整车竞争的核心是爆款大单品，其背后是一家公司的自身战略。 汽车整车具有一面制造、一面消费、一面周期的三重特性，并有逐步向科技品转型的趋势。其中在周期角度，长期以 来，整车的市场竞争均是围绕打造爆款大单品展开的，导致车企销量明显围绕新品周期呈现周期波动，并影响车企股 价跟随其销量、订单波动。因而，判定整车新车爆款对于汽车研究至关重要，我们认为，整车爆款主要围绕三个要素 展开，分别是市场竞争格局（外部因素）、品牌力（车企本身）、性价比（产品本身）。并最终形成了新兴市场策略、 性价比策略、品牌力策略三种爆款产品打造策略。需要强调的是，虽然车企爆款产品的打造策略各不相同，但爆款大 单品背后是整车厂自身战略的体现，因而只要主机厂在战略上走在正确的道路上，其爆款大单品的打造能力就是有保 障的。 复盘整车产品打造策略：新能车时代比亚迪、吉利、小鹏、零跑、理想爆款打造能力最强 由整车爆款产品的三个要素而来，我们认为，整车的产品打造策略有三种：1）新兴市场策略：公司产品集中布局于此 前总量少、供给匮乏的细分市场，即我们常说的蓝海市场，如理想增程系列，长城哈弗 H6、坦克系列等；需要的是一 家公司对细分市场的判断足够精准；2）性 ...

文/国务院发展研究中心市场经济研究所研究员 陈丽芬 我国正迈向高收入阶段，随着社会经济发展环境和消费主体特征变化，消 费进入结构转型的关键过渡期，蕴藏较大发展潜力和空间。建议有力有效 落 实 党 中 央 、 国 务 院 决 策部 署 ， 从 供需 两侧 着 手， 惠 民 生 、 促 消 费 相 结 合，充分释放消费潜力，形成经济发展和民生改善的良性循环。 2024年中央经济工作会议和2025年政府工作报告均提出大力提振消费，2025年3月中共中央办公厅、国 务院办公厅印发《提振消费专项行动方案》。消费是人民对美好生活需要的直接体现，不仅是当下经济 增长的主动力和稳定锚，也是经济高质量发展的关键力量。我国正迈向高收入阶段，随着社会经济发展 环境和消费主体特征变化，消费进入结构转型的关键过渡期，蕴藏较大发展潜力和空间。建议有力有效 落实党中央、国务院决策部署，从供需两侧着手，惠民生、促消费相结合，充分释放消费潜力，形成经 济发展和民生改善的良性循环。 居民消费具有较大的增长潜力 国际经验表明，迈向高收入阶段，居民消费增速换挡，但同时孕育增长新动能。韩国、智利、希腊、匈 牙利等12个OECD国家跨进高收入国家之前的 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the high costs of Java training programs, with fees ranging from 15,000 to 25,000 yuan in major cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen [3][4] - A specific example is provided where a student paid 22,800 yuan for a six-month full-stack course, highlighting the additional costs of living expenses [3] - The article mentions a more affordable option at Wang Shidai Education, where a student spent over 8,000 yuan and secured a job offer of 12,000 yuan in Hangzhou, with the institution claiming a 95% employment rate and average salaries between 8,000 to 15,000 yuan [3][4] Group 2 - Recommendations for prospective students include attending at least three trial classes, checking past students' GitHub accounts for code quality, and being cautious about installment payment interest rates, which can be as high as 15% [4] - A cautionary tale is shared about a student who paid 18,000 yuan for a course taught by a newly graduated assistant, using outdated project frameworks [5] - The article emphasizes the importance of cost-effectiveness in training programs, suggesting that a 20,000 yuan course leading to an 8,000 yuan salary is less favorable than an 8,000 yuan course leading to a 12,000 yuan salary [5]

金十数据5月6日讯，国雄资本有限公司董事长姚尚坤5月在内部信中指出，企业自由现金流是股东长期 回报的关键，健康现金流是企业可持续发展的基础。他认为，成熟行业龙头因现金流稳定应享确定性溢 价，而成长期企业需关注规模拐点后的现金流爆发潜力。展望2025年，姚尚坤对中国资产性价比持乐观 态度，认为政策护航下，国际化与流动性改善将推动市场修复。投资机会上，他聚焦两类企业：一是现 金流稳健、高股东回报的"压舱石"公司；二是具备全球竞争力、等待现金流拐点的超额收益标的。 （36氪） 国雄资本董事长姚尚坤：强调自由现金流为投资核心，看好2025年中国资产性价比 ...

• 一季度白酒行业利润端下滑幅度收窄，但仍弱于收入端表现。多数酒企采 取柔性经营规划，以应对外部和内部不确定性，以及淡季需求恢复的不确 定因素。 • 主动权益基金在一季度末对白酒投资市值环比增长，加仓汾酒、老窖和今 世缘。白酒板块股息性价比提升，茅台、五粮液等企业有回购或增持意愿， 表明板块处于稳步向好态势。 比下滑 10 个百分点、四季度下滑 14 个百分点，今年一季度下滑 6.4 个百分点。 这反映了淡季动销逐步走弱，中秋国庆双节期间动销显著下滑，以及今年春节 期间动销出现个位数下滑。 白酒 24&25Q1 业绩总结及板块观点更新 20250505 摘要 • 白酒板块整体收入在 2024 年三季度至 2025 年一季度呈现小幅增长，但 剔除茅台和五粮液后，板块收入显著回落，反映出淡季动销走弱和消费降 级趋势，春节期间动销也出现个位数下滑。 • 市场对白酒行业未来盈利预测信心较低，多数酒企盈利预测执行度不高。 考虑淡季和反腐等因素，全年盈利中位数或中高个位数下降可能是合理预 期，需等待中报披露及中秋国庆前瞻反馈。 • 2024 年白酒板块毛利率小幅提升，主要因高毛销差高端产品占比提升， 而非竞争格局趋缓或产 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent market environment has led to increased risk aversion among investors, making bond funds, particularly those with strong drawdown control and excess returns, an attractive option for stable income [1] Group 1: Performance of Guangfa Tianying Bond Fund - Guangfa Tianying Bond Fund's scale increased from 142 million to 926 million yuan in Q1 2023 [1] - The fund achieved a net value growth rate of 4.25% over the past year, outperforming the average of similar funds at 3.45% [2] - The fund's maximum drawdown was limited to 0.34%, significantly lower than the average maximum drawdown of 1.06% for similar funds [2] Group 2: Risk Management and Performance Metrics - Guangfa Tianying Bond Fund demonstrated excellent drawdown control with a maximum recovery time of only 7 days [2] - The fund's Sharpe ratio is 3.15, and its Calmar ratio is 12.48, indicating a strong risk-return profile compared to the average Calmar ratio of 4.48 for similar products [2] Group 3: Fund Management and Strategy - The fund is managed by experienced professionals, Fang Kang and Li Xiaobo, who have extensive backgrounds in securities and investment management [2] - In Q1 2023, the fund increased its allocation to credit bonds, particularly bank perpetual bonds, while slightly raising duration and leverage [3] - The fund's strategy focuses on prioritizing coupon income and selecting short to medium-term credit bonds, with flexible adjustments based on market conditions [3] Group 4: Market Outlook - The bond market's trading focus is expected to remain on changes in liquidity and market risk appetite, with potential for policy easing amid growth pressures [3] - The impact of macroeconomic data on market risk preferences and the effects of trade tensions on domestic industries will significantly influence credit expansion and bond yield pricing [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese credit market is experiencing a significant shift as credit risks and spreads have reached historical lows, driven by a combination of value imbalance, policy changes, and debt cycle dynamics [1][2]. Group 1: Value Imbalance - The ratio of credit spreads to LPR spreads fell below 50% in the second half of 2024, leading to a disappearance of capital gain expectations [1]. - Institutional investors, such as banks and insurance companies, are shifting towards long-term interest rate bonds due to the imbalance in value, resulting in a sharp adjustment in the credit bond market [1]. - This institutional behavior has intensified the differentiation within the credit market, highlighting the severe inadequacy of overall credit spread value [1]. Group 2: Policy Dynamics - Since the initiation of the debt reduction policy in 2015, credit spreads have been on a long-term decline, but the policy focus has shifted towards urban investment transformation rather than debt reduction itself as of September 2024 [2]. - The next three years will see the completion of implicit debt replacement, leading to a reduction in policy support and a transition into a policy bottom phase for the credit market [2]. - The decrease in debt reduction funds and the advancement of urban investment transformation are gradually diminishing the factors that mitigate credit risk, necessitating attention to the survival pressures of tail-end entities [2]. Group 3: Debt Cycle Context - In the context of a global debt crisis, China has adjusted earlier due to pressures from real estate and local government debt, with credit risk pricing at historical lows [2]. - However, the pressures from external demand contraction and urban investment transformation are increasing actual tail-end risks [2]. - As the largest industrial nation globally, China’s reliance on external demand is facing challenges, while the push for urban investment transformation exacerbates credit risks for tail-end entities [2].

广发证券 资深宏观分析师 陈礼清 博士 chenliqing@ gf.com.cn 广发宏观郭磊团队 报告摘要 第一， 截至4月30日，2025年4月大类资产表现为黄金＞欧指＞日经＞中债＞纳指＞0＞科创50＞沪深300＞道指＞恒指＞美元＞恒生科技＞LME铜＞原油。具体来 看：（1）4月初"对等关税"落地，中下旬阶段性预期缓和，全球资产在风险一次性计提后演绎冲回，股债金汇波动加剧；（2）伦敦金YTD至26.5%，4月收涨6%， 收益与夏普比率均位列大类资产之首但下旬冲高回调，金银比破百。有色中下旬温和反弹，幅度受全球经济增长前景担忧情绪压制。原油超跌后总体疲软，铜油比 走高至滚动三年+2.4倍标准差。国内定价品种偏弱运行，螺纹钢相对抗跌。（3）欧洲STOXX600、日经225指数及纳指收涨，标普收跌；中国资产低开后逐步修 复，纳斯达克中国金龙指数月跌0.35%；恒指、上证综指月线分别收跌4.3%、1.7%。（4）10年期美债利率先上后下，月内震荡剧烈，4月中上旬一度出现美元、美 债、美股三杀，下旬趋于平稳。（5）美元指数月度下跌4.4%，人民币先贬后升整体稳健，欧元兑美元升值4.7%至2022年以来高位。日元先 ...

意料外的行情。 五一假期之前，10 年减 1 年国债期限利差悄然收窄至 16bp 的新低，10 年国债中债估值收益再度探至 1.62%低位，债 市讨论从持债过节是否安全，快速切换到是否追涨。收益快速下行催化剂有三：一是跨月节点，资金不紧反松；二是 市场提前定价 4 月 PMI 读数；三是 30 年国债切换活跃券，定价产生提振。考虑到交易量与行情的脱节，若是相对收 益考核账户还未能赚到这波行情，接下来将面临 4 月初一样的问题：如何执行追涨？ 如何看待追涨性价比？ 牛市行情间隔时间不长，期间信用债调整力度还普遍大于利率债，是不是可以认为跌出票息性价比，反而提升信用债 的参与价值？从以下五个方面来看，仍需留一份谨慎。第一，脆弱的交易情绪，一般信用债距离年内低点即便高于利 率债，也并未展现应有的抢配，甚至是收益下行力度都谈不上修复过去两周的下跌，流动性较好的 AAA 信用债表现亦 平淡。第二，追久期的力度不足。第三，换手率亦未反映一般信用债的配置热度，无论是 3 年内还是 3 年以上城投债， 换手率都在年内较低水平。第四，票息增强不如博资本利得，4 月以来，关键期限城投债和中票平均票息收益与资本 利得收益占比各半， ...

Financial Performance - In Q1 2025, the company reported revenue of 880 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 1.6%, primarily due to the divestment of its real estate business [1] - The net profit attributable to shareholders was 50.712 million yuan, down 14.1% year-on-year, influenced by reduced income, decreased profits from associated companies, and increased R&D expenses [1] - The non-recurring net profit was 46.990 million yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 9.7% [1] Profitability Metrics - The gross margin improved to 51.3%, an increase of 0.5 percentage points year-on-year [1] - The net profit margin was 7.2%, down 1.0 percentage point year-on-year [1] - The selling expense ratio decreased to 35.5%, down 0.8 percentage points year-on-year, while the management expense ratio increased to 4.7%, up 0.6 percentage points year-on-year [1] Cosmetics Segment - The cosmetics segment generated revenue of 530 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 2.6%, with a gross margin of 61.1% [2] - The Yilian brand achieved revenue of 250 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 25%, while the Ai'er Doctor brand saw revenue decline by 18.4% to 240 million yuan [2] - The segment focused on R&D and technological innovation, with 12 new patents authorized and 47 new products launched [2] Pharmaceutical and Raw Materials Segment - The pharmaceutical business achieved revenue of 110 million yuan, remaining stable year-on-year, with a gross margin of 54.8% [3] - The raw materials and derivatives segment generated revenue of 90 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 2.4%, with a gross margin of 29.7% [3] - The company launched 8 new health food products and received international patent authorization for sodium hyaluronate quaternary ammonium salt [3] Future Outlook - The company maintains its profit forecast, expecting net profits attributable to shareholders to be 330 million, 370 million, and 420 million yuan for 2025-2027, corresponding to PE ratios of 23, 20, and 18 times [3] - The company anticipates significant growth signals in 2025, driven by consumer spending and the expansion of its skincare and sub-brands [3]