[Table_ReportInfo] 2025 年 12 月 08 日 证券研究报告•固定收益定期报告 债券 ETF 周度跟踪（12.1-12.5） 信用债类 ETF 增量几何？——基于销售新规的影响 摘要 西南证券研究院 [Table_Author] 分析师：杨杰峰 执业证号：S1250523060001 电话：18190773632 邮箱：yangjf@swsc.com.cn 分析师：叶昱宏 执业证号：S1250525070010 电话：18223492691 邮箱：yeyuh@swsc.com.cn 联系人：李茂怡 电话：15528164673 邮箱：limaoyi@swsc.com.cn 相关研究 请务必阅读正文后的重要声明部分 S 债券 ETF 有望承接新规下的机构资金迁移。若公募销售新规按征求意见稿落 地，对机构投资者，特别是理财产品和银行自营而言，把传统债基作为流动性 管理工具的性价比将大幅削弱，债券 ETF 有望承接新规下的机构资金迁移。 本部分拟测算公募销售新规的实施可能为信用债类 ETF 带来的机构资金迁移 规模。整体思路可分为两步：1）界定可迁移资金的潜在规模。假定信用债类 ETF 主要 ...

Report Investment Rating No information provided regarding the industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints - The main issue in the bond market currently is the lack of incremental funds, but factors such as central bank's support for funds and weak growth momentum are beneficial to the bond market. The market should operate based on technical indicators, and currently, indicators like RSI are in the oversold range [2][15]. - The market may underestimate the long - term impact of real estate events. Despite high expectations for "strong stocks and weak bonds" in 2026, the bond market should adopt an "oversold buying, over - bought selling" strategy [19]. Summary by Related Content Bond Market Situation This Week - The bond market declined significantly this week. The participation of public funds and securities firms decreased, and funds have been net sellers of interest - rate bonds for 7 consecutive trading days, forming a strong resonance with securities firms on Wednesday and Thursday [2]. - News about the new fund redemption rules and emotional concerns about fund redemptions affected the market, causing significant declines on Wednesday [2]. Market Phenomena Observed - Futures led the decline in cash bonds, but the allocation power of cash bonds remained, with the entry of insurance funds increasing recently [6]. - Banks' buying power of cash bonds was weaker than in October, indicating that the overall scale of the central bank's bond - buying might be average [6]. - Funds were relatively stable. On Friday, the overnight DR001 for cross - month dropped to around 1.3%. The central bank's attitude towards funds was dovish, so cash bonds outperformed futures [6]. - Banks' behavior of increasing allocation, redeeming bond funds, selling OCI, and buying short - term bonds has been present since October, and the stage of large - scale redemptions this year may have passed [6]. Credit Bond ETF Situation - There were concerns about the redemption of credit - bond ETFs, but the overall scale of credit - bond ETFs did not decline significantly. However, there was structural differentiation among products [8]. - Among interest - rate products, ultra - long - term bond products had obvious capital outflows. As of November 28, 2025, interest - rate ETFs had a net outflow of 249 million yuan in a week [11]. - For credit - type ETFs, there was a net outflow of 535 million yuan in a week. Short - term financing, corporate bonds, and urban investment bonds had net inflows of 1.212 billion yuan, 111 million yuan, and an outflow of 10 million yuan respectively. Market - making credit bonds had a large - scale net outflow of 2.952 billion yuan, while science and technology innovation bonds had a net inflow of 1.104 billion yuan [11]. Impact of Real Estate Bond Credit Events - A new important real - estate bond credit event had little impact on the market. The trading impact was only about 10BP, and it was unlikely to cause a chain negative reaction [15]. - The event did not lead to interest - rate trading for monetary policy easing expectations. The market believed that the credit of real - estate enterprises was "market - based", and there might be no corresponding aggregate policy support [17]. - In the short term, it was reasonable for the market to have such a reaction, as real estate/house prices have been decoupling from various assets this year [17]. - However, the market may have underestimated the long - term impact of real - estate events. There is still significant pressure to stabilize growth in Q1 2026, but the market has a surprisingly consistent view on "strong stocks and weak bonds" in 2026 [19].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the given text. 2. Core View of the Report The bond ETF market is experiencing a recovery, with both trading volume and prices rising. The net inflow of funds into bond - type ETFs has accelerated, and the capital situation of local bond ETFs has significantly improved. The share inflows of interest - rate bond and credit - bond ETFs have marginally improved, while the share of local bond ETFs has shown a steep increase. The net values of major representative bond ETFs have continued to grow [2]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 1.1 各类债券 ETF 资金净流入情况 - The net inflow of funds into bond - type ETFs has accelerated. Last week, the net inflows of interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs were 4.489 billion yuan, 9.919 billion yuan, and - 1.692 billion yuan respectively, with a total net inflow of 12.717 billion yuan in the bond ETF market. The capital situation of local bond ETFs has significantly improved, with the net inflow scale increasing substantially last week. Specifically, the top three in terms of net inflow amount were Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF (+6.323 billion yuan), local bond - type ETFs (+3.087 billion yuan), and Short - term Financing Bond ETF (+2.003 billion yuan), and only the convertible - bond ETF had a negative net inflow of funds [2][5]. 3.2 1.2 各类债券 ETF 份额走势 - The share inflows of interest - rate bond and credit - bond ETFs have marginally improved, and the share of local bond ETFs has shown a steep increase. As of the close on October 31, 2025, the shares of treasury - bond, policy - financial - bond, local - bond, credit - bond, and convertible - bond ETFs changed by 8.38 million shares, 3.31 million shares, 26.99 million shares, 207.60 million shares, and - 124.20 million shares respectively compared to the previous week's close, with a total change of 122.08 million shares in bond - type ETFs [2][16]. 3.3 1.3 主要债券 ETF 份额及净值走势 - The share inflow of the Urban Investment Bond ETF has increased significantly. As of the close on October 31, 2025, the shares of the 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF, Policy Financial Bond ETF, 5 - year Local Bond ETF, Urban Investment Bond ETF, and Convertible Bond ETF changed by 6.24 million shares, 1.49 million shares, no change, 123.50 million shares, and - 146.80 million shares respectively compared to the previous week's close. - The net values of all representative targets have continued to grow. As of the close on October 31, 2025, the net values of the 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF, Policy Financial Bond ETF, 5 - year Local Bond ETF, Urban Investment Bond ETF, and Convertible Bond ETF changed by 1.21%, 0.46%, 0.22%, 0.19%, and 0.74% respectively compared to the previous week's close [2][21][24]. 3.4 1.4 基准做市信用债 ETF 份额及净值走势 - There was no significant change in the share, with only a small inflow. As of the close on October 31, 2025, the shares of the existing 8 credit - bond ETFs changed by no change, no change, 0.20 million shares, no change, no change, 0.20 million shares, 0.25 million shares, and 0.20 million shares respectively compared to the close on October 24, 2025. - The net values continued the upward trend. As of the close on October 31, 2025, the net values of the 8 credit - bond ETFs changed by 0.26%, 0.27%, 0.28%, 0.24%, 0.33%, 0.34%, 0.35%, and 0.34% respectively compared to the close on October 24, 2025 [2][28]. 3.5 1.5 科创债 ETF 份额及净值走势 - The shares of Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Tianhong and Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Taikang led the increase significantly. Among the existing 24 Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETFs, the top three products in terms of net share inflow last week were Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Tianhong, Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Taikang, and Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Invesco, with changes of 43.62 million shares, 22.14 million shares, and 1.70 million shares respectively compared to the close on October 24, 2025. - The net values have increased for multiple consecutive weeks. The top three Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETFs in terms of net - value increase last week were Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Tianhong, Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Boshi, and Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Fuguo, with increases of 0.33%, 0.32%, and 0.32% respectively [2][32][35]. 3.6 1.6 单只债券 ETF 市场表现情况 - The net - value increase of ultra - long - term Treasury Bond ETF led again, and the scales of 0 - 4 Local Bond ETF and Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Tianhong led the growth significantly. Last week, the net - value increases of 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF Boshi and 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF continued to lead, at 1.38% and 1.27% respectively. - In terms of premium/discount rates, 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF, 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF Boshi, and Urban Investment Bond ETF led in terms of premium rates. In terms of scale change, the top three in terms of net inflow amount were Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Tianhong (+4.463 billion yuan), 0 - 4 Local Bond ETF (+3.029 billion yuan), and Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF Taikang (+2.199 billion yuan). The convertible - bond ETF had a significantly higher net outflow amount than other products last week, at - 1.979 billion yuan, indicating that funds were still withdrawing [2][37].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information provided regarding the report industry investment rating in the given content. 2. Core View of the Report The bond ETF market has experienced the largest redemption wave this year, with all bond - related ETFs showing net outflows. The net outflows of treasury - bond ETFs and sci - tech bond ETFs reached new highs this week. Only corporate bond ETFs and urban investment bond ETFs had small net inflows. Different types of bond ETFs presented various trends in share and net value changes [4][7]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Various Bond ETF Fund Inflow Situations - Bond - related ETFs had net outflows across the board. Last week, the net inflows of interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs were - 49.60 billion yuan, - 74.56 billion yuan, and - 9.41 billion yuan respectively, with a total net inflow of - 133.57 billion yuan in the bond ETF market. As of October 17, 2025, the bond ETF fund scale was 6778.33 billion yuan, down 2.00% from the previous week's close, up 277.05% from the beginning of the year, and accounting for 12.27% of the total market ETF scale, a 43 - basis - point decrease from the previous weekend [4][7]. - Treasury - bond ETFs and sci - tech bond ETFs had record - high weekly net outflows. Only corporate bond ETFs (+1.09 billion yuan) and urban investment bond ETFs (+1.89 billion yuan) had small net inflows last week, while the net inflows of other types of bond ETFs were negative. The net outflows of sci - tech bond ETFs and treasury - bond ETFs were relatively large, at - 49.52 billion yuan and - 48.59 billion yuan respectively, both reaching new highs in weekly net outflows since the beginning of 2024 [7]. 3.2 Various Bond ETF Share Trends - The shares of treasury - bond, credit - bond, and convertible - bond ETFs had significant outflows. As of the close on October 17, 2025, the shares of treasury - bond, policy - financial - bond, local - bond, credit - bond, and convertible - bond ETFs changed by - 45.47 million shares, - 0.93 million shares, no change, - 55.97 million shares, and - 71.20 million shares respectively compared to the close on October 10, 2025, with a total change of - 173.57 million shares for bond - related ETFs [20]. 3.3 Main Bond ETF Share and Net Value Trends - Among the representative products, only the urban investment bond ETF had positive share growth. As of the close on October 17, 2025, the shares of 30 - year treasury - bond ETF, policy - financial - bond ETF, 5 - year local - bond ETF, urban investment bond ETF, and convertible - bond ETF changed by - 5.33 million shares, - 0.46 million shares, no change, 18.60 million shares, and - 51.70 million shares respectively compared to the close on October 10, 2025 [24]. - The net values continued to rise, except for the convertible - bond ETF. As of the close on October 17, 2025, the net values of 30 - year treasury - bond ETF, policy - financial - bond ETF, 5 - year local - bond ETF, urban investment bond ETF, and convertible - bond ETF changed by 1.47%, 0.37%, 0.16%, 0.10%, and - 2.26% respectively compared to the close on October 10, 2025 [28]. 3.4 Benchmark Market - Making Credit - Bond ETF Share and Net Value Trends - The shares had an overall outflow. As of the close on October 17, 2025, the shares of 8 existing credit - bond ETFs changed by no change, - 2.00 million shares, - 1.80 million shares, 0.01 million shares, no change, 0.10 million shares, - 2.90 million shares, and - 1.80 million shares respectively compared to the close on October 10, 2025 [31]. - The net values continued the upward trend. As of the close on October 17, 2025, the net values of 8 credit - bond ETFs changed by 0.12%, 0.12%, 0.12%, 0.12%, 0.12%, 0.13%, 0.16%, and 0.13% respectively compared to the close on October 10, 2025 [34]. 3.5 Sci - Tech Bond ETF Share and Net Value Trends - The shares generally had outflows. Among the 24 existing sci - tech bond ETFs, the top three in terms of share size were Sci - Tech Bond ETF Harvest, Sci - Tech Bond ETF Penghua, and Sci - Tech Bond ETF China Merchants. The top three products in terms of share net inflow last week were Sci - Tech Bond ETF E Fund, Sci - Tech Bond ETF Penghua, and Sci - Tech Bond ETF Taikang, with changes of 0.30 million shares, 0.30 million shares, and 0.04 million shares respectively compared to the close on October 10, 2025 [37]. - The net values generally increased. The top three sci - tech bond ETFs in terms of net - value increase last week were Sci - Tech Bond ETF Dacheng, Sci - Tech Bond ETF Harvest, and Sci - Tech Bond ETF Huaxia, with increases of 0.16%, 0.15%, and 0.14% respectively [38]. 3.6 Single Bond ETF Market Performance - The net values of long - term interest - rate bond ETFs rebounded, and only the net values of convertible - bond ETFs declined. Last week, the net - value increases of 30 - year treasury - bond ETF and 30 - year treasury - bond ETF Boshi led, while only the net values of convertible - bond ETF and Shanghai - Stock - Exchange Convertible - Bond ETF adjusted downward, expected to be affected by the decline of the equity market in the second half of the week [40]. - In terms of premium/discount rates, the benchmark market - making credit - bond ETFs and sci - tech bond ETFs had significantly higher discounts than other products. Credit - Bond ETF Boshi, Sci - Tech Bond ETF Invesco, and Corporate Bond ETF E Fund had the highest discount rates [40]. - In terms of scale changes, urban investment bond ETFs and corporate bond ETFs had positive net inflows, while short - term financing ETFs, Treasury - Bond ETF Dongcai, and 30 - year Treasury - Bond ETF Boshi had the largest net outflows last week [40].

Overall Summary Report's Core View - During the period from September 29 to October 10, 2025, there was a divergence in funds flowing into bond ETFs, with credit - bond ETFs being favored by funds. The net inflow of funds into interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs was - 569 million yuan, 9.619 billion yuan, and - 2.452 billion yuan respectively, and the total net inflow of the bond ETF market was 6.598 billion yuan. The market preferred science - innovation bond ETFs and short - term financing ETFs [3][6]. 1.1 Various Bond ETFs' Net Inflow of Funds - There was a divergence in funds flowing into bond ETFs, with credit - bond ETFs being favored. The net inflow of funds into interest - rate bond ETFs, credit - bond ETFs, and convertible - bond ETFs was - 569 million yuan, 9.619 billion yuan, and - 2.452 billion yuan respectively. The bond ETF market had a total net inflow of 6.598 billion yuan, with a cumulative net inflow of - 2.967 billion yuan this month and 417.82 billion yuan this year. As of October 10, 2025, the bond ETF fund scale was 69.1673 billion yuan, up 1.06% from September 26, 2025, and up 284.75% from the beginning of the year, accounting for 12.70% of the total market ETF scale, a 19bp increase from September 26 [6]. - The market preferred science - innovation bond ETFs and short - term financing ETFs. The net inflow of funds into science - innovation bond ETFs and short - term financing ETFs last week was + 5.013 billion yuan and + 4.528 billion yuan respectively, leading significantly. The net inflow of funds into convertible - bond ETFs, policy - financial bond ETFs, and treasury - bond ETFs was negative, at - 2.452 billion yuan, - 491 million yuan, and - 78 million yuan respectively [6]. 1.2 Various Bond ETFs' Share Trends - Convertible - bond ETFs had a significant outflow of shares. As of the close on October 10, 2025, the shares of treasury - bond, policy - financial bond, local - bond, credit - bond, and convertible - bond ETFs were 684.67 million shares, 438.69 million shares, 80.18 million shares, 6.97434 billion shares, and 5.10215 billion shares respectively. Compared with the close on September 26, 2025, they changed by - 0.04 million shares, - 4.28 million shares, no change, 91.41 million shares, and - 208 million shares respectively, with a total change of - 120.91 million shares for bond - type ETFs [17]. 1.3 Main Bond ETFs' Share and Net Value Trends - Long - term interest - rate bond ETFs and convertible - bond ETFs had a net outflow of shares. As of the close on October 10, 2025, the shares of 30 - year treasury - bond ETF, policy - financial bond ETF, 5 - year local - bond ETF, urban investment bond ETF, and convertible - bond ETF changed by - 2.99 million shares, - 4.56 million shares, no change, no change, and - 107.80 million shares respectively compared with the close on September 26, 2025 [24]. - After the holiday, both stocks and bonds performed well, and the net values generally rebounded. As of the close on October 10, 2025, the net values of 30 - year treasury - bond ETF, policy - financial bond ETF, 5 - year local - bond ETF, urban investment bond ETF, and convertible - bond ETF changed by - 0.38%, 0.11%, 0.11%, 0.06%, and 1.56% respectively compared with the close on September 26, 2025 [28]. 1.4 Benchmark Market - Making Credit - Bond ETFs' Share and Net Value Trends - There was no significant change in shares. As of the close on October 10, 2025, among the 8 existing benchmark market - making credit - bond ETFs, the shares of most products had no change, and only a few had minor increases [31]. - The net values generally rebounded significantly. As of the close on October 10, 2025, the net values of the 8 credit - bond ETFs changed by 0.12% - 0.18% compared with the close on September 26, 2025 [32]. 1.5 Science - Innovation Bond ETFs' Share and Net Value Trends - The shares generally increased, with individual performance varying. Among the 24 existing science - innovation bond ETFs, the top three in terms of share inflow were GF Science - Innovation Bond ETF, Harvest Science - Innovation Bond ETF, and Dacheng Science - Innovation Bond ETF, with changes of 11.7 million shares, 10.0 million shares, and 8.0 million shares respectively compared with the close on September 26, 2025 [37]. - The net values generally increased, and the second - batch products generally had higher net values. This period saw a general increase in the net values of science - innovation bond ETFs, and the top three in terms of increase were Southern Science - Innovation Bond ETF, Harvest Science - Innovation Bond ETF, and GF Science - Innovation Bond ETF [38]. 1.6 Single Bond ETFs' Market Performance - Only the net values of ultra - long - term interest - rate bond ETFs declined. This period saw a general increase in net values, with convertible - bond ETFs leading the increase. Only the net values of 30 - year treasury - bond ETF and Boshi 30 - year treasury - bond ETF declined by - 0.4% and - 0.6% respectively [40]. - In terms of premium/discount rates, Boshi Credit - Bond ETF, E Fund Corporate Bond ETF, and Credit - Bond ETF Fund had relatively high discount rates. In terms of scale changes, the short - term financing ETF had a significantly leading net inflow this period, followed by GF Science - Innovation Bond ETF and Harvest Science - Innovation Bond ETF [40].

Group 1 - The overall revenue and profit growth of state-owned banks improved in 1H25, mainly driven by a significant increase in other non-interest income and cost release. Additionally, market interest rates and deposit rates declined, stabilizing the interest margin, leading to a marginal increase in net interest income growth [2][3]. - The asset quality of state-owned banks is relatively strong, with non-performing loan (NPL) ratios and attention rates remaining low and either stable or decreasing. The provision coverage ratio increased, enhancing the safety margin, and the capital adequacy ratio also improved, strengthening the risk resistance capability of these banks [2][4]. - Investment recommendations suggest a shift in the operating model and investment logic of bank stocks from "pro-cyclical" to "weak cycle." During periods of economic stagnation, high dividend yields from bank stocks will remain attractive, and the report continues to favor the stability and sustainability of bank stocks [2][5]. Group 2 - In terms of revenue, the year-on-year growth for 1H25 was +1.5%, with a turnaround from negative to positive growth compared to 1Q25. The net profit saw a slight decline of -0.1% year-on-year, but the decline narrowed compared to the previous quarter. The increase in revenue was largely attributed to the growth in non-interest income, particularly from the stock market [3][7]. - The asset quality analysis indicates that the overall NPL ratio remained stable at 1.27% in 1H25, with a slight decrease in the attention loan ratio. The overdue loan ratio increased slightly but remains low, and the provision coverage ratio rose to 237.50%, further enhancing the safety margin [4][9]. - The report highlights that the cost-to-income ratio for 1H25 was 29.3%, showing a year-on-year decrease, while the core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio improved to 12.67%, maintaining a high level of capital strength [4][10].

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints of the Report - The bond market lacks its own driving factors this year, with its fluctuations mainly influenced by external factors. The "endogenous" fluctuations of the bond market are converging, and it's difficult to change the "meager fluctuations" of this year's bond market. In the second half of the year, the bond market is expected to have narrow - range oscillations each month, and neither excessive short - nor long - positions are advisable [5][10][35] Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. 6 - month Bond Market's Expected "Old Script" - Since June, interest rates have been consolidating and oscillating, and fund durations have gradually increased, anticipating a downward trend in interest rates in July. The market was skeptical about the economic outlook despite good Q2 GDP data, expecting a neutral tone from the July Politburo meeting. As a result, in early July, the overall fund duration increased, and there was an expansion of credit - bond ETFs. In June, the net inflow of market - making credit - bond ETFs was 6.3314 billion yuan, a 146% increase from May. In mid - July, the Sci - tech Innovation Bond ETF took over the market, with an average duration of about 4.3 years and 3.9 years for the tracked indices [13] 2. New Developments in the Equity and Commodity Markets - Starting from June, the commodity and equity markets showed a completely opposite trend to the bond market, entering a trading mode with rapidly increasing risk appetite. Commodity prices rebounded from lows and then rose across the board, fully recovering the gap caused by the April tariff shock by July 22. The equity market reached new highs and continued to rise, spreading from bank dividends to low - valuation sectors in the technology sector and then to the cyclical sector. The bond market's expected scenario did not occur, and it started to adjust rapidly on July 21 [4] 3. Bond Market's Rise and Fall Driven by External Factors - The bond market has been in a narrow - range technical oscillation, with interest rates fluctuating around the central level by about 10 BP. Two major factors causing significant adjustments in the bond market are external: the unexpected escalation of trade frictions in April led to a sharp decline in bond interest rates, with the 10Y Treasury bond rate dropping from over 1.8% to 1.61% on April 7; the resonance of the equity and commodity markets in late July led to an accelerated upward movement of the 10Y interest rate, breaking through 1.70% [5][21] 4. The "Positive and Negative" Sides of the Convergence of Bond Market's Endogenous Fluctuations - On one hand, the yields of bond - based funds have declined, and the expected returns of bond - related assets need adjustment. As of August 1, the performance of pure - bond funds this year has been weaker than in 2024. On the other hand, the market's attention to bonds has significantly decreased. The trading volume of Treasury bond futures has not changed significantly, while the trading volume of coking coal contracts has increased. The "asset shortage" narrative in the bond market is also weakening, as insurance premium growth has slowed, rural commercial banks' trading volume has decreased, and the buying power of wealth management products for long - term bonds has weakened [24][25][26] 5. Main Themes in the Second Half of the Year - The market needs to find factors beyond the "stock - bond seesaw" effect. When the equity market stabilizes above 3500 points, it's necessary to consider the factors jointly influencing the stock and bond markets. The expectations, verifications, and adjustments of "anti - involution" will continue, and the market's understanding will change. The underestimated overseas and tariff factors may resurface. The most important factor for the bond market may be its own asset - liability changes. If the average annualized returns of bond funds and wealth management products are less than 1.5% by the end of the year, there may be a shift of deposits to riskier assets [8][30][33]