浙商证券表示，产能置换政策是供给侧结构性改革的核心工具，旨在控制总量、优化存量。该政策通过 减量或等量置换的原则，确保在新增先进产能的同时淘汰落后产能，从而实现行业总产能只减不增，并 推动产业升级。然而，由于产能置换指标的严格限制，可能导致未来需要减产。为了应对这一问题，国 家建立了煤炭产能储备制度，以减少部分产能置换指标。因此，在保持现有政策不变的情况下，预计煤 炭行业的供需将逐步趋于平衡，煤价将稳步上涨。 注：如提及个股仅供参考，不代表投资建议。指数/基金短期涨跌幅及历史表现仅供分析参考，不预示 未来表现。市场观点随市场环境变化而变动，不构成任何投资建议或承诺。文中提及指数仅供参考，不 构成任何投资建议，也不构成对基金业绩的预测和保证。如需购买相关基金产品，请选择与风险等级相 匹配的产品。基金有风险，投资需谨慎。 作为市场唯一一只煤炭ETF，煤炭ETF（515220）跟踪中证煤炭指数（399998），煤炭板块股息率较 高，截至9月18日，近12个月股息率超5.3%，在无风险利率下行的背景下配置价值凸显。可考虑逢低分 批布局煤炭ETF（515220）及其联接基金（联接A：008279；联接C：008280； ...

Core Viewpoint - The coal industry in China is facing potential risks related to the newly increased coal mine capacities, which may be revoked if companies fail to fulfill their capacity replacement commitments by the end of 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Capacity Replacement Policy - The capacity replacement policy is a key tool for supply-side structural reform, aiming to "control total volume and optimize stock" by ensuring that new advanced capacities are built only after eliminating outdated capacities [2]. - The policy promotes high-quality development in the coal industry by limiting total capacity while improving capacity quality through market and legal means [2]. Group 2: Historical Context - During the supply-side structural reform period (2016-2020), coal production exceeded demand, leading to tighter capacity allocation policies and the implementation of reduction replacement policies [3]. - The government provided financial incentives for exiting coal mines to reduce capacity replacement ratios and required that closed mines' capacities be at least 120% of the new mines' capacities [3]. Group 3: Current and Future Capacity Management - In the current production increase and supply guarantee period (2021-2025), the government maintains the "reduction replacement" or "equal replacement" principles while implementing a commitment system for capacity indicators [4]. - Companies can initially commit to increased coal mine capacities, with subsequent fulfillment of capacity replacement indicators [4]. Group 4: Capacity Constraints - Based on the 2015 capacity baseline and the "13th Five-Year Plan" exit situation, the legal capacity limits are estimated at 4.7, 4.5, and 4.4 billion tons per year, which is below the projected production of 4.76 billion tons in 2024 [6]. - Strict enforcement of capacity replacement policies may necessitate future production cuts, while a coal capacity reserve system has been established to alleviate some capacity replacement indicator constraints [6]. Group 5: Investment Targets - Key companies to focus on in the thermal coal sector include China Shenhua (601088.SH), Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry (601225.SH), and others [7]. - In the coking coal sector, companies such as Huaibei Mining (600985.SH) and Shanxi Coking Coal (000983.SZ) are highlighted for investment consideration [7].

Group 1 - The glass futures market has seen a significant increase, with the main contract closing at 1100 yuan/ton, marking a three-month high, driven by strong market sentiment and increased capital inflow [1] - There is a cautious attitude among glass industry players, with many expressing reluctance to accept high prices, as evidenced by declining quotes from traders in Shihezi [1] - The National Development and Reform Commission has implemented a capacity warning mechanism for key industrial products, including flat glass, indicating a focus on energy conservation and carbon reduction [1] Group 2 - In the building materials glass sector, some companies are opting for proactive cold repairs while waiting for further news, leading to a reduction in glass inventory [2] - The glass production lines have been affected, with four lines reported to be offline, resulting in a daily melting capacity loss of 2800 tons [2] - The cautious approach is also reflected in the downstream processing sector, where companies are only willing to take short-term orders due to tight cash flow in real estate projects [2] Group 3 - There is a prevailing atmosphere of caution in the market, with some investors betting on the effectiveness of policy implementation, while the actual demand remains uncertain [3] - The recent price recovery in the glass market has not translated into confidence among traders, who remain wary of the sustainability of the price increase without real order support [3] - The divergence in stock market performance is evident, with leading companies in the photovoltaic glass sector seeing stock price increases, while automotive and building materials glass companies experience volatility [2]