2025.09. 02 作者 | 第一财经 宋婕 深圳、香港和广州这三座大湾区极点城市，在科技创新与成果转化领域的优势正在放大。 近日，世界知识产权组织发布的《2025年全球创新指数》显示，"深圳-香港-广州"创新集群实现从连续 五年全球第二到第一的跨越。"深圳-香港-广州"创新集群超越东京-横滨集群，跃居榜首；圣何塞-旧金山 集群上升三位，位居第三。 | 深圳-香港-广州 | 1 | | --- | --- | | 东京-横滨 | 2 | | 圣何塞-旧金山 | 3 | | 北京 | 4 | | 首尔 | 5 | | 言布-奥士 | 6 | | 纽约市 | 7 | | 伦敦 | 8 | | 波士顿-剑桥 | 9 | | 洛杉矶 | 10 | | 大阪-神户-京都 | 11 | | 巴黎 | 12 | | 杭州 | 13 | | 圣选戈 | 14 | | 南京 | 15 | 来源：WIPO 本文字数：2585，阅读时长大约4分钟 | 人均排名 | 集群名 | 经济体 | 排名第一的申请人 | 排名第一的科学组织 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 圣何塞-旧等山 | ા ...

该排行榜通过三项核心指标来评价世界级创新活动的集中程度，即PCT国际专利申请量、科学论文发表 量及风险资本交易量，其中第三项指标为今年新增。在之前的排行榜中，深港穗集群连续5年名列日本 东京—横滨集群之后，蝉联全球第二位。 今年的排名显示，深港穗集群在过去5年间的专利申请密度为每百万人2292个，科学论文发表密度为每 百万人3775篇，风险资本交易量密度为每百万人135宗。在专利申请总量方面，深港穗集群占全球比重 为9%，仅次于东京—横滨集群（10.3%）；科学论文发表总量占全球的2.4%，位居全球第三。 值得一提的是，在上述三项指标的排名中，深港穗集群均未取得第一，最后却拿到"总分"第一。对此， 中国(深圳)综合开发研究院公共经济研究所所长汪云兴对第一财经分析，这次深港穗集群排名登顶，既 有调整优化评价指标的影响，也与粤港澳大湾区持续不断加强科技创新有关。 9月1日，世界知识产权组织（WIPO）发布《2025年全球创新指数》"世界百强创新集群"排行榜，深圳 —香港—广州创新集群首次登顶。这一突破不仅是粤港澳大湾区建设的重要里程碑，也标志着中国创新 力量正在世界舞台上崭露头角。 更重要的是，大湾区强大的产业基 ...

Core Insights - The Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou innovation cluster has topped the "Global Innovation Index 2025" ranking, marking a significant milestone for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area and showcasing China's growing innovation capabilities on the global stage [1][2] Group 1: Innovation Metrics - The ranking evaluates innovation concentration through three core indicators: PCT international patent applications, scientific paper publications, and venture capital transaction volume, with the latter being a new addition this year [1][2] - Over the past five years, the Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou cluster has achieved a patent application density of 2,292 per million people, a scientific paper publication density of 3,775 per million, and a venture capital transaction density of 135 per million [1] - The cluster accounts for 9% of global patent applications and 2.4% of global scientific paper publications, ranking second and third globally, respectively [1] Group 2: Factors Contributing to Success - The rise to the top position is attributed to the adjustment of evaluation metrics and the continuous strengthening of technological innovation within the Greater Bay Area [2] - The inclusion of venture capital data in the ranking reflects entrepreneurial activities and innovation financing, highlighting the balanced development of inventors, scientific authors, and venture capital activities in the cluster [2] - The Greater Bay Area benefits from a rich talent pool, with numerous universities and research institutions fostering high-quality local talent and attracting international expertise [3] Group 3: Financial Support and Infrastructure - Financial support, including venture capital, plays a crucial role in transforming favorable conditions into technological innovation strength, with over 1,560 venture capital firms in Shenzhen managing more than 1.5 trillion yuan, 90% of which is directed towards technological innovation [4] - The Guangdong province has seen an increase of 830.55 billion yuan in patent and trademark pledge financing during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, benefiting 16,700 enterprises [4] - The combination of basic research, application development, industrial incubation, and international market access forms an ideal innovation chain that underpins the rise of technological innovation in the Greater Bay Area [4] Group 4: Challenges and Future Directions - Despite the achievements, the Greater Bay Area faces challenges, including insufficient investment in basic research and systemic barriers to collaboration between cities, particularly between Hong Kong, Macau, and mainland China [5] - The innovation intensity ranking for the Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou cluster is 45th globally, indicating a need to enhance per capita innovation metrics [5] - To maintain competitiveness, the Greater Bay Area must focus on improving population quality, increasing research density, and fostering a knowledge-based economy for high-quality development [5]

2025.09. 02 本文字数：1258，阅读时长大约2分钟 作者 | 第一财经 金叶子 新一年的全球创新指数（GII）全球百强创新集群的变化表明，风险投资对创新活动也至关重要。 9月1日下午，第一财经从世界知识产权组织（WIPO）获悉，在WIPO预先揭晓的2025全球创新指 数之世界百强创新集群排名中，深圳-香港-广州集群超越东京-横滨集群，跃居榜首，而圣何塞-旧金 山集群则上升三位，成为第三。 集群名 排名 | 深圳-香港-广州 | 1 | | --- | --- | | 东京-横滨 | 2 | | 圣何塞-旧金山 | 3 | | 北京 | 4 | | 首尔 | 5 | | 上海-苏宁 | 6 | | 纽约市 | 1 | | 伦敦 | 8 | | 波士顿-剑桥 | 9 | | 洛杉矶 | 10 | | 大阪-神户-京都 | 11 | | | 12 | 来源：WIPO 方法上的改变使2025年出现了一个新的排名第一的集群，反映出深圳-香港-广州与东京-横滨相比， 在风险资本交易方面表现更为突出。然而，这两个集群继续为全球科学出版物和专利产出作出巨大贡 献，二者在全球提交的PCT申请中，几乎占到五分之一。与 ...

Group 1 - The Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou innovation cluster has ranked first in the "World's Top 100 Innovation Clusters" for the first time, surpassing the Tokyo-Yokohama cluster [1] - The cluster has maintained a position in the top two for five consecutive years since 2020, indicating a strong and consistent performance in global innovation [1] - The global top 100 innovation clusters are distributed across 33 economies, with China having the highest number of clusters at 24, followed by the United States with 22 [1] Group 2 - Guangdong province ranks first in China for high-value invention patents, with 367,700 patents, and has a cumulative PCT international patent application volume of 304,700 [2] - The province has been focusing on building a world-class intellectual property strong province, with significant efforts in cities like Guangzhou and Shenzhen [2] - The global innovation index cluster ranking was established in 2017 and evaluates the concentration of world-class innovation activities based on three core indicators: international patent applications, research paper publications, and venture capital transaction volumes [2][3]

自2017年起，GII每年都会对全球前100个创新集群进行排名，通过核心指标识别世界级创新活动在当地的集中程 度。今年的三项核心指标是：通过产权组织《专利合作条约》（PCT）提交的国际专利申请量、科学论文发表量， 以及今年新增的风险资本交易量。 9月1日，世界知识产权组织发布的最新报告显示，今年全球创新指数（GII）世界百强创新集群排行榜（以下简 称"排行榜"）上，深圳—香港—广州集群超越东京—横滨集群，跃居榜首；而圣何塞—旧金山集群则上升三位，成 为第三。 | 排名 集群名 | | 出版物全球占比 | PCT申请量全球占比 | 风险资本交易全球占比 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 深圳-香港-广州 | 2.4% | 9.0% | 2.9% | | 2 | 东京-横滨 | 1.4% | 10.3% | 2.2% | | 3 | 圣何塞-旧金山 | 0.7% | 3.9% | 6.9% | | ব | 北京 | 4.0% | 3.8% | 2.9% | | ട | 首尔 | 1.7% | 5.4% | 3.1% | | ଚ | 上海 苏州 | 2.5% | 3.3 ...

Core Viewpoint - The "Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou" innovation cluster has surpassed the "Tokyo-Yokohama" cluster to become the top global innovation cluster according to the Global Innovation Index (GII) released by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) [1] Group 1: Innovation Cluster Rankings - The GII cluster ranking was established in 2017 and is based on three core indicators: international patent applications via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), scientific publications, and the newly added venture capital (VC) transaction volume [1] - The "Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou" cluster has ranked second globally for five consecutive years before this year, when the inclusion of VC transactions reshaped the rankings [1] - In 2025, the "Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou" cluster is projected to account for 2.9% of global VC transactions, compared to 2.2% for the "Tokyo-Yokohama" cluster [1] Group 2: Performance Metrics - The "Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou" cluster holds a global share of 9.0% in PCT applications, ranking second, with Huawei being the top applicant [2][4] - The cluster also has a global share of 2.4% in scientific publications, totaling 194,000 papers, with Sun Yat-sen University being the leading institution [4] - Shenzhen has maintained the highest PCT international patent application volume in China for 21 consecutive years, with 16,300 applications projected for 2024 [4] Group 3: Human Capital and Innovation Ecosystem - The region has successfully transitioned its development engine to focus on high-quality human capital, referred to as the "engineer dividend," to effectively address the "Lewis Turning Point" [4] - The accumulation of large-scale, high-quality human capital, combined with an effective corporate innovation ecosystem, is expected to unleash greater innovation momentum and economic value [4] - Hong Kong's innovation and technology development has seen significant progress, with Huawei's research team in Hong Kong growing to over 700 members [5]

全球百强创新集群分布于33个经济体，集群数量最多的国家包括中国有24个、美国22个和德国7个。除 中国和印度外，另有若干个中等收入经济体也拥有跻身百强的创新集群，其中包括巴西圣保罗(第49 位)、埃及开罗(第83位)、伊朗德黑兰(第63位)、马来西亚吉隆坡(第86位)及其与新加坡共享的跨境集群 (第16位)、土耳其伊斯坦布尔(第58位)以及墨西哥的墨西哥城(第79位)。 另外，科学论文发表量前三甲的集群分别为北京(占全球总量的4%)、"上海一苏州"(2.5%)和"深圳–香 港–广州"(2.4%)。《专利合作条约》(PCT)申请量占比最高的集群为"东京-横滨"(10.3%)、"深圳–香港– 广州"(9%)和首尔(5.4%)。 世界知识产权组织(WIPO)公布《全球创新指数》(GII)集群排行榜，"深圳–香港–广州"集群超越"东京-横 滨"集群，上升1位，跃居榜首，而"圣何西-旧金山"集群则上升3位，成为第三。WIPO表示，今年的 《全球创新指数》集群研究将风险资本(VC)交易活动作为一项新指标，重新塑造了排名格局。伦敦凭 借在风险资本交易中排名第3的优势，从第21位攀升至第8位。出于类似原因，印度的集群也大步前 ...

8月30日，围绕"面向世界的粤港澳大湾区金融全面合作发展"的主题，第七届粤港澳大湾区金融发展论 坛在广州南沙举办。 （原标题：王一鸣：大湾区要加快构建同科技创新相适应的科技金融体制） 南方财经记者 王达毓 广州报道 王一鸣指出，大湾区应从协同创新转向创新集群建设。跟随模式试错成本低，但只能缩小差距而不能进 行超越，应从跟随模式转变为在部分优势领域进行引领。 中国国际经济交流中心副理事长、国务院发展研究中心原副主任王一鸣在发表主旨演讲时指出，目前大 湾区科技创新进入活跃期，创新投入大幅度增长，然而其原始创新能力仍然不强，大湾区需要从协同创 新转向创新集群，构建同科技创新相适应的科技金融体制。 王一鸣建议，应加快构建同科技创新相适应的科技金融体制，金融体系需匹配不同阶段企业的需求，从 制度上拓展金融企业支持科技创新的空间。 大湾区建设国际科技创新中心面临新形势新挑战。王一鸣表示，最关键是要增强原始创新动能，为增强 国际竞争主动权提供支撑。目前，大湾区研究与试验发展（R&D）经费投入强度突破4%，仅次于北 上，专利授权量跃居全国第一，已成为全国重要的创新动力源。 当前，新一轮科技革命产业变革迅猛发展，以人工智能为主 ...