幽灵外卖

Search documents
查办“幽灵外卖”等违法案件 “守护消费”铁拳行动典型案例公布
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-23 02:55
中新网8月23日电 据"市说新语"微信公众号消息,2025年,市场监管总局部署开展"守护消费"铁拳行 动,聚焦消费领域人民群众反映强烈、危害健康安全的食品非法添加、"幽灵外卖"、商标侵权等违法行 为,查办了一批违法案件,维护了消费者合法权益,着力营造安全放心的消费环境。现将部分典型案例 公布如下: 一、江西省宜春市靖安县市场监管局查处舒某清涉嫌生产经营添加他达拉非的露酒案 2025年1月,靖安县市场监管局接到投诉举报,反映宜春家园百货有限公司销售的"健豪情酒(露酒)"添 加他达拉非。经查,当事人通过其注册的贵州省仁怀市喜桥酒业有限公司,在委托贵州民族酒业(集团) 有限公司生产"健豪情酒(露酒)"过程中,添加了含有他达拉非的"枸杞含片"。经抽检,涉案露酒的他达 拉非含量为151mg/kg。至案发,涉案露酒生产经营数量为450件(100ml/瓶×5瓶/盒×6盒/件),货值金额 193.86万元。另查明,当事人委托宜春家园百货有限公司通过淘宝销售涉案露酒的销售额为3.95万元。 当事人的行为涉嫌构成犯罪,2025年2月,靖安县市场监管局依法将案件移送公安机关。 他达拉非是处方药,非法添加可能引发饮用者过敏反应、心脑 ...
外卖小作坊P成大门面,AI“照骗”岂能当饭吃
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-08-16 00:52
Core Viewpoint - The emergence of "ghost kitchens" in the food delivery industry, where businesses use AI-generated images to mislead consumers about their actual offerings, raises significant concerns regarding food safety and consumer trust [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Concerns - Many food delivery outlets are utilizing AI-designed storefronts to create a false sense of popularity, leading to consumer complaints about the disparity between advertised and actual conditions [1]. - The practice of using misleading images and claims is seen as a violation of consumer rights and is indicative of a broader issue of dishonesty within the industry [1][2]. - The existence of a black-gray industrial chain behind these "ghost kitchens" suggests systemic issues, including the ability to operate without necessary licenses and permits [1]. Group 2: Regulatory and Platform Response - Major food delivery platforms like Ele.me, Meituan, and JD.com have established special teams to address the issue of ghost kitchens, indicating a proactive approach to improving food safety management [2]. - There is a call for stricter oversight and enforcement from regulatory bodies, including collaboration with delivery platforms to monitor and eliminate illegal merchants [2]. - The industry is urged to adopt new technologies to combat fraudulent practices, ensuring that food safety and authenticity are prioritized [2].
京东入局自营外卖:击垮的是“幽灵店”还是“小微店”?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-02 08:30
Core Viewpoint - JD.com plans to open 10,000 self-operated takeaway stores named "Qixian Xiaochu," which has sparked controversy regarding its impact on small businesses and the role of platforms in the market [1][6]. Group 1: Impact on Small Businesses - The move by JD.com is seen as a threat to millions of small family-run businesses, with critics arguing that it represents monopolistic behavior rather than innovation [1][6]. - The introduction of "ghost takeaways" as a target for JD.com raises questions about the fairness of its competition, as many legitimate small businesses may be unfairly categorized as such [2][3]. - The new "immediate pickup restaurant" label allows previously excluded small businesses to re-enter the market, but this change appears to be tailored to benefit JD.com's new business model [5][6]. Group 2: Competition and Fairness - JD.com's entry into the self-operated takeaway market is likely to create direct competition with small restaurants that rely on the platform for traffic, raising concerns about unfair competition [6][8]. - Critics argue that JD.com controlling both the traffic and participating in the market could lead to data misuse and unfair advantages over smaller competitors [6][8]. - The lack of clear regulatory standards for platform self-operation versus neutral governance remains a significant concern for the industry [6][8]. Group 3: Financial Viability and Market Strategy - The takeaway industry is characterized by high costs and low profit margins, with delivery costs accounting for 60%-70% of expenses, making profitability challenging even for established players like JD.com [7][8]. - JD.com's first-quarter 2025 financial report indicated a significant operating loss in its new business segment, including takeaway services, highlighting the financial risks involved [7][8]. - The strategy of self-operated takeaways may be more about creating a narrative in a post-subsidy environment rather than addressing food safety issues, as the industry faces ongoing challenges from price wars and market saturation [8][9].
关于反内卷,这是我看到的最恐怖的评论
3 6 Ke· 2025-06-13 03:27
Core Insights - The article highlights the pervasive issue of "ghost takeout" in the food delivery industry, revealing the exploitation of merchants by platforms and the resulting compromise on food safety and quality [1][2][3] Group 1: Ghost Takeout Phenomenon - "Ghost takeout" refers to restaurants that operate under false pretenses, sharing addresses and licenses, leading to poor hygiene and untraceable food sources [2][3] - A specific case in Beijing showed over 40 takeout shops sharing the same address, misleading consumers with seemingly legitimate information while operating in unsanitary conditions [2] - The existence of these ghost restaurants poses significant health risks to consumers and disrupts the market for legitimate businesses, creating an environment where low-quality operators thrive [3] Group 2: Platform Responsibilities - Food delivery platforms are criticized for lax entry audits and oversight, allowing unqualified merchants to operate, which contributes to the rise of ghost takeout [4][5] - Regulations established in 2017 require platforms to verify the legitimacy of food service providers, but many platforms fail to enforce these rules effectively [4] - Platforms often prioritize rapid growth and market share over consumer safety, leading to a proliferation of ghost restaurants [5] Group 3: Impact on Food Quality - The prevalence of ghost takeout has led to a decline in overall food quality, with many operators using low-quality or expired ingredients to cut costs [6][7] - Poor hygiene practices in ghost kitchens, such as inadequate sanitation and untrained staff, further compromise food safety [6] - The use of substandard packaging materials by ghost restaurants can also pose health risks, as they may release harmful substances when heated [7] Group 4: Market Dynamics and Consumer Trust - The rise of ghost takeout undermines consumer trust in the food delivery industry, as repeated food safety issues can lead to a decline in market size and growth potential [6][7] - The article suggests that the ongoing price wars in the instant retail sector exacerbate these issues, as businesses are forced to cut corners to remain competitive [9][10] Group 5: Recommendations for Improvement - A multi-faceted approach is necessary to restore order in the food delivery and instant retail sectors, including stricter government regulations and platform accountability [11][12] - Platforms should enhance their merchant verification processes and utilize technology for real-time monitoring of food safety practices [12][13] - Consumers are encouraged to be vigilant about the quality and safety of the food they order, which can drive businesses to improve their standards [14]