings, which influences the dynamics between stocks and bonds [4] - There remains potential for further deposit migration, with estimates suggesting a possible 3.5 trillion yuan in additional savings movement based on current disposable income levels [5] Market Style - There is no clear market style identified, with a focus on industry prosperity rather than specific investment styles [6] - The potential for industry clustering is noted, particularly in sectors benefiting from increased AI investments, which could see growth rates of 20%-30% [7] - High dividend stocks are expected to present opportunities, as they may provide absolute returns in a market with low profit elasticity [7] A-shares vs. Hong Kong Stocks - The probability of Hong Kong stocks outperforming A-shares is considered high, with key assets like Alibaba and Tencent listed in Hong Kong, which may lead to more active capital operations [8] - The overall risk-reward profile for Hong Kong stocks remains favorable despite some reduction in potential gains after recent price increases [8]