尼日利亚非洲经济研究中心研究员安东尼.布松表示，美国滥施关税是一种贸易保护主义，是对全球贸 易生态系统的破坏，世界各国应该携手努力，推动全球贸易一体化。布松认为，美国政府应该重新审视 他们的关税政策。他说："对不同国家设定"基准关税"和"对等关税"，我们认为这是政策缺陷，它甚至 会对最不发达国家产生影响。比如，根据非洲过去两年的贸易情况来看，该政策对非洲的影响就很大， 特朗普总统需要冷静下来，重新审视这项政策。我们应该走向全球合作，而不是走向孤立主义。"(央视 新闻) ...

对小额包裹征税，不仅仅是美国，还有法国。 5月2日起，美国将终止对来自我国的低价进口商品免征关税的"小额豁免"政策。 什么是"小额豁免"？ 最早，"小额豁免"可以追溯至1938年，初衷是简化价值低于5美元（相当于今天109美元）的小包裹通关流程。 到了2016年，这一门槛提高至800美元。但随着近年来我国跨境电商迅速发展，也让美国等国家开始感受所谓的"威胁"。 根据美国国会研究服务处今年2月份的报告，2023年，来自我国低价包裹出口额从2018年的53亿美元飙升至660亿美元，而美国一直以来都是其主要市场。 随着美国开始在5月份对我国小额包裹征税，这项价值数百亿美元的市场，也要遭受考验了。 根据美联社的预计，这项小额包裹豁免政策曾允许每日多达400万个小额包裹进入美国市场。随着该政策的取消，将迫使大量依赖我国供应链构建商业模式 的美国企业重新评估其运营模式，以维持成本竞争力。 唯一能够在小额包裹中获益的，可能也就只有美国本土制造商了。 换句话说，这是特朗普推动让"美国制造业再次伟大"计划的一部分。 上个月，特朗普才宣布对我国商品关税上调至145%，对来自我国的小额包裹商品征收的关税从90%上调至120%，随着 ...

Core Viewpoint - The high-level economic talks between China and the U.S. in Switzerland are a response to global expectations and the interests of both nations, emphasizing the need for mutual respect and cooperation in trade relations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Economic Impact - The U.S. unilateral tariff measures have severely disrupted its own economy and negatively impacted global supply chains, highlighting the necessity for dialogue to resolve differences and avoid escalating conflicts [2][3]. - China's economy demonstrated resilience with a year-on-year growth of 5.4% in Q1, positioning it favorably among major economies [4]. - China's total import and export value is projected to exceed 43 trillion yuan in 2024, indicating a diversified trade partnership and optimized export structure [4]. Group 2: Trade Relations - The ongoing trade war and tariff disputes are characterized as a zero-sum game, where both sides must recognize the importance of mutual benefits rather than adversarial competition [2][5]. - China is committed to expanding its openness and actively promoting trade and investment liberalization, as evidenced by record participation from foreign buyers at recent trade fairs [5]. - The dialogue between China and the U.S. is seen as a crucial step towards managing differences and enhancing cooperative efforts for mutual economic growth [5]. Group 3: Principles of Negotiation - Any negotiations must be based on mutual respect, equality, and mutual benefit, with China emphasizing the need for the U.S. to acknowledge the negative impacts of its unilateral tariffs [2][3]. - China asserts that appeasement will not lead to peace, and maintaining principles of fairness and justice is essential for protecting national interests [3]. - The essence of the current economic confrontation is a clash between open cooperation and closed confrontation in the context of globalization [3].

特朗普政府正在调查进口飞机、喷气发动机及其零部件是否构成国家安全威胁，此举可能是对商用航空 产业加征新关税的铺垫。 根据美国商务部周五发布的公告，调查已于5月1日启动，涉及对象包括商用飞机、喷气发动机以及相关 零部件。 公告称，调查内容包括"美国相关进口是否集中于少数供应商，以及由此产生的相关风险"，还将评 估"外国政府补贴和掠夺性贸易行为对行业竞争力的影响"。 波音737 Max机身在美国华盛顿州伦顿的制造工厂 这是特朗普近期发起的一系列调查中的最新一项，旨在为其所认为的关键产业争取关税保护。特朗普此 前已根据《1962年贸易扩展法》第232条对钢、铝、汽车及其零部件加征关税，并对铜、药品、半导体 芯片、中重型卡车等产品的进口发起调查。 该法律项下的调查通常会在270天内得出结论，但特朗普政府已多次加快相关行动的推进节奏。调查启 动并不意味着一定会征收新关税，但特朗普一贯将其作为扶持美国工业的重要工具。 特朗普此前已经依据紧急授权对欧盟的数十个贸易伙伴加征关税。这些关税成为当前多项谈判焦点。欧 盟是空中客车的总部所在，而该公司是波音主要竞争对手。 最新发起的调查是对过去50年来全球航空产业格局的又一挑战，凸 ...

Group 1 - The "China-Europe Diplomatic Relations 50th Anniversary Forum" was held to commemorate the 50 years of cooperation between China and the EU, focusing on global trade, investment, innovation, digital transformation, and climate action [1][3] - The forum highlighted the historical significance of the diplomatic relationship established in 1975, marking a key step in China's opening up to the world [3][4] - Keynote speeches emphasized the importance of strategic autonomy for the EU and the potential for cooperation in addressing challenges such as climate change and economic development [4][5] Group 2 - The forum featured discussions on the evolution of China-EU relations, emphasizing mutual respect and rule-based multilateralism as foundations for sustainable development [4][6] - The role of the China Europe International Business School (CEIBS) as a bridge for China-EU dialogue and cooperation was underscored, highlighting its contributions to economic and cultural exchanges [6][7] - Roundtable discussions focused on energy, trade, investment, and green development, with participants advocating for fair competition and sustainable development principles [7]

Core Viewpoint - Trump's new policy to impose a 100% tariff on foreign-made films entering the U.S. is seen as a continuation of his protectionist agenda, which may harm the domestic film industry rather than protect it [3][5]. Industry Impact - The proposed film tariff will significantly impact the U.S. film industry's supply chain, leading to increased production costs and potentially fewer films being produced, which could disrupt the entire industry ecosystem [5]. - Hollywood's reliance on overseas locations, special effects teams, and post-production services means that the tariff could lead to a substantial increase in production expenses, ultimately harming the film distribution business [5]. International Response - European lawmakers have expressed strong opposition to Trump's film tariff, labeling it as a form of trade protectionism. They warn that retaliatory measures could be taken, such as limiting U.S. film imports or imposing additional taxes on American films, which would severely affect Hollywood's international box office revenues [6]. - If Europe enacts countermeasures, it could diminish the influence of American films in European markets, leading to a significant reduction in international ticket sales [6]. Cultural Exchange - The implementation of a film tariff could hinder cultural exchange between nations, as films serve as vital cultural conduits. A retaliatory response could further weaken cultural penetration and influence [8]. - While the immediate impact on Chinese films may be limited due to their small market share in the U.S., the long-term effects of disrupted international cultural trade could destabilize the global film market [8]. Conclusion - Trump's approach to tariffs, particularly in the film industry, is viewed as a misguided attempt that may not yield the desired protective effects and could lead to greater isolation for the U.S. in the international market [9].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese ambassador to Guinea-Bissau, Yang Renhuo, expressed a strong stance against the U.S. imposition of tariffs, labeling it as unilateralism, protectionism, and economic bullying, which severely impacts international trade and violates World Trade Organization rules [3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Impact - The U.S. has announced tariffs on all trade partners, affecting over 180 countries, which has drawn significant domestic and international criticism [3]. - The tariffs are expected to shrink global merchandise trade volume by approximately 1% this year, according to the World Trade Organization [4]. - The tariffs disproportionately affect developing countries, exacerbating wealth disparities and causing economic instability, particularly in Africa [4]. Group 2: China's Economic Resilience - China’s economy continues to grow, achieving a 5.4% growth rate in the first quarter, despite U.S. trade pressures [5]. - The Chinese economy is characterized as a vast market with a complete industrial chain, relying on self-reliance and hard work rather than external favors [5]. - The U.S. trade bullying has not only failed to achieve its goals but has also resulted in losses for American businesses and consumers, increasing the risk of domestic economic recession [5]. Group 3: China-Guinea-Bissau Relations - The relationship between China and Guinea-Bissau is strong, with recent high-level visits and discussions aimed at enhancing mutual cooperation [7]. - China has committed to providing zero-tariff treatment for 100% of products from 33 African countries, including Guinea-Bissau, contrasting with U.S. tariff measures [7]. - There are significant opportunities for cooperation in sectors such as cashew exports and bauxite exploration between China and Guinea-Bissau [7].

Core Viewpoint - The upcoming China-US economic and trade high-level talks in Switzerland are seen as an opportunity to alleviate trade tensions and provide certainty for global economic growth [1] Group 1: China's Economic Strategy - China focuses on high-quality development and high-level openness as a source of confidence in its ability to handle external challenges [1] - The country emphasizes the importance of concentrating on domestic affairs to enhance resilience against external shocks [1] Group 2: Economic Resilience and Opportunities - China's large market size offers significant opportunities, while institutional openness provides certainty and benefits [1] - The nation has cultivated a robust innovation ecosystem that contributes to sustained economic momentum [1] - The dual circulation strategy enhances the resilience of the economy, allowing for mutual promotion between domestic and international markets [1] Group 3: Global Cooperation and Trade - China expresses a commitment to strengthening coordination with the international community to resist unilateral protectionism and hegemonic practices [1] - The country advocates for the maintenance of free trade and multilateralism, aiming to promote inclusive global economic development [1]

即将在瑞士举行的中美经贸高层会谈备受国际社会瞩目。在全球经济复苏乏力的背景下，这场对话被视 为化解贸易摩擦的一个契机，各方期待中美通过建设性沟通，为世界经济增长注入确定性。 一段时间以来，美方一系列违规、无理的单边关税措施，严重冲击中美经贸关系，严重冲击全球产业链 供应链稳定，严重扰乱国际经贸秩序和世界经济增长前景。国际货币基金组织、经济合作与发展组织与 世界银行等国际机构都预测，美国关税政策将严重拖累全球经济，一些国家的经济增长迅速放缓，重新 推高通货膨胀，加重发展中国家的债务负担。美国企业和消费者也切实感受到滥施关税带来的痛感，美 国各界人士要求政府取消非理性关税措施的呼声强烈。 以负责任态度推动对话化解分歧，以战略定力守护核心利益，以开放包容汇聚合作动能。中国对中美经 贸谈判的态度清晰而坚定。历史也将再一次证明：惟有秉持相互尊重、和平共处、合作共赢的原则，才 能让谈判结出共赢之果。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年05月10日 03 版） 谈，是化解分歧的必要之举，但指望一两次谈判解决问题并不现实。中方对谈判的复杂性有清醒认知。 中国古话讲"听其言而观其行"，诚意需要用行动丈量。美方想要通过谈判解决问题， ...

Core Insights - China's foreign trade shows strong resilience and growth potential despite global economic challenges, with exports increasing by 8.1% year-on-year and imports decreasing by 0.2%, leading to a trade surplus of $96.18 billion, up 33.6% [1] Group 1: Export Performance - The export structure is continuously optimizing, with steady growth in electromechanical and high-tech product exports, while labor-intensive product exports remain weak [1] - In April, electromechanical product exports reached $190.58 billion, with significant growth in integrated circuits, audio-video equipment, general machinery, LCD modules, and ships [1] - The shift in export product structure indicates the effectiveness of China's manufacturing transformation and upgrade, enhancing the technical content and added value of exported products [1] Group 2: Trade Diversification - China's trade relationships are diversifying, with stable imports and exports to major economies except for the U.S., where trade has been negatively impacted by "reciprocal tariffs" [2] - Exports to ASEAN, Central Asia, Latin America, and Africa have seen rapid growth, with double-digit increases, while exports to the EU and Japan remain stable [2] - Strengthening trade ties with ASEAN, Latin America, and Central Asia promotes a more balanced trade market and enhances China's foreign trade's risk resistance [2] Group 3: New Trade Dynamics - New productive forces are rapidly developing, fostering competitive enterprises in high-end, intelligent, and green manufacturing, which supports the transformation and upgrade of foreign trade [2] - The equipment manufacturing sector has seen significant growth, representing a substantial portion of foreign trade, while domestic brand exports are increasing in scale and share [2] - The "cross-border e-commerce + industrial belt" model is thriving, providing a broad platform for SMEs to enter international markets, with digital technology reshaping competitive advantages in foreign trade [2] Group 4: Future Outlook - China's foreign trade faces external challenges, including global economic uncertainty and trade protectionism, which may impact trade dynamics [3] - The "reciprocal tariffs" from the U.S. have led to a "rush to export" effect, with a decline in new export orders and purchasing indices in April, indicating weaker export expectations [3] - To mitigate the impact of reduced external demand, China has implemented various supportive policies for foreign trade enterprises, including tax reductions and improved business environments [3] Group 5: Trade Development Trends - Future foreign trade is expected to show a differentiated trend, with stable and accelerating trade with closely linked economies, while others may experience slow growth due to global economic slowdown or trade protectionism [4] - High-tech products and key components are likely to maintain stable growth, while traditional low-value-added industrial and labor-intensive products are more susceptible to external influences [4] - Enterprises with strong technological reserves and international competitiveness may accelerate their globalization efforts, while SMEs reliant on external markets should actively seek transformation [4]