Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board's growth tier allows unprofitable tech companies to access capital markets, marking a significant shift in the valuation system for hard tech firms [1][2]. Group 1: Introduction of Unprofitable Companies - Three unprofitable new stocks—He Yuan Bio, Xi'an Yicai, and Bibet—are set to launch online subscriptions, becoming the first batch of new registered companies in the growth tier of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [1]. - This marks the return of unprofitable companies to the Sci-Tech Innovation Board after more than two years, following the China Securities Regulatory Commission's announcement in June to establish a growth tier focused on tech firms with significant breakthroughs and commercial potential [1]. Group 2: Valuation System Restructuring - The growth tier provides a new valuation dimension for hard tech companies, replacing short-term profit indicators with metrics like "degree of technological breakthrough" and "commercialization prospects," allowing for the quantification and recognition of technological value in capital markets [1]. - The introduction of professional institutional investors aims to enhance market evaluation of the technological attributes and commercial prospects of these tech firms [1]. Group 3: Resource Allocation Efficiency - Institutional innovations not only reconstruct valuation logic but also enhance resource allocation efficiency, addressing challenges faced by hard tech companies during critical R&D phases and in industry consolidation [2]. - Measures such as allowing unprofitable companies to raise funds from existing shareholders and supporting mergers of listed companies aim to alleviate funding shortages and obstacles in resource integration [2]. Group 4: Risk Management - The growth tier includes a "U" label for risk warning and strengthens investor suitability management, striving to balance support for innovation with risk prevention [2].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board's growth tier marks a significant opportunity for unprofitable tech companies to access capital markets, indicating a shift in the valuation framework for these firms [1][2]. Group 1: Introduction of the Growth Tier - Three unprofitable new stocks—He Yuan Bio, Xi'an Yicai, and Bibet—are set to launch online subscriptions, becoming the first new registered companies in the growth tier of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [1]. - This is the first time in over two years that unprofitable companies will be welcomed on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, following the China Securities Regulatory Commission's announcement in June to establish the growth tier [1]. Group 2: Valuation System Restructuring - The growth tier not only opens doors for unprofitable hard tech companies but also reshapes the valuation system for these firms, which have historically struggled to achieve reasonable pricing under traditional profit-oriented valuation frameworks [2]. - The new valuation approach emphasizes "technological breakthroughs" and "commercialization prospects" over short-term profit metrics, allowing for a quantifiable recognition of technological value in the capital market [2]. Group 3: Institutional Support and Resource Allocation - The introduction of seasoned institutional investors aims to enhance market evaluation of tech companies' innovation attributes and commercial potential [2]. - Innovative measures, such as allowing unprofitable companies to raise funds from existing shareholders and supporting mergers of companies listed on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board for less than three years, address funding challenges during critical R&D phases [2]. Group 4: Risk Management and Investor Protection - The growth tier includes a "U" label for risk indication and strengthens investor suitability management, striving to balance innovation support with risk prevention [2].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board's growth tier allows unprofitable tech companies to access capital markets, marking a significant shift in the valuation system for hard tech firms [1][2] Group 1: Introduction of Unprofitable Companies - Three unprofitable new stocks—He Yuan Bio, Xi'an Yicai, and Bibet—are set to launch online subscriptions, becoming the first new registered companies in the growth tier of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [1] - This marks the return of unprofitable companies to the Sci-Tech Innovation Board after more than two years [1] Group 2: Support for Hard Tech Enterprises - The growth tier aims to support tech companies with significant breakthroughs and promising commercial prospects that are currently unprofitable, providing a pathway for their listing [1] - The establishment of the growth tier reassures hard tech companies in the R&D phase, facilitating their access to capital markets [1] Group 3: Restructuring Valuation System - The growth tier introduces a new valuation dimension for hard tech companies, focusing on "technological breakthrough" and "commercialization prospects" instead of short-term profitability [1] - This shift allows for a more accurate quantification and recognition of technological value in the capital market [1] Group 4: Resource Allocation Efficiency - Institutional innovations not only reconstruct valuation logic but also enhance resource allocation efficiency, addressing funding shortages during critical R&D phases for hard tech companies [2] - Measures such as allowing unprofitable companies to raise funds from existing shareholders and supporting mergers with companies listed for less than three years aim to alleviate obstacles faced by hard tech firms [2] Group 5: Risk Management - The growth tier includes a "U" label for risk warning and strengthens investor suitability management, balancing support for innovation with risk prevention [2]

Core Insights - HICOOL serves as a global innovation and entrepreneurship platform, connecting laboratory challenges with industry needs and capital patience, exemplified by the success of the Guangying Aggregation team in the 2024 HICOOL Global Entrepreneurship Competition [1] - The platform has seen significant growth, with participation increasing from 2,026 projects and 3,085 talents in 2020 to over 10,055 projects and 13,150 talents in 2025, highlighting its appeal to global entrepreneurs [2] - HICOOL has fostered a robust ecosystem that supports hard technology projects, resulting in the emergence of unicorns and specialized enterprises, with total post-competition financing exceeding 50.8 billion yuan [2] Group 1: HICOOL's Role and Achievements - HICOOL has established itself as a bridge for global collaboration, facilitating the integration of technology, capital, and market opportunities in Beijing [3] - The HICOOL Industrial Park has expanded to 106,800 square meters, attracting international innovation centers and creating a global innovation cluster [4] - The 2025 HICOOL Global Entrepreneurs Summit has become a significant event on the world stage, with partnerships with 165 global entities, enhancing its international presence [5][6] Group 2: Ecosystem and Support - HICOOL's ecosystem includes a comprehensive service chain covering competition selection, management services, acceleration programs, funding, and industrial park support, ensuring a seamless transition from project registration to implementation [2] - The initiative has attracted over 400 quality projects in Shunyi District, focusing on intelligent manufacturing and AI, contributing to the region's development as a high-quality talent community [8] - The summit has introduced various international activities and collaborations, enhancing Beijing's position as a global innovation hub [6][7] Group 3: Future Outlook - HICOOL aims to evolve from a platform to a dynamic force in global entrepreneurship, promoting a networked approach to collaboration and innovation [7] - The ongoing support from local policies and the establishment of a high-quality talent community are crucial for sustaining innovation and entrepreneurship in Beijing [8] - The vibrant innovation scene in Beijing is characterized by a collaborative environment, fostering the next wave of technological advancements [9]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board's growth tier allows unprofitable tech companies to access capital markets, marking a significant shift in the valuation system for hard tech firms [1][2]. Group 1: Introduction of Unprofitable Companies - Three unprofitable companies, He Yuan Bio, Xi'an Yicai, and Bibet, have initiated online subscriptions, becoming the first batch of new registered companies in the growth tier of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [1]. - This marks the return of unprofitable companies to the Sci-Tech Innovation Board after more than two years [1]. Group 2: Valuation System Restructuring - The growth tier aims to support tech companies with significant breakthroughs and promising commercial prospects, despite currently being unprofitable [1]. - The new valuation framework replaces short-term profit metrics with indicators like "degree of technological breakthrough" and "commercialization prospects," allowing for a more accurate assessment of tech value in the capital market [1]. Group 3: Resource Allocation Efficiency - Institutional innovations not only reconstruct valuation logic but also enhance resource allocation efficiency, addressing funding shortages during critical R&D phases for hard tech companies [2]. - Measures such as allowing unprofitable companies to raise funds from existing shareholders and supporting mergers with companies listed for less than three years aim to alleviate obstacles faced by hard tech firms [2]. Group 4: Risk Management - The growth tier includes a "U" label for risk indication and strengthens investor suitability management, striving to balance innovation support with risk prevention [2].

Core Points - The core objective of the shareholding reform is to transition the company from a limited liability company to a joint-stock company, ensuring clear asset ownership, financial compliance, and a reasonable equity structure to lay the foundation for an IPO [2] Group 1: Shareholding Reform Key Points - The selection of the base date should be during a stable period for assets, finances, and operations, avoiding periods of significant income fluctuations or major asset changes [6] - The total share capital after issuance must not be less than 30 million yuan, and the share capital during the reform must reserve space for future issuance [6] - The ownership structure must be clear and stable, with controlling shareholders holding at least 30% post-reform to avoid dilution of control [6] - Employee stock ownership plans (ESOP) are encouraged, with specific disclosure requirements regarding holders, subscription prices, lock-up periods, and incentive mechanisms [6] - All assets from the limited company phase must have clear ownership without any disputes or encumbrances [6] - Financial records must be adjusted according to accounting standards, addressing any irregularities from the limited company phase [6] - Related party transactions must be disclosed accurately, and their pricing must be confirmed by an auditing firm [6] - Tax compliance is required during the reform process, ensuring all relevant taxes are paid or exemptions obtained [6] - Employees must sign new labor contracts with the joint-stock company, ensuring continuity of service [6] - Social security and housing fund contributions must be fully paid, with any arrears explained and committed to being rectified [6] Group 2: Governance Key Points - Corporate governance is crucial for companies on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, focusing on the effectiveness of governance structures, sound internal controls, transparency, and protection of minority shareholders [7] - The company charter must comply with legal requirements and clearly define the roles and operational rules of the shareholders' meeting, board of directors, supervisory board, and independent directors [12] - The organizational structure must include a shareholders' meeting, board of directors, supervisory board, management team, and a board secretary responsible for information disclosure [12] - The board of directors must include independent directors who are free from significant ties to the company, and the board secretary must meet exchange qualifications [12] - The supervisory board must fulfill its oversight responsibilities, ensuring accurate records of meetings and compliance with laws and the company charter [12] - Internal control systems must cover all operational aspects, and their effectiveness must be verified by an accounting firm [12] - Related party transactions must be disclosed, with fair pricing and a mechanism for avoiding conflicts of interest [12] - Companies must disclose their governance status, internal control evaluations, and significant related party transactions regularly [12] Group 3: Regulatory Focus of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board - The Sci-Tech Innovation Board emphasizes the importance of maintaining research and development investments, with a requirement that R&D expenditures account for at least 15% of total expenditures over the last three years [14] - Companies must establish mechanisms for communication with minority shareholders and ensure a profit distribution policy that guarantees a minimum cash dividend of 10% of distributable profits annually [14]

Core Viewpoint - China is shifting from pursuing GDP growth to focusing on technological innovation, marking the beginning of a "second curve" for the economy [1] Group 1: Policy and Economic Environment - The implementation of the "9·24" policy has led to profound ecological restructuring in China's capital market over the past year [2] - New policy financial tools mentioned in the April 25 Politburo meeting aim to support the economy and enhance confidence, with a focus on directing funds towards private enterprises [2] - The introduction of technology innovation bonds and risk-sharing tools is expected to channel investments into high-tech sectors such as artificial intelligence and low-altitude economy [2] Group 2: Innovation and Market Dynamics - The new type of national system emphasizes the role of private enterprises in driving innovation, contrasting with the traditional model that relied heavily on state-led initiatives [3] - The current capital market has transitioned from a "broad rise and fall" to a "structural market," with competition between China and the U.S. focusing on cutting-edge fields like artificial intelligence [3] - The structural evolution in both primary and secondary markets is driven by new productive forces, highlighting the importance of understanding industry development [3] Group 3: Investment Strategies and Research - The Tsinghua University Global Private Equity Research Institute has been tracking hard technology sectors since late 2017, creating a database covering approximately 1,500 sub-industries [4] - Successful technology investment now requires a deep understanding of the intersection between technology, industry, and finance, raising the bar for investors [4] - The "PE Industry Investor" program aims to establish a cross-disciplinary research paradigm, connecting scientists with industry practitioners to develop executable investment and acquisition strategies [5]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining caution towards controllable factors while remaining optimistic about uncontrollable ones, highlighting the resilience of entrepreneurial spirit despite macroeconomic fluctuations [2] - It discusses the shift in investment strategies and entrepreneurial logic in the context of a new paradigm in Chinese technology investment, driven by a wave of young entrepreneurs and scientists [2] Group 1: Investment Focus - There is a growing preference for hard technology and long-term value in investment decisions, with a notable emphasis on projects that demonstrate significant technological breakthroughs [5][7] - The discussion highlights the importance of understanding market needs as a critical threshold for hard technology entrepreneurs, indicating that successful market entry can lead to sustainability [10] Group 2: Changing Investment Logic - The transition from mobile internet to hard technology has altered the investment logic, with a focus on long-term project development requiring around ten years of accumulation [9] - Investors are now prioritizing projects that adapt to specific market needs and have the potential for ecosystem development, rather than those that simply aim for rapid monetization [9][10] Group 3: Caution in Investment - The article advises against blindly chasing trends in a rapidly changing market, suggesting that early-stage investors should focus on areas they understand well and develop unique insights [12] - It notes the lengthy process of bringing laboratory products to market, which can take up to 14 years, while current fund lifespans are often shorter, necessitating a strategic approach to investment [12] Group 4: Entrepreneurial Resilience - Entrepreneurs are encouraged to maintain a fast pace while also ensuring longevity in their ventures, as the window for success in the AI-driven era is becoming increasingly narrow [14] - The article underscores the importance of survival in entrepreneurship, suggesting that maintaining operational viability is crucial for seizing future opportunities [14]

Group 1 - The selection of underwriters for Nasdaq IPOs is a critical decision that directly impacts the success rate, pricing rationality, and subsequent market performance of the IPO [2] - Nasdaq primarily caters to technology and innovation companies, making the underwriter's industry experience and specific knowledge of Nasdaq essential [2][3] - The underwriter's distribution capabilities and global network are crucial for reaching core investors and ensuring efficient stock allocation [2][3] Group 2 - Nasdaq's market is highly sensitive to valuation rationality, particularly for tech stocks, where valuations are often based on future cash flows rather than current profits [2][3] - The underwriter's research support is vital for attracting ongoing investor interest, especially from institutional investors who rely on broker research reports to assess company value [2][3] - The underwriter's experience with Nasdaq IPOs, particularly in the last three years, is important for understanding listing standards and market dynamics [3][4] Group 3 - The professional capabilities of the project team are key to the success of the IPO, with a focus on execution and responsiveness to the company's needs [4] - The reputation and compliance of the underwriter are critical for reducing regulatory and market risks, as Nasdaq has high disclosure and compliance requirements [4] - The fee structure of the underwriter must balance cost and service quality, with typical underwriting fees ranging from 5% to 7% of the raised capital [4] Group 4 - The core logic for selecting a Nasdaq IPO underwriter revolves around matching the company's industry attributes, development stage, and listing goals while considering both short-term execution efficiency and long-term value creation [4] - Underwriters should provide additional services that support the company's long-term growth, such as refinancing support and investor relations assistance [4]

Group 1 - The issuance of equity and mixed financial products has significantly increased in 2025, with over 300 products currently available in the market [1][5] - As of September 2025, wealth management companies have conducted over 2,100 surveys of A-share listed companies, with a focus on the ChiNext and STAR Market, accounting for nearly half of the total surveys [2][4] - The active engagement of wealth management companies in surveys reflects a strategic shift towards active management and equity investment, influenced by macroeconomic conditions and changing client demands [1][4] Group 2 - The number of equity and mixed financial products issued in 2025 reached 259, with a total scale of 727 billion yuan, surpassing the entire issuance scale of the previous year [5][6] - The focus on "hard technology" companies has emerged, with frequent surveys conducted on firms like Zhongkong Technology and Dongxin Co., indicating a trend towards sectors with strong growth potential [4][6] - The current market environment shows a preference for "fixed income plus" products, as wealth management companies seek to meet client demand for higher risk-return profiles [5][6] Group 3 - The direct equity allocation scale for wealth management products dropped to a five-year low in the first half of 2025, while indirect allocation through funds reached a five-year high [6][7] - The issuance of mixed and "fixed income plus" products has significantly increased since August 2025, with expectations that total equity allocation will exceed 100 billion yuan in the latter half of the year [7] - The construction of equity investment capabilities within wealth management companies is deemed crucial for meeting the increasing client demand for equity investments as market conditions improve [7]