Workflow
网络不正当竞争
icon
Search documents
最高法:调整完善互联网法院案件管辖范围
Xin Hua She· 2025-10-11 06:41
最高法研究室负责人表示,由互联网法院集中管辖相关新类型案件,有助于完善数据类纠纷裁判规则, 依法规制各类流量劫持、数据爬取、刷单炒信、平台"二选一"等新型网络不正当竞争行为,促进平台经 济、数字经济有序健康发展,为新质生产力发展提供有力司法保障。 同时,规定将部分案件调整出互联网法院管辖范围,删除了由互联网法院管辖的"签订、履行行为均在 互联网上完成的金融借款合同纠纷、小额借款合同纠纷""在互联网上首次发表作品的著作权或者邻接权 权属纠纷""在互联网上侵害在线发表或者传播作品的著作权或者邻接权而产生的纠纷"等。规定施行 后,北京市、杭州市、广州市市辖区内上述案件将按照地域管辖和指定管辖等标准,由相关基层法院受 理。 (文章来源:新华社) 新华社北京10月11日电 最高人民法院10月11日对外发布《最高人民法院关于互联网法院案件管辖的规 定》,对互联网法院案件管辖范围作出调整完善。规定共4条,自2025年11月1日起施行。 规定将"网络数据权属、侵权、合同纠纷""网络个人信息保护、隐私权纠纷""网络虚拟财产权属、侵 权、合同纠纷""网络不正当竞争纠纷"纳入互联网法院管辖范围。规定施行后,北京市、杭州市、广州 市 ...
这四类案件下月起由互联网法院集中管辖,最高法阐释调整意图
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-10-11 05:35
与旧规相比有何变化? 10月11日,《最高人民法院关于互联网法院案件管辖的规定》(以下简称《规定》)发布, 将"网络数 据权属、侵权、合同纠纷"等四类网络案件调整为由互联网法院集中管辖。《规定》自2025年11月1日起 施行。目前我国共有北京、杭州、广州三家互联网法院。 2018年9月,最高人民法院制发文件明确互联网法院审理案件范围,互联网法院集中管辖所在市的辖区 内应当由基层人民法院受理的网络购物、网络服务、网络金融借款、网络小额借款、网络著作权、网络 域名、网络侵权、网购产品责任、网络公益诉讼等十一类纠纷。 在此基础上,《规定》新增四类网络案件由互联网法院集中管辖。将 "网络数据权属、侵权、合同纠 纷"、"网络个人信息保护、隐私权纠纷"、"网络虚拟财产权属、侵权、合同纠纷"、"网络不正当竞争纠 纷"纳入互联网法院管辖范围。《规定》施行后,北京市、杭州市、广州市市辖区内应由基层法院审理 的上述案件将分别由三家互联网法院集中管辖。 此外,对于算法歧视、算法操纵、算法诱导沉迷、算法违法处理数据等现象,最高法研究室负责人认 为,此次调整有助于推动系统治理,从而促进平台经济、数字经济有序健康发展。 此次案件管辖调整 ...
法治聚焦丨网络平台经营者应明示平台内公平竞争规则
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-10-09 02:36
人民日报记者 倪弋 十四届全国人大常委会第十六次会议表决通过新修订的《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》,自10 月15日起施行。 "公平竞争是市场经济的基础原则。新修订的反不正当竞争法立足数字经济时代市场竞争的新特 点、新挑战,对虚假交易、数据权益保护、平台责任等焦点问题作出回应,为进一步规范市场秩序和夯 实公平竞争法治根基,促进高质量发展提供更坚实的法治保障。"中国商业法研究会副会长、武汉大学 法学院教授孙晋说。 制图:汪哲平 浙江丽水市云和县警方破获的一起"网络水军"刷单案中,犯罪团伙通过开发刷单软件,为5000余家 电商提供虚假交易服务,涉案金额超3000万元。网络刷单炒信、虚假评价、恶意退货等行为频发,破坏 市场秩序。广告屏蔽、流量劫持、数据杀熟等新型网络不正当竞争行为花样翻新,损害广大经营者、消 费者的合法权益。 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室主任石宏介绍,新修订的反不正当竞争法完善了关于网络不 正当竞争行为的规定,对实践中恶意交易的多种表现形式进一步细化,如规定经营者不得滥用平台规 则,直接或者指使他人对其他经营者实施虚假交易、虚假评价或者恶意退货等行为,损害其他经营者的 合法权益,扰乱市场竞争 ...
网络平台经营者应明示平台内公平竞争规则
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-10-09 02:20
2025年10月起施行 整治"内卷式"竞争行为 新修订的《中华人民共和国反不正当 竞争法》规定,平台经营者不得强制 或者变相强制平台内经营者按照其定 价规则,以低于成本的价格 销售商品,扰乱市场竞争秩序 制图:汪哲平 十四届全国人大常委会第十六次会议表决通过新修订的《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》,自10月15 日起施行。 "公平竞争是市场经济的基础原则。新修订的反不正当竞争法立足数字经济时代市场竞争的新特点、新 挑战,对虚假交易、数据权益保护、平台责任等焦点问题作出回应,为进一步规范市场秩序和夯实公平 竞争法治根基,促进高质量发展提供更坚实的法治保障。"中国商业法研究会副会长、武汉大学法学院 教授孙晋说。 浙江丽水市云和县警方破获的一起"网络水军"刷单案中,犯罪团伙通过开发刷单软件,为5000余家电商 提供虚假交易服务,涉案金额超3000万元。网络刷单炒信、虚假评价、恶意退货等行为频发,破坏市场 秩序。广告屏蔽、流量劫持、数据杀熟等新型网络不正当竞争行为花样翻新,损害广大经营者、消费者 的合法权益。 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室主任石宏介绍,新修订的反不正当竞争法完善了关于网络不正当 竞争行为的规定, ...
新修订的反不正当竞争法10月15日起施行 网络平台经营者应明示平台内公平竞争规则(法治聚焦) 不得实施虚假交易、恶意退货等行为
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-10-09 01:03
"公平竞争是市场经济的基础原则。新修订的反不正当竞争法立足数字经济时代市场竞争的新特点、新 挑战,对虚假交易、数据权益保护、平台责任等焦点问题作出回应,为进一步规范市场秩序和夯实公平 竞争法治根基,促进高质量发展提供更坚实的法治保障。"中国商业法研究会副会长、武汉大学法学院 教授孙晋说。 浙江丽水市云和县警方破获的一起"网络水军"刷单案中,犯罪团伙通过开发刷单软件,为5000余家电商 提供虚假交易服务,涉案金额超3000万元。网络刷单炒信、虚假评价、恶意退货等行为频发,破坏市场 秩序。广告屏蔽、流量劫持、数据杀熟等新型网络不正当竞争行为花样翻新,损害广大经营者、消费者 的合法权益。 十四届全国人大常委会第十六次会议表决通过新修订的《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》,自10月15 日起施行。 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室主任石宏介绍,新修订的反不正当竞争法完善了关于网络不正当 竞争行为的规定,对实践中恶意交易的多种表现形式进一步细化,如规定经营者不得滥用平台规则,直 接或者指使他人对其他经营者实施虚假交易、虚假评价或者恶意退货等行为,损害其他经营者的合法权 益,扰乱市场竞争秩序。 治理网络不正当竞争,要合理 ...
网络平台经营者应明示平台内公平竞争规则(法治聚焦)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-10-08 22:11
2025年10月起施行 保障医疗器械网络销售质量 《 医疗器械网络销售质量管理规范》 制图:汪哲平 十四届全国人大常委会第十六次会议表决通过新修订的《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》,自10月15 日起施行。 整治"内卷式"竞争行为 "公平竞争是市场经济的基础原则。新修订的反不正当竞争法立足数字经济时代市场竞争的新特点、新 挑战,对虚假交易、数据权益保护、平台责任等焦点问题作出回应,为进一步规范市场秩序和夯实公平 竞争法治根基,促进高质量发展提供更坚实的法治保障。"中国商业法研究会副会长、武汉大学法学院 教授孙晋说。 新修订的《中华人民共和国反不正当 竞争法》规定,平台经营者不得强制 或者变相强制平台内经营者按照其定 价规则,以低于成本的价格 销售商品,扰乱市场竞争秩序 守住永久基本农田保护红线 《永久基本农田保护红线管理办法》 对于永久基本农田划定、管控、保护、 优化调整、质量建设等作出具体规定, 在永久基本农田保护红线整体稳定的 前提下,明确了允许优化 调整的情形、程序和规则 为压缩成本,充电宝行业部分厂商使用劣质电芯,导致安全隐患激增。新修订的反不正当竞争法规定国 家建立健全公平竞争审查制度,依法加强公平 ...
新修订的反不正当竞争法回应“内卷式”竞争、网络不正当竞争行为等新问题——保护公平竞争激发市场活力(坚持和完善人民代表大会制度)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-21 22:01
Core Viewpoint - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China aims to enhance fair competition and regulate market order, particularly addressing new issues arising from the digital economy and internet industry [1][2] Group 1: Key Highlights of the Revised Law - The law has been amended three times since its initial implementation in 1993, with the latest revision set to take effect on October 15, 2023 [1] - The revision specifically targets online unfair competition behaviors, such as false reviews and malicious returns, which have become prevalent in e-commerce [3][4] - The law now includes provisions against data rights infringement and malicious transactions, detailing various forms of unfair competition [4][5] Group 2: Addressing "Involution" in Competition - The law recognizes "involution" as a harmful competitive practice where businesses engage in excessive competition without overall profit growth, leading to resource misallocation [7][8] - It establishes a fair competition review system to ensure equal access to production factors and market participation for all businesses [8][9] - The law aims to shift the focus from low-cost, low-quality competition to innovation and high-quality development [8][9] Group 3: Regulation of Price Wars - The law addresses the issue of price wars initiated by platforms, which can lead to unsustainable business practices and harm consumer rights [10][11] - It prohibits platform operators from forcing or indirectly compelling businesses to sell products below cost, thereby disrupting market order [11] - The law encourages platforms to adopt long-term strategies that prioritize innovation and fair competition rather than short-term gains through aggressive pricing [11]
虚构履历卖课被罚200万元,一批直播电商领域典型案例公布
news flash· 2025-07-08 10:06
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent regulatory actions taken by various market supervision departments in China to address illegal practices in the live e-commerce sector, aiming to protect consumer rights and promote fair competition. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Hainan Provincial Market Supervision Administration fined Hainan Juguangzhongda E-commerce Consulting Co., Ltd. 2 million yuan and revoked its business license for false advertising related to its online store opening courses [2] - The Guangzhou Baiyun District Market Supervision Administration imposed a fine of 400,000 yuan on Guangzhou Zhiyuan Supply Chain Co., Ltd. for failing to publicly display its business license and for misleading advertising during a live broadcast [3] - The Ningbo Fenghua District Market Supervision Administration fined Ningbo Youduo Household Products Co., Ltd. 117,900 yuan for improper prize sales practices during promotional live streams [4] - The Hengshan District Market Supervision Administration in Hunan Province fined an individual 184,500 yuan for artificially inflating viewer counts in multiple live streams [6] - The Chengdu Market Supervision Administration fined Chengdu Fanxing Media Co., Ltd. 280,000 yuan for misleading claims about a brand's sales performance during a live broadcast [7] - The Nantong City Market Supervision Administration fined an individual 200,000 yuan for false advertising regarding the materials and quality of a down comforter sold through a live stream [8] - The Lishui City Yunhe County Market Supervision Administration imposed fines on two toy companies for selling products that did not meet national safety standards [8] Group 2: Violations and Consequences - Hainan Juguangzhongda E-commerce Consulting Co., Ltd. was found to have fabricated a female host's credentials and made unfulfilled refund promises, leading to numerous complaints [1] - Guangzhou Zhiyuan Supply Chain Co., Ltd. misled consumers about the quality of products during live promotions, which resulted in a lack of transparency regarding its business license [3] - Ningbo Youduo Household Products Co., Ltd. mismanaged prize distribution during promotional events, causing consumer dissatisfaction and confusion [4] - The individual involved in viewer count manipulation used multiple devices to create false engagement across 14 live streams [5] - Chengdu Fanxing Media Co., Ltd. failed to provide evidence for its claims of being the top-selling brand, misleading consumers and disrupting market order [7] - The individual selling the down comforter made false claims about the product's materials and origin, misleading consumers [8] - The toy companies sold products that posed safety risks to children, leading to regulatory penalties for non-compliance with safety standards [8]
新华鲜报|直面网络经营问题!反不正当竞争法完成修订
Xin Hua She· 2025-06-27 07:44
Core Viewpoint - The newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law, effective from October 15, aims to enhance fair competition and regulate market order in response to new challenges posed by the digital economy and internet industry [1][2]. Group 1: Regulation of Unfair Competition - The law addresses the issue of platforms using low-price competition strategies, which have negatively impacted the profits of small and medium-sized businesses and increased risks of false advertising and price fraud [2]. - New provisions prohibit platform operators from forcing or indirectly compelling platform merchants to sell products below cost, thereby disrupting market competition [2]. Group 2: Obligations of Platform Operators - The law mandates platform operators to clearly define fair competition rules in service agreements and establish mechanisms for reporting and resolving unfair competition complaints [3]. - It emphasizes the importance of compliance in competition, suggesting that higher compliance levels will attract more businesses and consumers [3]. Group 3: Addressing New Forms of Unfair Competition - The revised law specifies regulations against new forms of unfair competition, such as data infringement and malicious transactions, which are often difficult to prove and costly for affected businesses [4]. - It prohibits operators from abusing platform rules to engage in false transactions, fake reviews, or malicious returns, thus protecting the legitimate rights of other operators and maintaining market order [4]. Group 4: Legal Environment for Business - Establishing a legal framework to regulate unfair competition is seen as essential for fostering a fair competitive environment, which in turn supports the long-term healthy development of the socialist market economy [5].
全省查办762件网络不正当竞争案件
Xin Hua Ri Bao· 2025-06-08 22:04
Group 1 - The rapid development of artificial intelligence has led to the emergence of DeepSeek phishing websites, with nearly 3,000 monitored in just two months across the province [1] - The provincial market supervision bureau has initiated special governance actions, monitoring over 2,200 accounts and 4,700 internet information pieces, and has transferred relevant leads for local verification [1] - A total of 4,384 internet-related cases have been investigated, with 1,132 pieces of suspected illegal online transaction monitoring data handed over for further action [1] Group 2 - The provincial market supervision bureau has established a long-term governance system, including the formulation of local standards for online live marketing management and compliance requirements for digital human live broadcasts [2] - The bureau plans to enhance the network market monitoring system and strengthen technical support and special guidance for grassroots agencies to achieve real-time monitoring and precise strikes against unfair competition [2] - There will be an increase in online law enforcement efforts, improved inter-departmental collaboration, and the establishment of a long-term mechanism to optimize the market environment and promote high-quality economic development [2]