——这个消息是北美东部时间9月30日，美国贸易代表格里尔（Jamieson Greer）在参加纽约经济俱乐部 （the Economic Club of New York）时发言的内容，有许多现场目击者，所以消息内容本身是可靠的， 关键是这些消息所包含的美国政府和特朗普（Donald Trump）真正用意是什么。 格里尔原话是"如果你去问总统'我们和中国达成协议了么'，他会说'是的，这就是我们的协议。我们对 中国征收55%关税，这就是协议内容。'所以这就是一个良好的现状'，此外他还说了一些希望能够继续 与中方官员进行定期磋商，努力实现更加平衡的贸易关系，双方都能扩大"非敏感商品"的贸易，比如美 国的农产品和中国的消费品等诸如此类的话。 消息称美国不准备降低对华关税税率，是否可靠？ 很显然，美方试图将原本无端提出的20%"芬太尼关税"常态化和固定化，借以长期维持比中方对美产品 关税率低20%的美方对华关税率，同时继续维持在对华进出口、技术封锁等方面长期以来的双标。而中 方博弈的关键，则是力图在继打破"特朗普第三原则"之后，再打破其第一、第二原则，即破解其"极限 施压"和"漫天要价，就地还钱"的手法。 具体到策略 ...

近年来，美方以"国家安全"为名，对中国企业实施了一系列单边主义和保护主义措施。这些措施包括将 大量中国实体列入出口管制"实体清单"，限制中国高科技产品对美出口，以及阻碍中国企业在美正常投 资运营。美方一些人还滥用"长臂管辖"手段，对中国企业施加不当压力。例如，在TikTok问题上，近年 来美方一些人采取的措施超出了合理范围，将正常的商业活动政治化。这些做法不仅违反了世贸组织规 则和国际经贸秩序，也严重损害了全球产业链供应链的稳定。半导体产业作为高度专业化和国际化的行 业，中美企业间原本存在密切合作，美方的限制措施打破了这种合作生态，最终也会损害美国企业自身 的利益。 经济日报消息，上周，中美两国元首在9月19日晚的通话，再次为两国经贸关系发展提供了战略指引。 这是今年以来两国元首的第三次直接沟通，反映出双方对管理世界上最重要双边关系的持续重视。通话 传递出中方对稳定中美经贸关系的明确期望，即美方应为中国企业到美国投资提供开放、公平、非歧视 的营商环境。这一要求的提出基于对中美经贸优势互补、互利共赢本质的深刻认识，稳定中美经贸关系 离不开良好的营商环境。 中美建交40多年来，双边贸易额增长了270多倍，2024 ...

Group 1 - The core issue is the increasing economic pressure on India due to the U.S. government's imposition of punitive tariffs on Indian goods, which has severely impacted India's export trade and manufacturing sector [1][3]. - The U.S. tariffs have led to a significant reduction in export orders from India, causing a decline in business confidence, particularly affecting small and medium-sized enterprises that are less resilient to such shocks [3][5]. - Modi's government faces a dilemma in balancing relations between the U.S. and China, as India's manufacturing heavily relies on Chinese raw materials while simultaneously trying to appease U.S. demands [5][9]. Group 2 - The U.S. is using diplomatic channels to pressure India, urging it to take sides in the geopolitical rivalry, which undermines India's strategic autonomy [5]. - India's attempts to deepen cooperation with the U.S. to reduce dependence on China have not been successful, leading to a worsening export situation and increased trade pressures from the U.S. [5][9]. - The structural economic challenges faced by India are exacerbated by the U.S. tariffs, which disrupt India's plans to enhance its supply chain through Chinese manufacturing [9].

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the historical significance of the Chinese people's sacrifices during the Anti-Japanese War and the importance of unity in achieving victory against invaders, which is seen as a turning point for China [2] - It highlights the long-standing relationship between Sri Lanka and China, marked by mutual support during difficult times, such as the signing of the Rubber-Rice Agreement in 1952, which played a crucial role in the social and economic development of both countries [3] - The rapid development of China is referred to as a "China miracle," showcasing its ability to produce millions of electric vehicles and high-tech products, benefiting not only its own people but also the world [3] Group 2 - The article calls for international cooperation to address global challenges, emphasizing China's commitment to building a community with a shared future for mankind and its role in assisting developing countries, including Sri Lanka [3][4] - It stresses the importance of remembering history to maintain peace and encourages the younger generation in Sri Lanka to inherit the friendship with China and promote peace [5]

Group 1 - The shift in China's economy towards services is seen as a strategic response to tariffs impacting manufacturing and exports, as services provide a greater jobs multiplier effect [1] - The US has a significant trade deficit in goods but maintains a strong trade surplus in services, indicating a potential loss of competitiveness in services due to tariffs on goods [2] - China is diversifying its exports beyond low-value manufactured goods to include high-tech products, talent, capital, culture, and food, which helps mitigate tariff impacts [4][5] Group 2 - China's exposure to US domestic demand is relatively small, allowing for effective diversification and strengthening in the services sector, as evidenced by Singapore's services sector contributing over 70% to its GDP [6] - The services sector is closely linked to the manufacturing sector, where a downturn in manufacturing can still affect services, albeit to a lesser extent [7]

Group 1 - The ruling against the tariff policy has severely undermined Trump's political standing, with the former president claiming it will "destroy the American economy" if upheld [1] - The EU has made significant concessions, agreeing to a 15% tariff and a commitment to purchase $750 billion worth of U.S. energy products by 2028, yet the U.S. threatens to raise tariffs to 35% if investment commitments are not met [1] - The EU's internal dissatisfaction is growing, with officials criticizing U.S. tariff policies and calling for broader international trade alliances, indicating a potential backlash against Trump's trade strategy [2] Group 2 - India's government has adopted a strong stance against U.S. tariff threats, indicating a shift towards a "multilateral alliance" strategy and ignoring Trump's accusations [4] - Brazil's response to U.S. tariffs has been to seek international support against perceived trade bullying, with plans to address U.S. tariff policies at the upcoming BRICS summit [6] - The aggressive tariff policies are prompting BRICS nations to strengthen internal coordination, raising concerns about the erosion of U.S. dominance in the global economic system [6] Group 3 - The U.S.-China trade relationship remains strained, with unresolved issues regarding agricultural exports, particularly soybeans, stemming from Trump's failed tariff policies [7] - Trump's approach to trade policy reflects a gambler's mentality, prioritizing short-term gains over potential long-term economic consequences, which could lead to a fiscal crisis if the Supreme Court rules against him [9] - The focus of the Supreme Court's review is on presidential authority rather than economic benefits, highlighting the precarious position of Trump's tariff agreements and the potential loss of international credibility [9]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of the historical ties between Russia and China, highlighting their commitment to mutual cooperation and prosperity, especially in the context of commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in World War II [1][2][3]. Bilateral Relations - President Putin noted the successful visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping to Russia in May, which resulted in a detailed joint statement and a series of bilateral agreements, symbolizing a strategic choice to strengthen friendly relations and cooperation [1][2]. - The economic relationship between Russia and China has reached unprecedented levels, with trade volume increasing by approximately $100 billion since 2021, making China Russia's largest trading partner [3][4]. Historical Context - Putin emphasized the sacrifices made by both nations during World War II, stating that the Soviet Union and China suffered the highest casualties and played a crucial role in defeating fascism [2][3]. - He acknowledged China's resistance against Japanese aggression as a decisive factor that allowed the Soviet Union to focus on defeating Nazi Germany [2]. Economic Cooperation - The article highlights the ongoing efforts to reduce trade barriers and expand bilateral trade, particularly in the export of agricultural products, including pork and beef from Russia to China [3][4]. - Russia is a key market for Chinese automotive exports, and both countries are collaborating on high-tech production facilities and infrastructure projects [3][4]. Cultural and Human Exchange - Cultural exchanges between Russia and China are thriving, with over 100 large projects outlined in the "Roadmap for Cultural Cooperation by 2030" [4]. - The number of Chinese students studying in Russia exceeds 51,000, while around 21,000 Russian students are in China, indicating strong educational ties [4]. Multilateral Cooperation - Putin expressed optimism about the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) under China's presidency, aiming to enhance its role in addressing current global challenges and promoting a multipolar world order [5][6]. - The collaboration between Russia and China within multilateral frameworks, such as the G20 and BRICS, is seen as a significant factor in promoting economic development and addressing international issues [6][7]. Financial System Reform - Both nations support reforms in international financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank, advocating for a fair and open financial system that reflects the actual status of member countries in the global economy [7].

Group 1 - The Canadian government has decided to compromise by adjusting previously imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, canceling most tariffs while temporarily retaining tariffs on automobiles, steel, and aluminum [1] - Canada was the only developed country to directly confront the U.S. since the new trade agreement pushed by Trump, imposing a 35% tariff on U.S. goods starting August 1, 2018, significantly higher than the 15% tariffs imposed by other developed nations [1][2] - The economic pressure from the U.S. has forced Canada to reconsider its stance, as its economy is closely tied to the U.S., necessitating a balance of internal interests [2] Group 2 - Trump's long-term plan may involve integrating Canada into the U.S. political system, with a probability exceeding 60% that Canada could become a U.S. state by the end of 2028 [4] - The U.S. aims to strengthen economic ties with Mexico while also seeking to consolidate its influence over South American countries like Brazil and Argentina [4]

Core Viewpoint - The construction of a modern industrial system with Zhejiang characteristics is crucial for addressing new growth challenges and achieving high-quality development in the region [1] Group 1: Industrial Development - Zhejiang aims to leverage its geographical advantages and focus on the real economy as the foundation for building a modern industrial system [1] - The emphasis is on deepening the integration of traditional industries with emerging sectors, particularly in the low-altitude economy, which is identified as a significant new industry with substantial market potential [1] Group 2: Government Initiatives - The provincial government is encouraged to enhance policy support and service guarantees for the low-altitude economy, including the development of an innovative industrial chain [1] - There is a call for tailored strategies for different industries to elevate the capabilities of emerging industrial clusters and foster new benchmark enterprises [1]

Group 1 - Vietnam is proactively adjusting its import-export structure to maintain trade balance in response to the 20% tariffs imposed by the US on certain Vietnamese exports [1] - The Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam emphasizes the intention to avoid a significant trade surplus with any partner, including the US, by increasing imports of high-value-added goods such as pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, high-tech products, and agricultural products [1] - In the first half of 2025, imports from the US of pharmaceuticals increased by 18% year-on-year, while cotton and clothing raw materials grew nearly 25%, indicating a strategic expansion of supply channels from the US [1] Group 2 - The textile and garment industry in Vietnam is also increasing imports of cotton, chemicals, and accessories from the US to enhance localization and product traceability [2] - Economic experts highlight the importance of maintaining the US as Vietnam's largest export market, viewing the tariffs as both a challenge and an opportunity for Vietnam to enhance its value chain and responsible trade partner image [2] - The Ministry of Industry and Trade plans to diversify export markets and negotiate new free trade agreements with various regions, while also focusing on combating origin fraud and promoting international cooperation in new fields such as energy transition and innovation [2]