多边合作

Search documents
特朗普失算了!当着189国面,美联储接受中方提议,最大输家浮现
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-04-28 11:32
如今的特朗普正在为自己的关税失败找退路,因此特朗普突然调转枪口,猛烈批评美联储主席鲍威尔,并要求鲍威尔赶紧辞职。而为了推卸 责任,特朗普还将关税战这口大黑锅,提前扣在了鲍威尔的头上。 在特朗普看来,如果关税战失败,那便可以将一切的责任都推给美联储,而如果关税战胜利,那自己依旧是民众眼中的"救世主"。 前言 特朗普为什么要说谎?是因为美国失算了、失控了、失血过多了,但就是不承认"交易的艺术"失败了! 最近,特朗普不断释放"和中国正在谈"甚至将"达成协议"的假消息,却接连被我国外交部、商务部、驻美大使馆及时辟谣。 因为中方无数次地重申谈判的前提是平等、尊重、互惠,美国一天不彻底取消所有对华滥加的单边关税,那就一切免谈! 而如今的特朗普又失算了,一直与他作对的美联储主席鲍威尔居然接受了中方的提议,不仅站到了这一届美国政府的对立面,并且还有189 个国家的代表见证了这一幕。 从目前的情况下来看,如今特朗普政府早已陷入了四面楚歌的地步,而在本轮的"中美大战"中,最大的输家也已经浮出了水面。 东盟站队中国 在特朗普挥动"关税大棒"后,东盟拒绝妥协公开站队中国,这无异于是当着全世界面前打了特朗普的脸。 要知道,在关税战刚开 ...
特朗普关税失策,当着189国,美联储背书中国方案,输家已浮现?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-04-28 04:36
Group 1 - The article highlights the tension between the Trump administration and the Federal Reserve, particularly with Chairman Jerome Powell publicly supporting China's financial stability initiative at the G20, which contrasts with Trump's trade war strategy [1][5][11] - U.S. retailers and defense contractors are facing supply chain disruptions due to China's rare earth export restrictions, with reports indicating that their inventories can only last for 60 days, leading to rising costs and potential production halts [3][5][9] - The article discusses the broader implications of the U.S.-China trade war, suggesting that Trump's tariffs not only affect China but also harm global supply chains, impacting various industries worldwide [9][11] Group 2 - Powell's recent statements at the G20 and IMF meetings emphasize the Federal Reserve's commitment to maintaining independence from political pressures, which could hinder Trump's economic agenda [5][7][11] - China's proposal for global cooperation and dialogue to resolve trade disputes resonates with many countries, indicating a shift towards multilateralism in response to U.S. unilateral trade policies [9][11] - The article suggests that the ongoing trade conflict is not just a bilateral issue but reflects a larger global power struggle, with China emerging as a more influential player in international economic discussions [11]