13日晚，罗永浩微博最新发文称西贝的事情可以告一段落了，全文如下： 好吧，西贝的事情可以告一段落了。期待预制菜相关的国家法规尽快出台。 我要忙正事了，已经耽误了一些工作。感谢大家的关心。 此前，13日下午罗永浩发微博转发第一财经日报报道，配文称："太好了，万众期待！！！ 再次重申我的立场（以免被讹传和误解）： 1. 我不反对预制菜， 在某些情况下，我甚至会主动选择预制菜，比如图省事儿，赶时间，没胃口时对付一下等等。 2. 既然预制菜合法，餐馆当 然有权使用预制菜，但消费者有权知道餐馆是否使用了预制菜。 " 9月12日， 贾国龙在接受《中国企业家》采访时表示，他现在陷入自证循环了 。 他向记者透露，昨天（11日）和前天（10日）所有门店加起 来，日营业额分别掉了100万元，今天（12日）估计会掉200万元到300万元。 贾国龙表示他对预制菜的定义是按照国家的标准定义的。 "在工厂将整道菜全部做熟，做好封装，送到门店后，用水浴、微波炉或蒸箱加热后 就吃，这是预制菜。" 他认为预制工艺不是预制菜。 所有的菜都需要用到预制工艺，需要提前做，无非是在什么状态、用什么原料、工艺、调味品做。出餐效率、 标准化程度越高的餐饮 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the public dispute between Luo Yonghao and Jia Guolong regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes at the restaurant chain Xibei, highlighting the implications for consumer rights and industry standards [5][12]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei for using pre-prepared dishes, claiming they were overpriced and lacked transparency [5][6]. - Jia Guolong, the CEO of Xibei, responded by denying the use of pre-prepared dishes and threatened legal action against Luo for defamation [5][6]. - The situation escalated into a public relations crisis, with both parties holding firm to their positions [5][12]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The article notes that the National Health Commission is working on a national standard for pre-prepared dishes, which may require restaurants to disclose their use of such products [8]. - There is a growing trend in the restaurant industry towards pre-prepared dishes, which some see as a necessary adaptation to market demands [9][15]. - The lack of clear definitions and standards for what constitutes a pre-prepared dish complicates the public's understanding and acceptance of these practices [14]. Group 3: Consumer Perspective - Consumers are increasingly concerned about the quality and transparency of food products, with many feeling uncomfortable about the use of pre-prepared ingredients [9][14]. - Luo Yonghao's position resonates with consumers who demand more transparency and accountability from restaurants regarding their food sourcing and preparation methods [12][15]. - The article emphasizes the importance of consumer rights and the need for clear communication from businesses about their practices [12][14]. Group 4: Leadership and Management - Jia Guolong's strong reaction to the criticism reflects a broader challenge for business leaders in managing public perception and maintaining brand integrity [10][12]. - The article suggests that effective communication and conflict resolution are crucial for business leaders, especially in the face of public scrutiny [12][13]. - The contrasting approaches of Luo Yonghao and Jia Guolong highlight the complexities of navigating consumer expectations and industry standards in the restaurant sector [12][15].

Core Viewpoint - The recent public dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei regarding the transparency of pre-prepared dishes has garnered significant attention, with Luo offering a reward of 100,000 yuan for clarity on the matter [1]. Group 1: Industry Standards - Luo Yonghao highlighted the absence of formal national standards for pre-prepared dishes, indicating that while he does not oppose them, he criticizes the practice of selling pre-prepared dishes under misleading pretenses [2]. - He acknowledged that his own live-streaming sales include pre-prepared dishes, but emphasized that these are clearly labeled as such, ensuring transparency for consumers [2]. Group 2: Company Responses - In response to Luo's comments, Xibei has launched a menu that directly addresses the controversy, indicating a proactive approach to the public relations aspect of the dispute [1].

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding the restaurant brand Xibei and its use of pre-prepared meals has raised significant public concern, particularly regarding the health and nutritional standards of children's meals offered by the brand [1][4]. Group 1: Controversy Overview - On September 10, 2023, Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei on social media for serving pre-prepared meals, leading to a public dispute [1]. - Xibei held a press conference on September 11, 2023, denying the allegations and announcing plans to sue Luo Yonghao [1]. - Luo Yonghao offered a reward of 100,000 yuan for evidence proving Xibei's use of pre-prepared meals [1]. Group 2: Concerns About Children's Meals - The podcast episode discussed the lack of unified standards for what constitutes a healthy and safe pre-prepared meal, particularly for children [4]. - Parents are particularly concerned about the nutritional adequacy of children's meals, as children require safe and nutritious food during their growth stages [4]. - The processing and preservation methods of pre-prepared meals may not meet safety and nutritional standards, raising alarms among parents [4]. Group 3: Marketing Practices - The podcast also addressed the practice of fast-food chains like McDonald's and KFC offering toys with children's meals, which has been banned in some regions due to concerns over promoting unhealthy food [6]. - Xibei has invested significantly in marketing strategies to attract children, including themed tableware and gifts, which could be problematic if the meals do not meet nutritional standards [6]. - The focus should not only be on whether meals are pre-prepared but also on whether they meet the health and nutritional standards necessary for children's growth [6].

针对罗永浩发微博公开吐槽连锁餐饮品牌西贝预制菜一事，9月11日，西贝创始人、CEO贾国龙向《每日经济新闻》记者表示，西贝没有任何一道预制 菜，明天开始全国门店公开罗永浩消费的菜单让大家品尝监督。他同时表示，罗永浩的发言对西贝商誉影响非常大，将走法律程序进行起诉，"他对我们 的伤害是很大的，一定会起诉。" 对此，罗永浩于当日19：15在微博转发"贾国龙将起诉罗永浩"的媒体消息回应称："好，来吧。如果不是预制菜，那就太牛了。能把现做的菜做得全是重 新加热的味道，这肯定是高科技了。" 贾国龙表示，（罗永浩）作为消费者我感谢他，但其超出了正常消费者的行为。据贾国龙现场介绍，预制菜国家有标准，和有预制工艺是两回事，现在西 贝门店的菜品和曾经做过的"功夫菜"也完全是两回事。 贾国龙强调，预制菜是成品，他举例称：比如做鱼香肉丝，如果是在中央厨房炒好、冷冻，到门店加热出餐这叫预制菜；如果把肉丝切成丝，甚至肉丝焯 过水、过了油，但是烹饪、下料、炝锅等炒菜流程全在门店完成的，这不叫预制菜。值得一提的是，此次贾国龙接受媒体采访的门店所在地，为西贝北京 中粮祥云小镇店，该店正是罗永浩微博吐槽所吃的那家门店。 贾国龙公开罗永浩在西贝的 ...