Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for China and the EU to work together to prepare for important economic and trade agendas, promoting a healthy and stable development of their economic relationship [1][3] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has maintained close communication with the EU at all levels, focusing on enhancing bilateral trade and investment cooperation, and addressing trade disputes through dialogue [3][4] - China is committed to high-level openness and aims to provide European companies with a broad market and development opportunities, while opposing any actions that undermine China's development rights [5][6] Group 2 - The EU has been implementing various industrial policies and providing substantial subsidies to support European companies, with over €1.44 trillion in subsidies planned from 2021 to 2030, and more than €300 billion already disbursed by 2024 [4][6] - The Chinese government criticizes the EU's protectionist measures, which it views as a double standard, and calls for a fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises [6][7] - The EU's recent decision to restrict Chinese companies from participating in public procurement projects over €5 million has raised concerns about fairness and the impact on long-standing cooperation in the medical sector [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - Malaysia is not restricting the use of Nvidia chips or AI chips in servers under the Strategic Trade Act of 2010, but will cooperate with other countries on export control of sensitive goods [1][2] Group 1: Malaysia's Position on AI Chips - Malaysia's Investment, Trade and Industry Ministry states that the use of Nvidia chips in data centers is not classified as controlled goods under local law [1] - The country allows data centers to make independent business decisions while being supervised by relevant ministries [1] - Malaysia opposes any evasion of export controls or illegal trade activities and emphasizes compliance with international trade regulations [1] Group 2: U.S. Export Controls - Since 2022, the U.S. has intensified restrictions on AI chip exports to China, including a ban on Nvidia and AMD from selling advanced chips to the Chinese market [2] - The Trump administration initially imposed a ban on Nvidia's AI chip sales to China, which was later relaxed [2] - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has expressed that Chinese companies should operate within the law and opposes coercive restrictions on cooperation with China [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Malaysian government is verifying reports regarding a Chinese company using servers equipped with NVIDIA AI chips in Malaysia to train large language models, while ensuring compliance with domestic laws and international trade regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Government Actions and Regulations - The Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry of Malaysia is currently checking whether the use of NVIDIA chips violates any local laws or regulations [1]. - The ministry stated that servers using NVIDIA or AI chips are not classified as controlled items under the 2010 Strategic Trade Act of Malaysia [1]. - Malaysia opposes any evasion of export controls or illegal trade activities and will continue to enforce international trade regulations [1]. Group 2: Context of AI Chip Usage - A Chinese AI company reportedly rented 300 servers equipped with advanced NVIDIA chips in a Malaysian data center to input data for training AI models, which were then brought back to China [2]. - Since 2022, the U.S. has increased restrictions on the export of advanced AI chips to China, citing national security concerns [2]. - The Biden administration had previously proposed limiting the sale of advanced chips to Southeast Asia and the Middle East to prevent Chinese companies from acquiring these chips through third parties [2].

Domestic News - The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission issued a document to life insurance companies, stating that the level of dividends for participating insurance must not engage in "involution" competition, requiring companies to justify the necessity, rationality, and sustainability of proposed dividend levels [1] - The China Photovoltaic Industry Association indicated that the industry will face greater production cuts in Q3, with operating rates expected to decrease by 10%-15% compared to the previous quarter. A special audit team will investigate low-cost sales practices, and companies found violating regulations will face various measures [2] - The Beijing Municipal Committee of Propaganda and other departments issued a notice to promote the high-quality development of the gaming and esports industry, focusing on improving review quality and efficiency, and reducing review cycles for domestic network games [2] International News - The U.S. Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds rate at its current level for the fourth consecutive time, amid unclear impacts of tariffs on inflation, while raising inflation expectations for 2025-2027 [4] - Russian President Putin announced that negotiation teams from Russia and Ukraine are preparing for talks after June 22, aiming to find a long-term solution to the Ukraine crisis [4] Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index decreased by 0.79% to 3362.11, while the Shenzhen Component Index fell by 1.21% to 10051.97. The Hang Seng Index dropped by 1.99% to 23237.74 [6]

据央视新闻，今日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。有记者提问，有报道称，台湾当局 迫于美国的压力，已将华为和中芯国际（SMIC）列入台湾版的实体名单。中方对此有何回 应？ 郭嘉昆表示， 中方一贯反对美方将科技和经贸问题政治化，泛化国家安全概念，滥用出口管 制和长臂管辖，对中国进行恶意封锁打压，民进党当局"跪美媚美"，只会害台毁台。 来源：央视新闻 ...

[Table_Date] 2025 年 6 月 15 日 本周沪锡价格环比上涨，海外供给偏紧预期对 锡价或有支撑 [Table_Title2] 有色-能源金属行业周报 [Table_Summary] 报告摘要: ►本周沪镍价格环比下跌，纯镍供给仍旧过剩 截止到 6 月 13 日，LME 镍现货结算价报收 14,970.00 美 元/吨，较 6 月 6 日下跌 1.67%，LME 镍总库存为 197,538.00 吨，较 6 月 6 日减少 1.28%；沪镍报收 12.01 万元/吨，较 6 月 6 日下跌 2.13%，沪镍库存为 25,693.00 吨，较 6 月 6 日增加 0.30%；截止到 6 月 13 日，硫酸镍报收 28,500.00 元/吨，较 6 月 6 日价格持平。根据 SMM，从供给端来看，国内方面，菲 律宾的镍矿发运量继续增加，冶炼厂的原料库存较为充足。然 而，因成品价格下跌，部分国内冶炼厂可能会选择降低生产负 荷，这可能导致国内金属供应量趋弱。印尼方面，内贸火法镍 矿的升水依然坚挺，冶炼厂面临较大的成本压力。从需求端来 看，本周不锈钢市场出现大幅波动，主要头部企业采取不限价 不限量的政策 ...

来源：内容来自观察者网。 在前任美国拜登政府的胁迫下，日本和荷兰加强了对华半导体出口管控措施。现任特朗普政府在着 手制定更严格的管控措施时，还对这些"小弟"不爽上了。 据《 日经亚洲评论 》6月13日报道，美国商务部负责产业与安全的副部长 杰弗里·凯斯勒 （Jeffrey Kessler）12日在对众议院外交事务委员会下属的南亚和中亚小组委员会作证时声称，美国与日本、 荷兰等盟友协调出口管制措施的努力"尚未完成"，"我们不能让其他国家通过钻空子来破坏美国的出 口管制措施"。 凯斯勒还威胁称，"在世界各地的盟友和伙伴必须明白，美国国会意识到了这个问题，希望他们在美 国实施出口管制时与我们站在一起"，如果继续"钻空子"，美国将动用外国直接产品规则（Foreign Direct Product Rule）。该规则规定，外国制造的产品只要使用了美国技术，美国就有权对其实施 出口管制。 美国商务部负责产业与安全的副部长杰弗里 · 凯斯勒 视频截图 根据《日经亚洲评论》对海关数据的分析，2024年中国从主要来源国进口了309亿美元的半导体设 备，其中近200亿美元来自日本和荷兰。 特朗普政府暂未正式出台新的管制措施，但就 ...

公众号记得加星标⭐️，第一时间看推送不会错过。 来源：内容来自观察者网。 在前任美国拜登政府的胁迫下，日本和荷兰加强了对华半导体出口管控措施。现任特朗普政府在着 手制定更严格的管控措施时，还对这些"小弟"不爽上了。 据《日经亚洲评论》6月13日报道，美国商务部负责产业与安全的副部长杰弗里·凯斯勒（Jeffrey Kessler）12日在对众议院外交事务委员会下属的南亚和中亚小组委员会作证时声称，美国与日本、 荷兰等盟友协调出口管制措施的努力"尚未完成"，"我们不能让其他国家通过钻空子来破坏美国的出 口管制措施"。 凯斯勒还威胁称，"在世界各地的盟友和伙伴必须明白，美国国会意识到了这个问题，希望他们在美 国实施出口管制时与我们站在一起"，如果继续"钻空子"，美国将动用外国直接产品规则（Foreign Direct Product Rule）。该规则规定，外国制造的产品只要使用了美国技术，美国就有权对其实施 出口管制。 美国商务部负责产业与安全的副部长杰弗里 · 凯斯勒 视频截图 根据《日经亚洲评论》对海关数据的分析，2024年中国从主要来源国进口了309亿美元的半导体设 备，其中近200亿美元来自日本和荷兰。 ...

凯斯勒还威胁称，"在世界各地的盟友和伙伴必须明白，美国国会意识到了这个问题，希望他们在美 国实施出口管制时与我们站在一起"，如果继续"钻空子"，美国将动用外国直接产品规则（Foreign Direct Product Rule）。该规则规定，外国制造的产品只要使用了美国技术，美国就有权对其实施 出口管制。 在前任美国拜登政府的胁迫下，日本和荷兰加强了对华半导体出口管控措施。现任特朗普政府在着 手制定更严格的管控措施时，还对这些"小弟"不爽上了。 据《日经亚洲评论》6月13日报道，美国商务部负责产业与安全的副部长杰弗里·凯斯勒（Jeffrey Kessler）12日在对众议院外交事务委员会下属的南亚和中亚小组委员会作证时声称，美国与日本、 荷兰等盟友协调出口管制措施的努力"尚未完成"，"我们不能让其他国家通过钻空子来破坏美国的出 口管制措施"。 根据《日经亚洲评论》对海关数据的分析，2024年中国从主要来源国进口了309亿美元的半导体设 备，其中近200亿美元来自日本和荷兰。 报道称，去年，中国从日本进口了价值96.3亿美元的半导体设备，同比增长28.23%，连续第五年打 破纪录。自2019年中美紧张关系加剧以 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent approval of certain rare earth export licenses by China is a strategic move that highlights the importance of rare earth materials in the ongoing geopolitical tensions, particularly between China and the United States [1][6]. Group 1: Rare Earths as Strategic Assets - Rare earth materials are increasingly viewed as a "nuclear weapon" in the context of great power competition, especially for the U.S. military, which relies heavily on these materials for advanced weaponry like the F-35 fighter jet [3][4]. - The U.S. Department of Defense acknowledges that 97% of its heavy rare earth supply is dependent on China, indicating a significant vulnerability in U.S. military production capabilities [4]. Group 2: U.S.-China Negotiations - During recent trade talks in London, the U.S. aimed to address rare earth supply issues, with high-ranking officials suggesting that U.S. export controls would be relaxed if China increased its rare earth exports [6]. - China has strategically linked rare earth exports to broader trade negotiations, demanding concessions from the U.S. such as the removal of tariffs and the opening of markets, showcasing a calculated approach to leverage its position [6][10]. Group 3: China's Strategic Control - China's control over the entire rare earth supply chain—from mining to refining—gives it a dominant position in the global market, with 92% of refining capacity concentrated in China [4][10]. - The Chinese strategy involves a gradual tightening of export controls on various materials, which could leave the U.S. unprepared for the consequences of a supply disruption [10][12]. Group 4: Implications for Global Trade - The situation underscores a shift in global trade dynamics, where China aims to reshape international rules and break the U.S.-led technological hegemony, promoting a more equitable global supply chain [12]. - The ongoing tensions and strategic maneuvers indicate that the ultimate winner in this geopolitical contest will be the nation that can maintain a long-term vision and stability in its approach [12].