Group 1 - The Federal Reserve has restarted interest rate cuts, lowering the federal funds rate target range by 25 basis points to 4.00%-4.25%, marking the first rate cut of the year [1] - The decision to cut rates is based on weak economic data, easing inflation pressures, and a weakening labor market, which reinforced market expectations for a rate cut [1][4] - Financial markets exhibited a "buy the rumor, sell the news" phenomenon, with major U.S. stock indices initially rising but then retreating after the announcement, indicating a typical "buy the fact" reaction [1] Group 2 - The Fed's future rate cut pace will depend on three interconnected issues: the severity of the labor market's downturn, the speed at which policymakers adjust rates to neutral levels, and how to anchor the "neutral rate" in the current economic environment [1] - The Fed has expressed increased concern over "downside risks" in the labor market, adjusting its previous assessment of a "strong labor market" to a view of "slowing job growth and rising unemployment" [4] - Despite the Fed's rate cut, it is acting more slowly than the European Central Bank, and inflation remains a core constraint on further rate cuts, alongside risks in the housing market [4][5] Group 3 - The Fed views stabilizing long-term inflation expectations as a core monetary policy goal, with internal structural pressures on inflation still present despite manageable overall inflation [5] - The housing market shows signs of cooling, with weak demand and low existing home sales, which directly impacts monetary policy decisions [5] - Political uncertainties may influence the pace of rate cuts, but the Fed's independence is expected to maintain a gradual adjustment policy [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari supports the recent decision to cut interest rates by 25 basis points and believes that similar cuts in the last two meetings of the year would be appropriate [2] Group 1: Interest Rate Decisions - The Fed decided to lower the policy interest rate to a range of 4.00%-4.25% following a significant drop in monthly job growth and a slight increase in the unemployment rate to 4.3% [2][3] - Kashkari initially thought only two rate cuts of 25 basis points were necessary for the year but changed his view due to declining job creation [2] - Other Fed officials have differing opinions, with some suggesting only one more cut or no cuts at all, indicating a more cautious stance on inflation [4] Group 2: Economic Indicators - Kashkari expressed concerns about the risk of a sharp rise in unemployment, which justifies the need for the Fed to take action to support the labor market [2] - He noted that the risk of tariffs causing a significant rise in inflation is low unless there are substantial increases in tariff rates or other supply-side shocks [2] - Kashkari believes the neutral interest rate has risen to 3.1%, suggesting that the Fed's policy is not as tight as previously thought [4] Group 3: Future Outlook - Kashkari indicated that if the labor market weakens more rapidly than expected, the Fed may need to cut rates more quickly [3] - He also mentioned that if the labor market proves resilient or inflation unexpectedly rises, the Fed should be prepared to pause or maintain the current policy rate [3]

Core Viewpoint - Neel Kashkari, President of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, supports the Fed's recent interest rate cut and suggests two additional cuts of 25 basis points each within the year, given the current economic conditions [1][2]. Economic Conditions - Recent economic data indicates signs of weakness, with monthly job growth significantly slowing and the unemployment rate rising slightly to 4.3% [1]. - Kashkari emphasizes that the deterioration of the labor market is a primary concern for current policy decisions [1]. Inflation Outlook - Despite concerns about potential tariff re-implementation by the Trump administration, Kashkari believes the impact on overall inflation will be limited, estimating that inflation is "unlikely to exceed 3%" [1]. - He notes that the current neutral interest rate may have risen to 3.1%, suggesting that the Fed's policy stance is not as tight as previously thought [2]. Policy Flexibility - Kashkari indicates that the Fed has the flexibility to implement faster rate cuts if the labor market worsens beyond expectations [3]. - There are internal disagreements within the Fed regarding future rate paths, with some policymakers suggesting that only one more cut may be necessary this year, or potentially no further cuts at all [2].

Group 1 - The next Federal Reserve chair candidate, former St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, opposes a 50 basis point rate cut this week, stating that the Fed's decision is correct [1] - The Federal Reserve lowered borrowing costs by 25 basis points this week, a move described by Chairman Jerome Powell as a "risk management" measure aimed at boosting a weakening labor market [1] - Bullard estimates that the neutral interest rate, which neither stimulates nor suppresses the economy, is around 3.25% [1] Group 2 - A former Fed official and current dean of Purdue University's business school suggested that the Fed's large-scale purchase of mortgage-backed securities in spring 2020 may have been a mistake, as the U.S. housing market recovered after the initial COVID-19 shock [2] - The process of unwinding these securities from the Fed's balance sheet is expected to take a long time [2]

Core Viewpoint - The report from CMB International maintains the view that the Federal Reserve's decision to restart rate cuts in September does not indicate the beginning of a continuous rate-cutting cycle [1] Summary by Relevant Sections Interest Rate Outlook - The neutral interest rate has risen to around 3%, leaving only 4-5 potential rate cuts available [1] - Despite market expectations for rate cuts in October and December, caution is advised regarding these predictions due to the resilience of the U.S. economy and significant short-term inflation risks [1] Federal Reserve Actions - The Federal Reserve cut rates by 25 basis points to a range of 4.00%-4.25% during the September FOMC meeting, which is viewed as a typical preemptive rate cut [1] - The current labor market, while showing signs of slowing, remains manageable, and the restrictive nature of policy rates has significantly eased compared to the previous year [1] Labor Market Dynamics - The cooling of employment is primarily attributed to immigration policy restrictions, leading to a weak supply-demand balance, with low unemployment reflecting a "weak equilibrium" [1] - A significant rate cut is unlikely to result in a rapid improvement in the labor market [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve has restarted interest rate cuts, lowering the federal funds rate target range by 25 basis points to 4.00%-4.25%, marking the first rate cut of the year, driven by weak economic data and easing inflation pressures [1][2] Economic Conditions - The Fed's decision reflects a recognition of the deteriorating labor market, with employment growth slowing and unemployment rates rising, which has become a significant factor in the rate cut [3] - Despite the rate cut, the Fed's actions are seen as lagging behind the European Central Bank, and inflation remains a core constraint on further rate reductions, with upward adjustments in inflation expectations for the next two years [3][4] Real Estate Market - The U.S. real estate market is showing signs of cooling, with weak demand and low existing home sales, which directly impacts monetary policy decisions [4] Political Influences - Political uncertainties may influence the pace of rate cuts, but the Fed's independence is expected to maintain a gradual adjustment policy, despite external pressures from political figures [5][6] - The internal decision-making dynamics within the Fed reveal complexities, with notable divisions among members regarding the extent and timing of future rate cuts [5][6]

Core Points - The Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point cut in the federal funds rate target range to 4.00% to 4.25%, marking the first rate cut since December of the previous year and the beginning of a new easing cycle amid concerns over a slowing job market [1][2] - The Fed's shift in focus from inflation control to employment support is evident, as it acknowledged a slowdown in job growth and removed previous language indicating a robust labor market [1][2] - Fed Chairman Jerome Powell described the rate cut as a "risk management measure" in response to a complex economic environment, balancing the need for easing against persistent inflation [2][3] Economic Implications - The decision to cut rates by 25 basis points rather than 50 reflects a cautious approach, aiming to transition to a neutral rate level that supports employment without exacerbating inflation [3] - The median expectation among Fed officials suggests a further 50 basis points reduction by the end of the year, indicating a preference for gradual adjustments [3] - The rate cut is expected to weaken the relative returns on dollar assets, potentially driving international capital towards emerging markets, which could alleviate local financing pressures in the short term [3][4] Challenges and Risks - The initiation of a rate cut cycle while core inflation remains at 3.1% raises concerns about the long-term value of the dollar and the implications for the global reserve currency status [4] - The easing environment may temporarily relieve debt servicing pressures for high-debt economies, but structural issues remain unresolved, posing risks if financing conditions tighten unexpectedly [4] - The Fed's balancing act between controlling inflation, supporting employment, and managing political pressures is more complex than in previous easing cycles, with a structurally higher neutral rate limiting the scope for monetary easing [5] Global Impact - For China, the Fed's rate cut presents both opportunities and challenges, as it may attract capital inflows while also increasing market volatility [5] - The interconnectedness of global economies necessitates close monitoring of U.S. monetary policy effects, emphasizing the need for policy coordination to mitigate potential risks [5]

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate target range by 25 basis points to 4.00%-4.25% during the FOMC meeting on September 16-17, indicating potential further cuts in the remaining meetings of the year [2][3] - This rate cut is occurring closer to the neutral interest rate, which is neither stimulative nor restrictive, contrasting with last year's higher rates that were more clearly restrictive [2][4] - The current economic conditions do not necessitate aggressive stimulus, as the Fed's officials describe the current rate as "moderately" restrictive, limiting the scope for significant cuts [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. inflation rate has shown signs of stagnation, with recent data indicating a slight rebound in inflation, which has delayed the Fed's decision to cut rates [3][4] - The Fed's decision comes after a five-year review of its monetary policy framework, which resulted in the abandonment of the average inflation targeting strategy and reaffirmation of the 2% inflation goal [4][5] - The Fed's independence has been challenged by external pressures, particularly from the White House, which has called for more aggressive rate cuts [5][6] Group 3 - The labor market shows signs of cooling, with non-farm payroll data indicating a downward revision in employment numbers, suggesting that the job market is not as robust as previously thought [6][8] - The unemployment rate has risen to a four-year high, although the increase is modest, indicating potential concerns for the labor market [6][8] - The Fed's rate cut is expected to lower borrowing costs, which could stimulate consumer spending and potentially improve employment conditions, although the impact may be limited due to other factors such as uncertainty from trade policies [7][8] Group 4 - The mortgage rates have seen a significant decline, with the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage dropping to 6.35%, which may lead to increased refinancing activity [8][9] - The overall economic resilience suggests that while the rate cut is beneficial, it may not be urgently needed, as consumer spending has shown consistent growth [6][8] - The labor force participation rate has decreased, contributing to employment challenges, which may not be easily addressed through monetary policy alone [8][9]

智通财经APP获悉，周四根据《信息自由法》要求公布的内部文件显示，澳洲联储的中性现金利率模型 暗示其预估值将"大幅下调"，而就业市场比此前预期更为紧张。预估值下调表明，澳洲联储的基准利率 可能需要低于此前预期，才能帮助该行实现使命。然而，就业市场紧张程度超预期可能意味着需要采取 更为严格的政策。 澳洲联储3月份的模型显示，2024年年中，中性利率为2.9%，比之前估计的3.6%低约0.7个百分点。 这一新数据此前从未公布过，它与疫情前的观点更为接近，表明"现金利率高于中性水平的程度比此前 预期更为严重。" 澳洲联储将于周五在其网站上公布《信息自由法》。 澳洲联储今年对放松政策持谨慎态度，其宽松步伐落后于金融市场预期的激进步伐。 澳洲联储今年开始降息，迄今已三次降低借贷成本，目前现金利率已降至3.6%，为2023年4月以来的最 低水平。澳洲联储主席Michele Bullock表示，可能还需要"再降息几次"才能实现澳洲联储对就业和通胀 的最新预测。 经济学家和货币市场预计，澳洲联储将在9月29日至30日的会议上维持利率不变，随后在11月恢复降 息。经济学家预计，澳洲联储将在明年年初再次降息，最终利率将降至3.1 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Bank of England is expected to maintain its benchmark interest rate at 4% during the upcoming monetary policy meeting, while also slowing down its quantitative tightening (QT) plan due to increased volatility in the government bond market [1][4]. Group 1: Interest Rate Decision - Economists anticipate that the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) will keep the annual reduction of government bond holdings at £700 billion, down from £1 trillion [1]. - The MPC is expected to vote 7 to 2 in favor of maintaining the interest rate, as decision-makers await clearer signals regarding potential inflationary pressures from the labor market [5][7]. - The market currently sees only a one-third probability of further rate cuts by the end of the year, breaking the trend of quarterly cuts since August 2024 [7][10]. Group 2: Economic Performance - The UK economy showed better-than-expected performance, with a 0.3% growth in Q2, surpassing the previous forecast of 0.1%, making it the leader in growth among G7 countries [11]. - Despite positive economic indicators, the Bank of England remains cautious, predicting a 0.3% growth for Q3 and expressing concerns over persistent inflationary pressures [11]. Group 3: Inflation Concerns - The Bank of England expects inflation to peak at 4%, driven by temporary factors, but officials are wary of a potential "second-round effect" where rising wages could further elevate prices [11]. - The current inflation level remains significantly higher than that of the US and Eurozone, indicating ongoing challenges for the UK economy [11].