獨立非執行董事 執行董事 史玉柱 溫秋菊 王曉永（副董事長、行長） 1 中國民生銀行股份有限公司 CHINA MINSHENG BANKING CORP., LTD. （在中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） （股份代號：01988） 董事名單與其角色和職能 中國民生銀行股份有限公司（「本公司」）董事會（「董事會」）成員載列如下。 | 非執行董事 | 獨立非執行董事 | 執行董事 | | --- | --- | --- | | 劉永好（副董事長） | 曲新久 | 高迎欣（董事長） | | 史玉柱 | 溫秋菊 | 王曉永（副董事長、行長） | | 宋春風 | 宋煥政 | 張俊潼 | | 趙鵬 | 楊志威 | | | 梁鑫傑 | 程鳳朝 | | | 林立 | 劉寒星 | | | 鄭海陽 | | | C：有關董事委員會主席 M：有關董事委員會委員 中國，北京，2025年11月10日 2 董事會設立6個委員會。下表提供各董事會成員在這些委員會中所擔任的職位。 | | 董事委員會 | 戰略發展與 | 提名 | 薪酬與 | 風險管理 | 審計 | 關聯交易 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- ...

（在中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） （股份代號：01988） 關於非執行董事任職資格核准的公告 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚 賴該等內容而引致之任何損失承擔任何責任。 中國民生銀行股份有限公司 CHINA MINSHENG BANKING CORP., LTD. 承董事會命 中國民生銀行股份有限公司 董事長 高迎欣 中國，北京 2025年11月10日 於本公告日期，本行執行董事為高迎欣先生、王曉永先生及張俊潼先生；非執行 董事為劉永好先生、史玉柱先生、宋春風先生、趙鵬先生、梁鑫傑先生、林立先 生及鄭海陽先生；獨立非執行董事為曲新久先生、溫秋菊女士、宋煥政先生、楊 志威先生、程鳳朝先生及劉寒星先生。 中國民生銀行股份有限公司（「本行」）於2025年11月7日收到《國家金融監督管理 總局關於鄭海陽民生銀行董事任職資格的批覆》（金覆[2025]633號）。國家金融監 督管理總局已核准鄭海陽先生擔任本行董事的任職資格，鄭海陽先生自2025年11 月6日起就任本行非執行董事及 ...

证券简称：民生银行 A 股代码：600016 优先股简称：民生优 1 优先股代码：360037 编号：2025-043 中国民生银行股份有限公司 关于董事任职资格获国家金融监督管理总局核准 的公告 本行董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或 者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 中国民生银行股份有限公司（以下简称"本行"）于 2025 年 11 月 7 日收到《国 家金融监督管理总局关于郑海阳民生银行董事任职资格的批复》（金复〔2025〕633 号）。国家金融监督管理总局已核准郑海阳先生担任本行董事的任职资格。 2025 年 11 月 10 日 特此公告 中国民生银行股份有限公司董事会 根据监管规定、本行 2024 年年度股东会会议《关于选举郑海阳先生为本行非执 行董事的决议》及本行第九届董事会第十六次会议《关于调整本行第九届董事会部分 专门委员会成员的决议》，郑海阳先生自任职资格核准之日起就任本行第九届董事会 董事，并担任风险管理委员会委员。郑海阳先生的简历请见本行刊载于《中国证券报》 《上海证券报》《证券时报》、上海证券交易所网站（www.sse.com.c ...

Core Insights - The banking sector saw a 0.5% increase on November 10, with CITIC Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4018.6, up 0.53%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13427.61, up 0.18% [1] Banking Sector Performance - CITIC Bank (601998) closed at 8.23, up 1.48% with a trading volume of 479,600 shares and a transaction value of 392 million [1] - Other notable banks included: - Everbright Bank (601818) at 3.49, up 1.16%, with a transaction value of 1 billion [1] - Huaxia Bank (600015) at 6.99, up 0.72%, with a transaction value of 430 million [1] - Ping An Bank (000001) at 11.63, up 0.69%, with a transaction value of 958 million [1] - China Merchants Bank (600036) at 42.72, up 0.49%, with a transaction value of 2.27 billion [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The banking sector experienced a net inflow of 371 million from main funds, while retail and speculative funds saw net outflows of 131 million and 240 million, respectively [1] - Detailed capital flow for major banks included: - China Merchants Bank: Main funds net inflow of 29 million, speculative funds net outflow of 1.47 billion, retail funds net outflow of 1.43 billion [2] - Ping An Bank: Main funds net inflow of 92 million, speculative funds net outflow of 70 million, retail funds net outflow of 21 million [2] - CITIC Bank: Main funds net inflow of 73 million, speculative funds net outflow of 39 million, retail funds net outflow of 34 million [2]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between various bank wealth management products, which often have similar names and vague characteristics, to help investors make informed choices [1] - The South Finance Wealth Management team compiles a weekly performance ranking of wealth management products available through different distribution channels, focusing on those with the best performance [1] Product Performance Summary - The report categorizes products based on minimum holding periods of 90 days, 180 days, and 365 days, calculating annualized returns for each category [1] - A total of 28 distribution institutions are involved in the ranking, including major banks such as Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Bank of China, and Agricultural Bank of China [1] - The ranking is based on the assumption of the product's "on-sale" status, but actual availability may vary due to factors like sold-out quotas or differences in product listings for different customers [1] 90-Day Holding Period Products - The top-performing product for a 90-day holding period is from Hangzhou Bank, with an annualized return of 22.75% [4] - Other notable products include those from Minsheng Bank and Huaxia Bank, with returns of 10.21% and 10.08%, respectively [5] 180-Day Holding Period Products - For the 180-day holding period, Hangzhou Bank's product leads with a return of 14.04% [7] - Minsheng Bank also features prominently with products yielding 12.26% and 10.26% [7] 365-Day Holding Period Products - The report indicates that products with a 365-day holding period are also being evaluated, with specific performance data yet to be detailed in the provided excerpts [9]

Core Insights - The report highlights the significant growth and development of inclusive finance in China, particularly focusing on small and micro enterprises and rural areas, with a notable annual growth rate of over 20% in inclusive micro loans during the 14th Five-Year Plan period [1][2] - As of June 2025, the balance of inclusive micro loans reached 36 trillion yuan, which is 2.3 times that of the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan, with a decrease in interest rates by 2 percentage points [1][2] - The average interest rate for newly issued inclusive micro loans was 3.48% as of June 2025, reflecting a decrease of 66 basis points year-on-year [1][2] Group 1: Digital Empowerment - Digital technology has been a key driver for the development of inclusive finance, with banks utilizing big data and AI to enhance loan approval efficiency and reduce financing costs [2][7] - The market structure among banks is changing, with large commercial banks holding a 45.11% share of inclusive micro loans, while rural financial institutions have seen a decline in their market share [2][3] - The average growth rate of inclusive micro loans has been slowing down, with a decrease from 30.9% in 2020 to 12.3% by mid-2025 [2][3] Group 2: Performance of Listed Banks - Among listed banks, Agricultural Bank of China, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and Beijing Bank reported the highest growth rates in inclusive micro loans at 18.50%, 17.30%, and 17.27% respectively [3][4] - In contrast, some banks, including Shanghai Bank and Zhengzhou Bank, experienced negative growth rates of -3.97% and -2.06% [3][4] - The performance of different banks varies significantly, with state-owned banks generally showing stronger growth in inclusive micro loans compared to smaller banks [3][4] Group 3: Interest Rates and Risk Management - The interest rates for newly issued inclusive micro loans have decreased across various banks, with the highest rate at 4.20% and the lowest at 2.94% [7][8] - The gap in interest rates between large and small banks is narrowing, with some large banks' rates aligning closely with those of smaller banks [8][9] - The report emphasizes the importance of risk management in the inclusive finance sector, with several banks focusing on improving asset quality and managing non-performing loans [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - The "Minsheng Bank Cup" inaugural basketball invitation tournament was successfully held in Shenyang, showcasing the collaboration between Minsheng Bank and the Liaoning Provincial Cultural and Tourism Group, highlighting the integration of sports and finance for future development [1][3][5] Group 1: Event Overview - The basketball invitation tournament took place from November 5 to 7, organized by Minsheng Bank Shenyang Branch and Liaoning Provincial Cultural and Tourism Group, with participation from various industries [1] - The event featured 10 teams and nearly 200 athletes, emphasizing teamwork and competitive spirit among participants [3] Group 2: Outcomes and Achievements - Northeast Electric Power team won the championship, while Liaoshui Group secured the runner-up position, and Liaoning Provincial Cultural and Tourism Group along with Gaoshuo Petrochemical shared the third place [3] - The tournament served as a platform for enhancing mutual understanding and laying the groundwork for future cooperation and development among participating organizations [3] Group 3: Future Directions - Minsheng Bank Shenyang Branch aims to explore new paths for the integration of finance and sports, enhancing financial services and contributing to the modernization efforts in Liaoning [5]

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Group 2: Report's Core View - In October, the net financing of certificates of deposit (CDs) turned positive, and there was a phenomenon where primary market price increases led to a slight rise in secondary market interest rates. The increase in CD supply pressure in October may be due to the decline in the NSFR of some joint - stock banks and preparations for the "good start" at the beginning of next year [3][7][19]. - The pressure on the NSFR of joint - stock banks may have decreased with the significant increase in their net CD financing. The probability of a significant increase in the overall supply pressure of bank CDs this year, which could lead to a situation similar to that in Q1 where primary market price increases drive a sharp rise in secondary market interest rates, is relatively limited [4][43][45]. - In the baseline scenario, the central range of DR001 in November may be similar to that in October, remaining between 1.3% - 1.4%. Further decline in funding rates may require a policy rate cut [4][50]. - The central bank's resumption of bond purchases reflects that the current fundamental environment still requires monetary easing support. The central bank's interest - rate cut cycle is not over, and it is only a matter of time before the interest - rate cut is implemented. It is expected that the CD interest rate will fluctuate between 1.55% - 1.65% this year [4][52][53]. Group 3: Summary by Related Catalogs I. Q3 CD Supply - Demand Environment was Favorable, and the Widening Spread with Funds may be Disturbed by the Rise in Short - Term Interest Rates - In 2025, CD interest rates first rose, then fell, and finally stabilized. After the interest - rate cut in May, the 1Y AAA - rated CD interest rate basically fluctuated within the range of 1.6% - 1.7% [7]. - From May to September, banks' liability pressure was relatively limited. Asset - side credit growth slowed down, and the liability - side funding was loose. The central bank increased medium - term liquidity injection, resulting in negative net CD financing [10]. - Since Q2, non - bank institutions' demand for CDs has remained high. The spread between CDs and funds has widened, which is related to the weakening of the central bank's "timely reserve - requirement ratio and interest - rate cut" statement and the rise in short - term policy - financial bond yields [12][14]. - CDs are more resilient than policy - financial bonds. In the current supply - demand environment, the 30BP spread between CDs and funds may be at the upper limit of the fluctuation range, and it may be difficult to break through the 1.7% high in September [18]. II. The Increase in the Net Financing of Joint - Stock Bank CDs in October may be Affected by the Decline in NSFR and Preparations for the "Good Start" - In October, the net financing of CDs turned positive again, especially for joint - stock banks. From the perspective of asset - liability matching, commercial banks may not have significant liability pressure [19][20]. - The view that banks increase CD issuance at the end of the year to preserve next year's issuance quota may not be the main reason for the increase in CD issuance scale [23]. - Although the central bank's monetary policy tools were tilted towards large - scale banks in Q3, from the overall asset - liability perspective, the liability gap of small and medium - sized banks was not significantly higher than that of large - scale banks [31][33]. - In Q3, the NSFR of large - scale banks improved, while that of joint - stock banks declined. The decline in the NSFR of some joint - stock banks may be an important reason for the increase in their CD issuance scale in October. Some banks with relatively stable NSFR indicators may also be preparing for the "good start" at the beginning of next year [35][36]. III. The Decline in the NSFR of Joint - Stock Banks may be Affected by Deposit Migration and Increased Bond Investment, but the Related Pressure may have Gradually Eased after October - The increase in the NSFR of large - scale banks is due to the decline in the growth rate of required stable funds and the increase in the growth rate of available stable funds, which is related to the change in deposit structure [38]. - For small and medium - sized banks, the growth rate of required stable funds increased, while the growth rate of available stable funds decreased. Deposit migration may have reduced their liability costs but also put pressure on their NSFR [40]. - With the significant increase in the net CD financing of joint - stock banks, the pressure on their NSFR may have decreased, which is reflected in the increase in their reverse - repurchase scale [43]. - It is expected that the net financing scale of government bonds in November will rise but still be lower than that in the first three quarters. The central bank's possible purchase of treasury bonds is beneficial to the alleviation of bank liability pressure and the improvement of NSFR [45]. IV. CD Interest Rates may Remain Volatile and Decline at the End of the Year, with a Slight Downward Shift in the Central Range - In October, the spreads between DR001, DR007, and OMO reached new lows, and the funding volatility remained low. The current funding relaxation is the central bank's response to the fundamental environment [46]. - DR001 still has 10BP of downward space, but even if the lower limit drops to 1.2%, its central range may not decline significantly, and the volatility may increase. In the baseline scenario, the central range of DR001 will remain between 1.3% - 1.4% [50]. - The central bank's resumption of bond purchases reflects the need for monetary easing. Although there is uncertainty about the timing of the interest - rate cut, it is expected that the CD interest rate will fluctuate between 1.55% - 1.65% this year [4][52][53].

Core Insights - The banking sector saw a slight increase of 0.42% on November 7, with CITIC Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3997.56, down 0.25%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13404.06, down 0.36% [1] Banking Sector Performance - CITIC Bank's closing price was 8.11, with a rise of 1.37% and a trading volume of 604,400 shares, amounting to a transaction value of 490 million [1] - Other notable banks included Zhejiang Commercial Bank at 3.09 (up 0.98%), China Merchants Bank at 42.51 (up 0.40%), and Ping An Bank at 11.55 (up 0.35%) [1] - The overall trading volume for the banking sector showed mixed results, with some banks experiencing slight increases while others remained flat or decreased [1] Fund Flow Analysis - The banking sector experienced a net outflow of 15.13 million from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 18.1 million [1] - Specific banks like China Merchants Bank had a net inflow of 17.9 million from institutional investors, while CITIC Bank faced a net outflow of 24.62 million from retail investors [2] - The overall trend indicates a divergence in fund flows, with institutional investors pulling back while retail investors are more active in the sector [2]

广发银行股份有限公司中山分行成立于1988年，曾用名为广东发展银行股份有限公司中山分行，是一家 以从事货币金融服务为主的企业。 整理：南都N视频记者 黄敬奎 来源：国家金融监督管理总局广东监管局官网 | 序 | 当事人名 | 行政处罚决定 | 主要违法违规行为 | 行政处罚 | 作出决定 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ap | 标 | 书文号 | | 内容 | 机关 | | | 厂发银行 | | | | | | 1 | 殷份有限 | | 意动资金贷款业务产 | 罚款154 | | | | 公司中山 | | 重违反审慎经营规则 | 万元 | | | | 分行 | | | | | | | 学 | | | | | | | (时任广 发银行股 | | | | | | 2 | 份有限公 | | 流动资金贷款业务产 | 警告 | | | | 司中山分 | | 重违反审慎经营规则 | | | | | 行港口支 | | | | | | | 行客户经 | | | | | | | 理) | | | | | | | 周■ (时 | | | | | | | 任广发银 | | | ...