Core Viewpoint - The article argues that AI is not a bubble but a genuine and long-term productivity revolution, supported by significant user growth and revenue from leading AI companies like OpenAI and Nvidia [2][3][7]. Market Analysis - This year marks the third year of the current AI bull market, with a historical probability of 48% for continued market growth next year [3][18]. - Investors should maintain patience regarding AI development, as significant returns often require time, as evidenced by Azure's six-year journey to positive ROIC [3][22]. - The AI sector has shown a remarkable return of 165% over the past three years, significantly outperforming the S&P 500 and non-AI companies [7][8]. AI Growth Dynamics - AI growth has diversified beyond the "Magnificent Seven" companies, with returns from AI sectors excluding these giants surpassing them for the first time in 2025 [10][13]. - New AI winners are emerging in sectors like energy, semiconductors, and software, with AI energy showing a 53% return year-to-date [13][15]. - The growth of AI is shifting towards energy, computing power, and foundational software, indicating a structural change in the industry [15]. Historical Context of "Bubble" - The article emphasizes the importance of long-term holding and understanding market cycles, suggesting that the probability of market growth remains significant even after multiple years of increases [17][20]. - A historical analysis indicates that the current market conditions do not exhibit the characteristics of a bubble, as the valuation metrics are not at extreme levels compared to past bubbles [38][40]. AI's Economic Impact - AI is expected to generate substantial revenue growth, with projections indicating a potential tenfold increase in AI-related profits over the next 5-10 years, reaching $1 trillion [3][90]. - The AI sector's revenue is anticipated to account for 4% of global corporate profits, highlighting its significant economic impact [3][90]. Investment Principles - The article outlines key investment principles for navigating the AI landscape, emphasizing the importance of not selling early during massive adoption phases and recognizing the distinct investment logic across different stages of AI development [117][119]. - Monitoring indicators such as OpenAI's progress and enterprise revenues is crucial for assessing the health and growth potential of the AI industry [122].

I want to go back to what we were just talking about and the debt that's coming to the market and the absorption that's going to be happening. I'm looking at a story right now saying that the Bank of England is actually probing data center lending because they're worried about air bubbles brewing. Is this something you're planning to hear about in the market, Martin.Well, it's so interesting because a lot of the rationale for the I guess, complacency around the air trade has been that this is largely being ...

Core Insights - The current enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI) is reminiscent of the internet bubble of the late 1990s [1][2] - AI companies are being valued in the hundreds of billions, with significant capital expenditures directed towards AI infrastructure by tech giants [2][3] - There is a dual sentiment in the market, characterized by both skepticism and excitement regarding AI's potential [4] Group 1: Investment Trends - Global corporate investment in AI is projected to reach $252.3 billion in 2024, a 13-fold increase from 2014 [2] - Major tech companies, including Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, plan to spend a total of $320 billion on capital expenditures this year, primarily focused on AI infrastructure [2] - In the past two years, Microsoft, Meta, Tesla, Amazon, and Google have collectively invested approximately $560 billion in AI infrastructure, with only about $35 billion in clearly identifiable AI-related revenue [9] Group 2: Historical Parallels - The article draws parallels between the current AI investment climate and the over-investment in telecommunications infrastructure during the 2000 internet bubble, where excessive fiber optic cables became "dark fiber" due to overestimation of demand [5][8] - The business model of many internet companies in 2000 was hollow, with companies like Commerce One valued at $21 billion despite having no revenue [6][7] - The article suggests that the current AI landscape may face similar challenges if demand does not meet expectations, potentially leading to "dark compute" scenarios [8] Group 3: Economic Dynamics - The sustainability of AI infrastructure investments hinges on three critical curves: cost curve, demand curve, and capital curve [10][12] - The cost curve must show a continuous decline in computing and algorithm costs, while the demand curve needs to shift from pilot projects to essential production elements [10][12] - The capital curve is influenced by interest rates and risk premiums, which can compress the valuation of long-term cash flows if capital costs remain high [11][12] Group 4: Future Scenarios - The article outlines three potential paths for the AI sector: soft landing, phase-out of excess capacity, and structural differentiation between overcapacity in infrastructure and thriving applications [15] - It emphasizes the importance of focusing on operational metrics such as GPU utilization, cost efficiency, and customer retention rather than just narrative-driven valuations [15][16] - Historical lessons suggest that while AI will ultimately change the world, avoiding pitfalls similar to the internet bubble will depend on tangible economic indicators rather than market sentiment [16]