Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Treasury yields experienced a notable increase, indicating a shift in market sentiment and potential implications for investment strategies [1] Group 1: Treasury Yield Movements - The 10-year benchmark U.S. Treasury yield rose by 1.60 basis points, reaching 4.4253%, with intraday trading between 4.4014% and 4.4432% [1] - The 2-year Treasury yield increased by 1.06 basis points, settling at 3.8956%, with a trading range of 3.8726% to 3.9082% during the day [1] Group 2: Market Reactions - A significant V-shaped reversal occurred in the U.S. stock market around the time of the opening, suggesting a volatile trading environment influenced by the changes in Treasury yields [1]

| | | 关键期限国债 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 品种 | 买人 | 藝冊 | 现价 | 涨跌BP | | 3M 美国国债 | 4.338 | 4.327 | 4.327 | -1.08 | | 4M 美国国债 | 4.352 | 4.342 | 4.342 | 0.09 | | 6M 美国国债 | 4.271 | 4.260 | 4.260 | 0.15 | | 1Y 美国国债 | 4.068 | 4.057 | 4.057 | -0.04 | | 2Y 美国国债 | 3.896 | 3.894 | 3.894 | 0.85 | | 3Y 美国国债 | 3.872 | 3.869 | 3.869 | 1.67 | | 5Y 美国国债 | 3.982 | 3.980 | 3.980 | 1.06 | | 7Y 美国国债 | 4.190 | 4.188 | 4.188 | 1.85 | | 20Y 美国国债 | 4.973 | 4.971 | 4.971 | 2.86 | | 30Y 美国国债 | 4.981 | 4.979 | 4.979 | 3.31 ...

作为全球无风险定价的"锚点"，美债为全球金融市场提供了核心定价基准。 不过，由于"大而美"法案正式签署将进一步增加美国财政赤字负担，同时特朗普政府挑起的全球关税冲突仍存在不确定性，长期美债收益率再次走高。 | F9 叠加 画线 | 工具 > | CBOT长期美债 | | | | US 7 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 7.00万 振 0.36% 5/01/07-2025/07/14 (134日) ▼ | | 112.75000 | | | | -0.15625 | | | | 06:23:13 延时 | | | | -0.14% = | | | 122.1562 | 卖一 | 112.78125 | | 562 | | | | 120.8090 | | 112.75000 | | 147 | | | | | 总量 | 7万 现手 | | | | | | 119.4618 | 结算价 | . 开盘 | | | 113.00000 | | | 118.1145 | 最高 | 113.03125 最低 | | | 112.62500 | | | | ...

身边的人 股民a，老王，今年赚30万，穿破洞汗衫，不舍得买新衣，一门心思研究股票！ 股民b，冯女士，今年盈利颇丰（不详），估计赚50万，没车，也不给老公买车！ 股民c，李哥，今年赚8万左右，电脑是2016年买的，开机要5分钟，骑电瓶车，不打算买车！ 菠萝它爸 观点跟您相反，虽然以前是那种一毛不拔的人，但是也没攒下什么财富，现在是能力范围内，买 商品和服务，都买贵的，因为贵不一定好，但是便宜大概率没好货，而我们投资者的时间宝贵， 花时间去便宜里面选好货，完全没必要。 我90年的，上半年赚点钱了，正好媳妇车追尾了别人的，不严重，但是既然赚钱了那索性给她换 了一辆新车。 股民d，新股民小王，大学生刚毕业，本金不超过5万，今年盈利2万，生活简朴，理发不超过10 元。 股民e,本人，今年盈利10%，不喝奶茶不吃零食，5年买一次衣服，3年买一次鞋，最爱某多多！ 真实！ luckzpz 光看今年？ 楼主也许不知道他们过去几年是怎么过来的。 SJ666888 我们家已经进化到剪头发都在家自己解决的地步了。 因为我的账户有好几个，高风险的就是期货账户里面钱多，每单盈利，都会拿出10%给媳妇存下 来，她会定投黄金或者美股或者高息 ...

Core Insights - Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) is expected to report earnings of $2.68 per share and sales of $22.86 billion on July 16, 2025, compared to $2.82 per share and $22.45 billion in the same quarter last year [3] - The company has a market capitalization of $378 billion and reported $89 billion in revenue over the past twelve months, with $22 billion in operating profits and $22 billion in net income [4] Historical Performance - Historically, JNJ has delivered positive one-day returns in 55% of cases following earnings announcements over the past five years, with a median positive return of 2.3% and a peak one-day positive return of 6.1% [2][7] - Over the last five years, there have been 20 recorded earnings data points, with 11 resulting in positive and 9 in negative one-day returns [7] - The percentage of positive one-day returns drops to 33% when analyzing data from the last three years [7] Trading Strategies - Traders may consider taking a position prior to the earnings release based on historical data or wait for the earnings to be disclosed to analyze immediate and medium-term returns [6] - A correlation analysis between short-term and medium-term returns can guide trading choices, particularly if 1D and 5D returns demonstrate a strong correlation [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of the "Active Selection" strategy compared to the CSI 300 index and other equity fund indices, highlighting its ability to generate excess returns in most years since its inception, particularly noting a recovery in 2025 after underperforming in 2024 [1][2][36]. Performance Summary - As of June 30, 2025, the Active Selection strategy achieved a 5.46% excess return compared to the CSI 300 index [1]. - The performance of the Active Selection strategy since its inception shows that it outperformed the CSI 300 and the equity fund index in most years, particularly excelling during the bull market from 2020 to 2021 [4][8]. - Yearly performance data indicates that in 2020, the Active Selection strategy rose by 65.78%, outperforming the CSI 300 by 24.49% and the equity fund index by 5.61% [7][4]. 2024 Underperformance Analysis - In 2024, the Active Selection strategy increased by 6.56%, but underperformed the CSI 300, which rose by 14.68%, resulting in an 8.12% shortfall [11][12]. - The underperformance in 2024 is attributed to market style shifts, particularly a surge in small-cap and loss-making stocks, which the Active Selection strategy does not engage with [14][23]. Investment Strategy Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of investing in companies with strong profitability, as measured by Return on Equity (ROE), and categorizes companies into three groups based on their ROE [15][18]. - The strategy focuses on high-quality stocks, avoiding speculative investments in loss-making companies, which led to its relative underperformance during periods of "speculative trading" in 2024 [23][34]. - Long-term investment in high-performing stocks is advocated, aligning with the principle that stock prices ultimately reflect the underlying company's value over time [37][38].

美国国债收益率转为下行，10年期收益率现小幅下跌至4.411%。 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In H1 2025, the commodity market showed a narrow - range oscillation, with the CSI Commodity Futures Index rising slightly by 0.20%. Positive returns mainly came from gold, silver, and copper, while negative returns were mainly from rebar, rubber, and soda ash [2]. - The CSI Commodity Index's year - on - year sequence has bottomed out and rebounded, potentially indicating that the PPI sequence is in the process of bottoming out and rebounding. Microscopically, the sector index trends reflect certain operational pressures in the steel and chemical industries [2]. - Investors should gradually reduce their reliance on fixed - income assets and practice the methodology of stock - bond - commodity asset allocation, increasing the proportion of commodities in the portfolio [2]. - The CSI Commodity Index has shown a relatively independent and excellent performance compared to overseas indices, but the recent increase in correlation needs attention. Adding an appropriate amount of commodities to the traditional stock - commodity portfolio can significantly improve the return - risk ratio of the portfolio [2]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Market Review - In H1 2025, the commodity market presented a narrow - range oscillation. The CSI Commodity Index rose slightly by 0.20% annually, with an amplitude of only 10.27%. It was difficult to form a long - term trend, showing an inverted V - shaped oscillation after a strong start [9]. - Driven by frequent macro - events, the commodity market was repeatedly disturbed by policies and geopolitics. With the global economy still bottoming out, the demand side was weak, especially for industrial products. Three macro black - swan events occurred in H1 [12][14]. - There were two obvious characteristics in the commodity market: the significant differentiation between agricultural and industrial products, and the further differentiation within commodities due to different types of event shocks [15]. 3.2 Index Return Attribution 3.2.1 Roll Yield Contribution - The roll yield in H1 2025 was positive overall, at 1.07%, an improvement compared to 2024, possibly suggesting that the global economic growth is bottoming out. Most months had positive roll yields, except for March which had a large negative value [20]. 3.2.2 Sector Return Contribution - In H1 2025, the trends of industrial and agricultural products diverged. The agricultural product market had a small price increase and relatively low volatility, while the industrial product market had a large price decline and relatively large amplitude fluctuations. Agricultural products outperformed industrial products in most months [23]. 3.2.3 Variety Return Contribution - At the sector level, black and energy - chemical sectors mostly made negative return contributions, while precious metals, non - ferrous metals, and agricultural products mostly made positive return contributions. At the variety level, gold, silver, and copper had large positive return contributions, while rebar, rubber, and soda ash had large negative return contributions [24]. 3.3 Macro - Micro Representativeness 3.3.1 Macro Level: The CSI Commodity Index Leads PPI by About 2 Months - The CSI Commodity Index's year - on - year sequence is highly correlated with the PPI year - on - year and can lead by about 2 months. Recently, the commodity index's year - on - year sequence has bottomed out and rebounded, perhaps indicating that the PPI sequence is bottoming out and rebounding [25]. 3.3.2 Micro Level: The Sector Index Moves in Sync with the Industry's Total Profits - The year - on - year sequence of the sub - sector index is highly correlated with the year - on - year sequence of the corresponding industry's total profits. The energy - chemical futures index is in the process of bottoming out, and the steel futures index is still finding its bottom [29]. 3.4 Comparison of Major Asset Classes - In the long - term, the commodity market has similar returns but lower risks compared to the equity market. In H1 2025, the commodity market's risk indicators were still better than those of the equity market [38][39]. - The current risk - free interest rate is quite low, and the investment cost - performance of bonds has declined significantly. Investors should gradually practice the methodology of major asset allocation and increase the proportion of commodities in the portfolio [40]. - Since 2024, the correlation between the commodity market and the equity market has been increasing. In H1 2025, the correlation remained relatively high, but it decreased rapidly at the end of June [43]. 3.5 Comparison with Overseas Indices - In the long - term, the CSI Commodity Index has obvious advantages in both returns and risks compared to overseas mainstream commodity indices. In H1 2025, it still had better performance in risk control [47][48]. - The correlation between the CSI Commodity Index and overseas mainstream commodity indices increased rapidly in early April and remained high in Q2, mainly due to the impact of the tariff shock [50]. 3.6 Application Cases - Adding an appropriate amount of commodities to the traditional stock - commodity portfolio can significantly improve the return - risk ratio of the portfolio. Replacing half of the stocks in the traditional 40 - 60 stock - bond portfolio with commodities can significantly reduce the portfolio's volatility and drawdown while keeping the returns similar [54][60].

金溢科技（002869）公告，2025年1月1日至2025年6月30日，预计归属于上市公司股东的净利润亏损900 万元至1200万元，上年同期为盈利1556.39万元；扣除非经常性损益后的净利润亏损1800万元至2100万 元，上年同期为盈利261.12万元；基本每股收益亏损0.05元/股至0.07元/股，上年同期为盈利0.09元/股。 报告期内，公司完成对车路通科技(成都)有限公司100%的股权收购，自2025年5月1日起车路通纳入公司 合并报表范围。业绩下滑主要由于行业竞争加剧、部分产品售价下降、综合毛利率承压以及理财产品收 益减少。 ...

Group 1 - The core focus of the market is on the stability of the US 10-year Treasury yield, which remains around 4.42% as investors await the upcoming inflation data [1] - Analysts suggest that if the Consumer Price Index (CPI) data exceeds expectations, it could reignite market speculation regarding a more hawkish interest rate path from the Federal Reserve, potentially driving yields higher and limiting the downside for the dollar [1]