市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文不构成个人投资建议，也未考虑到个别用户特殊的投资目标、财务状况或需要。用户应考虑本文中的任何 意见、观点或结论是否符合其特定状况。据此投资，责任自负。 中国人民银行等七部门联合印发《关于金融支持新型工业化的指导意见》，《意见》要求，强化产业政 策和金融政策协同，为推进新型工业化、加快发展新质生产力提供高质量金融服务，坚持分类施策、有 扶有控，推动产业加快迈向中高端，防止"内卷式"竞争。推动金融资源向产业集群聚集和专业化发展， 推进贸易结算、资金管理、投融资等一系列跨境金融服务便利化举措，支持产业合理布局和拓展发展空 间，促进做强国内大循环。 风险提示及免责条款 ...

Group 1: Market Performance - In the first half of the year, China's automotive production and sales both exceeded 15.6 million units, with year-on-year increases of 12.5% and 11.4% respectively [2] - Passenger car production and sales surpassed 13.5 million units, reflecting a growth of approximately 13% [2] - The sales data prompted various automakers to adjust their annual targets, with some expressing confidence and others entering a "wartime state" due to competitive pressures [2][3] Group 2: Company Strategies and Targets - Geely Auto achieved 52% of its annual sales target with 1.409 million units sold, leading to an 11% upward revision of its target from 2.71 million to 3 million units [3] - Dongfeng Motor aims to challenge a sales target of 1.88 million units in the second half, with a total goal of 3 million units, including 1 million in new energy vehicles [3] - Chery Auto plans to reach a sales target of 2 million units in the second half, with a revenue goal of over 600 billion yuan [3] Group 3: Product Launches and Innovations - Several automakers are set to launch new models in the second half, including SAIC's new vehicles and Geely's five hybrid products [4] - The automotive industry is focusing on the iteration of intelligent technologies, with more L3-level conditional autonomous driving solutions expected to be announced [5] - Companies like Chery and Geely are restructuring their organizational frameworks to enhance operational efficiency and product development [5] Group 4: Profitability Challenges - Despite strong sales growth, the automotive industry faces low profit margins, with a reported profit margin of 4.8% for the first half of the year, below the industrial average of 5.15% [6] - From 2020 to 2024, the industry's profits decreased from 215.1 billion yuan to 65.4 billion yuan, a reduction of 70% [6] - Many automakers, including GAC Group and BAIC Blue Valley, are expected to report significant losses for the first half of the year due to various operational challenges [7][8] Group 5: Industry Competition and Regulation - The automotive industry is experiencing increasing pressure to address "involution" in pricing, with government bodies taking steps to regulate competition [9][10] - Recent government meetings have focused on curbing irrational competition in the new energy vehicle sector, which has been detrimental to profit margins [10] - Experts suggest that while regulatory measures may help stabilize profit margins, addressing the root causes of irrational pricing behavior is essential for long-term improvement [11]

中国商报（记者 陈文丽 文/图）自7月1日中央财经委员会第六次会议提出"依法依规治理企业低价无序竞争，引导企业提升产品品质，推动落后产能有序退 出"以来，汽车、水泥、电池等行业相继举行座谈会、发布倡议，坚决抵制"内卷式"竞争，推动行业高质量发展。7月30日召开的中央政治局会议，再次对整 治"内卷式"竞争作出重点部署。市场机构普遍认为，"反内卷"将成为下半年各行业重要议题。 低价竞争在短期内有助于提升客流与营收，但一味降价会带来利润下降、食品安全等问题。目前，已有一些餐饮企业率先转变竞争策略，将重心从价格转向 质量与体验升级。图为北京一家餐厅使用新鲜食材现场制作美食。 "'内卷式'竞争已成为当前我国经济转型升级的一大顽疾。"专家表示，"内卷式"竞争看似能让消费者从低价中受益，但就长远来看会带来很多问题，如激烈 的价格战使得企业的利润空间被严重压缩，削弱了其在技术研发、品牌建设等高附加值环节的投入能力；低价竞争破坏了行业生态，使得坚持品质与创新的 企业因成本较高处于劣势，市场竞争中易产生"劣币驱逐良币"现象，不利于行业整体创新与发展。 低价无序竞争引关注 近期，我国一些产业领域"内卷式"竞争问题比较突出，引发社会 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rise of "involutionary competition" in various industries, emphasizing the need for regulatory measures to address the inefficiencies and negative impacts of price wars, particularly in the platform economy [5][6][23]. Group 1: Definition and Characteristics of Involutionary Competition - "Involutionary competition" is characterized by low-price strategies leading to a race to the bottom, resulting in decreased profit margins and stagnation in industry development [8][9]. - This form of competition is marked by low-quality homogenization, price wars, and short-term behavior, ultimately harming the overall value of the industry [8][9]. Group 2: Price Wars and Their Implications - Price wars, while appearing beneficial in the short term, can create a "bubble market" through capital subsidies, leading to unsustainable competition [10][12]. - The phenomenon of sacrificing profits for market survival is driven by market pressures, strategic goals, and the allure of short-term gains [9][10]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework and Legal Measures - New regulations, including amendments to the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Price Law, aim to provide tools for comprehensive governance of involutionary competition [11][14]. - The revised laws will prohibit platforms from forcing merchants to sell below cost, thereby preventing market disruption and protecting fair competition [12][14]. Group 4: Transition from Price Competition to Value Competition - The article advocates for a shift from price wars to value-based competition, emphasizing the need for a collaborative approach involving government policy, industry self-regulation, and corporate innovation [20][21]. - This transition is seen as essential for breaking the cycle of low-price, low-quality competition and fostering a healthier market environment [21][23].

Core Viewpoint - The recent commitment from multiple food delivery platforms to resist malicious competition and regulate promotional activities marks a significant shift in the ongoing "subsidy war" within the industry, following regulatory discussions two weeks prior [1] Group 1: Nature of Price Wars - Price wars are seen as an aggressive competition strategy aimed at rapidly capturing market share and user resources, driven by structural motivations and competitive dynamics [1] - New platforms utilize subsidies to quickly attract users, while established platforms respond to defend their market share, leading to a cycle of competitive pressure among mid-tier platforms and merchants [1][2] - Despite being unsustainable, price wars often become institutionalized due to the "flow logic" and "competitive path dependence" in platform economies, resulting in normalized "involution" competition [1] Group 2: Regulatory Perspectives - Not all price wars are illegal; the legality hinges on whether they disrupt market order or harm fair competition, with key considerations including cost levels, forced participation, and exclusionary effects [4] - Short-term promotional subsidies are generally acceptable, but long-term, systemic below-cost subsidies may violate competition laws [4][5] Group 3: Short-term and Long-term Impacts - Short-term effects of price wars include a surge in orders and user growth, creating a false sense of prosperity that collapses once subsidies are withdrawn, leading to market instability [6] - Long-term consequences include profit compression for merchants, potential market exits of small businesses, and increased risks related to food safety and delivery pressures [7][8] Group 4: Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics - Price wars can distort consumer expectations, leading to a dependency on subsidies and a decline in the perceived value of product quality and service [8] - The instability in labor markets and employment quality arises from the pressures of price wars, resulting in temporary employment and increased workload for delivery personnel [8] Group 5: Regulatory and Market Solutions - Effective governance should aim to distinguish between legitimate competition and "involution" competition, focusing on maintaining a healthy market environment [10][11] - The ultimate goal of countering "involution" is to foster a market that encourages differentiated competition and efficiency, allowing stakeholders to make autonomous decisions [13] Group 6: Role of Government - The government should create conditions for innovation-driven development, expanding market opportunities and reducing reliance on low-price models [16] - By enhancing infrastructure and regulatory frameworks, the government can support small businesses and facilitate a transition from price competition to value creation [16]

今年7月份以来，多场中央重要会议持续释放整治"内卷式"竞争的信号，并明确指向"治理企业无序竞 争""推进重点行业产能治理"，"规范地方招商引资行为"。 落实中央部署，监管部门在"反内卷"方面也有所行动。8月1日，国家发改委表示，正在统筹采取修订法 律、出台政策、完善标准、强化行业自律等举措，加快推动整治"内卷式"竞争问题。 同一天，多家外卖平台集体发文，抵制行业无序竞争，承诺进一步规范补贴行为。此前，针对外卖行业 竞争存在的问题，市场监管总局曾两度约谈外卖平台，要求企业理性参与竞争。 不只外卖行业，从水泥、钢铁、汽车到光伏，多个行业掀起"反内卷"之风。与传统产业相比，平台经济 领域的"价格战"有何特点？为治理"内卷式"竞争，相关法律和政策如何发力？从"卷"价格到"卷"价值， 如何引导企业如何跳出"内卷"怪圈？地方政府在反"内卷式"竞争中又发挥何种作用？ 图为对外经济贸易大学竞争法中心主任、法学院教授黄勇。 围绕这些热点问题，南都·反垄断前沿近日专访了对外经济贸易大学竞争法中心主任、法学院教授黄 勇。黄勇研究竞争法、经济法已有40多年，是反垄断领域的知名专家。 南都：价格竞争是市场经济中常见的竞争手段，也并非所 ...

（文章来源：21世纪经济报道） 8月1日晚间，东风集团新闻发言人、战略规划部副总经理吕海涛针对理想i8对撞乘龙卡车事件表示，东 风集团全力支持东风柳汽去依法维护自己的合法权益和品牌的声誉。"现在这个件事，我们还在对相关 方，做相应的了解，包括碰撞产品本身的状况，目前实际上是在整个测试的了解过程中。"他还表示， 东风集团坚决贯彻落实高质量发展要求，反对内卷式竞争。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of high-quality construction of the Yarlung Tsangpo River downstream hydropower project, which is described as a century project requiring advanced technology and ecological protection [2][3] - The government is focusing on optimizing agricultural production and ensuring the employment of migrant workers and those who have escaped poverty, highlighting the importance of data-driven monitoring and support measures [3] - The establishment of the Housing Rental Regulations aims to fill legal gaps in the housing rental industry, emphasizing the need for accurate information and regulatory compliance among rental agencies and enterprises [4][5] Group 2 - The draft amendment to the Price Law seeks to clarify standards for unfair pricing behaviors, including low-price dumping and price collusion, to regulate market order and prevent "involution" competition [6] - The National Development and Reform Commission is taking steps to address "involution" competition by promoting cooperation between state-owned and private enterprises, enhancing industrial chain collaboration, and fostering technological innovation [7][8] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology is working to standardize competition in the new energy vehicle industry, focusing on product safety, quality, and fair market practices [9][10] Group 3 - The Market Supervision Administration is addressing "involution" competition in the quality sector by strengthening market access management and enhancing quality safety supervision [11][12] - The new tax policies for Hainan Free Trade Port aim to reduce production costs for local enterprises and stimulate market activity by exempting certain goods from import taxes [13][14] - The focus on local government behavior in the context of "involution" highlights the need for regulatory measures to prevent excessive competition and ensure sustainable economic growth [18][19][20]

Group 1: Company Performance - Xiaopeng Motors achieved a record monthly delivery of 36,717 vehicles in July, marking a 229% year-on-year increase and a 6% month-on-month increase, with total deliveries for the year reaching 233,906 units, up 270% [1][4] - Leap Motor's July deliveries reached 50,129 units, a year-on-year increase of over 126%, marking its first time surpassing 50,000 units in a month, with total deliveries for the year at 271,793 units [4][7] - Xiaomi Motors reported over 30,000 vehicle deliveries in July, tripling from 10,000 units in the same month last year, with production capacity expected to ramp up significantly [7][10] - Li Auto delivered 30,731 vehicles in July, a 39.74% year-on-year decrease from 51,000 units in the same month last year, with total cumulative deliveries reaching 1,368,541 units [12] - NIO delivered 21,017 vehicles in July, with year-to-date deliveries of 135,167 units, reflecting a 25.2% year-on-year increase [12][14] Group 2: Market Trends - The automotive industry is experiencing a price war, with over 60 models having price cuts in the first four months of 2025, escalating to over 100 models in May [15][17] - The China Automotive Association noted that July's retail sales for narrow passenger vehicles were approximately 1.85 million units, a 7.6% year-on-year increase, while new energy vehicle sales are expected to reach 1.01 million units, with a penetration rate of about 54.6% [18]

Core Viewpoint - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) emphasizes the need to combat "involutionary" competition in the market, which has been highlighted as a significant issue affecting various industries and is expected to be a focus for the second half of the year [1][4][7]. Group 1: Definition and Understanding of "Involutionary Competition" - "Involutionary" competition refers to inefficient and forced competition that does not lead to industry growth, often resulting in price wars that harm quality and service [3][4]. - The term has gained traction in government discussions, although it lacks a precise definition [3][4]. - Experts suggest that if competition does not lead to profit growth for the industry but results in price reductions, it can be classified as "involution" [4]. Group 2: Causes of "Involutionary Competition" - Factors contributing to "involutionary" competition include insufficient domestic demand, oversupply, and government subsidies that exacerbate capacity excess [5][6]. - Companies often engage in price-cutting to maintain market share, leading to a vicious cycle of competition [5]. - Some firms resort to cost-cutting measures that harm the supply chain, reflecting outdated business practices [5]. Group 3: Strategies to Combat "Involutionary Competition" - The NDRC plans to revise pricing laws to clarify standards for identifying unfair pricing practices, focusing on behaviors that exclude competitors or monopolize markets [7][8]. - There will be targeted investigations into industries with significant "involutionary" competition to encourage compliance with pricing norms [8]. - Emphasis will be placed on fostering innovation and preventing blind imitation in emerging sectors while addressing low-level, homogeneous competition in traditional industries [8][9]. Group 4: Recommendations for Future Actions - Experts recommend that authorities focus on expanding domestic demand to help companies escape the "prisoner's dilemma" of "involutionary" competition [9][10]. - A market-oriented approach is suggested for effectively addressing the issues of "involutionary" competition [10].