Core Viewpoint - Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Dongfeng Liuzhou") has issued a statement regarding unauthorized use and distortion of its truck collision test video by a certain automotive brand, claiming it constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, damaging the company's brand and commercial reputation [1][2]. Group 1: Infringement Facts - The unauthorized release of a collision video by a certain automotive brand on July 29, 2025, is deemed a serious infringement that misleads the public and violates multiple laws including the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Advertising Law [1]. - The testing conditions used by the certain automotive brand differ significantly from real-world scenarios, as they have not disclosed vehicle conditions or testing environments, leading to misleading results that could create safety hazards for consumers [2]. Group 2: Technology of Chenglong Brand - Dongfeng Liuzhou, with a 71-year history, emphasizes user needs and adheres to the principle of "real scene protection" in its Chenglong truck safety system [3]. - The Chenglong truck features an industry-first dragon bone frame cabin and a four-layer energy absorption structure designed to maximize passenger safety by dispersing collision energy [4]. - The truck is equipped with a dual active safety system, including an Automatic Emergency Braking System (AEBS) and a cabin rearward shift technology, effectively reducing accident casualty rates [4]. Group 3: Industry and User Commitment - As a state-owned enterprise, Dongfeng Liuzhou actively supports national calls against unfair competition and aims to foster a fair market environment [6]. - The company advocates for safety as a priority, urging adherence to traffic regulations and regular vehicle maintenance, emphasizing that proactive prevention is more effective than any test [6]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou promotes integrity in competition, encouraging technological innovation and quality improvement to maintain a healthy industry ecosystem [6]. Group 4: Follow-up Accountability - The company is closely monitoring the situation and has established a special team to further investigate the incident, reserving the right to pursue legal action for any damages caused [8].

（文/观察者网周盛明 编辑/高莘） 2025年7月31日晚间，东风柳州汽车有限公司（以下简称"东风柳汽"）发布《关于某品牌使用碰撞视频侵权的声明》。 值得注意的是，在发布会展示的视频中，方向盘处的Logo显示其品牌为"乘龙卡车"。 该测试引发大量争议。乘龙卡车官方社交媒体账号在回复网友留言时暗示"测试造假"，并表示"法务部门正在处理中。" 东风柳汽发布声明 东风柳汽 东风柳汽在声明中表示，某汽车品牌侵权事实包括"非法发布侵权视频"及"使用特定场景测试，与实际场景运营存在严重差异"。 针对第一点，东风柳汽表示："某汽车品牌在2025年7月29日发布与乘龙卡车正面碰撞视频的行为，已构成严重侵权，并超过正常商业竞争范畴，严重误导和 损害公众知情权，对我司品牌及商业名誉带来了巨大负面影响，涉嫌违反《反不正当竞争法》《广告法》及《民法典》等相关法律。" 针对第二点，东风柳汽表示："截至目前我司了解到的情况，某汽车品牌未公开测试车辆状况（双方车辆是否改装、减配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检 等）、场景环境（测试场地状况、车速、驾驶状态等），通过自定义碰撞条件，特定设计非常规测试场景，发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大的碰 ...

7月31日晚间，据乘龙卡车微信公众号，东风柳州汽车有限公司发布声明，回应某品牌对撞乘龙卡车测试。 文中提到，某汽车品牌使用特定场景测试，与实际场景运营存在严重差异。截至公司目前了解到的情况，某汽车品牌未公 开测试车辆状况（双方车辆是否改装、减配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景环境（测试场地状况、车速、驾驶 状态等），通过自定义碰撞条件，特定设计非常规测试场景，发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大的碰撞视频，不仅 贬低公司品牌形象，还容易对广大车主造成误导，形成安全隐患。 WANT IN TANK ANNEW HAT H H H L L L T T 负面影响,涉嫌违反《反不正当竞争法》《广告 法》及《民法典》等相关法律。 (二) 某汽车品牌使用特定场景测试,与 实际场景运营存在严重差异 截至目前我司了解到的情况,某汽车品牌 未公开测试车辆状况(双方车辆是否改装、减 配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景 环境(测试场地状况、车速、驾驶状态等), 通过自定义碰撞条件,特定设计非常规测试场 景、发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大 的碰撞视频,不仅贬低我司品牌形象,还容易 对广大车主造成误导,形成安全隐患。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile Co., Ltd. issued a statement responding to a specific automotive brand's crash test of its Chenglong truck, highlighting significant discrepancies between the test conditions and real-world scenarios [1][7]. Group 1: Response to Crash Test - The automotive brand conducted tests under specific conditions that do not reflect actual operational scenarios, leading to misleading results [1][3]. - The statement emphasized that the automotive brand did not disclose the condition of the test vehicles or the environment in which the tests were conducted, raising concerns about the validity of the test results [1][7]. Group 2: Safety Features of Chenglong Trucks - Dongfeng Liuzhou has a 71-year history and prioritizes user needs, adhering to the principle of "real scene protection" in its safety systems [4]. - The Chenglong truck features an innovative dragon bone frame cabin and a four-layer energy absorption structure designed to maximize passenger safety during collisions [4]. Group 3: Industry Position and Advocacy - As a state-owned enterprise, Dongfeng Liuzhou actively supports national calls against unfair competition and aims to foster a fair market environment [5]. - The company advocates for safety as a priority, encouraging adherence to traffic regulations and regular vehicle maintenance among users [5].

每经编辑｜金冥羽 7月31日晚间，据乘龙卡车微信公众号，东风柳州汽车有限公司发布声明，回应某品牌对撞乘龙卡车测试。 文中提到，某汽车品牌使用特定场景测试，与实际场景运营存在严重差异。截至公司目前了解到的情况，某汽车品牌未公开测试车辆状况（双方车辆是否 改装、减配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景环境（测试场地状况、车速、驾驶状态等），通过自定义碰撞条件，特定设计非常规测试场景，发 布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大的碰撞视频，不仅贬低公司品牌形象，还容易对广大车主造成误导，形成安全隐患。 截至目前我司了解到的情况,某汽车品牌 未公开测试车辆状况(双方车辆是否改装、减 配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景 环境(测试场地状况、车速、驾驶状态等）， 通过自定义碰撞条件,特定设计非常规测试场 景，发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大 的碰撞视频,不仅贬低我司品牌形象,还容易 对广大车主造成误导,形成安全隐患。 二、乘龙品牌技术说明 东风柳汽 作为一家有71年历史的央国 企，始终以用户需求为导向，乘龙卡车安全体 系严格遵循"真实场景防护"原则： (一) 行业首创龙骨框架驾驶室： (二) 采用四层吸能结构(抗冲 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and a truck has led to significant controversy, with Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile Co., Ltd. claiming serious infringement and misleading representation by the automotive brand involved in the test [3][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The Li Auto i8 was tested against an 8-ton truck at a speed of 50 km/h, resulting in the truck's wheels lifting and significant damage to the truck's cabin, indicating a lack of impact on the i8 [2]. - The testing video has sparked public discussion, particularly regarding the truck brand involved, leading to a formal statement from Dongfeng Liuzhou [3][4]. Group 2: Legal and Ethical Concerns - Dongfeng Liuzhou asserts that the use of the collision video without authorization constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, violating multiple laws including the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Advertising Law [5][6]. - The company highlights that the testing conditions were not disclosed, which could mislead consumers about the safety of their vehicles [6]. Group 3: Technical and Safety Standards - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasizes its commitment to safety, detailing the advanced safety features of its trucks, including a unique frame design and a four-layer energy absorption structure [7]. - The company promotes a safety-first approach, advocating for adherence to traffic regulations and regular vehicle maintenance as essential for accident prevention [9]. Group 4: Industry Response and Future Actions - Dongfeng Liuzhou calls for fair competition within the industry, opposing practices that undermine market integrity and urging peers to maintain ethical standards [8][9]. - The company has established a special team to monitor the situation and reserves the right to pursue legal action regarding the incident [10].

据"乘龙卡车"公众号消息，7月31日，东风柳州汽车有限公司发布关于某品牌使用碰撞视频侵权的声 明： 一、侵权事实认定 （一）非法发布侵权视频 某汽车品牌在2025年7月29日发布与乘龙卡车正面碰撞视频的行为，已构成严重侵权，并超过正常商业 竞争范畴，严重误导和损害公众知情权，对我司品牌及商业名誉带来了巨大负面影响，涉嫌违反《反不 正当竞争法》《广告法》及《民法典》等相关法律。 （二）某汽车品牌使用特定场景测试，与实际场景运营存在严重差异 安全为本：严格遵守交通法规，定期做好车辆维保，强化主动预防意识——这比任何测试都更能筑牢安 全防线！ 诚信竞争：恪守商业道德，以技术创新和品质提升驱动行业进步，共同维护健康可持续的产业生态！ 二、乘龙品牌技术说明 东风柳汽作为一家有71年历史的央国企，始终以用户需求为导向，乘龙卡车安全体系严格遵循"真实场 景防护"原则： （一）行业首创龙骨框架驾驶室； （二）采用四层吸能结构（抗冲击层→缓冲层→高强骨架→柔性防护层），通过多通道传导专利技术分 散碰撞能量，最大化保障驾乘安全； （三）主动安全双重防线：AEBS自动紧急制动系统（主动预防）+驾驶室后移技术（被动防护），有 效降低 ...

Group 1: Macroeconomic Dynamics - The Chinese government will provide childcare subsidies for infants born after January 1, 2022, until they reach three years old, starting from January 1, 2025 [1] - The subsidy aims to support families during the critical early years of child development, aligning with international practices [1] Group 2: Immigration and Travel - Chinese passport holders can now travel to over 90 countries and regions without a visa or with a visa on arrival, improving the passport's global ranking from 72nd to 60th [2] Group 3: Industry Competition - The China Metal Materials Circulation Association has called for an end to "involution-style" competition in the steel circulation industry, advocating for fair competition based on product quality and innovation [3] Group 4: Financial Institutions - HSBC's Swiss private banking division is under investigation by Swiss and French authorities for alleged money laundering activities, which may have significant implications for the company [7] Group 5: Market Data - As of July 30, the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 0.17%, while the ChiNext Index fell by 1.62%, with a total market turnover of approximately 1.844 trillion yuan [8] - The financing balance in the two markets increased by 15.271 billion yuan, reaching a total of 1.962 trillion yuan [9] Group 6: Company Dynamics - New Oriental's stock fell over 11% in pre-market trading due to revenue forecasts for the first fiscal quarter of 2026 being below market expectations [11][12] - Long River Power plans to invest approximately 26.6 billion yuan in the construction of the Gezhouba shipping capacity expansion project [18] - Digital Certification will change its controlling shareholder to Beijing Data Group, following a transfer of state-owned shares [19]

Core Viewpoint - The subsidy war among food delivery platforms is reaching its end due to regulatory intervention, highlighting the need for sustainable innovation and service capability competition rather than price wars [1][4][5] Group 1: Impact on Restaurants - Many restaurants are experiencing reduced dine-in orders as consumers prefer cheaper delivery options, leading to a decline in overall profitability [1][2] - The financial burden of subsidies has increased significantly for small and medium-sized restaurants, with some facing unsustainable costs due to high promotional expenses from platforms [2][3] - The negative impact of low-price competition is evident, as restaurants struggle to maintain profitability while still covering operational costs such as rent and labor [3][4] Group 2: Regulatory Changes - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law, effective from October 15, aims to regulate chaotic competition and prevent platforms from forcing merchants to sell below cost [6][7] - Regulatory bodies are actively engaging with major platforms to ensure compliance with laws and promote fair competition within the food service industry [4][5] Group 3: ESG Considerations - The subsidy war has exposed significant shortcomings in platforms' ESG responsibilities, affecting the entire industry ecosystem and raising concerns about food safety and quality [4][8] - Experts emphasize the need for platforms to balance the interests of merchants, consumers, and delivery personnel as part of their ESG commitments [8][9] - The environmental impact of increased packaging waste from delivery services is a growing concern, necessitating a shift towards sustainable practices [8][9] Group 4: Future Directions - Platforms are encouraged to move away from low-price competition and focus on innovative business models that support small merchants and community values [8][9] - There is a call for enhanced regulatory frameworks to ensure fair practices and transparency in platform operations, particularly regarding algorithmic decision-making [9]

Core Viewpoint - The China Asset Appraisal Association (CAAA) has released the "Implementation Opinions on Anti-Unfair Competition Behavior" to protect public interests and the legitimate rights of appraisal institutions, encourage fair competition, prevent "involution" competition, and promote high-quality development in the asset appraisal industry [1]. Summary by Sections Anti-Competition Standards - The "Implementation Opinions" define standards for low-price competition, stating that if an appraisal institution's bid is below 50% of the average bid of all compliant institutions, competitors can report this behavior [2][3]. Mutual Supervision - Appraisal institutions are encouraged to supervise each other to resist unfair competition and maintain a fair competitive environment. They can report suspected unfair competition to various authorities, including the CAAA and local associations, providing evidence for investigation [4]. Legal Recourse - Institutions that believe their rights have been harmed by unfair competition can file lawsuits in people's courts [5]. Evidence for Reporting - Institutions can provide evidence of low-cost bidding through various means, including bid prices, cost accounting, and historical charges. Specific thresholds for reporting include bids below 50% of the average bid and below 45% of the maximum project price [6][7]. Industry Self-Regulation - The CAAA and local associations are tasked with strengthening industry self-regulation, guiding appraisal institutions to compete legally, and establishing monitoring mechanisms for bidding behavior. They will focus on investigating reported unfair competition and may impose penalties for non-compliance [8]. Market Overview - As of June 2024, there are 272 securities appraisal institutions in China, a decrease of 9 from the previous year. The majority are located in major cities like Beijing, Shenzhen, and Shanghai, accounting for 61.8% of the total [9]. Workforce and Revenue - By the end of 2023, there were 9,282 asset appraisers, a 4.2% increase year-on-year. The total revenue for securities appraisal institutions reached 11.27 billion yuan, a 3.0% increase, with asset appraisal income making up 75.4% of total revenue [10][11]. Report Generation - In 2023, 213 securities appraisal institutions issued 12,069 asset appraisal reports, a 26.8% increase from the previous year, with 91.4% of these reports issued for listed companies [12]. Regulatory Updates - By the end of 2024, the Ministry of Finance and the China Securities Regulatory Commission will revise the "Filing Measures for Securities Service Business by Asset Appraisal Institutions," tightening filing requirements and enhancing ongoing supervision [13].