美国方面刚释放特朗普访华的消息，马上就高调宣布逮捕中国公民，他们还想"虚空造牌"？然而，特朗普连续犯下战略错误，而且美国自身问题也在加剧， 他已经没有什么资格与中国继续对抗了。而中方就在这个时候出手，断掉美国的后路，具体情况如何？ 日前，多家媒体透露消息称，美国总统特朗普要带领豪华代表团访华。不少人认为，特朗普在与中方进行一系列对抗后，终于意识到"遏华政策"不会带来好 处，还被"稀土牌"卡脖子卡得"翻白眼"，因此选择缓和对华关系。但就在这个时候，特朗普政府突然以"加密货币洗钱、黑客攻击"等借口，逮捕6名中国公 民。特朗普这种"欲加之罪"的操作，似乎要复刻"孟晚舟事件"。而且就在美国对华动手前，特朗普还公开表示"与中国融洽相处很重要"。从这些情况看，美 国还是在进行他们惯用的"虚空造牌"手段，试图给中美谈判增加筹码。 不过从美国自身的情况看，特朗普并没有资格施压中国。在欧洲央行2025年央行论坛上，美联储主席鲍威尔坦言，若关税问题不存在，美国的降息政策早就 实施了。显然，鲍威尔就是暗示特朗普实施的"对等关税"，打乱了美联储的降息计划。而对"是否降息"的问题，鲍威尔没有直接回答，而是强调"美国经济 的情况相对较好 ...

Group 1 - The dollar index has fallen below 100, while the 30-year Treasury yield has surged past 5%, leading to an additional $50 billion in annual interest payments [2] - The U.S. is experiencing a wave of de-dollarization, primarily driven by actions from the Trump administration, including a recent executive order imposing 100% tariffs on key exports from 23 countries [2][4] - Countries like Russia, Brazil, and Iran are increasingly using alternative currencies for trade, with 92.3% of Russia's trade with BRICS partners now settled in currencies other than the dollar [4] Group 2 - The U.S. sanctions have prompted a significant shift away from the dollar, with China selling $74 billion in U.S. Treasuries, marking a 16-year low in holdings [4] - The SPFS system in Russia, which bypasses SWIFT, is now connected to 159 countries, indicating a growing trend towards alternative payment systems [5] - The dollar's share in global foreign exchange reserves has dropped below 55%, the lowest level since 1995, signaling a decline in dollar dominance [7]

Core Viewpoint - The signing of the "Guidance and Establishment of the U.S. Stablecoin National Innovation Act" (also known as the "Genius Act") by President Trump marks the formal inclusion of digital assets into the national strategic framework of the U.S., amidst global concerns regarding the uncertain future of stablecoins [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Debt Crisis and Stablecoin Legislation - The imminent U.S. debt crisis is a primary motivation for the rapid introduction of the "Genius Act," which is seen as a reaction to the challenges faced by the dollar hegemony in the wake of technological revolutions [3]. - The legislation mandates that stablecoin issuers must peg their assets to the U.S. dollar at a 1:1 ratio, effectively creating a "digital dollar colonial system" that positions stablecoins as "shadow buyers" of U.S. Treasury bonds [3]. - Tether (USDT) reportedly held nearly $120 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds in the first quarter of this year, surpassing the holdings of countries like Germany, leading to concerns about systemic risks such as "stablecoin runs" that could trigger urgent sell-offs of U.S. debt [3]. Group 2: Global Payment System and Financial Sovereignty - The "Genius Act" aims to reshape the global payment system, asserting that stablecoins can be used for cross-border payments, payroll, and energy trade settlements, directly challenging systems like China's CIPS and the EU's INSTEX [4]. - The U.S. Treasury's requirement for stablecoins to utilize smart contracts approved by the Federal Reserve reflects a "technological new cold war" mindset, which has drawn significant opposition [4]. - The act's intention to "consolidate the dollar's dominance" is criticized as a misguided approach, as it may ultimately alienate global partners and exacerbate the risks of currency substitution [4]. Group 3: The Future of Dollar Hegemony - The so-called "digital dollar revolution" is viewed as a façade for a crumbling hegemony, with the belief that the end of dollar dominance is an inevitable outcome of global cooperation and consensus-building [5]. - The historical context of U.S. financial policies suggests that attempts to reinforce dollar supremacy through such measures may be counterproductive, as evidenced by the growing movements towards digital currencies in the EU and BRICS nations [5].

Group 1 - The article discusses the significant debt levels of the world's wealthiest countries, specifically the United States, Japan, and China, highlighting their differing attitudes towards debt management [1][2] - The United States has a total debt exceeding $40 trillion, which is significantly higher than its GDP, indicating a hidden debt risk despite apparent economic prosperity [4][14] - Over 70% of the U.S. debt is held domestically, driven by a culture of consumerism and widespread credit card use, leading to increased borrowing by individuals and businesses [6][8] Group 2 - Japan's debt totals approximately 1,300 trillion yen (around $9.1 trillion), which is more than double its GDP, presenting a severe debt pressure situation [18][20] - The Bank of Japan has historically supported the debt market through large-scale bond purchases, but this support is weakening, raising concerns about future debt stability [22] - Recent economic pressures from the U.S. on Japan's automotive industry have exacerbated Japan's debt challenges, prompting a shift in Japan's diplomatic stance towards the U.S. [24] Group 3 - In contrast, China's debt level is approximately 86 trillion yuan, which is about 60% of its GDP, indicating a manageable debt situation within a recognized safe range [26][28] - China has implemented a proactive "debt reduction plan" to optimize debt structure and reduce repayment pressure, showcasing a strategic approach to debt management [28] - Chinese debt is primarily directed towards infrastructure projects, creating a positive cycle of borrowing for development, which enhances economic growth and repayment capacity [30][32]

据国际货币基金组织（IMF）统计，2024年第四季度美元在全球官方储备中的份额已降至57.8%的历史低位。在此背景下，为维持美元在全球货币体系中的 主导地位，美国试图在数字经济时代为美元寻找新的增长极，并延伸其影响力。 中国人民大学重阳金融研究院国别研究部研究员刘英在接受《每日经济新闻》记者采访时表示，稳定币存在三大结构性缺陷，无法担当货币体系的支柱角 色。稳定币缺乏主权信用背书，且不同发行方的稳定币存在信任壁垒和互操作性问题，无法保证像法币一样具有单一性。同时，发行方的资产负债表无法灵 活扩张收缩，难以承担稳定宏观经济的重任。 她同时对记者指出，稳定币的"稳定"依赖于其储备资产构成的稳健性、流动性、可靠性、透明度等，以及发行方能否在任何市场环境下确保其1:1的赎回承 诺。 编者按：随着《天才法案》（Genius Act）的签署，中国香港的《稳定币条例》即将于8月1日生效，以及欧盟委员会已于6月下旬通过《加密资产市场条 例》补充修正案，全球稳定币领域正迎来"窗口期"。《每日经济新闻》特别策划推出"祛魅稳定币"系列专访，邀请多位顶尖学者，试图穿透稳定币的"稳 定"表象，拆解其底层运行机制，展开兼具专业深度与现实 ...

Core Viewpoint - The decline of the US dollar's dominance is becoming evident, with a significant drop in its global reserve currency share, signaling a shift towards a multipolar currency system driven by the BRICS nations [1][3][11]. Group 1: Dollar's Decline - The share of the US dollar in global reserves has fallen below 60%, the lowest in thirty years, attributed to long-term issues such as excessive money printing and the use of dollar sanctions [3]. - The BRICS nations are accelerating the development of their own payment systems in response to the risks associated with dollar reliance, particularly after the sanctions imposed on Russia [3][5]. Group 2: BRICS Payment System - The BRICS-led payment system now covers 159 countries, challenging the dollar's supremacy, with increasing frequency of transactions in local currencies and the Chinese yuan [5][8]. - China has significantly reduced its holdings of US Treasury bonds, with over $100 billion cut in the first five months of 2025, dropping the US from its position as China's largest creditor to third [5][8]. Group 3: Response to US Policies - The Trump administration's attempts to curb de-dollarization through high tariffs and stablecoin legislation have backfired, leading to increased local currency transactions among BRICS nations [6][11]. - The actions of BRICS countries are driven by a strategic need for financial security and diversification, rather than a direct confrontation with the US [8][11]. Group 4: Future Implications - The rise of BRICS and the establishment of alternative payment systems indicate a restructuring of the global financial order, raising questions about the future viability of the dollar [11]. - The ongoing inflation, fiscal deficits, and social issues in the US highlight the weakening of its hegemonic status, making the future of the dollar increasingly uncertain [11].

Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen's unexpected announcement about positive U.S.-China talks and the cancellation of export restrictions on Nvidia's advanced chips to China has calmed market fears, leading to a significant rise in stock indices [1][3] - The U.S. economy is facing severe challenges, including a high inflation rate of 3.2%, which is impacting American households, and a national debt exceeding $35 trillion, leading to concerns from major investors like Elon Musk and Warren Buffett [3][5] - Political pressures are mounting ahead of the 2024 elections, with domestic issues taking precedence over maintaining a hardline stance against China [5][12] Group 2 - The U.S. is experiencing a shift in its foreign policy due to external pressures, particularly from China, which has reduced its holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds by over $28 billion, indicating a strategic move to lower dollar risk [5][6] - The Federal Reserve's attempt to attract global capital by maintaining high interest rates has not been effective in curbing capital outflow to China, as the yuan remains stable [6][8] - The ongoing geopolitical tensions and the U.S.'s continued arms sales to Taiwan suggest that the underlying conflicts between the U.S. and China remain unresolved, indicating a complex and prolonged competition [8][12]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unprecedented power struggle between President Trump and Federal Reserve Chairman Powell, centered around the implications of interest rate cuts on U.S. debt and the potential threat to the dollar's dominance [1][10]. Group 1: Economic Implications - U.S. national debt has surpassed $36 trillion, with a 1% decrease in interest rates potentially saving $360 billion annually in interest payments [1]. - Trump aims for a 3% reduction in interest rates, which could lead to annual savings of up to $1 trillion [1]. - Powell warns that significant rate cuts to manage debt could lead to a repeat of the bank failures seen in 2023, indicating a severe risk to financial stability [1][10]. Group 2: Market Reactions - The climax of the confrontation occurred in July when news of Trump allegedly drafting a letter to dismiss Powell caused significant market turmoil, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 1.33% and the dollar falling 120 points [3]. - Following Trump's unexpected statement that it was "unlikely" he would fire Powell, markets experienced a V-shaped recovery, highlighting the volatility and sensitivity of financial markets to political developments [3]. Group 3: Internal Fed Dynamics - The power struggle has also affected the Federal Reserve internally, with dovish members like Waller advocating for a rate cut due to perceived risks in the job market, while hawkish members like Williams warn against such actions [7]. - The Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation data rebounded to 2.7%, complicating the decision-making process regarding interest rates [7]. Group 4: Leadership Changes - Trump is reportedly pursuing a "leadership change" at the Fed, with potential candidates for the new chair including economic advisor Kevin Hassett, current board member Chris Waller, former board member Kevin Warsh, and Treasury Secretary Mnuchin [8]. - If a new chair is appointed, Powell's influence over policy decisions could be significantly diminished, leading to concerns about the independence of the Federal Reserve [8].

Group 1 - The former U.S. President Trump has made bold claims about dissolving the BRICS nations and imposing a 10% tariff on member countries, which is seen as unrealistic given BRICS' significant global presence, accounting for 40% of the world's population and 25% of its economic output [3] - Trump's concerns are primarily focused on the BRICS nations' move towards "de-dollarization," which he perceives as a conspiracy against the U.S., while Russian officials clarify that this shift is a response to U.S. sanctions rather than an attempt to replace the dollar [5][9] - The Russian Deputy Foreign Minister stated that the current trade among BRICS countries is predominantly conducted in local currencies, with 90% of trade no longer relying on the U.S. dollar, indicating a strategic adaptation rather than a direct challenge to U.S. dominance [5] Group 2 - Russian President Putin has criticized the U.S. dollar's dominance, likening it to a castle built on sand, suggesting that U.S. fiscal policies, including the issuance of $36 trillion in debt, undermine the dollar's stability [7] - The recent U.S. legislation, referred to as the "Big and Beautiful" act, is projected to increase spending by $3 trillion over the next decade, which could further weaken the dollar's position in the global market [7] - BRICS nations are not seeking to overthrow the dollar but rather to diversify their currency options, as evidenced by India's use of the yuan for oil purchases from Russia and Saudi Arabia accepting yuan for oil sales [9]

Global Market Performance - The global stock market showed mixed results last week, with the US indices displaying divergence; the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose while the Dow Jones experienced a slight pullback [3] - In Europe, the FTSE 100 and DAX indices increased, whereas the CAC40 index saw a minor decline [3] - The Asia-Pacific region also had mixed results, with the SENSEX30 index in India retreating [3] Economic Indicators - The US Consumer Price Index (CPI) showed a moderate increase, with a month-on-month rise of 0.3% and a year-on-year increase of 2.7%, marking a four-month high [3] - Core CPI rose by 0.23% month-on-month, with a year-on-year increase of 2.9%, slightly below expectations [3] - The impact of tariffs on specific product categories is becoming more pronounced, indicating ongoing inflationary pressures [3] Stablecoin Legislation - On July 17, the US Congress passed three significant bills regarding stablecoin regulation, which were signed into law by President Trump [4] - The GENIUS Act mandates that stablecoin issuers must hold reserves in a 1:1 ratio with US dollars, enhancing the security of funds held by users [4] - The CLARITY Act delineates the regulatory responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC, establishing a framework for digital assets linked to blockchain technology [6] - The Anti-CBDC Surveillance Act prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing retail central bank digital currency without explicit Congressional authorization, ensuring that the future of digital dollars remains in the private sector [7] Market Implications of Legislation - The passage of these bills is expected to create a new dominance in the digital finance sector, reinforcing the US's position in the global cryptocurrency market [8] - By binding stablecoins closely to the US dollar, the legislation aims to strengthen the dollar's role in the international monetary system [8] - The demand for US Treasury bonds may diversify as stablecoin issuers are likely to purchase them, alleviating selling pressure and potentially lowering government borrowing costs [8] Market Strategy - Following recent highs in the US stock market, caution is advised due to potential volatility stemming from ongoing tariff negotiations and changing interest rate expectations [3] - The report suggests focusing on high-certainty interest rate trades and sectors with strong growth potential, such as nuclear power and semiconductors, as a strategy to navigate increased market fluctuations [3]