Group 1 - The article highlights the absence of the United States in three significant global governance discussions, symbolized by three "empty chairs" in Brazil, Switzerland, and South Africa, representing a retreat from climate, human rights, and economic governance [1][2][3] - In Brazil, the U.S. delegation was notably absent from the UN Climate Change Conference, which is seen as a disregard for the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" in addressing climate change [1] - The U.S. also missed a crucial human rights review in Geneva, marking a historic absence that has led to a stalemate in the review process, undermining its previous role as a self-proclaimed human rights judge [2] Group 2 - At the G20 summit in South Africa, the U.S. absence was particularly striking, as it missed an opportunity to engage in discussions on debt relief and multilateral reforms, reflecting a prioritization of its own interests over global cooperation [2][3] - The article suggests that the U.S. is attempting to counter a multipolar world through isolationist policies, viewing international rules as constraints rather than foundations for peace and development [3] - The empty chairs symbolize a significant shift in global governance dynamics, allowing for more diverse voices to emerge in international discussions, as emphasized by South African officials [3]

这不是危言耸听，为什么会出现如此严重的后果呢？一切都源于特朗普的关税政策。 特朗普当上总统后，一直坚持美国优先的理念。他认为，通过对其他国家的商品征收高额关税，可以保 护美国的企业和工人。因此，他对中国、欧盟等国家展开了大规模的关税行动。起初，这个策略似乎见 到了成效，美国的关税收入大幅增加。据最新数据，到今年9月，美国的关税收入已经达到了1740亿美 元，比去年同期增加了1160亿美元，看上去特朗普似乎是赢了。 但是，问题随之而来。很多国家和美国企业开始反对特朗普的做法，认为他滥用关税权力，把关税当作 武器，这种做法非法，因此诉讼最终闹到了美国最高法院。最近的第一场听证会，情况对特朗普不太有 利。多数法官对特朗普征税的理由表示怀疑，就连一些平时支持共和党的保守派法官也对此表示怀疑， 这让特朗普十分紧张。 那么，2万亿美元是如何计算出来的呢？首先是关税收入部分。如果最高法院判定关税征收不合法，那 么白宫可能需要将已经征收的关税退还一部分。目前，美国已经征收了1740亿美元，但如果加上利息以 及未来可能继续征收的关税，这个金额可能会增至5000亿美元左右。 特朗普最近在自己的社交媒体上发出了一个严肃的警告，他表 ...

Core Points - The article emphasizes the importance of global cooperation in addressing climate change, particularly in the context of the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement and the ongoing COP30 conference in Brazil [1][2] - It highlights China's commitment to multilateralism and its proactive role in climate governance, showcasing its achievements and future goals in reducing carbon emissions and promoting green technology [3][4][5] Group 1: Global Climate Governance - The COP30 conference focuses on finding common solutions to the climate crisis, accelerating emission reductions, and promoting an inclusive transition [1] - The Paris Agreement has successfully lowered the projected global temperature rise from over 4°C to between 2.1°C and 2.8°C by the end of the century [1] - China has consistently advocated for multilateralism and has taken practical actions to support global climate governance, despite setbacks from some countries [2] Group 2: China's Climate Commitments - China has exceeded its 2020 carbon intensity reduction target and has set ambitious goals for 2030, including a transition from carbon intensity control to absolute emission reductions [3][4] - The country aims for non-fossil energy to account for 19.8% of primary energy consumption by 2024, ahead of its 2030 targets [5] - China's carbon trading market covers over 60% of national carbon emissions, showcasing its commitment to effective climate action [5] Group 3: International Cooperation and Support - China has provided over 177 billion RMB in funding for climate change projects in developing countries, supporting capacity building and technology transfer [6][9] - The "African Solar Belt" project exemplifies China's efforts to enhance clean energy access in Africa, providing solar systems to households in need [7] - China plays a crucial role in facilitating negotiations at climate conferences, helping to bridge gaps between developed and developing nations [8][9]

Group 1: Core Insights - The trade friction between China and the U.S. has been ongoing for years, but recent signs of easing have created a complex situation for surrounding countries, particularly the EU [1][3] - A preliminary consensus has been reached in U.S.-China trade negotiations, with China maintaining a proactive stance and core interests while the U.S. seeks stable rare earth supplies [3][11] - The agreement includes a one-year extension of tariffs, reducing certain tariffs to 10%, which is lower than those faced by Japan and South Korea, enhancing the attractiveness of China's supply chain [3][11] Group 2: Germany and EU Response - Germany has quickly shifted its stance, with Chancellor Merz emphasizing the need for Europe to not let the U.S. and China dictate technological futures, launching a "German High-Tech Agenda" [7][9] - The EU has historically attempted to benefit from the U.S.-China rivalry but has not gained significant advantages, leading to a strategic shortfall as the U.S. focuses on other allies [11][13] - The shift in Germany's position highlights the urgency for the EU to pursue technological independence, although internal divisions among member states may hinder cohesive action [11][13] Group 3: Global Trade Dynamics - The recent consensus between China and the U.S. is expected to reshape global trade dynamics, with Japan and South Korea investing heavily to secure lower tariffs, while the EU faces potential losses [13] - China's role as a stabilizer in global trade is emphasized, with trade agreements like RCEP and CPTPP gaining importance amid shifting geopolitical landscapes [13] - The need for substantive actions from Germany and the EU is critical to avoid further industrial pressures, as mere verbal commitments may not suffice [13]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining a "reasonable proportion" of the manufacturing industry within China's economy, as outlined in the "14th Five-Year Plan" to strengthen the foundation of the real economy [1]. Group 1: Definition of "Reasonable Proportion" - The "reasonable proportion" refers to the share of manufacturing value added in the GDP, which is influenced by both manufacturing and other sectors like services [2]. - Over the years, as China's economy has grown and evolved, the proportion of manufacturing in GDP has decreased, while the service sector has increased, with service value added surpassing secondary industry for the first time in 2012 [2]. - The historical trend shows that while the absolute size of manufacturing is growing, its relative share in GDP cannot be excessively high, reflecting a common pattern in the development of other economies [2]. Group 2: Importance of Maintaining Manufacturing's Proportion - Manufacturing plays a crucial role in daily life, providing essential goods and services that meet basic needs [3]. - It serves as a solid foundation for the development of other industries, including agriculture and services, and is vital for job creation, employing over 100 million people, which accounts for 24.4% of the workforce in secondary and tertiary industries [3]. - The stability and growth of the economy, technological strength, and overall national power are closely tied to the health of the manufacturing sector [3]. Group 3: External Factors and Challenges - In the context of increasing international competition, manufacturing is a critical area for nations to focus on [4]. - Despite being the world's largest manufacturing country, China faces challenges from new technological revolutions and rising protectionism, which threaten global supply chains [4]. - To navigate these challenges, it is essential to focus on the real economy, enhance core technologies, and strengthen the resilience and competitiveness of supply chains [4]. Group 4: Strategies to Maintain Reasonable Proportion - The "14th Five-Year Plan" outlines specific tasks to build a modern industrial system centered on advanced manufacturing, optimize traditional industries, and cultivate emerging sectors [6]. - The goal is to enhance the quality and strength of manufacturing, with projections indicating that by 2024, China's manufacturing value added will account for nearly 30% of the global total [7]. - Addressing existing shortcomings, such as insufficient innovation capabilities and technological gaps, is crucial for advancing towards a manufacturing powerhouse [7].

美国宣布了一个突然的大新闻：从11月10日起，美国将暂停对中国造船业、船岸起重机等行业的"301调查"措施，为期一年。紧接着，中 国也作出了迅速回应，表示这是一项"相向而行"的积极信号，并暂停了自己的反制措施。这一来一往的举动，犹如两位老朋友在吵架后 突然握手言和，瞬间引爆了全球媒体的关注。国际舆论纷纷报道，专家们也开始分析，大家都在好奇这背后意味着什么？这是否预示着 中美贸易战有望降温？ 事件的起因其实很简单：一项"暂停"引发了全球范围的广泛关注。事情的源头要追溯到11月9日，美国贸易代表办公室（USTR）发布了 一则公告，宣布暂停对中国造船业和船岸起重机等领域的301调查，暂停期为一年。简单来说，所谓的"301调查"是美国依据1974年制定 的《贸易法》采取的一种贸易政策工具。如果美国认为其他国家的贸易行为对其经济构成不公平，它可以单方面加征关税或者采取其他 制裁措施。而这次针对中国的调查，最初的理由是"国家安全威胁"与"不公平竞争"。虽然这些理由听起来似乎很有威胁性，但令人意外 的是，调查刚启动不久，美国就决定主动暂停。这就好比是一场拳击比赛，选手们刚准备好开始，裁判突然宣布暂停，观众无不感到惊 讶。 ...

来源：中国新闻网 中新网北京11月12日电 (记者 夏宾)近日，中欧国际工商学院北京校区举办31周年校庆系列活动，在"高 朋满座"论坛上，中国服务贸易协会副会长赵晋平、原WTO总干事帕斯卡尔·拉米分别发表主题演讲，并 与对外经济贸易大学国际经贸学院教授崔凡就"全球经贸治理的挑战与未来"展开对话。 中欧国际工商学院北京校区举办31周年校庆系列活动——"高朋满座"论坛。主办方供图。 赵晋平在主旨演讲中表示，面对全球单边主义和贸易保护主义抬头的复杂形势，中国正通过推进制度型 开放开创合作共赢新局面。 他系统梳理了近年来中国就服务业开放与服务贸易出台的系列政策文件，包括通过跨境服务贸易、投资 准入和市场准入"三张负面清单"实现内外资一致管理；以上海自贸试验区和海南自由贸易港为代表，在 特殊区域进行高水平开放的"先行先试"；通过签署国际协定等方式推进制度型开放等。 赵晋平特别指出，近年来，中国和全球南方国家之间的合作不断深化，尤其是中国与东盟的双边经贸合 作，已经成为中国对外经贸关系的稳定锚和新引擎。2025年1-9月，中国和东盟双边贸易同比增长 9.6%，双向投资也对增强区域产业链供应链韧性产生重要作用。 帕斯卡尔· ...

中新网北京11月12日电(记者夏宾)近日，中欧国际工商学院北京校区举办31周年校庆系列活动，在"高 朋满座"论坛上，中国服务贸易协会副会长赵晋平、原WTO总干事帕斯卡尔·拉米分别发表主题演讲，并 与对外经济贸易大学国际经贸学院教授崔凡就"全球经贸治理的挑战与未来"展开对话。 赵晋平在主旨演讲中表示，面对全球单边主义和贸易保护主义抬头的复杂形势，中国正通过推进制度型 开放开创合作共赢新局面。 他系统梳理了近年来中国就服务业开放与服务贸易出台的系列政策文件，包括通过跨境服务贸易、投资 准入和市场准入"三张负面清单"实现内外资一致管理；以上海自贸试验区和海南自由贸易港为代表，在 特殊区域进行高水平开放的"先行先试"；通过签署国际协定等方式推进制度型开放等。 赵晋平特别指出，近年来，中国和全球南方国家之间的合作不断深化，尤其是中国与东盟的双边经贸合 作，已经成为中国对外经贸关系的稳定锚和新引擎。2025年1-9月，中国和东盟双边贸易同比增长 9.6%，双向投资也对增强区域产业链供应链韧性产生重要作用。 帕斯卡尔·拉米在题为"全球贸易：挑战与机遇"的主旨演讲中指出，全球贸易正呈现三大新常态：保护 主义抬头、预防主义强化 ...

Core Points - The fourth Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) - European Union summit concluded in Santa Marta, Colombia, amid increased U.S. military presence and pressure on Latin American countries, indicating a backdrop of U.S. influence over the summit [1][3] - Despite U.S. shadowing, participants emphasized multilateral cooperation, opposition to interference, and reached consensus on maintaining regional peace, defending multilateralism, enhancing trade and investment cooperation, and promoting renewable energy development [1][2] Group 1: Summit Outcomes - The summit, co-hosted by Colombian President Petro and European Council President Costa, reaffirmed adherence to the UN Charter, emphasizing sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference in domestic affairs [2] - A joint declaration was issued, highlighting the importance of maritime security and regional stability in the Caribbean, alongside commitments to combat transnational organized crime [2] - The European Investment Bank announced approximately $1.15 billion in financing under the EU's "Global Gateway" initiative to enhance energy security in Central America [2] Group 2: Political Context - The absence of key European leaders, including European Commission President von der Leyen and German Chancellor Merz, raised concerns, attributed to low participation from other countries and U.S. pressure on Latin American nations [3] - Analysts noted that the U.S. military buildup in the Caribbean and sanctions against Colombia's President Petro influenced European leaders' decisions to lower their participation level [3] - The summit's discussions reflected a collective call against military intervention and a push for unity, with leaders warning against the normalization of threats of force in the region [4]

Core Viewpoint - The recent trade tensions between China and the U.S. illustrate a complex relationship where initial goodwill is quickly undermined by subsequent actions, highlighting a lack of genuine cooperation and trust [1][3][15]. Group 1: Trade Dynamics - China recently placed a significant order for 180,000 tons of soybeans from the U.S., signaling a desire for improved economic relations [3]. - Following this order, the U.S. announced a reduction in tariffs on certain Chinese goods, including a drop from high tariffs to 10% on fentanyl-related products, while also suspending a 24% tariff for a year [5][6]. - Despite these gestures, U.S. officials expressed skepticism about China's compliance with previous trade agreements, indicating a lack of trust [5][6]. Group 2: U.S. Actions Against Chinese Companies - Concurrently with tariff adjustments, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission initiated new restrictions targeting Chinese companies, citing national security concerns [8]. - New regulations could lead to the rejection of new applications and the removal of existing products from the market if they contain specific Chinese components, despite a lack of substantial evidence for these claims [8][9]. - This move resulted in a significant number of Chinese electronic products being removed from major U.S. e-commerce platforms, impacting availability and pricing for American consumers [9]. Group 3: Implications for Consumers and Market Dynamics - The actions taken by the U.S. are seen as detrimental not only to Chinese companies but also to American consumers, who may face higher prices and reduced product availability [9][11]. - China's response emphasizes that the U.S. is politicizing trade issues under the guise of national security, which undermines fair market competition and international norms [11][13]. - The ongoing trade relationship is characterized as interdependent, with both nations benefiting from mutual trade, suggesting that unilateral actions could lead to negative outcomes for both sides [15][17].