谢锋说，当前全球经济增长动能不足，家家有本难念的经，同舟共济是唯一出路，保护主义是饮鸩止 渴。抽刀断水水更流，在全球化的今天想人为切断资金流、技术流、人才流是不现实的，你筑墙设垒， 它就会流向其他地方。今年前5个月，中美贸易额同比下降8%，但中国同东盟、欧盟贸易额却分别增长 9%、3%。"小院高墙"圈不住墙外花开，"大院铁幕"只会激发中国加快自立自强。美国工商界既担心将 中国市场拱手相让，更担心丧失研发后劲，你们的关切应该得到重视。 据中国驻美大使馆网站消息，2025年6月18日，中国驻美国大使谢锋应邀出席美中贸易全国委员会2025 年度庆典晚宴并发表演讲。 谢锋指出，上世纪30年代，大打贸易战加速经济大萧条的殷鉴不远。如果各国都以邻为壑，将市场、产 能、技术甚至签证武器化，世界就会倒退到不讲规则、不讲诚信、弱肉强食的黑暗丛林。关税战扰乱了 全球产供链稳定，加剧了经济衰退风险，国际资本市场忽高忽低、忽红忽绿，IMF最新预测今年全球经 济增速仅为2.8%，美经济增长预期被下调0.9个百分点，这是你们希望看到的吗？ 谢锋强调，关税战没有赢家，冲突对抗不应成为选择，对话协商才是正确出路。近期，世界前两大经济 体重新 ...

Group 1 - The European Commission President accused China of ignoring global trade rules and providing substantial subsidies to domestic companies, claiming that China is weaponizing its dominance in rare earths and transferring excess capacity to global markets [1] - China firmly opposes these statements, asserting that its industrial subsidy policies adhere to open, fair, and compliant principles, and that it strictly follows WTO rules [1] - China's industrial development relies on continuous technological innovation, a complete supply chain system, sufficient market competition, and abundant human resources, rather than subsidies [1] Group 2 - The notion of "overcapacity" is essentially a concern of certain countries regarding their competitiveness and market share, using it as a pretext for protectionist measures [2] - The EU has been implementing industrial policies and providing substantial subsidies to support European companies, with an estimated total of over €1.44 trillion in various subsidies from 2021 to 2030, and over €300 billion already disbursed by 2024 [2] - China emphasizes its commitment to high-level opening-up and aims to provide European companies with vast market opportunities, while opposing any attempts that undermine China's development rights for the benefit of others [2]

Core Viewpoint - China is willing to implement a 100% zero-tariff policy on products for 53 African countries with diplomatic relations, through the signing of a Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement, as part of efforts to enhance economic cooperation and respond to global trade challenges [1][2]. Group 1: Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement - The Joint Development Economic Partnership Agreement is an innovative free trade agreement between China and African countries, aimed at promoting economic cooperation and implementing the zero-tariff policy [1]. - This initiative reflects the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and aims to expand autonomous opening-up, serving as a concrete action to further the outcomes of the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation [1][2]. - The agreement is expected to provide institutional guarantees for deepening economic and trade cooperation between China and Africa, setting a new benchmark for South-South cooperation [2]. Group 2: Implementation and Future Steps - The Ministry of Commerce will collaborate with relevant departments to promote the signing of the agreement based on principles of equality and mutual benefit, considering the specific needs of African countries [2]. - The agreement will focus on facilitating trade, inclusive growth, resilient supply chains, and modern development areas, aiming for a swift conclusion that aligns with World Trade Organization rules [2]. - As of December 1, 2024, China has already granted 100% zero-tariff treatment to products from 33 African countries and other least developed countries with diplomatic relations with China [3].

Core Viewpoint - The statement emphasizes that there are no winners in trade wars and that unilateralism, protectionism, and hegemonism ultimately harm all parties involved [1] Group 1 - The current global situation is characterized by accelerated changes and a new period of turmoil and transformation [1] - The importance of fairness, justice, and mutual benefit is highlighted as essential for maintaining world peace and achieving common development [1] - The call for unity and the rejection of a return to the "law of the jungle" is made, advocating for the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the significance of the Economic Partnership Agreement as an innovative free trade agreement between China and African countries, aiming to implement zero tariffs on 100% of products for 53 African countries that have diplomatic relations with China [1] - This agreement is a concrete action to expand autonomous opening-up and reflects the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, further promoting the outcomes of the China-Africa Cooperation Forum Beijing Summit [1] - The initiative is a response to the rising trends of unilateralism and protectionism, showcasing the determination of China and Africa to jointly address challenges and inject stability and positive energy into global trade development [1] Group 2 - The agreement aligns with the direction of economic globalization, meets the expectations of African countries, and complies with World Trade Organization rules [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar emphasized the need to resist protectionism and geopolitical tensions that disrupt global clean energy development and green transition processes [1] Group 1: Regional Cooperation and Investment - Anwar called for Southeast Asian countries to establish a clear and coordinated financial framework to enhance investor confidence and attract more capital into renewable energy projects in the region [1] - The Prime Minister highlighted the importance of upgrading grid systems and accelerating the adoption and application of green technologies [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques the United States' approach to trade, particularly its emphasis on "reciprocal tariffs," which the author argues is a double standard that overlooks the significant service trade surplus the U.S. enjoys [3][5]. Trade Balance - The U.S. service trade surplus is projected to reach nearly $300 billion in 2024, highlighting a significant imbalance in how the U.S. discusses its trade position, focusing on goods trade deficits while ignoring service trade advantages [3]. - The U.S. often claims to be at a disadvantage in goods trade, yet fails to acknowledge its substantial gains in service trade, which is seen as a selective narrative [3][5]. Global Trade Dynamics - The global service industry now accounts for over two-thirds of GDP, with high-value services like finance and IT predominantly controlled by the U.S. and other developed nations, raising questions about the fairness of the U.S. trade narrative [5]. - The article suggests that the U.S. is not genuinely advocating for free trade but rather seeks to maintain a system that benefits itself while imposing restrictions on others [7]. International Reactions - The European Union, particularly Germany, is expressing concerns over unilateral trade actions and the need for stronger multilateral coordination to avoid a trade war, indicating a shift in sentiment among global partners [7]. - China's recent statements at the WTO are framed as a call for a more equitable global trade environment, challenging the notion that might makes right in international trade [9]. Future Implications - The article raises concerns about the sustainability of the U.S. trade strategy, questioning how long it can continue to operate under a logic that demands reciprocity while maintaining flexibility for itself [9].

Core Viewpoint - The emergence of the "Trump 2.0 era" signifies a fundamental shift in global dynamics, rather than a temporary phenomenon, with significant implications for the future of the U.S. and the world [2][3]. Group 1: Global Dynamics and Geopolitical Changes - The current global situation is characterized by three key trends: Protectionism, Politicization, and Polarization, which are reshaping geopolitical and economic rules [3][4]. - Non-aligned third-party countries are rising in influence, moving away from the binary "us vs. them" mentality, and engaging in diverse partnerships across various regions [7][10]. - The U.S. is rapidly losing its global standing due to its current policies, which are leading it towards a developing country status [3][10]. Group 2: Economic Implications for China - China's GDP growth is projected to reach 5%, but underlying issues such as corporate debt, consumer confidence, and employment pressures remain [21][22]. - To transition into a consumption-driven economy, China must address social security issues and shift focus from production to consumer support [22][23]. - The current global economic landscape presents a "golden opportunity" for China to enhance the international status of the Renminbi, especially as capital flows away from the U.S. [24][25]. Group 3: Technological Advancements and AI - The impact of AI is expected to be more profound than the Industrial Revolution, presenting both opportunities and challenges for developing countries [5][31]. - Countries must adapt their education systems to prepare for the skills needed in an AI-driven economy, ensuring that they do not fall behind [31][33]. - The rise of AI necessitates a collaborative approach among nations to address global challenges, rather than fostering competition [38]. Group 4: Corporate Strategies and Market Positioning - Chinese companies expanding overseas should prioritize localization and identify their core competitive advantages to avoid pitfalls associated with price competition [17][18]. - The need for a shift in competitive thinking is crucial, as many Chinese firms face narrow profit margins and must innovate rather than imitate [17][18]. - The concept of "mayor economy" highlights the importance of local government support in fostering private enterprise and driving industrial growth [28].

从西安到阿斯塔纳，六国领导人将再次齐聚一堂，共叙传统友谊，共谋未来发展。 中国驻哈萨克斯坦大使韩春霖：峰会继续坚持元首引领。以落实六国元首共识为根本遵循，筑牢睦邻友好、团结互信的政治基础。中方坚定支持涉及彼此主 权、独立、安全和领土完整等核心利益，支持六国联合自强。当前，世界百年变局加速演进，国际和地区形势中的不稳定因素明显增多，中国同中亚国家坚 持睦邻友好、团结携手、深化合作、共同支持多边主义、维护多边贸易体制，将为地区繁荣发展注入新动力、为地区和平稳定增加确定性。 近年来，在元首外交战略引领下，中国—中亚机制日臻完善，各领域合作硕果累累。 第二届中国—中亚峰会即将在哈萨克斯坦举行。中国和中亚五国领导人将齐聚阿斯塔纳，共同擘画中国中亚关系和中国—中亚机制发展新蓝图。本届峰会意 义重大，各界高度期待。通过本次峰会，中国同中亚五国将进一步夯实互信基础，凝聚合作共识，深化战略对接，推动各领域合作提质升级，为构建更加紧 密的中国—中亚命运共同体注入更多正能量。 两年前，首届中国—中亚峰会在中国西安成功举办，中国—中亚元首会晤机制正式建立，中国同中亚国家关系迈入了新时代，双方合作持续走深走实，为地 区发展源源不断注入 ...

【环球时报报道 记者 肖震冬】第51届七国集团（G7）峰会于当地时间15日至17日在加拿大艾伯塔省卡 纳纳斯基斯举行。在美国总统特朗普再度返回G7峰会时，"他已经带领全球经济经历了一场过山车式的 起伏"，彭博社13日报道称，而这一次，美国关税政策在国内外遭遇了日益增长的反对，"再次深刻地提 醒人们贸易战的高昂代价"。 同时，美国政府的关税政策也在挑战其作为多数国家主要经济伙伴的角色，及对全球经济议程的影响 力。彭博社的研究模型显示，美国关税政策可能使其在全球贸易中的份额从22%降至16%。这在亚洲市 场尤为明显，当前中国已是该地区多数国家最大贸易伙伴。原TPP成员国（亚太地区）对华贸易占比 23%，对美贸易仅占13%，关税政策可能将美国份额压至11%。 特朗普退出TPP的后果在8年后的今天仍然体现在盟友态度的转变上。 特朗普的关税也打击了许多美国 盟友的经济。随着出口下滑，加拿大等贸易伙伴正面临陷入衰退的可能性。日本和德国标志性的汽车行 业也面临着生存威胁。目前有三个G7成员（加拿大、日本和英国）已加入TPP的"继承者"《全面与进步 跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》（CPTPP）。报道援引日本内阁府前高级经济学家川崎健 ...