Group 1: Policy Tracking - The Central Political Bureau meeting emphasized the importance of "doing our own things well" and highlighted "stabilizing employment" as a priority in the face of external risks [1][2] - The meeting called for rapid implementation of established policies, indicating that the speed of policy rollout will increase following the Two Sessions [2] - The focus will be on high-quality development and internal stability, with a flexible and unconventional policy approach expected to address economic data fluctuations [1][3] Group 2: Employment and Economic Stability - The government is implementing measures to expand employment opportunities, focusing on traditional sectors and new growth areas, with a central budget allocation of 667 billion yuan to support these initiatives [6][8] - Specific measures target key groups such as college graduates, migrant workers, and those in difficulty, with policies including job subsidies and training support [6][7] - The employment public service system is being enhanced to better match job seekers with available positions through targeted recruitment and skills training [7][8] Group 3: Technological Innovation - The government aims to establish a globally influential technology innovation hub, with a focus on artificial intelligence and high-end industry leadership [10][11] - Emphasis is placed on enhancing the national innovation system, promoting original innovation capabilities, and addressing key core technologies [11][12] - The integration of technology and industry is prioritized, with a call for a comprehensive approach to developing new productive forces [11][12] Group 4: Financial Support for SMEs - The People's Bank of China and financial regulatory authorities are working to improve financing services for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) through standardized supply chain finance practices [14][15] - New regulations aim to ensure timely payments to SMEs and prevent core enterprises from abusing their positions [14][15] - The focus is on creating a supportive environment for SMEs to thrive, with measures to enhance credit risk management and promote diverse financing models [14][15] Group 5: Market Access and Regulatory Reform - The National Development and Reform Commission is launching a six-month campaign to clear market access barriers, addressing issues such as local approvals and regulatory inconsistencies [16][17] - The initiative aims to create a unified national market by eliminating unnecessary restrictions and improving the transparency of approval processes [16][17] - Public participation is encouraged in identifying and reporting barriers to market access, enhancing accountability and regulatory efficiency [16][17]

7日上午，三位金融管理部门"一把手"亮相国新办发布会，介绍一揽子重磅金融政策相关情况，释放出 了稳市场稳预期的强信号。相关数据和政策安排，显示出中国金融体系更加从容自信的姿态，更强的系 统化思维和统筹能力，以及对把握市场趋势、应对外部冲击、综合运用政策的游刃有余。这是我国抵御 外部冲击、坚定做好自己的事的有力保障。 首先，在外部环境复杂多变的背景下，中国金融体系展现出强大的稳定性与韧性：股债汇市场运行平稳 有序，上证指数在4月7日短暂回调后快速企稳回升；10年期国债收益率稳定在1.65%左右；人民币兑美 元汇率在经历小幅波动后，目前也稳定在7.2元附近。 其次，金融部门推出的一揽子政策眼光长远，构建起"远中近"协同发力的政策矩阵，形成多层次、立体 化的政策支持体系。一是凭借双轮驱动，在房地产与资本市场领域持续精准施策，筑牢市场稳定基石。 自去年9月起，通过城市房地产融资协调机制扩围增效，推动住宅建设与交付保障，让房地产市场供需 格局显著改善。数据显示，今年一季度房地产贷款余额增长超7500亿元，其中个人住房贷款新增规模创 2022年以来单季新高，住房租赁贷款同比增长28%，彰显了政策落地实效。而此次全面降准0 ...

Core Viewpoint - The macroeconomic backdrop is characterized as "external risks, internal responses," with technology breakthroughs and geopolitical changes driving the restructuring of China's asset valuation system [1] Group 1: China Asset Valuation - The narrative of China's asset revaluation continues, despite the impact of the U.S. "reciprocal tariff" policy, which has caused global asset volatility [2] - The core of China's asset revaluation narrative lies in technology breakthroughs and geopolitical changes, with AI technology development acting as a catalyst [3] - Current valuations of A-shares and Hong Kong stocks are relatively low, with the CSI 300 index's dynamic P/E ratio below 11 times, which is approximately 0.8 to 0.9 standard deviations below the historical average [3][4] Group 2: Investment Opportunities - The current dividend yield of the CSI 300 is about 3.5%, indicating a historically high relative attractiveness of stocks compared to bonds [4] - The long-term process of China's asset revaluation is influenced by external uncertainties, with a focus on how these uncertainties may shift to certainties, potentially creating opportunities [5] - The trend of foreign capital entering A-shares continues, with net buying trends observed even during periods of external risk [8] Group 3: Market Dynamics - Southbound capital has shown increasing interest in Hong Kong stocks, with net buying trends expected to continue due to attractive valuations and the benefits from China's AI technology breakthroughs [9] - The proportion of southbound capital in trading has exceeded 30%, indicating a growing influence on Hong Kong's pricing power [9] - The overall market conditions suggest that A-shares may perform better in the second half of the year compared to the first half [10]

Core Viewpoint - The launch of new dividend indices by China Securities Index Company reflects the growing demand for dividend assets in the A-share market, driven by improving dividend behaviors among listed companies [1][4]. Group 1: New Indices and Their Characteristics - The newly released indices include the CSI A500 Dividend Index, CSI A500 Low Volatility Dividend Index, and CSI A500 Dividend Growth Index, aimed at enhancing the dividend index investment ecosystem [1]. - The CSI A500 Dividend Index focuses on high dividend yield stocks, while the Low Volatility Dividend Index selects stocks with high dividends and low volatility, and the Dividend Growth Index emphasizes continuous dividends and high yields [1][2]. - The adjustment cycles for these indices are set at six months, with specific limits on the proportion of adjustments for each index [2]. Group 2: Industry Distribution and Coverage - The CSI A500 Dividend Growth Index covers the most industries, with 11 primary sectors, including Industrial (29.55%), Financial (22.58%), and Consumer Staples (18.75%) [2]. - The CSI A500 Dividend Index and Low Volatility Dividend Index cover 7 and 10 primary sectors respectively, with Financial, Industrial, and Consumer Discretionary being the top sectors [2]. Group 3: Dividend Trends and Market Conditions - In 2024, the total dividend payout by A-share listed companies reached a record high of 2.4 trillion yuan, with an average payout ratio of 37.7%, up by 2.5 percentage points from 2023 [4]. - Over 1,800 companies have paid dividends for five consecutive years, and nearly 800 have done so for ten years, indicating a strong trend in dividend payments [5]. Group 4: Investment Environment and Policy Support - The low interest rate environment enhances the long-term investment value of dividend assets, with the 10-year government bond yield dropping to a historical low of 1.82% [6]. - Regulatory policies have been introduced to strengthen dividend constraints for listed companies, including the incorporation of cash dividends into market value management tools [6][7]. - The combination of supply-side incentives for companies and demand-side enthusiasm from investors creates a favorable market environment for dividend assets [7].

Group 1: Impact of Tariffs - The new tariffs proposed by Trump could generate additional revenue of $600-700 billion per year, requiring the average effective tariff rate (AETR) to rise from 2.2% to 21%[7] - If the tariffs are fully borne by households, the average loss per American household could be $5,400, approximately 5% of median household income[9] - If the tariffs are shared equally between households and corporations, household income could decline by 2.5% and corporate after-tax profits could drop by 15%[9] Group 2: Economic Objectives and Comparisons - The economic objectives of the new tariffs include increasing federal revenue and promoting the return of manufacturing, differing from the 2018 focus on trade balance[10] - By Q4 2024, manufacturing's share of non-residential fixed asset investment is expected to rise to 5.7%, up from 2.7% five years ago[10] Group 3: Economic Growth and Market Reactions - The Federal Reserve has lowered its GDP growth forecast for 2025 from 2.1% to 1.7% due to tariff impacts, while only slightly adjusting the unemployment rate[12] - As of April 7, 2025, S&P 500 EPS forecasts have been revised down by 4.1% for Q1 and 2.5% for Q2, indicating a cautious market outlook[16] Group 4: Federal Reserve and Monetary Policy - The Fed's monetary policy aims to maintain a 2% inflation rate, with actual wages and long-term inflation expectations being critical factors in policy decisions[21] - As of April 7, 2025, the 5-year inflation swap rate is at 2.3%, indicating stable long-term inflation expectations[23] Group 5: Asset Allocation and Market Trends - High tariffs are expected to create both demand and supply shocks, influencing asset allocation strategies, with potential shifts favoring commodities over financial assets in a stagflation scenario[26] - The 10-year U.S. Treasury term premium is currently at 43 basis points, significantly lower than historical averages, indicating reduced demand for U.S. debt amid tariff-induced inflation risks[29]

截至2 0 2 5年1月底，纽约证券交易所和纳斯达克的上市公司总市值超3 0万亿美元，远超全球其他 交易所。亚洲市场中上交所、日本证券交易所和印度国家证券交易所市值虽超5万亿美元，但仍 远低于美国交易所。从流动性来看，美股及深交所日均成交额均突破千亿美元，而东南亚部分市 场日均成交额不足1 0亿美元，反映出部分亚洲新兴市场的流动性仍较有限。回顾过去五年全球市 场规模和流动性表现，全球上市公司数量保持稳定，发达市场增长放缓，而中国和印度等新兴市 场成为推动增长的主要力量。美股市场仍然主导全球股票市值和流动性，纳斯达克和纽约证券交 易所的市值持续上升，受益于科技股上涨和流动性回暖。与此同时，中国大陆和印度市场的市值 与交易活跃度稳步提升，特别是深圳证券交易所成交量在2 0 2 4年底大幅攀升，显示出市场活跃度 的增强。相比之下，日本、中国香港、新加坡等成熟市场虽保持稳定，但整体增长动能有限。未 来，全球资本市场格局可能进一步调整，投资者对新兴市场的关注度或将持续上升。 文 ｜ 杨宇泽 顾晟曦 车宇璇 赵文荣 刘方 本报告聚焦全球股票市场的运行特征与结构变化，提供定量跟踪与横向比较，供投资者参考。基于 最新数据，报 ...

给大家摆一个数据的对比。 今天股市非常给力，上证指数一举突破3400点，创年内新高，而收盘后， A股的总市值也首次突破了99万亿 ，创历史新高，离100万亿的 历史性时刻，仅仅咫尺之遥了。 ...... 上面说到A股总市值已经接近100万亿了，而港股的总市值目前大概在40万亿人民币左右，两会的时候，有位香港的代表提到，内地企业在港股的总 市值占比已经超过了80%，那么也就是说，内地企业的港股总市值大概在30万亿出头，而中概那边大概还有1万多亿，保守点算，国内企业的总市 值，大概在130万亿出头。 而目前，国内居民存款大概在150万亿左右，房地产总市值在300-400万亿之间。 中国的股市总市值：居民存款：地产总市值≈0.8：1：2。 美国那边，美股跌了一波之后，目前总市值在50万亿美刀左右，居民存款20万亿美刀不到，房地产总市值也是50万亿美刀左右， 所以美国那边的三 者比值≈1：0.4：1。 可以看到，和美国相比，或者和全球相比，我们的储蓄率都非常高，地产占居民财富的比值也非常高，这里既有经济发展阶段的问题，也和民族的 特性有关。 而股市的总市值，相当于经济体量来说，还是偏低的。 低基数，也是未来发展的空间 ...