当地时间8日，俄罗斯国防部通报称，过去一天，俄军控制了扎波罗热地区一处居民点，完成了对顿涅 茨克地区克列班-贝克水库以南被封锁乌军部队的清剿。在各方向行动打击了141个区域，击毁目标包 括：变电站、铁路机动列车、军用机场基础设施、无人机装配车间和储存点、燃料仓库、乌军武装部队 和外国雇佣兵临时部署点。 责编：张荣耀、卢思宇 同一天，乌克兰武装部队总参谋部通报称，过去一天前线地区发生200次战斗，乌空军、导弹部队和炮 兵袭击了俄军人员、武器和军事装备集结区等目标。乌克兰总统泽连斯基8日称，目前乌军在多布罗皮 利亚、波克罗夫斯克方向展开反攻，同时在库皮扬斯克和新帕夫利夫卡方向积极防守，并取得一定成 果。 ...

【环球网报道】据彭博社7日报道，在英国首相斯塔默抵达印度进行访问前数小时，印度总理莫迪给俄 罗斯总统普京送去生日祝福。在前往印度的飞机上被问及此事，斯塔默选择了"回避"。 据法新社等媒体8日报道，斯塔默已抵达孟买，开始对印度进行访问。此外，根据英国方面发布的消 息，此次访问代表团包括来自英国商界、学术界和文化界的100多名人员。 彭博社称，在斯塔默抵达印度前数小时，莫迪在社交媒体上发帖称，他与"朋友普京总统"进行电话交 谈，给后者送上"温暖的生日祝福"。"我对他多年来致力于深化印俄关系深表感谢。"莫迪补充称。 报道称，莫迪这一做法使斯塔默对印度的访问一开始就显得"尴尬"。斯塔默在飞往印度的专机上"回 避"直接回答关于莫迪与普京通话的提问，称"我没有向普京致生日祝福"。 彭博社称，斯塔默曾敦促各国就俄乌冲突加大向俄方施压，迫使俄方坐到谈判桌前。此外，在俄罗斯无 人机近日被指"侵犯"有关北约成员国领空后，英国方面宣布向波兰派遣战机执行任务。 对于俄乌冲突，俄方已多次作出表态。俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫近日曾表示，普京仍愿意通过政治 和外交手段解决乌克兰问题，并且正在为此付出巨大努力。"基辅政权和一些欧洲国家正竭力 ...

俄罗斯袭击了乌克兰苏梅，哈尔科夫，切尔尼戈夫州，扎波罗热等前沿的州后，乌克兰当地石油天然气设施不剩什么了，不少火车站都被轰了，在一些地区 找不到目标，连加油站加气站都开始轰了。 除此以外，小摩托轰炸开始迅速延伸，包括基辅，利沃夫，波尔塔瓦等地的铁路和能源电力设施也开始遭到轰炸。 更魔怔的是，乌克兰进口天然气甚至要通过匈牙利和斯洛伐克，一年前这两个国家求着乌克兰不要断气，泽连斯基一把拒绝了，把欧尔班，菲佐，武契奇气 的不得了。 俄罗斯和乌克兰继续对轰能源电力和铁路设施，俄罗斯大批油厂烈火熊熊，甚至一些地区开始出现车辆无油可加的情况。可是毕竟俄罗斯油气设施多，无人 机多，乌克兰则相反。 乌媒公布一组图片，显示波尔塔瓦及其周边地区遭受小摩托大规模袭击，目标发生爆炸火灾燃烧殆尽。就包括机务段、供电网络和牵引变电站，行政大楼 等。 这些地区被轰炸，前线军事物资输送势必受影响，前线作战受影响。同时电力能源设施被炸，而冬季供暖期已到，乌克兰人还没准备好，大批地下天然气储 罐空空如也，即使如此也面临被炸的危险。 泽连斯基开始向欧盟求助，说俄罗斯轰炸民用设施，不想让乌克兰人过冬，希望增加天气热电力输送。这就魔怔了，欧盟自家天然 ...

Group 1 - Ukrainian intelligence officials claim that Russian missile strikes have become more precise, allegedly due to intelligence support from China [1] - There are indications of high-level cooperation between China and Russia in satellite reconnaissance over Ukrainian territory, aimed at identifying and targeting strategic objectives, including foreign investment enterprises [1] - Since March 2025, Ukrainian energy facilities have reportedly been attacked nearly 3,000 times, with significant damage occurring since late September [3] Group 2 - The Russian military has shifted from using low-cost drones to employing more advanced missile systems, significantly increasing the destructive capability of their attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure [5] - The increase in missile usage suggests an enhancement in Russia's intelligence capabilities, although some argue that Russia may have previously chosen not to target these facilities aggressively [5] - The Kremlin's recent decision to intensify attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure is attributed to Ukrainian President Zelensky's declarations to target Russian energy facilities [5][7] Group 3 - Zelensky's rhetoric regarding military actions often leads to increased risks for Ukraine, as he calls for strikes on Russian infrastructure, which may provoke further retaliation [7] - Accusations against China for supporting Russia are seen as a tactic by the Ukrainian government to deflect blame for its own challenges and to escalate the conflict [7]

Group 1 - The Russian military conducted a large-scale attack on Ukrainian defense industrial facilities and energy infrastructure using "Kinzhal" hypersonic missiles and other weapons, achieving all designated targets [1] - Over 50 missiles and approximately 500 attack drones were used in the assault, resulting in at least 5 fatalities and around 10 injuries, with ongoing rescue and repair efforts [2] - Ukrainian President Zelensky emphasized the urgent need to expedite defense agreements with allies, particularly in the air defense sector, following significant damage to energy facilities leading to widespread power outages [3] Group 2 - Russian President Putin warned that the provision of long-range precision strike weapons, such as "Tomahawk" missiles, to Ukraine by the U.S. could destroy the positive momentum in U.S.-Russia relations [3] - Russia has historically summoned an average of 127,000 conscripts each autumn, with this year's spring draft reaching a record high of 160,000, indicating an escalation in military recruitment efforts [4] - A new legislative proposal aims to implement year-round conscription in Russia, moving away from the traditional spring and autumn recruitment model [4]

Core Points - The Trump administration plans to provide intelligence to Ukraine to help target Russian oil and gas facilities, marking a significant shift from Trump's previous stance against unlimited aid to Ukraine [1][3] - Discussions are ongoing within the White House about potentially supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles, which have a range of 1,600 kilometers and high precision [3] - This decision may be politically motivated, as 2025 is an election year in the U.S., and Trump aims to garner support from conservative factions, particularly those aligned with the military-industrial complex [3] Group 1 - The potential targeting of Russian energy infrastructure could severely impact Russia's economy and civilian life, escalating the conflict [5] - Russia has responded strongly, with President Putin warning that the use of Tomahawk missiles by Ukraine would severely affect U.S.-Russia relations and indicating that Ukraine could not operate these missiles without U.S. military assistance [7] - The Kremlin expresses concern that continued Western support is perpetuating a cycle of conflict rather than facilitating peace negotiations, making resolution increasingly unlikely [9] Group 2 - The escalation of conflict could lead to higher global oil prices, affecting consumers and potentially prompting Russia to retaliate against NATO supply routes to Ukraine [11] - A resolution to the conflict will require more than just intelligence and missile support; it necessitates a return to negotiations that respect the sovereignty and security needs of all parties involved [13]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing stalemate in the Russia-Ukraine conflict has heightened concerns in Europe, particularly in Poland, which warns that a Ukrainian defeat would signify a failure for the entire continent [1][11]. Group 1: Poland's Position and Historical Context - Poland's warning is rooted in historical and geographical factors, emphasizing the close historical ties and security cooperation between Poland and Ukraine [1][2]. - The potential loss of Ukraine's resistance poses a direct risk to Poland, as it would mean facing Russian influence on its eastern border, threatening Poland's security [2][4]. Group 2: Military and Humanitarian Aid to Ukraine - Poland has been at the forefront of providing military assistance to Ukraine, supplying hundreds of T-72 tanks and "Carnation" self-propelled artillery, which have been crucial in Ukraine's defense [2][4]. - In 2023, Poland delivered over 1.2 million tons of humanitarian aid to Ukraine, including essential supplies like food and medicine, and has accepted over 1.5 million Ukrainian refugees [4][9]. Group 3: Broader European Implications - A Ukrainian defeat could disrupt Europe's energy security and economic stability, as Ukraine is a vital transit route for energy supplies and a significant grain exporter [5][11]. - The conflict has already led to rising global food prices due to disrupted Ukrainian grain exports, which could exacerbate inflation in Europe [5][11]. Group 4: European Unity and Support for Ukraine - Poland's firm stance has highlighted divisions within Europe regarding support for Ukraine, with some Western European countries hesitant due to domestic pressures [7][11]. - In response to Poland's advocacy, the EU has announced a new €5 billion military aid package for Ukraine, focusing on air defense and winter combat supplies [7][9]. Group 5: Regional Defense Initiatives - Poland is actively promoting enhanced defense capabilities among European nations, including a $10 billion arms procurement agreement with the U.S. for advanced military equipment [9]. - The establishment of a "Regional Security Alliance" among Central and Eastern European countries is being pursued to strengthen military cooperation and intelligence sharing [9][11].

Group 1 - The EU plans to freeze Russian overseas assets to provide a €20 billion loan to Ukraine, which will ultimately be repaid by Russia, raising concerns about the EU's reputation and future investments in Europe [3] - France has taken a significant step by seizing a Russian oil tanker in the Baltic Sea, indicating a joint effort with the UK to cut off Russian energy exports, which are crucial to the Russian economy [5] - The EU's actions appear to align more with US strategic interests rather than its own, as it continues to impose sanctions on Russia and define it as the primary threat, despite the potential harm to Europe from prolonged conflict [7] Group 2 - The internal divisions within the EU, particularly between Germany and France, are becoming more apparent, with Hungary expressing dissatisfaction, complicating the EU's unified stance on Ukraine [1] - Despite rising energy prices and public discontent in Europe, the EU remains committed to supporting Ukraine with military purchases and maintaining a confrontational stance against Russia [5] - The EU's approach may lead to long-term consequences for its economic stability and investment climate, as the perception of risk increases among potential investors [3][7]

Group 1 - The EU plans to use frozen Russian overseas assets to provide a €20 billion loan to Ukraine, which is essentially a way to utilize Russian funds under the guise of supporting Ukraine [3] - France has taken the lead by seizing a Russian oil tanker in the Baltic Sea, aiming to cut off Russia's energy exports, which are crucial for its economy [5] - The current European strategy appears to align more with the long-term goals of the United States rather than protecting its own interests, as sanctions against Russia continue to escalate [7] Group 2 - The internal dynamics of the EU are complex, with member states like Hungary expressing dissatisfaction, highlighting the lack of consensus among key players like Germany and France [1] - Despite rising energy prices and public discontent within Europe, the EU remains committed to supporting Ukraine and opposing Russia, indicating a determination to continue the conflict [5] - The actions taken by the EU, including the loan to Ukraine and the seizure of Russian assets, may deter future investments in Europe, raising concerns about the long-term implications for the region's financial stability [3]

Group 1 - The EU's sanctions against Russia, including the latest round, have put many European companies in a difficult position, particularly due to the halt of Russian oil and gas imports, which were previously a major source of energy for Europe [1] - NATO's expansion continues despite Russia's military actions in Ukraine, with Finland and Sweden recently joining, highlighting NATO's commitment to its eastern expansion policy [1][3] - The EU's support for Ukraine and its sanctions against Russia are seen as aligning with U.S. strategy, but this has resulted in significant costs for the EU, including the loss of access to affordable Russian energy [3][5] Group 2 - While the EU imposes sanctions on Russia, the U.S. continues to import Russian nuclear fuel and titanium, benefiting its own industries without harming its interests [5] - The EU's decision to support U.S. strategies at the expense of its own manufacturing competitiveness is viewed as a significant irony, indicating the EU's role as a tool of U.S. interests [5]