Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that safety is the top priority in advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) [1] - The recent testing conducted by Dongche Di highlighted the performance of 36 smart vehicles equipped with ADAS, revealing that models from Hongmeng Zhixing had unsatisfactory pass rates in various scenarios [3][4] - Specific results showed that only the Wanjie M9 and Zhijie R7 successfully avoided obstacles in high-speed scenarios, while other models failed to perform adequately in critical situations [3] Group 2 - Tesla's response to the testing results was notably different, with CEO Elon Musk stating that the company achieved high performance in China despite legal restrictions on data export [3] - Tesla's Vice President, Tao Lin, emphasized that the company does not focus on rankings, as any test results are relative and temporary, but insists on the importance of safety [4] - Industry experts, including Lantu Auto's CBO, pointed out that the testing reflects common technical bottlenecks in the industry, suggesting the need for improved capabilities in high-speed obstacle avoidance and perception systems [4]

Core Viewpoint - Harmony Smart Mobility has chosen not to comment on the recent testing conducted by a certain platform, which has sparked significant controversy regarding the evaluation of various models' assisted driving capabilities [1] Group 1 - Harmony Smart Mobility acknowledged the existence of the so-called "test" by a certain platform but opted not to provide any comments [1] - The testing results were part of a program called "Understanding Car Intelligence Arena," which evaluated 36 vehicle models, including the AITO M9, AITO M7, AITO M8, and Zhijie R7 [1] - The evaluation results have generated considerable debate within the industry [1]

Core Insights - Tesla's CEO Elon Musk shared a video from Dongche Di highlighting Tesla's top performance in a driving assistance test conducted in China [1][2] - The test, part of a public awareness program, simulated high-risk accident scenarios and included nearly 40 vehicle models, revealing an average pass rate of only 35.74% [1][6] - The program aimed to educate the public on the capabilities of driving assistance features rather than providing an official ranking [1][6] Group 1: Test Results - The 2023 Tesla Model 3, utilizing a pure vision system with seven cameras, successfully passed five out of six tests, earning the "first place" [2] - Tesla Model 3 and Model X ranked as the top two vehicles, with no other brand surpassing three successful tests [2] - The test included 15 high-risk accident scenarios, both in urban and highway settings, assessing the vehicles' perception and decision-making abilities [1][2] Group 2: Industry Reactions - The release of the test results sparked significant discussion within the industry, with some critics questioning the validity and rigor of the testing process [6] - Dongche Di responded to criticisms, clarifying that the program's results reflect the vehicles' performance in specific simulated scenarios and not their overall driving assistance capabilities [6][7] - Experts noted that such tests are beneficial for consumers to better understand driving assistance features and prioritize their driving safety [7]

零跑汽车高级副总裁曹力表示，零跑B01搭载高通8650高性能芯片和激光雷达端到端大模型，算力达 200TOPS，并配备27颗高精度感知硬件，支持高速领航辅助、通勤领航辅助、停车场记忆泊车等26项辅 助驾驶功能。 曹力认为，纯视觉方案在极端天气或复杂光线条件下存在局限性，而激光雷达的加入能够有效弥补这一 短板，提升辅助驾驶系统的安全冗余。 朱江明表示，公司第二季度的平均月销量稳定在4.5万辆左右，预计将带动毛利、净利润等显著提升。 今年上半年，零跑累计交付22.17万辆，全年目标50万辆，并希望"超预期达成"。 中证报中证网讯(记者李嫒嫒)7月24日晚，零跑汽车旗下B系列首款纯电轿车——零跑B01正式上市，定 位为"年轻人的高品质智能轿车"，搭载零跑汽车最新LEAP3.5技术架构，瞄准A级轿车市场。新车推出 三种续航共六款版本，官方指导价为8.98万元-11.98万元。零跑汽车董事长朱江明在发布会后的媒体采 访中表示："零跑争取做'世界级电动车企'，目标年销量400万辆。" "年销百万辆是车企生存的基础，零跑正朝这一目标加速迈进。"朱江明说。 朱江明表示，零跑汽车争取成为"世界级电动车企"，目标年销量400万辆 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant shortcomings of current advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) in popular vehicles, emphasizing that no tested model passed all simulated high-risk driving scenarios, indicating potential safety risks for users who overly rely on these systems [1][5][12]. Summary by Sections Testing Overview - A recent large-scale test involved over 36 popular vehicle models from more than 20 brands, simulating 15 high-risk driving scenarios in urban and highway settings [6][7]. - The overall pass rate for these scenarios was low, with only three urban scenarios exceeding a 50% pass rate, while the majority of highway scenarios had pass rates below 50% [1][6]. Performance by Vehicle - Tesla's Model 3 and Model X performed the best among the tested vehicles, with Model 3 failing only one scenario and Model X failing one as well [10]. - Other models, such as the Zhijie R7 and Wanjie M9, had pass rates above 50% in both urban and highway scenarios, with prices ranging from 300,000 to 500,000 yuan [10][11]. - Notably, high-priced vehicles did not necessarily correlate with better ADAS performance, as some lower-priced models performed well in tests [11][12]. Safety Implications - Experts warn that current ADAS features are inadequate for handling complex and dangerous traffic situations, stressing the importance of driver readiness to take control of the vehicle at all times [4][12]. - The article references a significant incident involving a Xiaomi vehicle that raised public concern about automotive safety, leading to increased scrutiny of ADAS capabilities [15][16]. Regulatory Context - Recent government communications clarify that existing "smart driving" systems are still in the ADAS phase and do not equate to full automation, placing the responsibility on drivers to remain attentive [16][17]. - The article emphasizes the need for clear guidelines and accountability in the development and deployment of automated driving technologies to mitigate risks [17].

Core Insights - The performance of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) does not correlate with vehicle price, as demonstrated by a recent large-scale test involving over 36 popular models [1][4][5] - No vehicle achieved a perfect score in the simulation of 15 high-risk driving scenarios, indicating significant room for improvement in ADAS capabilities [2][3] Group 1: Test Results - The test included 20 popular brands and nearly 40 models, simulating 15 real-world accident scenarios in urban and highway environments [2][3] - The overall pass rate for the scenarios was below 50%, with only three urban scenarios exceeding this threshold [2][4] - High-priced vehicles did not necessarily perform better; for instance, the Tesla Model 3 and Model X had the best results, but many lower-priced models also performed well [4][5] Group 2: Safety and User Awareness - Experts emphasize the importance of user awareness when using ADAS, as current systems cannot handle complex and dangerous traffic situations [1][6] - The lack of certified Level 3 autonomous driving products in the market means that drivers must remain attentive and ready to take control at all times [6][7] - Recent discussions highlight the need for clear communication regarding the limitations of ADAS to prevent over-reliance and potential accidents [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - Tesla achieved the highest performance in autonomous driving tests in China without local training data due to legal restrictions on data export [1][3]. Group 1: Program Overview - The "Understanding Car Intelligence" program launched on July 23, featuring over 40 models from more than 20 popular brands, including Tesla, aimed to educate the public on autonomous driving capabilities and safety boundaries [1][3]. - The program includes simulations of 15 high-risk accident scenarios for both urban and highway driving, with a focus on enhancing public awareness of safe driving practices [3]. Group 2: Testing Results - The average pass rate for the tested vehicles across the 15 scenarios was only 35.74%, indicating significant challenges in the performance of these autonomous driving systems [3]. - Specific scenarios tested included "entering a large roundabout," "merging within a roundabout," and "avoiding a broken-down vehicle" for urban driving, as well as "encountering an accident vehicle on the highway" and "dealing with construction vehicles" for highway driving [3].

Core Viewpoint - The launch of the large-scale popular science program "Understanding Car Intelligence" by Beijing Dongchedi Technology Co., Ltd. aims to educate consumers on the proper use of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and highlight the safety risks associated with over-reliance on these technologies [1][2] Group 1: Program Overview - The program features over 40 models from more than 20 popular brands equipped with comprehensive ADAS, simulating 15 high-risk accident scenarios in urban and highway settings [1] - The overall pass rate for the simulated scenarios is below 50%, with only three urban scenarios exceeding this threshold, indicating significant safety concerns when relying on ADAS [1][2] Group 2: Safety Insights - The program emphasizes that current ADAS capabilities have considerable room for improvement, and users should not fully trust or depend on these systems [2] - A reminder is issued that while the program's results do not represent the performance of the vehicles in all scenarios, the existing ADAS cannot handle certain complex and dangerous traffic situations effectively [2] Group 3: Industry Implications - The lack of certified Level 3 autonomous driving products in the domestic market means that users are primarily operating Level 2 systems, which require constant driver attention [2] - The initiative by Dongchedi is seen as significant for raising consumer awareness about the correct understanding of ADAS and the importance of driver safety [2]

Core Viewpoint - SAIC Group is poised for significant growth in the second half of the year, driven by the launch of multiple strategic new models and a strong performance in the first half, with a notable increase in sales and market position [1][14][19]. Group 1: Product Launches and Innovations - The first model from the SAIC-Huawei collaboration, the "Shangjie" H5, features a spacious design and offers both pure electric and range-extended versions, with a maximum range of 1300 km [3][5]. - The LS9 model from the Zhiji brand is a full-size SUV with impressive dimensions (5279/2000/1806 mm) and a new design philosophy, enhancing its market appeal [7][9]. - Upcoming models from SAIC's self-owned brands include the luxurious Roewe M7 DMH and the upgraded MG4, both promising advanced technology and enhanced user experience [5][12]. Group 2: Sales Performance - In the first half of the year, SAIC Group achieved a vehicle sales volume of 2.053 million units, marking a year-on-year increase of 12.4% [1][14]. - The company's self-owned brands accounted for 63.5% of total sales, with a 21.1% increase in cumulative sales [15]. - SAIC's new energy vehicle sales reached 646,000 units in the first half, reflecting a 40.2% year-on-year growth [15]. Group 3: Technological Advancements - Over the past decade, SAIC has invested nearly 150 billion yuan in core technologies, resulting in over 26,000 effective patents across various platforms [15][17]. - The company has achieved mass production capabilities for L2, L3, and L4 level assisted driving technologies, collaborating with leading suppliers in the industry [15][17]. Group 4: International Expansion - In June, SAIC's overseas sales reached 90,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 11.5%, with a total of 494,000 units sold in the first half [18][19]. - The MG brand has maintained a strong market presence in Europe, achieving over 150,000 deliveries despite high tariffs, and consistently ranking among the top-selling Chinese automotive brands [19].

7月23日，国新办举行"高质量完成'十四五'规划"系列主题新闻发布会，介绍以高水平安全护航"十四 五"规划高质量完成有关情况。 对于智能驾驶相关问题，公安部交通管理局局长王强在发布会上回应称，目前我国市场上销售的汽车搭载 的"智驾"系统都不具备"自动驾驶"功能。这些"智驾"系统都还暂时停留在辅助驾驶阶段，驾驶人才是最终 的责任主体。如果驾驶人在驾驶车辆的时候"脱手脱眼"，不仅存在严重的交通安全风险，一旦出事，还可 能面临着民事赔偿、行政处罚和刑事追责三重法律风险。 综合自：国新网 责编：万健祎 校对： 苏焕文 版权声明 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体 法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes END 王强介绍，为进一步加强规范管理，公安机关将会同有关部门从以下三方面开展工作： 首先，加强车企管理。积极配合工业和信息化部等行业主管部门，督促车企落实主体责任，充分开展组合 驾驶辅助测试验证，明确系统功能的边界和安全响应措施，严格遵守《中华人民共和国广告法》，杜绝进 行夸大和虚假宣传；督促车企严格履行 ...