总之，石油工程服务行业唯有通过向"内"深耕、向"外"突围、向"上"融合的系统性变革，才能真正打破 低水平重复竞争，推动企业从规模扩张转向质量提升、从同质化竞争转向差异化发展。这既是破局"内 卷"的必然路径，也是石油工程服务行业实现可持续高质量发展的战略选择。 作者：中原石油工程公司工程服务管理中心 李胜景 二是向"外"突围。要构建"人无我有"的技术壁垒，主动紧盯技术含量高、附加值高的服务项目，通过深 度挖掘市场需求，精准匹配自身资源与能力，打造独特的竞争优势；要注重技术研发投入，强化核心技 术创新，提升市场竞争力。同时，建立灵活的市场响应机制，快速捕捉行业新趋势和客户新需求，抢占 细分赛道先机，将技术优势转化为产品矩阵优势和市场竞争优势，避免陷入价格战。 三是向"上"融合。要深化"党建+"与安全生产、市场拓展、成本管控等核心业务深度融合，围绕"节能、 减排、自动化、智能化"需求，以"管理—技术—人才"协同发力，加快推进高原钻机泥浆净化系统、钻 机电动化改造等研发项目，解决钻井施工生产现场痛点。此外，还要持续完善人才培养体系，打造一支 具备技术专长和管理能力的复合型人才队伍，为企业的可持续发展提供坚实保障。 目 ...

政府采购市场是国内市场的重要组成部分。推进全国统一大市场建设，必须消除政府采购中的各类不合 理限制和壁垒，整治异常低价问题，营造公平竞争的市场环境。 "1元中标""0元中标"，这种异常低价的乱象在政府采购市场屡见不鲜。日前，财政部印发《关于推动解 决政府采购异常低价问题的通知》，整治政府采购领域"内卷式"竞争，促进形成优质优价、良性竞争的 市场秩序。 政府采购市场是国内市场的重要组成部分。统计显示，2024年全国政府采购总额突破3.3万亿元，占全 国财政支出的比重超12%，覆盖货物、服务、工程等全领域。推进全国统一大市场建设，必须消除政府 采购中的各类不合理限制和壁垒，整治异常低价问题，营造公平竞争的市场环境。 在过程管控方面，实施政府采购异常低价审查。以往对"异常低价"难以认定，此次文件明确了量化标 准，规定了启动异常低价投标审查程序的具体情形，提升了可操作性。 在事后监管方面，强化履约验收。政府采购不能"一购了之"，必须跟踪履约情况、落实履约责任。履约 验收不能"走过场"，而是要细致落实每一项技术和商务要求是否履行到位。如供应商不履行合同或者未 按合同约定履行合同导致验收不合格的，采购人应当依法追究其违约 ...

Group 1 - The Chinese market regulatory authorities have intensified efforts to address market competition issues, particularly in the food delivery and travel service sectors, by launching investigations into practices such as price wars and market dominance abuse [1][2] - The National Market Supervision Administration has emphasized the need to deepen fair competition governance, focusing on anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition enforcement to combat "involution" in various industries [2][3] - Recent regulatory measures include the implementation of the "Live E-commerce Supervision Management Measures" and the prohibition of certain mergers in the public utility sector, aimed at curbing monopolistic behaviors and ensuring fair practices [3][4] Group 2 - The regulatory authorities are creating a favorable institutional environment for companies to engage in lawful mergers and acquisitions, particularly in sectors experiencing "involution," such as automotive and renewable energy [4] - A notable example of regulatory support is the approval of a joint venture between China National Petroleum Corporation and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., which aims to enhance innovation and efficiency through strategic collaboration [4]

Group 1 - The Chinese market regulatory authorities have intensified efforts to address market competition issues, particularly in the food delivery and travel service sectors, by launching investigations into unfair practices such as price wars and market dominance [1][2] - The National Market Supervision Administration has announced a focus on deepening fair competition governance, emphasizing the need to combat monopolistic behaviors and "involution" in various industries, which has led to reduced profits and increased operational burdens [2][3] - Recent regulatory measures include the implementation of the "Live E-commerce Supervision Management Measures" to address issues like false advertising and unfair competition in the live e-commerce sector, as well as guidelines to regulate fees charged by online trading platforms [3] Group 2 - The regulatory authorities aim to create a favorable institutional environment for companies to engage in lawful mergers and acquisitions, particularly in sectors experiencing "involution" competition, such as automotive and renewable energy [4] - A notable example of regulatory support is the approval of a joint venture between China National Petroleum Corporation and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., which is intended to enhance innovation and efficiency while avoiding homogeneous competition [4] - The National Market Supervision Administration plans to continue improving the review system for business consolidations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness in addressing "involution" competition [4]

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has launched a comprehensive campaign to address "involution" competition across key sectors, including online freight, mobile power banks, new energy vehicles, and photovoltaics, aiming to transform market competition from "disorderly internal consumption" to "quality improvement" [1] Group 1: Online Freight Industry - The online freight industry has seen rapid growth but has been marred by platforms like Huolala using algorithms to unfairly lower freight prices, harming drivers' rights [2] - The State Administration for Market Regulation publicly interviewed Huolala, emphasizing compliance with antitrust laws and promoting fair competition to protect drivers and consumers [2] - The goal of the intervention is to ensure platform rules and algorithms are transparent, restoring fairness in competition [2] Group 2: Mobile Power Bank Industry - The mobile power bank sector has faced safety issues due to price wars, leading to incidents like battery explosions, as companies prioritize market share over product quality [2] - In 2025, the administration oversaw 10 recalls involving 1.3977 million units, with complaints about mobile power banks decreasing by 85% since July 2025 [3] - The administration plans to enhance recall supervision and enforce strict compliance with defect product recall obligations [3] Group 3: Product Quality Supervision - The administration highlights the need for stringent quality control to prevent cost-cutting from compromising product safety [4] - Mandatory product certification serves as a critical safeguard for quality, with increased random inspections and strict management of production processes [4] - The administration aims to ensure that companies maintain quality assurance capabilities and consistency in product management to combat "quality reduction for lower prices" [4] Group 4: Fair Competition - Addressing "involution" competition requires not only regulating corporate behavior but also standardizing government intervention to eliminate local protectionism and market fragmentation [5] - The administration emphasizes proactive measures, such as pre-warning and compliance guidance in the photovoltaic sector, to mitigate risks before they escalate [6] - In 2025, the administration reviewed 58,000 policy measures to prevent the introduction of policies that hinder fair competition, conducting numerous interviews to ensure compliance [6] Group 5: Future Directions - The administration plans to enhance enforcement of the Fair Competition Review Regulations and combat the abuse of administrative power that restricts competition [7] - Efforts will focus on integrating effective markets with proactive government actions to support the development of a unified national market [7]

近日，市场监管总局发布综合整治"内卷式"竞争十大典型案例，涵盖网络货运、移动电源、新能源汽车、光 伏等重点领域。从约谈货拉拉规范网络货运市场，到整治充电宝行业低价乱象；从抽查新能源汽车整车质 量，到预警光伏行业"内卷外化"风险，一系列精准施策的监管行动，以刚柔并济的手段破解行业痛点，推动 市场竞争从"无序内耗"向"提质向优"转型。 遏制"价格战"乱象 "内卷压力下，企业降成本的冲动往往会转化为降质量的风险。"市场监管总局认证监管司副司长杨冬点出了 质量管控的关键。强制性产品认证作为守护质量安全的重要制度，在综合整治"内卷式"竞争中发挥了"防火 墙"作用，而加强产品一致性管理则是其有效落地的基础。 "生产环节必须加严过程管理。"杨冬介绍，监管部门要求型式试验的样品需在生产企业现场随机抽取，并明 确抽样人员、封样程序等具体要求；同时提高不预先通知的飞行检查频率，将关键原材料、零部件、生产工 序等作为检查重点，一旦发现产品与认证标准不一致，立即依法暂停或撤销相应认证证书。 此外，监管部门还对生产企业的关键工序提出明确要求，确保生产设备适配、工艺流程科学、原材料质量可 靠。并将企业的产品质量保证能力、产品一致性管控制 ...

近日，市场监管总局发布综合整治"内卷式"竞争十大典型案例，涵盖网络货运、移动电源、新能源汽 车、光伏等重点领域。从约谈货拉拉规范网络货运市场，到整治充电宝行业低价乱象；从抽查新能源汽 车整车质量，到预警光伏行业"内卷外化"风险，一系列精准施策的监管行动，以刚柔并济的手段破解行 业痛点，推动市场竞争从"无序内耗"向"提质向优"转型。 遏制"价格战"乱象 "以前跑一单货，平台抽成高还压价，有时候忙活一天连油钱都不够"。这是不少货车司机的心声。近年 来，网络货运行业快速发展，在便利物流与消费、扩大就业等方面发挥了重要作用，但部分平台利用算 法不合理压低货运价格、强制要求司机张贴独家车贴等行为，严重破坏了公平竞争秩序，损害了货车司 机的合法权益。 去年9月23日，市场监管总局依法约谈货拉拉，要求其严格遵守反垄断法等法律规定，落实反垄断合规 主体责任，及时规范经营行为，公平参与市场竞争，维护货车司机和消费者合法权益。市场监管总局反 垄断一司副司长刘健表示，此次约谈采用反垄断"三书一函"，既通过柔性监管充分传导压力，又为企业 预留整改空间，核心目标是推动平台规则与算法公开透明，让竞争回归公平理性的轨道。 如果说约谈货拉拉 ...

Core Viewpoint - The competitive landscape in the food delivery and retail sectors is shifting towards a focus on service quality and sustainable practices, driven by regulatory interventions and changing consumer expectations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes and Market Dynamics - The State Council's Antitrust Committee announced investigations into the food delivery platform market and other sectors to assess competition [1]. - The Ministry of Finance and the State Taxation Administration will eliminate VAT export rebates for solar products starting April 1, 2026 [1]. - The market is witnessing a transition from aggressive price competition to a focus on service quality and user experience, as exemplified by the decline of "zero-yuan milk tea" promotions [2][3]. Group 2: Industry Evolution and Strategic Shifts - Major platforms are moving from a "burning money" strategy to a dual strategy of consolidating core businesses while exploring new retail avenues [4][5]. - The competition is evolving from food delivery to instant retail, with companies like Alibaba aiming to dominate the instant retail market by investing heavily [3][4]. - The focus is shifting towards optimizing user experience and ensuring sustainable business practices, moving away from mere scale expansion [2][3]. Group 3: Consumer Behavior and Market Trends - Consumers are increasingly rejecting "involution" products that prioritize low prices over quality, indicating a demand for better service and product standards [6][7]. - The market is expected to segment into efficiency-driven and experience-driven categories, reflecting diverse consumer needs [8][12]. - The rise of local brands and unique experiences is fostering a more vibrant consumer ecosystem, as seen in the popularity of cultural and experiential offerings [12][13]. Group 4: Food Safety and Transparency - Regulatory efforts are shifting towards proactive measures in food safety, aiming for a comprehensive oversight system to prevent risks [9][10]. - Initiatives are being implemented to enhance transparency in food sourcing and processing, which is crucial for rebuilding consumer trust [10][11]. - The food safety environment is anticipated to improve through ongoing regulatory adjustments and market responses to consumer concerns [11].

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) is focusing on addressing prominent issues related to "involution" competition in product quality, enhancing safety governance, and ensuring public safety standards. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - SAMR has dynamically adjusted the production licensing management catalog, increasing the number of high-risk product categories from 10 to 14 and the types from 21 to 27, with a total of 53,000 production licenses issued [1] - A new regulation has been established to enforce quality safety responsibilities among industrial product manufacturers, requiring the appointment of 1.705 million quality safety supervisors and implementing a management system for daily, weekly, and monthly quality checks [1] - A national key industrial product quality safety supervision catalog has been created, intensifying oversight on 459 products, including children's and elderly products, and conducting special inspections on sectors with severe "involution" like new energy vehicles and photovoltaic products [1] Group 2: Quality Improvement Initiatives - Local market regulation departments have launched quality technical support initiatives, helping 378,000 enterprises improve product quality during the 14th Five-Year Plan, contributing to an increase in industrial output value of 97.81 billion [2] - The SAMR is optimizing production licensing services, allowing cross-province processing of licenses and integrating online issuance and cancellation systems with the national government platform for improved efficiency [2] - Future efforts will focus on enhancing quality safety regulation, promoting enterprise support services, and guiding companies towards quality and brand competition to foster a safe and reliable consumer environment [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court Intellectual Property Court is exploring judicial paths to deepen the comprehensive governance of "involutionary" competition, focusing on regulating monopolistic and unfair competition behaviors to support the construction of a unified national market [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Judicial Regulation of Competition - The Intellectual Property Court has identified "involutionary" competition as a significant issue in the construction of a unified national market, driven by factors such as monopolistic behaviors, insufficient innovation, and unfair competition [1][2]. - The court has recognized 66 cases as constituting monopolistic behavior since its establishment, with 15 cases identified in 2025 alone [2][3]. Strengthening Innovation Protection - The court is actively applying measures such as behavior preservation, evidence preservation, and punitive damages to combat patent infringement and promote a shift from low-quality competition to high-quality and innovative competition [2][3]. Addressing Malicious Competition - The court is focusing on regulating unfair competition practices, particularly those involving the theft of trade secrets and organized efforts to gain competitive advantages, aiming to break the cycle of "downward competition" [2][3]. Enhancing Judicial Efficiency - The court has handled 24,602 cases since its establishment, with 23,069 concluded, and has applied punitive damages in 58 cases, totaling 2.05 billion yuan [4][5]. - In 2025, the court received 4,679 cases and concluded 3,146, indicating a significant increase in case handling [4]. Supporting National Innovation Strategy - The court has strengthened judicial support for the national innovation-driven development strategy, with cases related to strategic emerging industries increasing from 17.6% in 2019 to 32.4% in 2025 [5]. - The court has also seen a rise in foreign-related cases, with 2,546 cases accepted, representing 10.3% of total cases, and an annual growth rate of 18.7% [5].