諾 比 侃 人 工 智 能 科 技（ 成 都 ）股 份 有 限 公 司 （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） 香港交易及結算所有限公司、香港聯合交易所有限公司（「聯交所」）及香港中央結算有限公司 （「香港結算」）對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表 示概不就因本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因依賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責 任。 除非本公告另有界定，否則本公告所用詞彙與諾比侃人工智能科技（成都）股份有限公司（「本公 司」）日期為2025年12月15日的招股章程（「招股章程」）所界定者具有相同涵義。 本公告僅作說明用途，並不構成收購、購買或認購本公司證券的邀請或要約。本公告並非招股 章程。有意投資者於決定是否投資發售股份前應細閱招股章程，以獲得有關本公司及全球發售 的詳細資料。任何有關全球發售的投資決定應以招股章程所載資料為唯一依據。 本公告不得直接或間接於或向美國（包括其領土及屬地、美國任何州以及哥倫比亞特區）或法律 禁止有關派發的任何其他司法權區發佈、刊發、派發。本公告並不構成證券的任何出售要約或 招攬買入、購買或認購的要約或其組成部分，亦不得在美國境內或有關要 ...

革故鼎新，鉴证不凡！ 2025年12月18日，"2025年度资本市场卓越执业英才盛典"活动在苏州隆重举办，2025资本市场"卓越执 业英才"全名单揭晓，共212位大咖、36个团队和机构、18只债券类产品获殊荣！ 完整名单如下： 年度卓越保荐代表人 卓越执业英才 C 全景 Q 全景投 教基地 2025年度资本市场卓越执业英才盛典 名名与公服艺仪表 1 2417457 17 者 张帅 华泰联合证券 曲娱 _ 李浩森 RECEE 当杨华川道 recess 线 杨利国影 头吴同欣 影 teces 国金证券 国泰海通证券 中信证券 华泰联合证券 广发证券 Access recess 戴劲 ices 蒋迪 recess 星世英 成燕 reces 蔡锐 recess resear recess 顾培培 ori 国泰海通证券 国联民生证券 广发证券 兴业证券 广发证券 国泰海通证券 *排名不分先后 NEWS 63 全景网 杰出专精特新保荐代表人 ○ 全景投教基地 卓越执业英才 2025年度资本市场卓越执业英才盛典 | 朱 舟 | 开源证券 | | --- | --- | | 朱凤军 | 申万宏源证券 | | 郑 媛 | 开源 ...

Core Viewpoint - Huatai Securities maintains a "Buy" rating on Micron Technology (MU.US) with a target price of $360, citing better-than-expected revenue and profit for FY26Q1 driven by AI-related demand for HBM and DRAM, along with significant gross margin improvement [1] Financial Performance - FY26Q1 revenue and profit exceeded expectations, indicating strong performance [1] - The company raised its capital expenditure to $20 billion, reflecting confidence in growth prospects [1] Market Demand - AI-driven demand for HBM and DRAM is experiencing high growth, contributing to the company's positive outlook [1] - NAND is benefiting from the expansion of AI server SSDs, further enhancing market opportunities [1] Profitability and Valuation - Gross margin has significantly improved, supporting the upward revision of profit forecasts [1] - The earnings forecast has been substantially raised, with a shift to a 15.0x FY26E PE valuation, leading to an increased target price of $360 [1] Competitive Position - HBM4 yield ramp-up is accelerating, and SOCAMM2 has a clear first-mover advantage, positioning the company favorably in the market [1]

华泰证券维持美光科技"买入"评级，目标价360美元。 ...

来源：新浪基金 近期《基金管理公司绩效考核管理指引（征求意见稿）》（下称《指引》）面向行业征求意见，指引对 基金公司给股东的分红进行约束规定，引发热议。 根据华泰证券2024年报数据，南方基金营业收入75.23亿元，净利润23.52亿元。华泰证券持有南方基金 41.16%的股权，南方基金2024年度未给股东分红。 依此类推，近十年（从2015到2024），南方基金累计净利润141.16亿元，累计给股东分红65.99元。近十 年华泰证券累计从南方基金获得分红27.77亿元。 | | | | 同县金力年分级 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | स्टेस | 华泰证券 | 华泰山泰 | 南万县金 | 南方是令 | 分红率 | 四月左 | | | 获得分红 | 持股比例 | 分红总额 | 净利润 | | 萱收亿元 | | 2015 | 1.35亿元 | 45.00% | 3.00亿元 | 8.31亿元 | 36.09% | 29.99 | | 2016 | 1.62亿元 | 45.00% | 3.60亿元 | 8.26亿元 | 43.59% | ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent news about the "removal of quantitative trading equipment from exchanges" highlights concerns regarding trading fairness, as high-frequency traders benefit from significantly lower latency compared to retail investors [2][20]. Group 1: Trading Fairness and Latency - Retail investors experience a transaction delay of 20 to 200 milliseconds due to various factors, while high-frequency traders can optimize their transaction time to between 0.1 and 1 millisecond by hosting servers at exchanges [3][23]. - The trading process for retail investors involves multiple steps, each contributing to overall latency, whereas high-frequency traders have direct access to faster trading channels [5][22]. - The disparity in transaction speed creates an uneven playing field, where institutional investors have a significant advantage over retail investors [10][24]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - Regulatory efforts have focused on addressing the speed advantage of quantitative trading, with new rules implemented to protect retail investors [5][22]. - The policy regarding the removal of servers from exchanges is still under discussion, raising questions about how these servers were initially placed there [5][22]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Competition - The competition among brokerages to provide faster trading systems has intensified, with a notable shift towards catering to quantitative trading firms, which has led to a rise in the number of billion-dollar quantitative hedge funds [9][26]. - Brokerages are investing in advanced technologies, such as FPGA chips and distributed architectures, to reduce latency further, indicating a technological arms race in the industry [9][26]. - The increasing reliance on low-latency trading strategies has made it essential for brokerages to attract institutional clients, which in turn drives up commission revenues [9][26]. Group 4: Impact on Retail Investors - Retail investors without access to high-speed trading infrastructure are at a natural disadvantage, lacking the resources to compete effectively [10][27]. - The current market structure, where retail investors contribute 60-65% of trading volume, contrasts sharply with the lower percentage in markets like the U.S., highlighting the unique challenges faced by retail investors in the domestic market [33].

非银金融 | 证券研究报告 — 行业周报 2025 年 12 月 22 日 强于大市 非银金融行业周报 证监会会议部署"五项坚持" 证监会会议为"持续深化资本市场投融资综合改革"提供具体措施，传达学 习贯彻中央经济工作会议精神，对"十五五"规划与 2026 年进行具体布局。 会议强调要增强市场内在稳定性，不断提高资本市场制度的包容性吸引力。 金融与资本市场相关部署贯穿于中央经济工作会议的政策要求与重点任务 中，凸显了金融在服务"十五五"时期国家战略中的重要枢纽地位。继续看 好证券行业高景气度下长期估值中枢提升。 行业要闻 投资建议 继续看好券商板块估值向上空间。监管持续强化金融功能发挥重要性， 勾勒 2026 年资本市场改革与行业高质量发展路径，在证券行业景气度上 升背景下板块长期估值中枢有望提升。建议关注头部综合券商优势扩大 以及特色中小券商错位发展两条主线。 风险提示 监管政策、宏观经济发展及市场流动性表现不及预期；证券市场及利率 大幅波动导致业绩波动加剧；资本市场开放加速带来海外市场风险与外 资机构竞争压力；同质化竞争或引发价格战；券商并购不确定性或影响 板块价格稳定。 相关研究报告 《公募基金销售行为 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the recent news regarding the "removal of quantitative trading servers from exchanges," highlighting concerns about trading fairness and the competitive advantages that high-frequency trading (HFT) firms have over retail investors [2][5]. Group 1: Trading Fairness and Speed - The core issue revolves around trading fairness, where retail investors face significant delays (20-200 milliseconds) compared to high-frequency traders who can optimize their order execution to 0.1-1 milliseconds by hosting servers at exchanges [3][8][11]. - The disparity in trading speed creates an uneven playing field, likening the situation to a theme park where some can skip lines while others wait for hours [3][12]. Group 2: Infrastructure and Costs - High-frequency trading firms invest heavily in infrastructure, such as purchasing VIP trading seats and deploying servers in exchange data centers, with costs ranging from 50,000 to 300,000 dollars annually for these services [10][19]. - The competition among brokers to provide faster trading solutions has intensified, with many focusing on attracting quantitative firms by enhancing their technological capabilities [15][16]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - Regulatory efforts have been aimed at curbing the speed advantages of quantitative trading, with new rules implemented to protect retail investors [5][32]. - The ongoing discussions about server removal from exchanges raise questions about the future of trading speed and its impact on market dynamics [6][32]. Group 4: Market Dynamics and Trends - The rise of quantitative trading has led to a significant increase in the number of quantitative hedge funds, with 55 firms managing over 10 billion dollars [15]. - The article notes that the competitive landscape is shifting, with brokers increasingly targeting quantitative traders rather than traditional retail investors [15][20]. Group 5: Perception of Low Latency - The term "low latency" has become a marketing focus for many firms, with a majority promoting their capabilities in this area, reflecting the competitive pressure within the industry [22][28]. - Low latency is defined as the ability to minimize delays in receiving market information and executing trades, which is crucial for capturing market opportunities [28][29]. Group 6: Impact on Retail Investors - Retail investors, lacking access to high-speed trading infrastructure, are at a disadvantage, which raises concerns about the overall fairness of the market [17][35]. - The article emphasizes that the majority of trading volume still comes from retail investors, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to technological advancements in trading [35][36].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market has shown a strong recovery, with the Shanghai Composite Index returning to 3900 points, indicating a bullish sentiment among investors and a potential for growth in the coming months [1][6]. Market Performance - On December 22, the Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3917.36 points, up 0.69%, while the Shenzhen Component Index rose 1.47% to 13332.73 points, and the ChiNext Index increased by 2.23% to 3191.98 points. The total trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets reached 188.22 billion yuan, an increase of 133.5 billion yuan from the previous trading day [6]. - Major Asian markets also saw gains, with the Nikkei 225 index up 1.81% to 50402.39 points and the Korean Composite Index rising 2.12% to 4105.93 points [6]. Commodity Futures - On the same day, domestic commodity futures saw most contracts rise, particularly in the precious metals sector, with silver reaching a new high and both platinum and palladium hitting the daily limit [7]. Fund Flows - Data from Choice indicates that the top ten stocks with net inflows on December 22 included companies like Wolong Electric Drive, Zhongji Xuchuang, and Industrial Fulian, with several of these being CPO concept stocks [8]. Institutional Insights - According to a report from China International Capital Corporation (CICC), the recent adjustments in the market may be nearing an end, suggesting that the current liquidity environment remains relatively loose, providing a good opportunity for investors to position themselves for a year-end rally [9]. - Huatai Securities noted that the recent rebound in A-shares is primarily due to improved liquidity conditions, with significant net inflows from allocation-type funds. They anticipate a potential spring rally in 2024, although the market is currently navigating a period of uncertainty regarding fundamentals and policy [9]. - UBS Wealth Management's CIO office highlighted that AI innovation and related expenditures are expected to drive significant profit growth in China's technology sector by 2026, suggesting favorable liquidity and reasonable valuations could further support the Chinese stock market [9].

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is Neutral, maintained [1] Core Insights - The macro liquidity environment is easing, alleviating funding pressure and providing a stable cost advantage for brokerages' capital-intensive businesses such as proprietary trading and margin financing. The sustained high trading volume in equity funds is expected to support brokerage commission income. The margin financing balance has remained above 2.4 trillion, indicating a transition from "incremental expansion" to "stock optimization" in the use of leverage in the A-share market, suggesting that the previously influxed leveraged funds have not significantly withdrawn but are instead showing a trend of "settling down" [4][6] - The bond market has shown a clear "strong in Shanghai, weak in Shenzhen" pattern, with Shanghai focusing on government bonds and policy financial bonds, which are more attractive for institutional funding due to their pledge financing convenience at year-end. This shift in funding between equity and bond markets may indicate subtle changes in current funding risk preferences [4][7] Industry Fundamentals Tracking - The SHIBOR 3M rate has stabilized at 1.60%, showing a recovery from previous lows and indicating alleviated funding pressure [5][14] - The average daily trading volume of equity funds for the week from December 12 to December 19 was approximately 220.29 billion, reflecting a slight decline from the previous week's average of 238.02 billion, but still indicating that a trillion-level transaction has become the new normal for the A-share market [5][15] - As of December 18, the margin financing balance in the Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing markets was 2,499.366 billion, indicating a consolidation phase at high levels since September 2025, marking a transition in leverage use [6][18] - The China Bond New Comprehensive Index closed at 248.8624 points, currently stabilizing after a decline from November's peak, supported by a stable liquidity environment [6][19] - The brokerage sector's valuation has diverged significantly from the overall market, with the Shenwan brokerage index PE rising 5.63% year-to-date, compared to a 20.25% increase in the Shenwan A index, widening the gap to 14.62 percentage points [6][22] Market Review - Last week, the A-share Shenwan Securities II industry index increased by 1.01%, outperforming the CSI 300 index, which declined by 0.28%, with a relative outperformance of 1.29 percentage points [6][26] - For the year, the CSI 300 index has increased by 15.78%, while the brokerage sector has decreased by 0.11%, underperforming by 15.89 percentage points [6][26] - The A-share securities II sector ranked 14th among 31 Shenwan first-level industries last week, underperforming the non-bank financial sector [6][27]